Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Most Dangerous Division in Sports

HOF 2015

Barring comeback attempts, Torry Holt, Isaac Bruce, Kurt Warner, and Orlando Pace will all become eligible for the Hall of Fame in 2015.  Warner, Bruce, and Pace seem like sure bets, while Holt is more of a question mark due to his big-peak and relatively short career. 


Star-divide

The questions I have, for those of you that have followed the selection process, is what are Holt's chances, what are the first ballot chances of the other three, and does having the core of a great team on the ballot together hurt each individual's chances or do they reinforce each other?

<!--Session data-->

Comment 32 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Sadly, I don't think any of them are shoe-ins.

Especially Kurt Warner.

A brief look at Approximate Value (weighted) on ProFootballRefernce, the candidates rank as follows:

118. Bruce -tied with HOFers Ray Nitschke, Gary Zimmerman, Franco Harris, Raymond Berry and Jim Parker. Also tied with non-HOFers Ricky Watters, Rod Smith, Mark Tingelhoff and Donovan McNabb

128. Pace – tied with HOFers Shannon Sharpe, James Lofton, Buck Buchanan and Sonny Jurgensen. Also tied with non-HOFers Maxie Baughan, Curtis Martin, Jonathan Ogden and Champ Bailey

137. Holt – tied with HOFers Len Dawson, Bart Starr, Len Ford, Lou Groza and Jim Otto. Also tied with non-HOFers Richmond Webb, Steve McMichael, Mike Kenn, Tiki Barber, Steve McNair, Brian Dawkins, Sam Mills, Lamar Parrish

177. Warner – tied with HOFers Larry Wilson and Lenny Moore. Also tied with non-HOFers Mark Brunell, Bill Bergey, Roman Gabriel, Walter Jones, Jim Tyrer, Jim Hart, Henry Ellard, L.C. Greenwood, Will Shields and Lomas Brown.

In total, Bruce is ranked at a level with 5 HOFers and 4 non-HOFers (6-3 if you think McNabb will make it, and I do). Pace at a level that’s 4-4. Holt at a level that’s 5-8. Warner at a level that’s 2-10.

Granted, I am not counting the players above/below their rank level (ie Bruce is ranked above 33 HOFers and below 9 non-HOFers), and Approximate Value isn’t the be all end all of HOF credentials. It is, however, just another measure by which to compare players across eras and positions.

If I were a voter, I absolutely vote Bruce and Pace in. I’d need some thinking time for Holt and Warner.

"I have something 95 percent of all those All-Stars only wish they had: a World Series ring. If I had to choose between that and being an All-Star, it would be no contest. I’d grab the gold ring and never look back." -Tim Salmon

by BruinHalo on Feb 7, 2011 12:31 PM CST reply actions  

Warner is a HOFer

Everyone knows you have to throw out stats when considering Warner.
Undrafted QB, the bag boy, Arena/Europe league, 2 separate clubs to the Superbowl, departure both clubs take massive dives.

Warner is in before Bruce/Pace/Holt.

by OcRamfan on Feb 7, 2011 3:22 PM CST up reply actions  

I actually don't know if that's true

I remember back to Warner’s Super Bowl with the Cards against the Steelers, and many of the writers, pundits, etc said that Warner needed that victory to secure a place in Canton. Well, he didn’t get it, and I wouldn’t be surprised if a QB who was 1-2 in Super Bowls didn’t make it.

I recall that there are a lot of HOF voters out there who look down on his short time in the NFL and the fact that he had like 4 good, complete seasons without injury or benching. That’s a short tenure for a HOF player.

Perhaps another way to look at it: should Warner be considered one of the best QBs ever? Look at the list of HOF QBs (modern times, 1970s+, for comparisons sake):

Troy Aikman, Terry Bradshaw, John Elway, Dan Fouts, Jim Kelly, Dan Marino, Joe Montana, Warren Moon, Joe Namath, Bart Starr, Roger Staubach, Fran Tarkenton, Johnny Unitas, Steve Young.

