More On Josh McDaniels' Future
It was reported on Thursday that two teams, the Kansas City Chiefs and the New England Patriots, have requested permission to interview Josh McDaniels for their offensive coordinator openings. There is still no confirmation as to whether or not the Rams have acceded to those requests. At any rate, the news presents the opportunity to clarify a few things about the rules for NFL coaching hires and some additional speculation popping up about McDaniels and the Rams.
Peter King said this about the Rams and McDaniels on Twitter today: "Rams have told Josh McDaniels they won't hold him to his contract. If he wants to leave, they'll let him."
That's not a surprise at all. In fact, it's pretty much standard operating procedure for team hiring a new head coach. That coach gets to bring in the staff he wants. Kevin Demoff said as much in his Monday afternoon press conference when asked about McDaniels' status and future with the team (hat tip to the Rams PR department for getting that transcribed so quickly the other day, they've been a huge help to TST throughout this).
I think obviously we're engaged in a search for a new head coach. That head coach is going to make a decision on their coaching staff. Josh McDaniels is our only coach who's under contract for 2012, so obviously the new coach will have to make a decision on Josh. I'm sure Josh will have opportunities around the NFL to possibly be a coordinator or better throughout this process. It's going to be fluid, but I think we'll figure out what's best for both parties.
It's also a good time for a reminder about the NFL's rules for hiring coaches.
Teams are required to give permission for other teams to interview assistant coaches for a head coaching job, a promotion, as long as it happens before March 1.
Lateral moves are a different matter, and that's worth paying attention to here with regards to McDaniels. A team cannot interview an assistant coach for an assistant coaching job without permission from that team.
So, in order for the Patriots or Chiefs to interview McDaniels for their offensive coordinator positions, the Rams would need to grant them permission. And it sure sounds like the team is willing to give McDaniels permission to interview for other openings, since a new head coach, especially an established guy Jeff Fisher.
21 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Stan give your permission
Hell give them a 7th rounder if they hire the guy
Make McDaniels wait
until the Rams got a head coach. Make McDaniels wait as long as it takes for one of our WR’s to get open in his 7 8 or 9 step back system. Make him wait. Then when new coach is in place have him interview for his position just to piss him off. Oh KC and New England this will cost you a draft pick FYI.
http://www.codex99.com/illustration/images/foster/songbird_sm.jpg
by Da Rookie on Jan 6, 2012 12:42 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
Bye Bye
McDaniels, one season into his run as the Rams offensive coordinator, asked St. Louis for his freedom in the wake of head coach Steve Spagnuolo’s firing, per NFL Network’s Michael Lombardi. The Rams have granted his request, opening the door to a return with the Patriots, where he served as an assistant from 2001 to 2008.
So there goes McD and Lloyd. :
I would like to keep Lloyd
But if that mean t we had to keep Mac around I am ok losing him
Warren Moon on Blackmon: he's like Dez Bryant but with all his brain cells
I give Moon some credit, cause he was the only one who saw Cam being what Cam is
Note to Douglas M: Remember that 99% of what I say involves BS
by King Sam Rules! on Jan 6, 2012 1:43 PM CST via mobile reply actions
Point is still valid
Note to Douglas M: Remember that 99% of what I say involves BS
by King Sam Rules! on Jan 6, 2012 2:44 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
FYI its Irving
"Victory at all costs, victory in spite of all terror, victory however long and hard the road may be; for without victory there is no PLAYOFFS."
Winston Churchill
Can't we trade him?
Note to Douglas M: Remember that 99% of what I say involves BS
by King Sam Rules! on Jan 6, 2012 1:44 PM CST via mobile reply actions
After the comments last year about Shurmur being held back by the ultra conservative Spags I’ve wondered if that wasn’t the case the McDaniels as well.
Bradford has said he’d like to play another year in McDaniels’ system, that’s a pretty big deal, and another reason to go one more year.
By keeping him hopefully we could sign Lloyd to a multi-year deal. That’s a clincher in my book.
With those things in mind the only reason I’d get rid of him is if we signed a head coach who wants nothing to do with him and his system.
McDaniel already back with New England.
Per Jim Thomas’ twitter.
"Fac Fortia et Patere"
by FailureDrill on Jan 6, 2012 6:21 PM CST via Android app reply actions
I'm on my phone so I'm a little restricted.
But here’s the tweet:
Goodbye Josh from the Stl. Pats move fast on McDaniels. Rams signed permission form only 1 hour ago. Kansas City yet to request permission. — jthom1 (@jthom1)
"Fac Fortia et Patere"
by FailureDrill on Jan 6, 2012 7:58 PM CST via Android app up reply actions
I interpreted that as he had already gone for NE.
That’s what I took from the “only signed an hour ago” thing. Thomas usually doesn’t report stuff unless it’s totally for certain.
"Fac Fortia et Patere"
by FailureDrill on Jan 6, 2012 8:02 PM CST via Android app up reply actions
Yeah you're right.
“He clarified it in a quick article.”: http://www.stltoday.com/sports/football/professional/rams-report/farewell-josh-hello-jeff/article_c6d293e8-38d3-11e1-89e9-001a4bcf6878.html
"Fac Fortia et Patere"
by FailureDrill on Jan 6, 2012 8:24 PM CST via Android app up reply actions
How I miss you, preview button
"Fac Fortia et Patere"
by FailureDrill on Jan 6, 2012 8:25 PM CST via Android app up reply actions
So Long
Josh McLame-O at least you weren’t as predictiable as Pat S. although that’s not saying much……

by 


























