Another writer gets it wrong on the Rams draft
Yesterday, Mel Kiper confused the St. Louis Rams 4-3 defense with a 3-4 defense. Today, a regional sports reporter makes his picks for the Rams' best and worst draft picks over the last five years. Matt Maiocco's pick for the Rams worst draft pick in the last five years might indicate that he clearly hasn't been paying much attention to the Rams during that span...not that anyone can blame him for overlooking them during that time.
And his worst draft pick was: Jason Smith, OT, Baylor, who the Rams selected with the second overall pick of the 2009 NFL Draft. Wha? Huh?
I know the Jason Smith didn't excite many Rams fans, but it's pretty difficult to call it the worst pick from a time period encompassing the notoriously bad 2006 and 2007 draft classes. Of those two draft classes, totaling 18 players, only one player, DT Clifton Ryan, saw any snaps with the team in 2010. Ryan only played in one game before ending up on IR. The Rams effectively cut him lose by not opting to tender a restricted free agent offer, just in case the league goes back to the six-year rules for free agency.
Of the two first round picks in those two draft classes, DT Adam Carriker and CB Tye Hill, it's hard to say which one was the worst pick. Tye Hill had a decent rookie season before injuries seemed to ruin his career. Carriker never clicked in the wayward Rams defense of those years.
Back to Smith. Smith lost the majority of his rookie season because of a string of injuries, the most serious of which was a concussion that ended his season completely. Before he went down, he was showing improvement at right tackle. Last season Smith started 15 games at right tackle, at times flashing the talent that made him worthy of such a high draft selection.
What will separate Smith from the ranks of being an adequate starter to a cornerstone player will be consistency. Given his age and the time he missed as a rookie as well as what he has shown in one season and change as a starter, it's reasonable to expect Smith to take it to the next level this year.
Some people consider Smith a disappointment because he plays right tackle rather than left. That's an hard sell for me. Rodger Saffold, a second-round pick, took over the left side at a much cheaper rate than Smith. Both players, ideally, should be interchangeable at each position, for the most part, so in terms of total value tied up in their offensive tackles, the Rams have about what you'd expect...it's just distributed differently than is typical.
This is a big year for Smith to be sure, but he already has shown enough not to be considered the worst draft pick of the last five years.
32 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Figured I might as well throw this in, I gave you guys Aldon Smith in SB Nation Bay Area’s mock draft. Both top receivers were off the board, and I think Smith would fit in great on that line.
Ironic I make you guys aware of the pick when you’re discussing a writer getting it wrong, but yeah. I’d like to point out that, as a 49ers fan and a colleague of Maiocco’s, he’s admittedly terrible with mocking drafts and making those kinds of predictions, and always has been. He’ll be the first to tell you, so his determination of best/worst picks sort of suffers as well.
And then God created Saturn ... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
SaberCats Examiner | SB Nation Bay Area | Niners Nation | Twitter
I'll be the first to say Smith hasn't performed how I've hoped
But worse then Tye Hill? Carriker?
Even Ramchop will agree that’s debatable.
Number 8 is great
Yes, but I don't think Barron or Hill (complete busts) were chosen 2nd overall. We took that coveted pick and got an average RT. Not too good. I wish now we had Crabtree instead.
Oh my God
Finally, A crabtree fan says something. Let’ us see after this year. I know I clamored for Crabtree too!
If Crab had Sammy throwin' at him it'd look like Montana to Rice all over again...
But Tree has no QB and Brad has no receivers (at least not a true #1).
What're you a Niners fan?
Montana to Rice ALL OVER AGAIN??? Like those were the real glory days?
Just jivin’
Smith is doing a fine job. He was a quality RT last year as a quasi rookie. He, like Mardy, is gonna be better this year.
by Pekka for Predator Pontiff on Apr 5, 2011 11:52 AM CDT up reply actions
Smith looked pretty good in run-blocking
And Sam wasn’t on the turf most of the time he rolled right
The grade on Smith is incomplete, but he's an animal run bocker and mostly unknown as a pro LT
He’s not as good a pass blocker as Saffold, and I think getting someone as good as Saffold tinges the view on Smith quite a bit. Finding someone better only 31 picks later doesn’t mean Smith is a bust.