That’s a pretty damn talented crop of QBs. In my opinion, I have a hard time placing Warner among that list. Looking just at the 1990s, there’s 6 QBs (Aikman, Elway, Kelly, Marino, Montana, Young). Each of these players had careers that spanned nearly 2 decades and have that mythic nature about them.

For the late 1990s/2000s, we’re looking at Brady, Manning, Favre, McNabb and probably Brees/Rivers. Does Warner belong in that crowd? During the 1999 and 2001 Super Bowl runs, yeah I guess so. But that’s just 2 years. Those guys listed above exemplified HOF play every year. For a long career.

I love Kurt Warner. He’s the kind of guy I wish I was friends with. But unfortunately due to his rough path to the NFL and the fact that he sucked on the Giants, I’d have to think long and hard about voting him into the HOF.

"I have something 95 percent of all those All-Stars only wish they had: a World Series ring. If I had to choose between that and being an All-Star, it would be no contest. I’d grab the gold ring and never look back." -Tim Salmon

by BruinHalo on Feb 7, 2011 3:40 PM CST up reply actions  

No way Rivers can ever be considered a HOF QB until he wins something

preferrably a superbowl, maybe a few more playoff games.

He’s good but I doubt he ever wins the big one. He’s a stat monster like Romo but despite winning in the reg season in the clutch he has yet to prove he can do it at crunch time.

Brees needs to continue being awesome for 3 years too. With the likely 18 game sched QB’s will need to win more than one superbowl to be considered, or to put up 5000 yard seasons on a regular basis.

Bradford to Onobun!

by Infemous on Feb 8, 2011 6:30 AM CST up reply actions  

Super Bowls aren't necessarily required

You do need to be amazing though if you never win one. Just look at Marino or Kelly.

"I have something 95 percent of all those All-Stars only wish they had: a World Series ring. If I had to choose between that and being an All-Star, it would be no contest. I’d grab the gold ring and never look back." -Tim Salmon

by BruinHalo on Feb 8, 2011 9:50 AM CST via mobile up reply actions  

or at least get to one lol

i really don’t think Rivers has the demeanour to win a superbowl.
he seems like he throws a strop when stuff doesn’t go his way instead of rally the team.

Really, this comes from my perception tht Rivers is a bitch. A good QB, but a bitchy bitch mcbitcherson.

Bradford to Onobun!

by Infemous on Feb 8, 2011 10:32 AM CST up reply actions  

so true

"I have something 95 percent of all those All-Stars only wish they had: a World Series ring. If I had to choose between that and being an All-Star, it would be no contest. I’d grab the gold ring and never look back." -Tim Salmon

by BruinHalo on Feb 8, 2011 1:33 PM CST up reply actions  

this is incredibly dumb
Everyone knows you have to throw out stats when considering Warner.

"And a boring game for boring people. Did you ever watch golf on television? It's like watching flies FUCK. Think of the intellect it must take to draw pleasure from this activity: hitting a ball with a crooked stick and then WALKING AFTER IT" -George Carlin

TWITTER

by stlcardsfan4 on Feb 8, 2011 1:36 PM CST up reply actions  

It's interesting

Warner has the stats just not the longevity.

"I have something 95 percent of all those All-Stars only wish they had: a World Series ring. If I had to choose between that and being an All-Star, it would be no contest. I’d grab the gold ring and never look back." -Tim Salmon

by BruinHalo on Feb 8, 2011 2:49 PM CST up reply actions  

care to clarify then?

this is how i’ve always viewed warner, now if you think its wrong, explain.
I’m more of a story person, maybe its baseball advance stats mentality that’s part of your view.

