St. Louis Rams: First Downs and Touchdowns

Dilip Vishwanat

Newsflash: First downs and touchdowns are a pretty important ingredient to an NFL team’s offensive success. Knowing this, the good folks over at Pro Football Focus have formulated a statistic which highlights how the 2012 Wide Receivers performed in regards to both.

In terms of routes run, the stats display what percentage of catches a Wide Receiver had in correlation with whether or not they resulted in a First Down or Touchdown. Let’s take a look at the cream of the crop [full PFF list here]:


Routes Run


1DTD Percentage

1. Andre Johnson




2. Percy Harvin




3. Brandon Marshall




4. Michael Crabtree




5. Calvin Johnson




Not a bad bunch. Interestingly enough, a now former St. Louis Rams Wide Receiver just missed the Top 5. That WR - as you might have guessed - is none other than Danny Amendola.


Routes Run


1DTD Percentage

6. Danny Amendola




Amendola - the heir apparent to Wes Welker in New England - has been the Rams most reliable [when healthy] receiver in recent memory. Though oft-injured, Amendola was/is electric when on the field, and his productivity/play-making ability will certainly be missed.

So who is the Rams top-rated 1DTD player? It took a bit of scrolling to find him, but along the way I bumped into a few familiar names of interest. How are some of the former Rams receivers stacking up?


Routes Run


1DTD Percentage

27. Danario Alexander




28. Brandon Gibson




41. Brandon Lloyd




Amongst the short list of recent Rams is newly acquired Miami Dolphins' wideout, Brandon Gibson. Unlike Amendola, who missed five games due to injury, Gibson played the entirety of the 2012 season, lead the team in touchdowns, and the 1DTD numbers listed above show that his absence in the offense should not go unnoticed. Whether or not Gibson was still a fit, or whether the price tag determined his worth on the team, the Rams - statistically - lost a large chunk of their offense when Gibby took his talents to South Beach.

As for the two remaining/current Rams receivers who did make the list:


Routes Run


1DTD Percentage

60. Chris Givens




79. Austin Pettis




So, since you’re asking, let’s do some simple addition to see what the Rams have lost, and...well...what’s left.


Routes Run


1DTD Percentage









The figures in the chart above are also a bit misleading as a result of Amendola missing games last season. Had he been able to play, you can factor in that he was averaging 30 routes and 3.5 1DTD’s per game. The stats for Amendola/Gibson would then look closer to 950 and 100, and an even higher 1DTD percentage of 10.52%

Though Amendola only played in 11 games, he lead the team in receptions last season, hauling in 63 balls...Gibson finished second on the team with 51. Givens and Pettis combined for 72. Pettis caught less balls (30) than Lance Kendricks (42) and Steven Jackson (38).

Sam Bradford Threw For 21 TD’s & 185 1st Downs in 2012 [206 combined]

So what does it all mean? Well, nothing more than you already knew. The Rams lost two receiving threats and need help at WR, whether it comes in the form of free agency or in the upcoming draft. They saw what they got in rookie Chris Givens in 2012...blazing vertical speed that can blow the top off of defenses [specifically 49er’s safety Craig Dahl]. Pettis, however, is a bit more of an enigma. He’s shown the ability to make big plays, yet he’s been such a small facet of the passing game [57 receptions in two seasons]. Pettis is now the ‘veteran’ presence amongst the Wide Receiver corps...assuming Steve Smith is no longer with the team [note: that portion of the sentence was probably not necessary].

Brian Quick - the 33rd overall selection from 2012’s Draft - is going to need to step up big this season, and the addition of Jared Cook could help fill the slot position that Danny Amendola left vacant. With that being said, the Rams still seem to have more questions than answers at this point, at least in regards to their receivers.

The Rams have two first round picks this April, and aren’t sitting on a large pile money to spend in free agency. Could one of the two first round picks help solidify the cast of receivers in St. Louis? Do the Rams need a ‘veteran’ wide receiver...err...someone who’s over the age of 24?

The clock is ticking, and the majority of big name FA wideouts have already found new homes. The loss of Amendola and Gibson may not be as easy to replace as one might think. At this point our thoughts on whether or not they should have been retained is moot. What’s the plan to replace nearly 1,000 routes run and 100 1DTD’s?

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior users will need to choose a permanent username, along with a new password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

I already have a Vox Media account!

Verify Vox Media account

Please login to your Vox Media account. This account will be linked to your previously existing Eater account.

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior MT authors will need to choose a new username and password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Turf Show Times

You must be a member of Turf Show Times to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Turf Show Times. You should read them.

Join Turf Show Times

You must be a member of Turf Show Times to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Turf Show Times. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.