Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

St. Louis Rams Owner Stan Kroenke Still In The Running For The Los Angeles Dodgers

The sale process for the Los Angeles Dodgers continues. On Friday night, the Los Angeles Times reported that two bidders had been eliminated from the process, Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban and former sports agent and estate planner Dennis Gilbert. St. Louis Rams owner Stan Kroenke is still believed to be in the mix among the eight finalists for the team.

Kroenke would still have to be selected as a bidder. That might hinge on a couple factors, including the future of the land where Dodger Stadium sits and its ability to hold an NFL facility. The details after the jump.

Star-divide

The bids went through an initial vetting by Blackstone Advisory Partners. Kroenke is not the only high profile bidder left in the process. A group led by Stan Kasten and Magic Johnson made the cut, as did a group headlined by Joe Torre. Hedge fund manager Steve Cohen and the family of the late Roy Disney, Walt's nephew, are also in the mix.

Patrick Soon-Shiong, LA's richest man, is also exploring the possibility of getting into the mix for the Dodgers, according to the LA Times, linking up with one another bidder.

From here, Major League Baseball conducts the next round of vetting, making sure potential bidders meet their standards. After that, Frank McCourt, the current owner, will select the winning bidder. He has pledged to announce the winner by April 1, with the sale being completed by April 30.

The team is expected to fetch a sale price of $1.5 billion. That price tag is relatively small compared to the potential for tens of billion of dollars in television rights, and the ability to develop and own a regional broadcasting network centered around the Dodgers. Similar to what the Yankees have with YES, with is technically owned by the Yankees owners and not the team, that could make the Dodgers' new owner even more money than just selling the television rights.

Kroenke has a background with sports networks, owning one for his Denver sports enterprises, which include the Nuggets and the Avalanche. Ok, technically his son owns those teams now. That point certainly won't be lost on MLB in the process, as they look to find an owner who can restore the Dodgers to financial prominence and a lofty national sports brand. MLB has a long had a preference for insiders, people with connections to Bud Selig or the name brand to restore a franchise, a la the group led by Nolan Ryan that purchased the Texas Rangers.

There's another issue complicating the sale of the Dodgers. The buyer will receive the team and Dodger Stadium, but the parking lots around the facility will still belong to McCourt, a parking lot baron of sorts. How a developer plans to handle that issue could go a long way in picking the next owner.

Selecting the winner is not as simple as handing the keys to Dodger Stadium to the highest bidder. McCourt will likely want someone capable of paying cash on the barrel head. A plan for the real estate question will be key too.

Two questions surround Kroenke's potential purchase as it relates to the future of the Rams.

First, there's the little matter of the league's cross-ownership rules. Right now, owning the Dodgers would not present a problem for Kroenke since the NFL has no team in LA. If Kroenke owned the Dodgers and the NFL were to move a team there, it could throw a kink into those rules. Would he be grandfathered in if the league moved there after he bought a team? Some are citing that rule and Kroenke's potential purchase as a sure sign that the Rams would move to LA.

I asked Maury Brown of the Business of Sports about the ownership situation. Not surprisingly, he called it a "gray area." The NFL made some generous exceptions for Kroenke to buy the Rams, so I can't imagine there wouldn't be some wiggle room in finding a solution again. You can read a copy of the league's constitution on Brown's site. Here's the rule as it pertains to cross-ownership:

That the controlling owner of an NFL club may acquire an interest in a major league baseball, basketball or hockey ("other major sports league") franchise (subject to prior notice to the Commissioner and to such covenants and safeguards as the Commissioner and Finance Committee may determine are appropriate to address actual or perceived conflicts of interest that may arise in the particular situation), but only if such other franchise is located (1) within the home territory of the owner's NFL club, or (2) within a neutral area, i.e., any area that is not within the home territory of any NFL club;

I'm not a lawyer, but you can see that the verbiage leaves room for creative solutions.

A second factor is that land around Dodger Stadium. Some believe McCourt wants to hang onto to it, using it to recoup some of the income he lost in the messy divorce.