Here’s where i’m coming from,
02 injured,
03 no chance broken hand goodbye starting job,

04 starts with NYG (2 year deal), 5-2 then two defeats and Manning2 gets a starting job, NYG 6-10, what was the wildcard picture that year? oh right 8-8 Rams/Vikings/Saints

05 starts with Cards, groin/MCL injuries, (3 game span nearing 1,000 total yards)
06 yet again goodbye starting job to Leinart, enjoy the backup role
07 back up until game 5, 8-8 cards.

08 superbowl
09 amazing playoff game against Packers, serious did you guys watch that game? 51-45, dear lord was the pretty.

shorten version
02-03 injuries, i blame on Martz, see Bulger
04 new team, playoff chances, pulled early for Manning 2.0
05 new team, injuries, however 1,000 yards total in 3 games?
06-07 played back up Leinart, reminders of Manning situation anyone?
08-09 yep still great.

by OcRamfan on Feb 8, 2011 6:16 PM CST up reply actions  

it seems though that while he was great his entire career

he got injured some and didn’t play, through circumstances out of his control, but still did not play.

he has production from when he played and the story, but he just did not play enough.

I’d always consider him one of the best ever and a revolutionary player for the position just for being in the GSOT but I think non partial football fans would struggle to put him in the top 5 of QBs who played during his career.

Thus in my estimation it looks like a long shot but still possible, QB’s always go in.
They should try and lower the number of QB’s going into the HOF imo.
need more linemen and WRs

Bradford to Onobun!

by Infemous on Feb 9, 2011 7:29 AM CST up reply actions  

That leads me to think this:

If all QBs of all time were available in a draft, how far down would Warner fall? Would he even be first round?

"I have something 95 percent of all those All-Stars only wish they had: a World Series ring. If I had to choose between that and being an All-Star, it would be no contest. I’d grab the gold ring and never look back." -Tim Salmon

by BruinHalo on Feb 9, 2011 4:40 PM CST up reply actions  

well for one, there are a ton of players who if not injured would have make the HOF, but didn't

no idea why Warner deserves to be the exception (and for what it’s worth, I just don’t think he has the longevity that he needs))

Injuries are a part of the game and so are new playbooks and your supporting casts – wonder how many players were actually good enough, but never had the stats because of their team

You can’t just say that Warner played bad or little beucase this happened or this happened because that’s part of the game and you have to judge his whole career

"And a boring game for boring people. Did you ever watch golf on television? It's like watching flies FUCK. Think of the intellect it must take to draw pleasure from this activity: hitting a ball with a crooked stick and then WALKING AFTER IT" -George Carlin

TWITTER

by stlcardsfan4 on Feb 13, 2011 11:24 PM CST up reply actions  

I think Torry Holt should sign and retire a Ram

And then team up with Bruce and become WR coaches.

"We start wit straight--shots then get the bottle poppin!"

by OGC Reds on Feb 7, 2011 2:57 PM CST reply actions  

Three highest passing yard games in Super Bowl history.

1. Kurt Warner
2. Kurt Warner
3. Kurt Warner

http://www.nfl.com/superbowl/45/categorystats?tabSeq=0&statisticCategory=PASSING

If it doesn't matter who wins or loses, then why do they keep score?

by Blair Rocket on Feb 7, 2011 3:47 PM CST reply actions  

I don't see how Isaac Bruce isn't a first ballot HOFer

7th in career receptions, 3rd in career receiving yards and 9th in career receiving TDs. If he’s not first ballot, I’m gonna have some issues with how they select WRs.

Turf Show Times editor, Mocking the Draft writer, and I gots that Twitter too, yo.
"my keyboard won't corporate, neighter will my smell check."

by 3k on Feb 7, 2011 4:37 PM CST reply actions  

List of HOF WRs

Fred Biletnikoff, BobHayes, Don Hutson, Charlie Joiner, Steve Largent, James Lofton, Don Maynard, TommyMcDonald, Art Monk, Jerry Rice, John Stallworth, Lynn Swann, Charley Taylor, Paul Warfield

Should Bruce be in there?

