Washington unwilling to cut Albert Haynesworth
For all the dismissal of the St. Louis Rams signing Plaxico Burress and other aging receivers, I am more than a little reluctant to pen a post talking about Washington Redskins DT Albert Haynesworth. Dan Snyder's $100 million man is in the news plenty lately as speculation builds around whether or not Washington will cut, trade or keep him once the lockout ends.
The latest news, out of Philly, says that Mike Shanahan will not cut him. Instead, they'll seek a trade in an effort to get some return on their investment. Good luck with that. Haynesworth has a monster contract, given the personality risk and his recent play (which may or may not be better than it seemed and somewhat lost in the transition to a 3-4).
Haynesworth is signed through 2015, but the next three years of his contract are particularly expensive. This year, he's due a salary of $5.4 million. That number goes up to $6.7 million with a half million dollar workout bonus next year. His contract gets really problematic in 2013, when it includes a "poison pill" worth $29 million, an $8.5 million base salary and a $20 million "discretionary signing bonus" plus another half million dollar roster bonus.
Haynesworth's base salary this year is guaranteed, meaning that any team acquiring him through a trade would be on the hook for that. An new team could work out a new deal, incentive-laden, upon acquiring Haynesworth. The risk of Fat Albert being a huge pain in the neck will weigh heavily on any interested team...and drive down the trade cost, maybe to as low as a seventh-round pick. The Rams have a recent history of trading with the Redskins, shipping Adam Carriker there for draft pick swap.
It's a move that could pay off under the right circumstances, but before eating up salary cap space, teams will want to have a clear idea about whether or not he can be controlled.
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
shananhan needs to stop it already, hes playing with fire...
we all know what hes doing right everyone? hes using albert as an example, in ’ you want to **** with me albert?….well see what you get!" type of thing. and its going to blow up in there face. albert has already stated he wants out of washington, and by doing this? washingtons further alienating albert, to where is isnt going to do a damn thing on the field! watch. dont know what personal beef the shanahans have with haynsworth but it needs to stop. its like our bosses picking on you for know reason, just because they can.
also he's handled the McNabb situation very poorly
he also has a beef with him it seems. If Mike can’t get along with his players and treat them with more respect, he will have to be fired soon and it won’t be pretty.
You can follow me on Twitter @brandonbirkhead.
So let me understand this...
If the Rams were to trade their 2012 7th round pick for Haynesworth they must pay him the $5.4 mil. for the upcoming 2011 season BUT would NOT be obligated to the rest of his contract he made with Washington? So in essence are you saying we could just do a one year stint with this guy and if he didn’t pan out we could just get rid of him? …or am I way off base with this?
Go Rams!
"We can't run. We can't pass. We can't stop the run. We can't stop the pass. We can't kick. Other than that, we're just not a very good football team right now." --- Bruce Coslett, New York Jets Head Coach circa 1990s
I think you got it right
If I remember correctly it’s Albert’s dislike of the 3-4 system that Washington runs. Could you imagine him lined up next to Long, Hall, and Quinn/Robbins? nah….. it would never happen…. to much risk.
The only thing comparable to a Rams win is a 49er loss!
But that's $5.4 million
you don’t have under the salary cap to pay for willing players. There’s nothing that says he will be willing to play hard for anyone else either. I can’t see risking that much salary cap money on him.
Correct me if I'm wrong...
but I’m pretty sure all the notable Rams/Redskins moves have been players moving to Washington, and St Louis not receiving any one in particular. Archuleta, Carrier, OJ. I think it should stay that way.
From what I understand think Albert’s contract is really 2 contacts in 1.
The first contract is 4 years / $48M deal. $41M guaranteed in 2009-2011 and $7M non-guaranteed in 2012.
The second contract is a 3 year / $52M non-guaranteed for 2013-2015.
I think the fact that he deduces 100million + 3-4 defense = "wage slave"
should tell you everything you need to know about his mental status and his work ethic.
- And here's the Rams' 2010 season in a series. Incomplete pass, 18-yard run, incomplete pass, 7-yard run, 5-yard pass, 3-yard run, sack, incomplete pass, punt. Shoot me. - 3K
I mean the Rams just got rid of Cogs, remember hoping he would just get ejected
from the game and I dont remember him cleat stomping a helmetless player in the face!
- And here's the Rams' 2010 season in a series. Incomplete pass, 18-yard run, incomplete pass, 7-yard run, 5-yard pass, 3-yard run, sack, incomplete pass, punt. Shoot me. - 3K

by 



























