Rams season hinges on game versus Washington, again
After their second close loss, the St. Louis Rams will regroup and try to overcome their fourth consecutive 0-2 start with home game against the Washington Redskins.
In week two last season, the Rams very nearly beat Washington. That game was decided by some poor receiving performances by the Rams, most notably Donnie Avery who had 1 catch in 6 attempts. Avery fumbled the ball on the 5-yard line, and the resulting turnover prevented the Rams from kicking what would have been a deciding field goal.
Though I doubt it would have reversed fortunes for the Rams significantly, a win over Washington last year would definitely have changed the overall feel of the 2009 season. Dropping the first two games of the season has put the Rams in a similar place.
Of course, this is a ostensibly a much better Washington team, one that features Donovan McNabb at QB and Mike Shanahan as head coach. The Rams should be a better team this season as well, but their first two games have done little to reaffirm that. A loss this week could very well dash any momentum the Rams had this year, not to mention whatever bit of fan enthusiasm remains.
A few tidbits worth sharing about this week's opponent...
Washington was supposed to have solved their offensive line issues with the first round selection of Trent Williams, who protected Sam Bradford during their playing days at Oklahoma. He left this week's game with a bruised knee and sprained toe, and his status for this week is uncertain. Tomorrow's practice will reveal more about his availability. If Williams is out this week, Shanahan could slide Jammal Brown to the left side and put Stephon Heyer on the right. Heyer replaced Williams last week and promptly got flagged for holding, negating a big play that Washington really could have used before eventually losing to Houston in OT.
Brown missed last season, and is said to still be finding his form. Mario Williams dominated Washington's line last week with 3 sacks, though McNabb still manged to throw for 426 yards.
The Rams didn't do a great job taking advantage of a weakened Oakland offensive line last week. If they intend to win this game, it will mean getting pressure on Donovan McNabb whose performance dropped off considerably after Williams left the game last week.
Washington has relied heavily on the passing game (small sample size warning), averaging 282 yards per game, but with just one receiving TD to show for their effort. They're averaging just 53.5 yards per game on the ground, with 2 rushing TDs, both of which came last week. Cowboys OT Alex Barron played the role of midwife in Washington's week 1 victory, getting flagged for holding on a play that would have resulted in a score.
Speaking of adjustments, maybe the Rams game plan this week will get some information from Pat Shurmur, McNabb's former QB coach with the Eagles, where he started working in 1999, McNabb's rookie year.
42 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Defensive strategy
We ran a solid amount of blitzes in week 1, and disguised them relatively well. We backed off last week, and played more coverage. It worked against Jason Campbell, but not Gradkowski. I don’t see how we don’t go back to something closer to the week 1 gameplan this week with Donovan at the helm.
You don't seem to want to accept the fact you're dealing with an expert in guerrilla warfare, with a man who's the best, with guns, with knives, with his bare hands. A man who's been trained to ignore pain, ignore weather, to live off the land, to eat things that would make a billy goat puke. In *St. Louis* his job was to dispose of enemy personnel. To kill! Period! Win by attrition. Well, *Steven Jackson* was the best.
Thats my hope
Its obvious (and should have been known by Rams fans coming into the season) that the D line can not get pressure by themselves – regardless of who is blocking. The blitzes are needed for QB pressure so I would like to see more – closer to week 1 use than last. I know it leaves secondary on islands, but its either that and hope you can get to QB or let him sit back and just wait till someone does get open.
I should be working right now...
since they seem to be pass lovers
what is our cb situtation looking like this week? Is everone healthy again?
yes
King should be a go, Dockery could be ready too
Turf Show Times
by Ryan Van Bibber on Sep 21, 2010 11:48 AM CDT up reply actions
I also felt that Murphy did ok
It’s always nice to get a turnover, especially from a rookie in the secondary when the game is on the line.
all i no
Is if we can pull off a w this week the nay sayers will come back. Not too worried about the running game but i am about the special teams. Our punt coverage was considerably worse last week wo chamberlain n hull n curry can run but doesn’t look like he can tackle. Hold mcnabb under 300 yrds n i say were in this game like the last two…
by markg1127 on Sep 21, 2010 11:20 AM CDT via mobile reply actions
yeah
all i can say about special teams is thank god we have a kicker who isn’t afraid to tackle….lol
I really like Bradford to Clayton
Clayton was covered mano-a-mano by Nnamdi Asomugha (probably the 2nd or 3rd best CB in the world) and Clayton was giving up 4 inches and 20 pounds in that match-up. Bradford and Clayton still managed to make the most of their very limited opportunities and with the 2 hookups for TD’s.
