Turf Show Times: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Sounder At Heart for Seattle Sounders Fans!

No drugs, just good football

Update [2007-12-14 14:49:15 by VanRam]: Bulger will start this weekend and Frerotte will back him up.

Well, at least none of the Rams players were named in the Mitchell Report, huh? Fakhir Brown might have been, but he forgot his meeting with investigators...(rim shot) oh! Hey!

Ah good old football, where the performance enhancing drugs issue is handled quickly and swiftly. Here's a Friday morning water cooler item for you: why are perceptions about PED use in the NFL so different than in Major League Baseball? Is it because players come from college where testing and penalties are in place, on the surface anyway? I was talking about this with someone yesterday, and I just can't wrap my head around why there are such different perceptions.

Regardless, I don't think all the performance enhancing drugs in the world are going to give the Rams any more advantage over the Packers this Sunday. I'm mostly a realist. However, sticking your fantasy sports cash into an IRA rather than a kegerator is kind of a boring way to go through life, so I can suspend that sometimes stilted personal quality when it comes to being a fan.

The Rams, above all, must play ERROR FREE football this week. There's a close parallel to this week's game in the heartbreaking loss against Seattle in week 12. Seattle's offense, especially the pass-centric one that Holmgren implemented as the season went on, is very similar to Green Bay's. The Packers' main advantage over Seattle is their running game headlined by the emergence of previously unheard of Ryan Grant.

Grant was pulled after a measly 29 carries in last week's win over the Raiders, with GB Coach Mike McCarthy telling Grant that he intended to keep him fresh for the postseason. The Packers, duh, are assured postseason play, and will continue using their starters this week as they look to clinch the first round bye. That means the Rams defenders will have to play better against the run than they did last week against Cincinnati; not an unreasonable goal given that, despite the overall rankings, they've been solid against the run this season. In fact, the Rams biggest weakness against the run has been letting the long runs go by. Per Football Outsiders, 22% of rushing yards against the Rams have come on runs of 10 yards or more past the line of scrimmage; they rank 26th in league on that stat. But the other run defense stats look much better. To wit: on the "percentage of runs on third or fourth down, two yards or less to go, that achieved a first down or touchdown" 53% have been successful, 4th best number in the league; our stuffed numbers, "percentage of runs that result in (on first down) zero or negative gain or (on second through fourth down) less than one-fourth the yards needed for another first down" look good as well, with just 28% of the plays in those situations being successful, 6th best in the league. Compare those numbers to last year where the Rams were in the bottom third in all three departments.

The Packers have a solid o-line; no small thanks to super sub Jason Spitz. Running, however, is their weakness, relative weakness I should say. The blitz will be key for the Rams defense, for holding Farve in check as well as stopping the run. The Packers use each running lane pretty evenly, so I'd look for some eight-man box situations and Atogwe to get some work coming up the middle as well.

The Green Bay o-line is tops in the league in pass protection, but the Cowboys had success pressuring Farve with a 3-4 setup, not unlike the one featuring Witherspoon on the edge we've seen from Haslett lately, the same one that worked so well against Hasselbeck in the first half of the week 12 game. It goes without saying that the d-backs will have to play their best football against Farve and his receivers.

The Packers defense has really emerged this season, but their run defense has been much better than their pass defense, not that it's bad by any means though. There is this encouraging news on this front from the Packers blog Acme Packing Company:

The Packers pass defense keeps slipping as the season goes on. Only CB Charles Woodson has been solid this season while everyone else has struggled at some point (or multiple points).

So, if Bulger comes back, make throws to whoever isn't covered by Woodson, duh. That will likely be Bruce since, they'll put their best on Holt, especially if Bulger's back.

Bulger's status won't be determined until after practice today. Linehan also seems to be keeping the same o-line together despite Romberg's availability for the game.  

Preview with the Packers blogger from Acme Packing Company coming tomorrow.

0 recs  |  Comment 9 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Let me get this straight...
Rohmberg in NOT playing, while we can't wait to get Bulger out there?

by Big Red on Dec 14, 2007 10:33 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

the "success"
of the line from the last three games must have them enamored

by VanRam on Dec 14, 2007 1:48 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

PEDs
"Ah good old football, where the performance enhancing drugs issue is handled quickly and swiftly."

Or just completely ignored/hidden.  Please don't kid yourself into thinking MLB is the only major sport with steroid/HGH issues...it's a joke that football hasn't come under similar scrutiny.  I mean, in MLB there's constant talk about comparing the sizes of today's players vs. their counterparts from previous decades, as well as all the talk about all the heralded records being broken.  Correct me if I'm wrong here, but look at the sizes and freakish ability of today's players compared to the old days.  Today's LBs run like yesterday's CBs and are HUGE.  Dick Butkus would be lucky to be a special teams star in today's game.  And the records?  True, unlike MLB, the numbers aren't quite as important to people--but the single-season TD record has been broken numerous times in the last few years, much like all the HR marks have been shattered in baseball.  I LOVE both sports, and honestly I'm not nearly as upset as many are about PEDs in today's sports (heck, I knew McGwire was taking something, I loved those moon shots anyway), but it's certainly not fair how the NFL gets a pass and MLB takes all the heat for something I'm positive plagues BOTH sports.

by bigwood25 on Dec 14, 2007 2:54 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

true dat
the NFL has done a better job of at least giving off the appearance that their out in front of it with highly public suspensions. You're absolutely right though about PEDs being a big factor in both sports...or any pro sports for that matter, looking at you cyclists.

by VanRam on Dec 14, 2007 6:56 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

PEDs
The ineffectiveness of the NFL system, for me, reared its ugly head last year against the Chargers. Shawne Merriman had TESTED POSITIVE for steroids the week before we played them. Now, my problem is, he appealed, and was allowed to eat Marc Bulger's cookies all game long. Soon after the game, he ADMITTED to using steriods, withdrew his appeal, and was suspended for ? ammount of games (I don't remember). Why are these guys allowed to play when they appeal? That seems to defeat the purpose of a positive test for steroids, knowingly let a guy play who has juiced, and has a decided advantage already (over the Rams O-Line anyway).

