2011 Draft: Rounds 1-3 A Respectful Antithesis
Yes, this is reactionary. Yes, this is full of praise for our FO. Yes, I like our draft picks. No, I'm no expert. No, I do not absolutely love these picks. No, screw the intensive draftniking research this is my opinion.
After exploring the draft results a little on TST, it seems to me that the general consensus is dissatisfaction. While I agree that the picks are utterly shocking, that doesn't have to breed hate. I think that psychologically, the main reason that we are so against the draft so far is that each of us went into the draft with an idea in our heads of exactly what we want, and then when all of our dream picks did not come true we found ourselves dissatisfied. Sorry guys, as much as I'd love it, we can't have a draft of: Jones, Quinn, Austin, Carter, Jarret, Sands, Foster, McClain, Hunter, LeShoure. Why?
- The draft boards that we make in our heads are worth nil. The Rams FO has a draft board and for the most part they are sticking to it.
- Our arm-chair analyses are mostly based on the arm-chair analyses of other people and a few Youtube clips. The FO was all over the place drilling these players and seeing what they could do in real life. Obviously they saw something that we needed.
- Other teams want the same players that we want cause they're good, duh.
- We have a system in place. We can't take our favorite college player and just insert it into the system and expect Spags to work to our whim, he and Josh McDaniels know what they're doing. Josh is running a 2 TE system that made Tom Brady an MVP last year. Spags is solidifying the pass rush and doing what he did in New York, coaching up a secondary to play our system without relying on one player.
After all has been said, I'm honestly happy that the team is starting to take some shots. I think that the push to build a formidable offense is more gutsy drafting than we've ever seen in the Rams' St. Louis tenure. Instead of calling us down and out before: free agency, 3 more draft picks, undrafted free agents, training camp; I'm going to put my faith in the dice until they prove me wrong. Now, I'm calling this a gamble now, but obviously if we draft 3 more tight ends, that's stupidity. But how I see the rest of our draft shaping up is: Safety, Running Back, Guard Now, lets take a look at how each player will help us.
1st - Robert Quinn Best pass rusher in the draft. Need I say more? Probably not, but there are those stubborn scrooges. Robert Quinn is all about speed and hand moves. 260 lbs is big but no overwhelming so there's probably little chance of him being moved inside to play tackle. (Adam Carriker...) However, don't rule out some creative line packages by Spags. We even saw the smaller George Selvie play (and I should mention succeed) on the inside of the line occasionally with Hall and Long outside still. When discussing our DE choice, Hall is usually the main topic of discussion because he is who the draft pick is most likely replacing. However, Long is really the key to why Quinn is such a good pick. More specifically, the Long-Quinn tandem. Quinn's skill set is what Long lacks, elite speed, explosiveness, nastiness. Long on the other hand, is a GREAT right end. He's got power, smarts, leg drive, motor, and balance. On the right side of the line, Long keeps contain and can maintain his position, constantly putting a pressure on the QB. Quinn, on the other side of the line, is the finisher, the man who will get the sacks. My favorite aspect of watching Quinn's highlights is his explosiveness. For most people, that word is thrown around without much translation that's easily visible. For Quinn, what I see, is engaging a block and then suddenly turning on the speed to explode around and sack the QB. Lastly, the surgically removed benign brain tumor is not going to come back with a gun and kill the man. Lets let the team doctors be doctors and the fans be fans.
2nd - Lawrence Kendricks SURPRISE! Everyone felt it, and we all probably reacted badly at first. Honestly, I was hoping for us to pick Austin so that the entire UNC line that dominated the ACC would eventually be our line. However, after a few hours of contemplation and after seeing our Pettis pick, Kendricks makes sense. McDaniels is building his offense. Bring in a new offensive coordinator, bring in new offensive players. Obviously we will be implementing a new scheme and based on New England's success, McDaniels is probably looking to add a 2TE component to his "amoeba" offense. We all saw what the Patriots did with Aaron Hernandez and Rob Gronkowski last year. With Hoomanawanui and Kendricks, we have a much more talented duo and should be able to produce, in my opinion, at least the same results. Kendricks is the fastest tight end in this draft and as good of as pass catcher as any of our WR's save Danny. Kendricks brings the speed in a TE that can break away from those sneaky intermediate passes that explode after one good block. Also, multiple tight ends keep rushing 3-4 linebackers occupied. What teams have 2 great pass coverage LB's? There's got to be a mismatch somewhere. Sorry Fendi, we need football players, not basketball players. Though it'd be fun to see Shaq play offensive tackle. Lastly, he's from WISCONSIN! His blocking can't be too bad.
3rd - Austin Pettis Honestly, Pettis was the best WR on the board still. If we are talking risk/reward, Pettis is the much safer choice over Hankerson, who plays out to be a very risky choice imo. Based on the drafting after this point, Pettis most likely would have been gone had we not taken him here too. Pettis is the hands man. While obviously they aren't the same caliber of a prospect, Pettis reminds me of Calvin Johnson the way that he jumps and uses his body/hands. He isn't nearly as fast as Johnson, speed and separation is probably Pettis' biggest weakness, but for a jump ball, he has similarities. Standing at 6'3, he's taller than most of our diminutive WR corps. He will be a major red zone threat and a reliable pass catcher. Reliable hands is something that we've cried about over and over, and this is the answer. He will be that big guy to make circus catches like Danny but not get bullied around in the traffic.