So does Washington have someone (or ones) that can shut the Rams duo down? Matt Shaub just ripped the skins for … are you ready?…..497 freaking yards. The Texans had 4 Receivers over 50 yards, and 2 of them went over 140.
Now I’m not saying the Rams offense is the Texans, and Clayton is not Andre Johnson of course, but damn, we’re talking nearly 500 yards the Skins gave up though the air. 2 guys with double digit receptions and a combined 300 receiving yards? That’s pretty heavy damage. That Redskins D has been exposed in a very serious way.
I think Bradford and Clayton will light it up this week, with the one big IF — the same if we have every week apparently — if the O-line can give him time. Hopefully the coaching staff can work around the loss of TE’s and get Amendola more catches than the running back…..
McNabb to Cooley has to be covered, and I think last week’s work against Mc Fadden was good prep for this week’s Portis matchup. Skins are only a 3 1/2 point favorite at home. If the Rams can stay mentally strong, I believe they can upset.
I am really hoping for an upset
but I have to say I am a little worried considering how deflated the boys got as soon as the raiders took the lead. They are going to have to be alot stronger than that mentally if we are going to pull wins this year. They will be the underdog more times than not. It was painful to watch them seem to kind of give up as soon as the second half momentum started changing.
I think VanRam was right when he said
if they had won that one, it’d be a different team. With a young team like this, it takes actually doing it to prove to their minds that it’s “expected.” That’s the advantage veteran teams have developed, and the Rams will just need to keep fighting until they get it for themselves.
by CoachConnors on Sep 21, 2010 5:14 PM CDT up reply actions
Yea i hope orapko doesn’t molest smith. N with bajema out we should try some of those heavy extra tackle lines that oak uses to give the samchise extra time. N i wouldn’t b suprised if haslett n carricker r out to prove something against us
by markg1127 on Sep 21, 2010 11:24 AM CDT via mobile reply actions
vs Washington
Can we try something new? There no way the dink n dunk will bring a win. Let’s give the what they absolutely will not be prepared for. A 3 & 4 WR set with Onobun at TE & WR. What have got to lose? If we can have success with mid and long range passing then they would have to abandon the slam Sam 8 in the box. I think San can do it, do you? What else we gonna do? Keep try what keeps failing?
The only thing comparable to a Rams win is a 49er loss!
by DevsLaRams on Sep 21, 2010 12:01 PM CDT via mobile reply actions
3 and out
If we are gonna have 3 and outs, and we will, let them be 3 long bombs and out.
The only thing comparable to a Rams win is a 49er loss!
by DevsLaRams on Sep 21, 2010 12:04 PM CDT via mobile reply actions
I don't think the season "hinges" on tomorrow
Redskins are probably a better team. A W would be tits – don’t get me wrong, but this was a 3 win team to start the season and it is more than likely a 3 win-ish team now. The Rams weren’t going anywhere THIS year regardless of how bad the division is.
The most important thing this season is the continued development of Bradford – which means Shurmur needs to either A) read TST to get a feel for his strategy Q rating and change it, or B) get a whats what talking to by Spags or even Bradford himself to open things up.
I should be working right now...
+1 about the "season not hinging on this game"
We are only a 3-5 win team anyway.
As for opening up..we need receivers to get down field and time to throw. Take a look at this past week’s “Flea Flicker”..Bradford could not follow thru to get the ball down field because Jason Smith had been pushed back into him.
The dink and dunks are not all designed as some are the 2nd & 3rd options when the design could be to go downfield.
Picture look like pass interference
by one mili-second
"The greatest accomplishment is not in never falling, but in rising again after you fall." - Vince Lombardi
it all hinges on the OLine
if they can hold up and give Bradford time to throw downfield we have a shot…. if they can’t skins will just stack the box on us and blitz all day….. dear oline…please hold up damn it
If the season hinges
on this game with Washington then all is lost. Washington is a much better team then it was last year and as was pointed out the Raiders OL was crap and we still could not do much about it. So to be perfectly honest our DL isn’t going to any thing more then they did last week. The honest outlook: another 1-15 season. Hope I’m wrong.
Im glade somone else is looking at the facts
The Rams or not going to beat washington McNabb wont let it happen and I dont know if we can beat the Detroit Loins now so if we dont that means the Rams are the worst team in football and they might not Win a game
How much longer is it going to take to be a playoff contender?
Another year, two, three??? We’re in probably, what is the worst division in the NFL so you would think things would look better than what they are. But. no… we are still at the bottom of this division, albeit we share the cellar with the 49ers.
How long will it be before we get a ‘true’ #1 WR? Next year, or the next? It’s really hard to stick by these Rams. I just hope once we do become a playoff contender we will be there for quite a while.
