St. Louis Rams depth chart battles: Fullback
Another preseason game gives the St. Louis Rams to get a better feel for some competitive spots on the depth chart. With a few notable exceptions, the starting lineup looks to be mostly written in ink at this point, barring injuries or a surprise performance. Superstars aside, depth plays a big role in whether or teams win or lose in the NFL. The Rams have a few interesting subplots brewing on the roster among players who will become a key part of the team's depth chart.
Yesterday, I looked at the bottom of the cornerback depth chart. Today's question is more about a particular position, the fullback.
And a quick reminder, Turf Show Radio is today at 5 p.m. Central. Besides the liquor store, it's only pregame stop you need to make. Don't forget to express your love for TST by voting for us in the Best St. Louis Sports Blog contest. If I don't win, my wife won't let me run TST anymore...without making me move into the basement anyway.
Obviously, the days of the single-purpose fullback disappeared, going extinct, not coincidentally, about the same time as the lone back rushing attack. The hybrid fullback, however, is alive and well.
Britt Miller saw a number of snaps against the Colts last week with the first team. His most notable play came on sneaky fourth-down conversion, keeping the Rams scoring drive alive. At 6'1" 250 lbs, Miller has prototypical fullback size. A converted linebacker, he doesn't have a long resume catching passes, something you would assume figures into his workload in Josh McDaniels' offense.
Obviously, the Rams have their top three running back positions figured out, with Cadillac Williams backing up Steven Jackson and Jerious Norwood working situationally. Last year, the Rams kept four running backs, three tailbacks and fullback Mike Karney to start the season. Karney's playing time decreased as the Rams passed more and opted to use fewer and fewer two-back sets. Miller worked his way into the lineup, after being signed from the practice squad, as a special teams contributor, and he's a pretty good teams guy, as you might expect from a former linebacker transformed into a fullback.
Miller's special teams ability might be the deciding factor. More likely than not, the Rams will keep a fourth running back. Miller's main competition would seem to be Keith Toston, who played very well against the hapless Colts last week. McDaniels kept four backs on his rosters in Denver, but never a true fullback type. In 2009, he had Peyton Hillis, but dealt him away the next year, and that was the closest he had to a fullback.
It stands out to me that Miller took as many snaps as he did with the first team last week; however, the offense resembled last year's more than the new version. They also ran a significant amount of play action passes, which often featured two backs.
Keep an eye on how much Miller plays tonight, when the Rams are expected to be using more of McDaniels' playbook. Keith Toston's role also merits attention to see if he can pick up where he left off last week.
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
If we could keep 56 active players...
we should have kept Karney. From what I saw last week, Guidugli worked in the FB role a little bit. He’s built like Miller and played Spread-TE in college (with Gilyard). I liked his blocks and he probably has better hands than either of the true FBs on the roster.
I hope he gets a taste of true FB duty this week.
arent
Illinois Mike and Kendricks gonna take the reps when se do need a fb? That’s wat I’ve been hearing.
Sam Bradford to Austin Pettis
Kinda has a ring to it
by RG31 on Aug 20, 2011 9:46 AM CDT via mobile reply actions
we should line up the self proclaimed "hammer" at fullback, poppinga lol
My two favorite teams, the St. Louis Rams and whoever's playing the winers.
ya really
hammertime!
My two favorite teams, the St. Louis Rams and whoever's playing the winers.
by caliramsfan1 on Aug 20, 2011 10:30 AM CDT up reply actions
It All Changes Last Night...
I personally believe that Toston just made the final cut because of what happened in the ARZ game. With the Cards now being very thin at running back I do not believe that BD will take the chance that Ar picks him up and he eventually becomes a valuable back-up to B. Wells getting substantial playing time.
With all of our NFC West opponents scheduled for the 2nd half of the season how bad would it be if Toston is completely integrated into the Arz offensive attack? Just a rhetorical question but one that I believe BD will not want to answer later….
Go RAMS!!!
AZ wants a veteran backup
I don’t think they would consider Toston. But even if they did, Toston won’t strike fear in the Rams D.
He can't run tough unless behind an OL that opens hanger sized holes-
But any OL that can do that can run Twiggy as FB. Look what Obanana is doing behind a good OL.
on another note
SJax wa.td to play tonight to start getting into this offense, does the coaches let him in and for how long? Because the starters them selfsame are probably gonna be in for the whole first half.
Sam Bradford to Austin Pettis
Kinda has a ring to it
by RG31 on Aug 20, 2011 10:07 AM CDT via mobile reply actions
Hmmm
I’d rather we roll without a FB and keep 7 WR’s. Mike Hoomanawanui and Lance Kendricks can hold down the FB spot when we need them to.
I think they should keep him because he looks like a good player.
This situation might be a little bit different since the Rams biggest playmaker is jackson, I have heard jackson say he likes to run behind a fullback before…they might keep him for that. I know if you have a fullback in there, it sort of telegraphs run, but remember, a certain percentage of the offense will be shurmur’s still.
- And here's the Rams' 2010 season in a series. Incomplete pass, 18-yard run, incomplete pass, 7-yard run, 5-yard pass, 3-yard run, sack, incomplete pass, punt. Shoot me. - 3K

by 




