The NFL has long had an eye on it as the potential site for a stadium, and that's where this could get really interesting with Kroenke. Neither of the current LA stadium proposals are much closer to shovel-ready than they were a year ago.

The city council and the state government have made some arrangements to ease the path to construction, notably clearing out some red tape hurdles for environmental impact suits in exchange for some green technology and the promise of jobs. The NFL has never really blessed either of those bids, preferring to find the best deal between the two or another location.

One appeal for Kroenke in purchasing the Rams was their lease on the Ed Jones Dome. It gave him an easy out and a ticket to get a stadium of his very own, stadiums being big cash cows that don't get thrown into the NFL revenue sharing pie.

The AEG stadium downtown would not offer Kroenke ownership. The Ed Roski stadium in the City of Industry might, and the Dome belongs to Missouri taxpayers. Another benefit of owning the Dodgers for Kroenke is the potential to build an NFL stadium there. That will depend on what Frank McCourt wants to do with his land, but he might be swayed by a bidder that wants to bring him into a lucrative stadium development deal. If Kroenke woos McCourt with that, the Rams will most likely be heading back to Southern California.

Comment 35 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Am I wrong?

Or does the verbiage in the agreement state that he can own two teams from different sports if they are in the same city? I know the Dodgers won’t be going to St Louis….

by LARams72 on Jan 28, 2012 10:12 AM CST via mobile reply actions  

(2) within a neutral area, i.e., any area that is not within the home territory of any NFL club;

I’m sorry, but I thought there wasn’t an NFL team in LA. Has San Diego or Oakland suddenly annexed Los Angeles?

"Doin' blow off a strippers nipple" -VanRam
Hit me up on Facebook and Twitter. You know you want to.

by Eric Nagel on Jan 28, 2012 11:04 AM CST reply actions  

The idea is that if Kroenke buys the Dodgers, the only team that could move to LA is the Rams.

So, if he buys them, there are only two ways the Rams stay in St. Louis:

1. They make an exception for Kroenke if another team moves to LA.

2. No team moves to LA.

Everyone assumes a team will move to LA, which eliminates #2 (of course, everybody could be wrong). So the only way the Rams stay, if Kroenke buys the Dodgers, is if they make an exception for him.

by wustl_chiefs_fan on Jan 28, 2012 1:06 PM CST up reply actions  

Idk

He shouldn’t buy it, it’s like if the Colts move back to Baltimore….meaning another team should move there

Haikus are easy,
but sometimes they don't make sense.
Refrigerator.

by sergey606 on Jan 28, 2012 1:31 PM CST up reply actions  

So once again he gets to bargain with the league

I really think Kroenke is a genius.

"Doin' blow off a strippers nipple" -VanRam
Hit me up on Facebook and Twitter. You know you want to.

by Eric Nagel on Jan 28, 2012 2:51 PM CST up reply actions  

Seriously?

Nobody should care about a story that may indicate that the Rams will move to LA? On a Rams blog?

by wustl_chiefs_fan on Jan 29, 2012 6:27 PM CST up reply actions  

Stan, don't be a douche.

Haikus are easy,
but sometimes they don't make sense.
Refrigerator.

by sergey606 on Jan 28, 2012 1:00 PM CST via mobile reply actions  

I hope they come back to LA

id me making a trip there every home game. just seeing them in SF and the occasional Oakland isnt enough.

by onlyK on Jan 28, 2012 1:35 PM CST reply actions  

Well I live in Alaska so I'm not really mad

But if I want to watch a game, I’d rather fly to STL or SEA than SoCal

Haikus are easy,
but sometimes they don't make sense.
Refrigerator.

by sergey606 on Jan 28, 2012 2:19 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

You'd rather fly from Alaska to STL?

Isn’t that a lot longer of a flight?

