clock menu more-arrow no yes mobile

Filed under:

Adam Schefter report on Clay Matthews debunked by Clay Matthews

Matthews is willing to play, but couldn’t reach agreement with Broncos

Los Angeles Rams v Cleveland Browns Photo by: 2019 Nick Cammett/Diamond Images/Getty Images

Clay Matthews’ time with the Rams was brief and didn’t yield the value that either side had hoped for, but he did record eight sacks in 13 games and cause some of the disruption on quarterbacks that he became known for during 10 years with the Packers. Matthews was released and became a free agent this offseason and the Seahawks and Browns were at least two teams connected to him in 2020, but he has yet to sign with any team. He also didn’t announce retirement.

His agent wants to make it clear for anyone who didn’t notice, including ESPN, that he didn’t retire.

On Thursday, Adam Schefter said that the Broncos contacted Matthews’ camp after they lost star linebacker Von Miller for the season on Wednesday, but that they were told he is “not going to play” this year. Connecting the two sides makes sense, Matthews has been productive in the past playing outside linebacker and there aren’t many available options with days to go until the first game. They aren’t going to replace Miller’s production or presence or fix the issue that his absence creates, but Matthews is a sensible option.

It’s just that the reason he isn’t going to play for the Broncos isn’t that he doesn’t play to play at all. He didn’t want to play in Denver right now based on whatever it was that they offered him. His agent Ryan Williams released a statement saying that they were “under the impression that communication would remain private” and “Clay remains open to playing in the NFL in 2020.”

It was noted by the NFL’s Tom Pelissero that Matthews could be looking to get at least $2 million, based on the fact that his bonus will be offset by any new deal he signs.

After Matthews’ agent took issue with Schefter’s wording of his tweet, Schefter decided to write a tweet with a clear message that wouldn’t have sounded as interesting.

If Matthews is willing to play again, he could sign with a team midseason and will likely get opportunities as other injuries mount up and clubs have a clear picture of their financial and personnel situations. The Rams did lose linebackers Cory Littleton, Dante Fowler and Travin Howard from their options at the position, in addition to Matthews, but would Brandon Staley have a place for him in the same way that Wade Phillips does?

I’d say that’s not an option.

But Matthews wants to make it clear he’s keeping his options open.