Imagine An offense with Avery developing into a successful burner. Alexander making strides towards his #1 potential. And the massive bodies of Jackson, Hoomanawanui, Pettis, and Kendricks running around in the red zone. Personally, I like it.
13 comments
|
5 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Completely agree
I think McHoody is building his offense and we shouldn’t diss it until it fail us. I think all three of these guys have the potential to start from day one to be honest and I like how they drafted. Not the “sexy” picks but they are good.
Get some impact players!!
Danario is the deep threat if he stays healthy
Neither Kendricks nor Pettis will stretch the field like Danario. The odd men out will be Fells and Laurent, imo.
First off Bravo on YOUR outlook
Now Mc D wasnt apart of NE’s team when Gronkowski and Hernandez were pick/played so that theory is ish off the bat. Quinn was a total Boom right off the bat and should factor right away as a pass rusher so bravo on that call. Kendricks is a huh? Yea I get why they did it and if it were Rudolph I probably wouldnt be as upset but it still doesnt make sense. Then there’s Pettis, solid yea good hands yea value well maybe a reach but if not Smith in the 2nd then why him? and this redzone thing is stupid too….isnt that why we drafted Hoho and Kendricks anyway plus DX and ummm oh yea SJax. this one has to be the biggest head scratcher and i guess imma wait to see what tomorrows like but if we dont get some serious OLB,S,RB,DT,OG help somewhere then we are 7-9 fuk’d…again
"Victory at all costs, victory in spite of all terror, victory however long and hard the road may be; for without victory there is no PLAYOFFS."
Winston Churchill
What exactly is your position in the Ram FO?
And, you are incorrect. Quinn still has a tumor. It was not removed, just aspirated.
I like it too
And the thing we shouldn’t forget is this year FA is after the draft, so needs can still be filled. There’s some good defensive player available and they shouldn’t be too expensive, see Cofield, Mikell or Lawson.
Why do you think they are going to be available?
All signs point to the league using the six year rule for unrestricted FA again. Cofield has been tendered since he doesn’t have six years yet. I’m not sure about the other two you mention, but many of the guys we thought looked good have been tendered and we won’t be getting them unless the owners suddenly have an amazing onset of good sense and the players realize they need to get serious with the negotiations.
Awesome article.
I was thinking the same things.
Obviously the front office does not perceive our needs to be what a lot of fans do. I think we did a couple of things so far in this draft:
1. A huge problem last year was having WRs that could not catch the freaking ball. We drafted 3 receivers whose greatest strength is having great hands. The will catch the ball, thereby making our offense much better. And the 2-TE formations is eactly why we took a TE. Boy I was screaming WTF at the TV. But that’s gonna work out just fine.
2. We don’t need an OG. Goldberg wasn’t very good last year, I grant that. But when you have ZERO vertical passing game, it’s easy to load up in the box and exploit the OL. With the addition of some receiving threats, that will be far more difficult for teams to do this year. Greco is a good backup and I"m not convinced that he won’t be the starter.
3. Do we really need a DT? Gibson is undersized. But that can be overcome hopefully in the FA period when it comes. Cofield? I think all we need is an average DT to replace Gibson and our front foursome will be fearsome. With Quinn and Long at the bookends they’ll get a lot of sacks and take some pressure off the DTs. And who knows? Maybe Cudjo/Scott will be really to start this year.
4. Spags has never had great LBs. Furthermore, I liked Josh Hull from last year’s preseason. Maybe add Homan in the 7th if he’s still available? In any event, this is a position that had to be sacrificed in order to add some weapons for Bradford.
5. Backup RB? Sure, it’d be nice to have one. But we have SJ39, so its not imperative.
I’m not saying in the latter comments that we don’t need upgrades at these positions. But obviously Spags/Devaney think it best to upgrade at some other positions first. I’m really excited about seeing our new offense next year. And if they’re better / average next year, then the D is gonna be the beneficiary, cause they were already good last year.
I am hopeful.
That’s my story and I’m sticking to it :)
The truth is always the right answer....
by Pekka for Predator Pontiff on Apr 30, 2011 5:24 PM CDT reply actions
Round 3 and 4 are the same guy!
I actually like Salas better than Pettis. I would have been o.k. with either in round 4 and picked up an OG or Safety in the third. As I see it, Doss or Hankerson were available and would have been a much better choice than Pettis at round 3. Not terrible, just kind of a wasted opportunity. Really sorry we didn’t get an OL pick as this draft was deep there. So, a missed opportunity to get Austin or Paea in round 2. And a missed opportunity to do OL or OLB in round 3. I really hate that we didn’t take Laurence Guy, DT from Ariz. St. with one of our Round 7 picks. I did like the project OLB from, Stephen F. Austin as a project and special teams guy. I’m anxious to see if we can upgrade via some free agency!
Your comment on Kendricks
“sorry Fendi, we need football players not basketball players.” Sorry Kendricks, we need football players, not combine freaks
Remember the great 2004 and 2005 Rams teams...
by Marmie is the best on May 1, 2011 4:20 PM CDT reply actions



























