St. Louis Rams running back situation: Reggie Bush vs. Darren Sproles

NEW ORLEANS - AUGUST 21: (FILE PHOTO) Reggie Bush #25 of the New Orleans Saints jumps over Brice McCain #21 of the Houston Texans at the Louisiana Superdome on August 21 2010 in New Orleans Louisiana. The Heisman Trophy Trust has decided that Bush was ineligible to play college football for USC during the 2005 season and will be taking back the Heisman trophy awarded to him for that season according to reports on September 7 2010. (Photo by Chris Graythen/Getty Images)

As soon as the New Orleans Saints drafted Alabama RB Mark Ingram in the first round of the draft last month, speculation about the future of Reggie Bush became conversation fodder for every team needing offense, including the St. Louis Rams. Bush is one of several options that might or might not be available for Billy Devaney this offseason, though probably whose brand inflates his price. There's another name that's been talked about for the Rams too, one they were interested in last season: Darren Sproles. Which would be a better addition, Bush or Sproles?

Reggie Bush
Age: 26

Recent performance: Bush's total touches declined substantially with the Saints last season. His rushing attempts were cut in half, as Sean Payton turned to other options on the ground. Bush carried the ball 36 times for 150 yards and an average of 4.2 YPC. As a receiver he caught 34 passes for 208 yards, an average of 6.1 yards per catch and 1 TD, all three-year lows for Bush. However, it hardly seems like Bush's ability is in decline. The Saints just didn't make it a priority to get him the ball last year. 

A fit for the Rams: Oh yeah. Can you imagine him as a weapon in the passing game, a bond fide weapon for Sam Bradford to target? As far as a backup running back, the Rams would still need another option to work between the tackles if Steven Jackson was out for any period of time. Playing in the Dome would be a good fit. 

Price: Bush is on the chopping block now because he's due more than $11 million. Like I said above, there would definitely be an extra premium for the brand name. 

Darren Sproles
Age: 28 (turns 28 in June)

Recent Performance: Sproles rushed 50 times for an average of 5.3 YPC. That represents a decline in rushing attempts, but an increased effectiveness. He did see an uptick in targets, catching 59 passes for 520 yards and 2 TDs. Sproles lacks the pizazz and the brand name, but he has some miles left on his tires to be sure. As a return man, he was just as effective. 

A fit for the Rams: Definitely. In fact, NFL Network's Michael Lombardi offered some speculation on Tuesday that St. Louis might be the free agent's eventual landing spot.

Price: He'd cost, but not as much as Bush...he's also probably not as dynamic. 

Depending on what they want to pay, and the tolerance for distractions, either one could play a role in McDaniels' spread offense. As far as backing up Jackson, is 30-50 carries enough? It would seem like they'll still need a guy, Toston?, to do some work on first and second downs. And like we've said before, Steven Jackson's a pretty damn good receiver. 

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Turf Show Times

You must be a member of Turf Show Times to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Turf Show Times. You should read them.

Join Turf Show Times

You must be a member of Turf Show Times to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Turf Show Times. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.