It’d be a different conversation if Smtih had stayed at LT and developed a little more there, people wouldn’t have the argument that his value is so much lower because he plays RT.
I hate calling someone who has really good parts to his game a bust. The guy is a vicious run blocker who is extremely tenacious, but yeah he’s a step below what appears to be a franchise LT in Saffold at pass blocking.
Overall, in only one full year of play, we have basically an absence of evidence at the LT spot. And absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. (as Ed would say, cipher on that a while)
He only gave up about 4 sacks last year
That is pretty good. And he is a good run blocker. What is the problem again? Oh yea, it is that people don’t know anything about football.
If you love something, set it free. If it doesn't come back, find it and kill it.
Quote: "Oh yea, it is that people don’t know anything about football." Self-appraisal there Pyle?
Re: Smith. I didn’t see all that great run-blocking and I don’t think SJax did either. He might look ok compared to our other linemen like Goldberg or Bell, but that ain’t sayin’ much. And, no four sacks ain’t bad, if that’s right. But I’d give some credit to Sam’s scrambling ability and the fact that we played the 2nd easiest schedule in the NFL in 2010.
The biggest issue is that Smith is getting paid more per year than Saffold will earn in four. It just makes the situation unfair when the left tackle is considered to be the cornerstone of the offensive line. I wouldn’t say it was a horrible pick but it highlights the need to reduce the amount of money spent on high draft picks. Players should have to earn the amount of money that some currently see in their first contract.
Interchangeable?
LoL…its not as easy as you think Van. Try telling a lineman he’ll be swapping from left to right or vice versa from time to time. He won’t be happy. I said it back then and I’ll say it again, if we take an OT at 2 overall, better be J. Long material. Smith isn’t anywhere close to Long. It was a poor choice at 2….but then again, Billy D isn’t known for his drafting acumen..ahem Ryan Leaf….anyone who had anything to do with the drafting of Leaf, shouldn’t be making decisions for an NFL team
by JordansDad on Apr 5, 2011 1:53 AM CDT via mobile reply actions
Each draft year has different ability in players...
The year we drafted Smith, there wasn’t a Jake Long in the draft. So, how can you say we should draft a Jake Long that wasn’t there?
Look at this year, we drafted Sam Bradford #1 last year and might have taken Suh instead and would have been very happy with that pick… but neither player of that quaility is in the draft this year. So whoever takes Cam or Blaine, they should just assume they will be the same as Sam last year?
Each draft year has a different level of players available. You can’t assume you’ll get a future pro-bowler at that #1 spot or #2 spot each year.
Which, brings back the fact that there does need to be a rookie wage scale and let the players earn big money after they prove they are pro-bowlers.
Right on Jord. We took a most coveted pick and got a mediocre player. Well, at least he can start unless he get that soft-head smacked.
Just curious...
Who would everyone had picked in the 2009 draft that would have been better than Smith and would have been worthy of the #2 pick at the time of the draft (no monday morning QB-ing)?
#2 was too high to take Crabtree....he fell to 10th for a reason.
And I’m not sure, but is he even that good?
by Pekka for Predator Pontiff on Apr 5, 2011 11:56 AM CDT up reply actions
eh... Crabtree is good at whining about...
not getting top 5 money when he dropped to 10th. It’s good to hold out on your team for half a season just to move up a couple of dollars.
In a way...
you have to be proud of Spags for realizing that Saffold is a better LT than Smith and that Spags had the cohona’s (sp?) to move the cheaper player to LT. As for Smith, he’s a world above Barron for that RT spot!!! :-)
I still Love Barron for that play he made...
at the end of the Cowboys game to give the Redskins that win!!!!! :-)
I've heard this several times...
but maybe someone can explain it to me?
Why can’t you take a guy who has played Right Tackle and Left Tackle… and just plug him in at either spot? Smith was playing Left, but we moved him to Right because Saffold was the better Tackle. But if Saffold goes down for an injury, we couldn’t we just move Smith over to Left?
I like having Smith and Saffold for that reason, gives us a little depth at that Left tackle position.

by 


























