More Fantasy Value: Amendola or Gilyard?
by DCRamFan on Sep 6, 2010 8:06 PM CDT
Email
PrintJust curious for the Rams fans out there that have the gusto to draft their own, who has more fantasy football value by seasons end: Danny Amendola or Mardy Gilyard? Either could prove beneficial in the slot, on special teams, and both have the skillsets to turn short- into long-yardage plays. Does Amendola hold his starting gig with the addition of Mark Clayton, or does Gilyard ease his way into the starting lineup? Does the addition of an unforeseen WR drop the value of either? The arrival of King Sam add's value to all involved. Just want the thoughts of Rams fans who might be willing to draft someone other than the tremendous Steven Jackson. Do either of the aforementioned have what it takes to be the Wes Welker of the 2010-11 season???
8 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Im in a 16 team 43 man roster dynasty league
and i drafted Amendola pretty late. So I am hoping he gets a ton of catches with 4-5 TD’s
Sam Bradford
Amendola all day
PPR monster and you can pretty much bet your house on him going undrafted unless you have some Ram homers in your league
Per fas et nefas - Latin translation="By Any Means Necessary"
Sleeper value?
I guess the question is more based around whether or not Sam makes either a fantasy sleeper by seasons end. Lets hope that they’re both relevant
yeah.
if we’re being honest here the answer is “none of the above.”
follow me on twitter @nickg105, @Rams_Fan_Voice
by stlcardinalsfang on Sep 7, 2010 11:29 AM CDT up reply actions
Say what?
Considering I picked up both Mark Clayton and Laurent Robinson in Free Agency in my league, I have to wonder what you’re doing looking at Amendola and Gilyard.
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2012 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
