Sunday Semantics: College Systems Growing Up, RB values plummeting, Safety Valves

Matthew Emmons-USA TODAY Sports

3k takes up three topics after the 2013 NFL Draft has come to a close: how QB play is affecting evaluation from college to the pros, the decline of the NFL RB as a premier position and how safety play will impact the Rams' 2013 season.

As I've been working on my first 2014 mock draft coming out this week (three rounds of insanely early speculation!), I've been thinking quite a bit about three positions that are really tough to evaluate because of the disparity between NFL and college football: quarterbacks, running backs and safeties.

The New NFL Quarterback

The landscape for NFL quarterbacks has been undeniably altered by the advent of the mobile quarterback across the college level.

It's not just the zone read option (ZRO) or the pistol formation that made landfall in the NFL in 2012. Cam Newton ran for nearly 1,500 yards in his Heisman & Championship-earning 2010 season at Auburn in a very simple ZRO offense. The Tim Tebow/Colin Klein/Blake Bell types don't enthuse NFL front offices, but the first two were very successful in college (and that's an understatement for Skip Bayless' favorite unemployed football player). The Belldozer is a popular darkhorse pick for the Heisman in 2013. So it's not just the systems we've seen in Nevada and Oregon and other places making it tough, though if you're sleeping on Cody Fajardo and Marcus Mariota, those two teams' starting QBs for 2013, you're making a mistake.

At the same time, the various implementations of the spread (that don't use much ZRO) have offered less mobile QBs a different path to the NFL. He're at TST, we're all aware of Sam Bradford's ascent to the pros. I think it's more interesting that a QB like Geno Smith in Dana Holgorsen's version of the air raid drops as far as he did on draft day beyond so many teams that are built for stationary QBs in the same year his top two targets go 8th and 92nd the same team.

Systems are confusing the game (good read - you should click that link...).

So looking ahead, I'm really apprehensive in slotting QBs on my board. You won't find consensus on Johnny Manziel right now. As fun as Johnny Football is to watch, there are a lot of different takes on his game and how he can fit into the NFL. And what about the aforementioned Fajardo and Mariota? I haven't seen their names anywhere near the Teddy Bridgewaters or Tajh Boyds often. I'm not sure why. Fajardo looks just as capable as Kaepernick did after his junior year at Nevada. I don't hear a lot of 49ers fans upset that Colin's entering his first season as a starter this year...

I'm just torn about how to approach QBs right now. Denard Robinson was an actual thing...and a person. So if you have unlocked this one, let me know cause I need some help.

Back to Running

As was popularly noted after the 2013 NFL Draft's first round came to a close, this year marked the first time since 1963 that no running back was selected in the first round. I don't think we're going to have to wait 50 years to see it happen again.

Unless you're relatively new around here, you know I've been on the bandwagon on the decline in value of the running back at the NFL level for years. Nevertheless, with the junior class as stacked as it is, I think one of them is gone in the first round of the 2014 NFL Draft. De'Anthony Thomas (Oregon), Lache Seastrunk (Baylor), Ka'Deem Carey (Arizona), James Wilder (Florida St.), Michael Dyer (somwhere in Arkansas...) -- I think they all could be first round Seven months time will probably change that for some of those guys.

I'm incredibly interested to see how this year's class pans out...and how that could affect next year's draft. Jonathan Franklin, Marcus Lattimore, Stepfan Talor, Joseph Randle, Mike Gillislee, Andre Ellington and, yes, Zac Stacy all went between round 4 and 6. Should any of those pan out to be a reliable 1,000+ yards guy, it only reinforces the decline of RB value to the NFL.

I think it'll happen. And the fingers are crossed that it's Stacy.

Safety in Numbers

As much has been talked about in defending ZRO concepts, it's accepted that the first step (and therefore arguably the most important) is the scrape exchange -- allowing the backside defensive end to crash inside while the backside linebacker takes the edge. This allows the DE to get to the handoff point quickly if done correctly while the LB offers contain on the backside.

But football is just chess with violence and weirder rules. ZRO schemes are going to prep for this by running more inverted veer sets and let the backside LB take himself out of the play. That leaves the pass off the table, so it's a run defense of 10 guys against an 11 man offense. How do you combat that?

The safety. With the pass rush that the Rams have combined with the quality of corner play, having a great deep safety isn't the biggest need. Especially against the ZRO, it's going to take smarter angles from a box defender (often the safety) to work with Laurinaitis ESPECIALLY in nickel looks when he's the only LB not aiming for the backfield.

Much like this year's RB class is going to have an affect on the overall position stock for the 2014 draft, I'm eager to see how teams take on the Redskins, Seahawks, 49ers and Panthers early this year. Everyone has months to prep, and for teams like the Rams who have five games against those teams (to say nothing of any other teams that might run some ZRO concepts...looking at you, Chip Kelly in Philadelphia...)

I think that's a large reason the Rams took TJ McDonald. I wish we had a chance to see how we might deal with ZRO defense in the preseason.

But it's the NFL. A trial be fire. And in the end, one team is going to get burned...or end up with a tie.

And nobody wants a tie. Nobody.

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Turf Show Times

You must be a member of Turf Show Times to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Turf Show Times. You should read them.

Join Turf Show Times

You must be a member of Turf Show Times to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Turf Show Times. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.