St. Louis Rams free agents: Danny Amendola, Brandon Gibson could both be gone

Dilip Vishwanat

The Rams, perpetually in need of wide receivers, could lose their two best in free agency.

It seems like the St. Louis Rams always need a receiver. Imagine then the irony of the team's top two receivers leaving via free agency next month. Really. Jim Thomas of the Post-Dispatch dropped a few ominous tidbits about the fate of Danny Amendola and Brandon Gibson in his weekly chat with readers.

Let's start with Gibson. Here's what Thomas had to say about the 25-year old who led the Rams in receiving yards and touchdowns.

Gibson had his best season as a Ram in 2012. Even so, I don't think he'll be back.

Through four seasons, Gibson has two years with 600+ yards. It's not a huge total, but his age and flashes of talent, as well as the iffy circumstances surrounding his time in the Rams offense, will make him an interesting option for receiver needy teams.

So how much could Gibson command on the market? If I were his agent, my asking price would start along the lines of the four-year, $25.9 million deal the Chargers gave Robert Meachem (whoops). He had a similar level of production in his four years with the Saints, a team with a much more stable offense than the Rams had during Gibson's time in St. Louis.

Gibson probably would not get that much, but he could fetch something in the neighborhood of $3 million per season.

Amendola is the wild card. The Rams could franchise him, but a one-year, $11 million salary is a bit out of the team's price range, as it should be. Here's what Thomas said about Amendola:

I do think it will drive up the price on Amendola. And if it rises to $6 million or $7 million a year, I don't think the Rams will be buyers.

Ask yourself who the better receiver is, Amendola or Gibson? You'd probably say Amendola, and you're probably right. He catches the ball well, and showed a much wider range of ability this season, before injuries torpedoed it, just a year after he missed all but a few snaps in one game. Gibson owns better career stats than Amendola.

Amendola looks an awful lot like Wes Welker, in more ways than one, which helps his case. He also enters a market thin on receivers, which could net him a better deal. His injury history is a risk, but it's not hard to see some team giving him a deal that averages out to $6 million per season, even on a shorter deal because of his injuries.

Re-signing both Amendola and Gibson almost certainly seems out of the question given the cost. Picking up Titus Young adds an experienced receiver - albeit a wild card - to the mix as a replacement.

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior users will need to choose a permanent username, along with a new password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

I already have a Vox Media account!

Verify Vox Media account

Please login to your Vox Media account. This account will be linked to your previously existing Eater account.

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior MT authors will need to choose a new username and password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Turf Show Times

You must be a member of Turf Show Times to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Turf Show Times. You should read them.

Join Turf Show Times

You must be a member of Turf Show Times to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Turf Show Times. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9341_tracker