Yes.

"I have something 95 percent of all those All-Stars only wish they had: a World Series ring. If I had to choose between that and being an All-Star, it would be no contest. I’d grab the gold ring and never look back." -Tim Salmon

by BruinHalo on Feb 7, 2011 5:14 PM CST up reply actions  

It has been interesting listening to Bernie Miklasz on 101ESPN

recently. He is one of the 44 voters for the NFL HOF, and was the lead presenter for Marshall Faulk this year. When discussing the possibilities of the various candidates this year, never once did he mention Approximate Value or any other metric of that sort. It was all about typical measures (TDs, yards, receptions, sacks, leadership, etc.), plus whether the team won and how much credit the guy gets for that.

Each of the 15 candidates has one member of the 44 who presents his stats and the reasons to consider him as a HOF member. The group then discusses that guy some, moves on to the next presentation, and so on until they get through all 15. They then cut the field to 10 and go through it again. Eventually they get down to the last 5 and take a final up or down vote for them.

I think the four Rams in question all have a chance to be elected, but none of them is a shoo-in. One problem for Bruce and Holt is that no WRs are being elected these days. When Chris Carter doesn’t even make the top 10, it looks like there is a real roadblock to getting new WRs elected. Bruce has a better chance than Holt, but I don’t think either is a cinch to make it – especially in their first year. Bruce definitely deserves to be there, but somehow the logjam for WRs needs to be broken first. Pace will have to deal with Willie Roaf every year, so he is probably only 50-50. Warner has a chance simply because of his spectacular stats in his good years, the way he took three teams to the Super Bowl and they both fell apart the year after he left, and his great story. Again, I don’t think he will win on the first ballot, but he still has a chance.

by andyhawk on Feb 7, 2011 5:12 PM CST reply actions  

I spend too much time on baseball blogs

I need to lay off the advanced metrics. HOF voters on the NFL side of things don’t really follow that stuff as closely.

Also, when you put it into the context that you just did, I have a hard time seeing anyone but Bruce or Pace making it through the ringer.

"I have something 95 percent of all those All-Stars only wish they had: a World Series ring. If I had to choose between that and being an All-Star, it would be no contest. I’d grab the gold ring and never look back." -Tim Salmon

by BruinHalo on Feb 7, 2011 5:16 PM CST up reply actions  

I don't think the metrics will ever work in football

The fact is depending on what team you play on, the style of play, the amount of time on the field, targets, touches, weather, etc. all effect the stats of players. It is just way to many variables to deal with so the metrics won’t be as accurate as they are in baseball.

There is no substitute for victory

by Brandon Birkhead on Feb 7, 2011 6:57 PM CST up reply actions  

Yup I didn't know the process either

       I’m thinkin Roaf needed to go in a long time ago. You’re right if Roaf isn’t in what O-lineman should be in. That makes me think there’s not enough Roaf representation. I hope he does make it in, and Pace, shortly after.
      Warner should go in1st or 2nd. Bruce maybe, but Holt, no. Not my hope but my opinion.

Wolf. Wolfgang Wolf

by dbcouver on Feb 7, 2011 5:33 PM CST up reply actions  

This was Roaf's first year of eligibility.

You have to be retired for 5 years before you are eligible. He made it through the cut down from 15 to 10, but lost out when they cut down to 5. He will have a better chance next year.

by andyhawk on Feb 7, 2011 9:31 PM CST up reply actions  

Wow I thought Roaf had been gone for like 15 years

        He’s nearly 8 years younger than me. I’ll be damned.

Wolf. Wolfgang Wolf

by dbcouver on Feb 7, 2011 11:03 PM CST up reply actions  

Bruce maybe?!?!?!

He has the second most receiving yards of all time, there is not way he doesn’t get in.