"Doin' blow off a strippers nipple" -VanRam
Hit me up on Facebook and Twitter. You know you want to.

by Eric Nagel on Jan 28, 2012 2:51 PM CST up reply actions  

Yeah but in the end I'd be in STL not LA

Haikus are easy,
but sometimes they don't make sense.
Refrigerator.

by sergey606 on Jan 28, 2012 3:20 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

Have you been to so cal?

I live in Nor Cal now for college but the moment im done im booking the first flight back to Southern California. It really doesn’t get better.

by Lexxi on Jan 28, 2012 4:04 PM CST up reply actions  

I wonder why the CVC doesn't just give the EJD to Kroenke on the condition the Rams stay in St. Louis?

It’s a 20 year old facility that is in need of modification, and its maintenance are only going to go up each year as it wears out. Then it would be on Kroenke to improve the stadium or not?
The remaining debt on the stadium could be re-packaged, and paid for by property and revenue based taxes. The Taxpayers are covered, Kroenke gets a valuable asset that only stays valuable if the Rams remain the tenant? Just a thought…

by Douglas M on Jan 28, 2012 2:46 PM CST reply actions  

If he buys it he needs to remodel the hell out of it

Like Demoff said, it needs to accommodate college sporting events, the superbowl, etc. Then he’d make money on it

Haikus are easy,
but sometimes they don't make sense.
Refrigerator.

by sergey606 on Jan 28, 2012 3:22 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

I'm talking about "giving" it to him, not selling it.

Considering the recent estimates of $200 mil + to renovate EJD, plus the long term liability of continuous repairs in the future, how much does the city actually make off EJD? Wouldn’t it be cheaper in the long run to turn the asset over to Kroenke than to have to pay off a new loan for updates?

by Douglas M on Jan 28, 2012 3:38 PM CST up reply actions  

Good point, but I doubt they'll just give it to him.

Would be cool if the owner had the team and the stadium like Jerry Jones (but not as crazy)

Haikus are easy,
but sometimes they don't make sense.
Refrigerator.

by sergey606 on Jan 28, 2012 4:03 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

For all the good it would do us if the Rams go they might as well give it to him.

But I imagine it would cost as much to renovate the Ed to the high standards to host a superbowl as it would to build a new stadium from scratch. Also a major renovation of the Ed could very well require finding an alternate site for the Rams to play for a season or two. Probably the wisest thing to do is to find out what could be done to make the dome a little more profitable for the Rams for the next decade with an agreement to kick in some “jack” for a new stadium at a different site. If the community kicks in a few hundred million it would take to renovate the Ed then Stan and the NFL will kick in the rest giving him outright ownership of a facility that he can develope to host other events outside of Rams football.

by Sggladden on Jan 29, 2012 10:06 PM CST up reply actions  

Can the city turn over an asset like that without voter approval?

Not many people would see the logic in giving away real property, whether it’s fiscally good business or not. The city would have to show how they’d lose money by not giving it to him. I think that’s a rough sell.

Wolf. Wolfgang Wolf

by dbcouver on Jan 28, 2012 7:35 PM CST up reply actions  

He's a billionaire

Why should he be given anything?

I’ve got nothing against rich people, but at the same time, they shouldn’t be given free stuff, either, especially since it comes at the expense of those with far less money.

by DiscoJer on Jan 29, 2012 3:52 AM CST up reply actions  

obviously, we are still a ways away from any closure but....

My dad has been saying for YEARS that the area up on the hill could accommodate an NFL stadium and Dodger Stadium. He has wondered forever why that location was never in consideration through all the failed LA stadium proposals.

I should be working right now...

by gorams77 on Jan 28, 2012 7:49 PM CST via iPhone app reply actions  

If they fixed...

the parking situation at Dodger Stadium, that could work.

by victorian on Jan 29, 2012 4:03 PM CST up reply actions  

Wow!

If McCourt was able to use the land surrounding the stadium as a bargaining chip to get an NFL team and kept himself in the mix for long term payouts, then he really is smarter than I thought. I personally believe MLB should make him sell everything and get the heck out of Dodge.

by victorian on Jan 29, 2012 4:00 PM CST reply actions  

I think MLB can only MAKE him sell the team!