Fakir smoked some grass, okay, whatever. Those of us who have been to college know that won't improve your performance in anything, yet he still got four games. I know there is a blanket 'substance abuse' policy, but should the NFL make a distinction between PEDs and recreational drugs, i.e., a distinction when it comes to punishment? I mean, I could be way out in left field with this, who knows.

by kevinramsfan on Dec 14, 2007 7:39 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

I assume
an illegal drug is an illegal drug, no matter what.  

And as far as the appeal process, there really isn't any other way to handle it.  Let's say a player recieves a 4 game suspension for a positive test and he appeals it.  Well, if he's not allowed to play and it takes 2 weeks for the appeal to be heard and a decision to be made AND he's found not guilty, how does he (or his team) get back those two games he missed unfairly?

Now, this could be fixed if the appeal is heard immediately, but it isn't and i'm not sure why but that's just the way it is.

Anyway, you can't "give back" punishment time if the offender is found to have not "offended".  You hear the appeal and then serve whatever punishment is/was handed down.

Unfortunatly, this allows for players (and teams) to be able to 'cheat' the system and the only two solutions I see that might help the situation are as follows:

  1. Hold the appeal hearing immediately when the "offender" files the appeal.  However, this might not be possible since people aren't just sitting around waiting to hear appeals at the conveniece of the league/players etc.
  2. Allow the appeal process to proceed as is currently structured with a little change.  If the appeal is heard and the punishment is found to be unjust (or the 'offender' is not guilty of said offense) then the penalty will be lessened or removed and everyone lives happily ever after.
However, if the "offender" is found to be in offense and the punishment is the usual punishment OR the "offender" pulls back his appeal before the case can be heard...then the punishment is extended (possibly doubled, i.e., a 4 game suspension becomes an 8 game suspension).

I don't know if option 1 really could concievably work, but I think option 2 has some merit to it.  The players union would probably freak out, but the NFL union pales in comparison to the MLB union so they probably wouldn't be able to do anything about it anyway.

by Big Red on Dec 14, 2007 9:31 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree
I like option two. Particularly the part about the extra punishment for withdrawl of appeal before it's heard. That way, you discorage guilty players from saying hey, "If I go to appeal, it'll be shot down and I'll get suspended. BUT we have a really important game this week, so I'll appeal this week in order to play, then withdrawl with no consequence." I think that's what irked me most about the Merriman situation.

by kevinramsfan on Dec 14, 2007 11:28 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Not to bring this back to the game or anything...
I've noticed that the Pack's pass d has seemed to decline in the last two months.  It doesn't seem they're getting the pass rush pressure from the front four that they were getting at the begining of the year.  Those numbers are somewhat slanted though.  In five of the last six games they've played with the kind of lead that forced the other team to pass (except for Dallas, but they pass a lot).  I think their ends are getting sceemed against and Cullen Jenkins isn't playing as good as last year.
Their run d is very good.  They've out rushed everyone they've played since the end of Oct.  They shut down Minnesota and the RRRaaaidas, no. 1 and 4 rush offenses respectively.
Help me out.  Why are the GBP a 10.5 pt favorite? This team scares me.  They don't play like a 3-10 team.  They've been in every game since oct.  What am I missing.  Are they "really" a 3-10 team?  

by packfan on Dec 15, 2007 10:44 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

3-10?
Probably not.  Probably closer to 5-8 but poorly run teams don't win games they should win plus the offensive line has been in shambles so what you end up with is a 3-10 record.

by Big Red on Dec 15, 2007 11:50 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about St. Louis Rams.
Start posting about the Rams »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

St-louis-cardinals_small
The State of the Team

Recent FanPosts

Dickcheneycftblmask2_small
Saints versus Rams - Trap Game?
Small
O-line grades
Ricky_prohel_small
Please thank Mike Karney and the offensive line for their job this season
Peter_small
Sent SJAX An "Honorable Tweet" + Shower Loofa
Dsc03827_small
A Link to the Jim Rome Radio Show
Images
The Draft
Images
Keys for success (with Boom Boom Pow help)
Saved_small
we here alot about the draft but...
Peter_small
Special Teams May Shine Today - Amendola
Ricky_prohel_small
If you really think about it, the Rams receivers aren't "that" bad

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Cincy Jungle
Keith Rivers leaves on crutches. MRI shows it's not a season-ending injury
Big Blue View
TC: "You can second-guess it all you want"
Big Blue View
Tom Coughlin post-game, 11.08.09

Cover the web with Turf

Add a little Turf to your internet!

Become a fan of TST on Facebook.

Follow TST and talk more Rams on Twitter.


Managers

Turfshowtimes_small VanRam

Editors

Spags_victory_small 3k

Authors

340x_small kevinramsfan

Wildcat_small Tackle Box

Uncleface_small taiko

Small ram_rod

Dsc03827_small CoachConnors