Rugby is a beastly game played by gentlemen, soccer is a gentlemen's game played by beasts and US football is a beastly game played by beasts.
Henry Blaha

by Brandon Birkhead on Feb 7, 2011 9:37 PM CST up reply actions  

Of the four

I think Bruce has the best chance of making it. Warner and Pace have a fair chance. I don’t think Holt makes it. But you just never know. It will be fun to watch.

by andyhawk on Feb 7, 2011 9:43 PM CST up reply actions  

I'd say Bruce is a lock

Pace has a massive chance, he was flat out awesome for a long time.

Holt, not so much, if he continued his production throughout his career he’d probably be considered.

Warner is an outside bet. I love the guy, love what he did and have no doubt he was a great QB, but if he gets in it’s purely because of some great lobbying on grounds of emotion and his story.

His play speaks for itself, but it was only for a few years. I hope he gets in, but he needs to come in after Bruce and Pace.

Bradford to Onobun!

by Infemous on Feb 8, 2011 6:28 AM CST reply actions  

In addition to the four Rams first being eligible in 2015,

OT Walter Jones and LB Junior Seau will both become eligible that year. That means Pace will be up against Jones, and maybe Roaf if he hasn’t gotten in by then. Big O isn’t a slam dunk by any means. Listening to Bernie Miklasz today it was clear he thinks Jones was better than Pace. Pace will have to stand in line until the other two OTs get in first.

There are only 21 WRs in the HOF. There is a real logjam at the position, with no new ones getting in lately. Bruce certainly should make it at some point, but the logjam needs to be broken first so WRs are more seriously considered.

Like everyone says, Warner is a special case. Whether he gets in or not depends more on his story and his few great years than upon his career stats. Holt is the least likely of the group to make it, and rightly so. There are other WRs in line ahead of him who were just as good as Holt, and he isn’t likely to leapfrog over them.

by andyhawk on Feb 8, 2011 11:13 PM CST reply actions  

Warner is likely a first ballot HOFer. Those voters have already shown us what they think of him by placing him in their top 100 players of all time(NFL Network)

Bruce will get in, but I foresee a Andre Reed or Cris Carter type wait.

Pace and Holt will not get in. They shone brightly for a while, but didn’t sustain their high play long enough because of injuries.

by Ram_Country on Feb 9, 2011 6:19 AM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about St. Louis Rams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Cletus-the-slack-jawed-yokel-7_small
Attention All Dome Lemmings: Shut Up!
Img_20120429_144716_small
Quick Thoughts: CVC Proposal vs Rams Proposal
Small
New York Giant And Medal Of Honor Winner: 1st Lt Andrew Jackson Lummus
Small
St. Louis Rams:Tough Call - Who Stays And Who Goes In 2013?
Marshall-faulk-1999_small
St. Louis Rams Coaching- The Offensive Line

Recent FanPosts

L50i99-l50i4n0704ohiostaterams_small
Does Mike Karney Deserve A Second Shot?
Small
How many games will the Rams win this coming year??
Small
My Early 53 Man Roster Predictions
Stewie_small
Time To Step Up Bradford
Images_small
Mocking the 53
Small
Rams Land a Litter in Ground-Breaking Trade
Small
40 Years of Ram Football

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Cover the web with Turf


Managers

71523_170793669601439_100000124211145_596632_5713708_n_small Ryan Van Bibber

Baby_drinking_becks_small 3k

Editors

Jackson_medium_small Eric Nagel

Peter_small VTramsFan

Bugs_bunny_pose_small Douglas M

Authors

Marshall-faulk-1999_small papapegasus

Lggn0229jules-and-vincent-cartoon-pulp-fiction-poster_small Rick Siegel

Images-3_small DCRamFan

Bradford_draft_small Josh Wehrle

Tst_small Tevin Broner

Images_small Brick Top

Plaid_small EddieP

Profile_pic1_small Mike Dietrich

Sp-studio1_small Joe Mazzi

Moderators

Dsc03827_small CoachConnors