The land and buildings are not really part of the Dodgers, but assets of the owner. Now the Bankruptcy court can make him sell.

Personally I think Bud Selig is a dick! McCourt has someone willing to pay him $3 billion for the broadcast rights and Bud says no!? Give me a break. Bud doesn’t like McCourt so that’s that.

On another not if Kroenke is in the running to buy the Dodgers, do you think that gives him even more leverage over the Edward Jones people? I think it gives him a huge advantage in negotiations.

Go Rams!!!

by Ron Winkler on Jan 30, 2012 4:26 PM CST up reply actions  

Um. You’re wrong. That broadcast deal was a Fox swindle and EVERYONE knew it. It was a McCourt Need Money Now deal, and in the long term, horrible for the Dodgers and Dodger fans. Selig did the right thing. As for Kroenke bidding on the Dodgers giving him leverage against St. Louis, you’re right, although I don’t see a scenario unfolding where Kroenke would get what he wanted from St. Louis. Why the Rams are even still there in the first place is beyond me, when they consistently have some of the lowest attendance in the NFL, along with the Raiders (Maybe leaving LA was a bad move after all…YA THINK?). One way or another, I think the Rams are leaving the Gateway to the West in the next 5 years and probably returning to SoCal where they belong.

by lnickerson88 on Jan 30, 2012 8:08 PM CST up reply actions  

I think...

One way or the other, McCourt will sell the land to whoever buys the Dodgers, whether it is Kroenke or not. If it is Kroenke, there’s nothing stopping him from bringing the Rams back home and developing the vast tract of prime unused land around Dodger Stadium for two professional teams. In fact, the reason O’Malley sold the team in the first place was because the LA city council (by which I mostly mean Riordan, that motherfucker) forced O’Malley to stop seeking part ownership of an NFL team in order to bring them to Elysian Park with the Dodgers. But the LA City council is much more practical now and is receptive to pretty much any stadium proposal they can get, as long as it is in Los Angeles, meaning they would work with Kroenke on bringing the Rams to the Ravine; if Kroenke wants to move them to Roski’s shithole, which I doubt, then the council might turn on him.

by lnickerson88 on Jan 30, 2012 8:04 PM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about St. Louis Rams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Cletus-the-slack-jawed-yokel-7_small
Attention All Dome Lemmings: Shut Up!
Img_20120429_144716_small
Quick Thoughts: CVC Proposal vs Rams Proposal
Small
New York Giant And Medal Of Honor Winner: 1st Lt Andrew Jackson Lummus
Small
St. Louis Rams:Tough Call - Who Stays And Who Goes In 2013?
Marshall-faulk-1999_small
St. Louis Rams Coaching- The Offensive Line

Recent FanPosts

L50i99-l50i4n0704ohiostaterams_small
Does Mike Karney Deserve A Second Shot?
Small
How many games will the Rams win this coming year??
Small
My Early 53 Man Roster Predictions
Stewie_small
Time To Step Up Bradford
Images_small
Mocking the 53
Small
Rams Land a Litter in Ground-Breaking Trade
Small
40 Years of Ram Football

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Cover the web with Turf


Managers

71523_170793669601439_100000124211145_596632_5713708_n_small Ryan Van Bibber

Baby_drinking_becks_small 3k

Editors

Jackson_medium_small Eric Nagel

Peter_small VTramsFan

Bugs_bunny_pose_small Douglas M

Authors

Marshall-faulk-1999_small papapegasus

Lggn0229jules-and-vincent-cartoon-pulp-fiction-poster_small Rick Siegel

Images-3_small DCRamFan

Bradford_draft_small Josh Wehrle

Tst_small Tevin Broner

Images_small Brick Top

Plaid_small EddieP

Profile_pic1_small Mike Dietrich

Sp-studio1_small Joe Mazzi

Moderators

Dsc03827_small CoachConnors