Go Rams! (haven’t given up on them so far)
"We can't run. We can't pass. We can't stop the run. We can't stop the pass. We can't kick. Other than that, we're just not a very good football team right now." --- Bruce Coslett, New York Jets Head Coach circa 1990s
IMO - Next year
and this coming from the guy who predicted only 3 wins this year.
This year (in my estimation) is all about maturation from the QB and tackle spots where we are incredibly young. As the season goes on on these guys get better by seeing more film and game action – they will be ok moving forward into next year (at least that is the hope).
Moving into next season the 2 primary holes that need to be addressed are the DL and the #1 WR spot. Asumming there is a season (and the whole matter could complicate things some), one should be addressed heavily in draft and the other through FA. With those 2 areas improved + a full season under the belt of Bradford, Saffold, and Smith (he was very limited last season) – the Rams should be in position to compete for the division (there will still be too many holes to compete for a SB – but enough for the division).
I should be working right now...
The Rams better dig deep
If your best shot is 14 points and a loss to oakland, you better take a trip to nepal and meditate with those monks that wrap themselves in scalding hot towels! LOL!
I'm hoping we can fix our issues for the 'Skins.
I hope that Shurmur realizes that he needs to mix it up on offense, do a lot of short stuff, medium stuff, and a bit of long stuff to keep the defense stretched out. Otherwise, they can condense when all you do is play around at the line of scrimmage. If Shurmur mixes things up, Jackson will get going, Bradford will get going if he has protection, and the offense will click. We have the players to be more effective than just 13.5 points a game on offense.
Execution needs to be better too, especially on the offensive line. We need Jason Smith to have a nice bounceback game against Washington, and Saffold needs to play well. Brown was fine last week, but neither Bell or Goldberg played well. That needs to change. Playing against the 3-4 that Washington employs, I’m worried about how the line responds.
The receivers played an underrated secondary against Oakland last week, and it’s not getting any easier against the ‘Skins. Last week, the Raiders played a bunch of press coverage because they knew we weren’t going deep. If the playcalling improves, the receivers might still be able to separation, but they definitely need to get better.
On defense, we should dress Bartell, Fletcher, Murphy, King at cornerback. We’ve only been going with three lately, and we are screwed if we lose somebody. We need to dress four. The secondary has a tough test, but they are good enough to succeed. I worry about the linebackers, who will have to cover Chris Cooley at tight end. We need Grant and Diggs to step up their play, and Animal Jr. needs to continue to be a beast. The Redskins don’t have an exceptional offensive line, so the defensive line needs to get good penetration to stop the running game. Hopefully our blitzes work well enough to rattle the offense, but they have a lot of veterans, especially McNabb, that might mean the blitz doesn’t work well.
We don’t need to play a perfect game, but we are going to need to play damn well if we want to have a chance at the upset.
sorry, it ain't gonna happen
Sure it would be great if our OC would realize the need to shake things up, but if he was that kind of person would he not have made those adjustments last year when out offense was the most pathetic in recent history. NO, he will stick to his guns and think that he knows more the the rest of us and continue down the path of 1-15.
by johnny scuba on Sep 21, 2010 7:20 PM CDT up reply actions
Seasoned
“As Fans we want the Rams to win every game” OFCOURSE WE DO! But let’s put this season into perspective. O.K., 0-2 is not a good start, but can you say this year is much better than last year at this time. This team can’t be measured by it’s record! It has to be with the product we’ve seen so far. This is a very young team and it shows on the field.
As pretty much a life long fan, I have seen the cycles that teams go though. We’re not there, yet! I’m preaching patence to the newer fans who didn’t see those losing years in the last few decades only to return to the playoffs and finally a Superbowl win.
Experience, a full year of progress, a good 2011 draft and a few good free agent signings will have the Rams in the playoff hunt by week 12 in 2011.
give up?
Nah, I’d never GIVE UP on my Rams but i feel I may THROW-UP.
The only thing comparable to a Rams win is a 49er loss!
by DevsLaRams on Sep 21, 2010 5:26 PM CDT via mobile reply actions
Like Marshall Faulk said,
EVERY GAME OM YOUR SCHEDULE IS THE MOST IMPORTANT GAME. I know we have a lot of pieces in place and some not, but I think this should carry over. I don’t feel like we are playing with ALL of the fervor that we need to. The defense is playing good, but the offense has to get to the point where its felt, its grabbed ahold of, and shaken like a rag doll. It’s just not there yet.
the should pick
johnson and basket up We need a little hope
everybody sucks on the rams until they don't play on their team anymore
then they become good magically
by stlcardsfan4 on Sep 22, 2010 9:57 AM CDT up reply actions

by 






























