Turf Show Times: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: College Football Rankings - BlogPoll Top 25

The Rams and the Rosenbloom legacy

For the most part, the national press never really understands the St. Louis Rams. There's a pretty simple explanation: losing teams in small markets don't get press. National pundits swoop in for one or two games a year, catch up at the Combine and the NFL Draft and then ignore the goings on at places like Rams Park. The latest example comes from the National Football Post (an outfit I really do like) and their franchise rankings that put the Rams dead last, the 32nd worst franchise out of the NFL's 32 total teams. 

Star-divide

Even the homers would have a hard time arguing with the ranking itself. Years of front office turf wars, bad drafts and a lack of enlightened football leadership since the middle of the decade have left the Rams with six wins in three years. In that time the team has lost the casual fans needed to sustain ticket and merchandise sales, not to mention national TV appearances that keep the team relevant in the national conversation. The fans that remain have grown exasperated and exhausted with it all, subsisting on a refugee diet of Steven Jackson's fantastic ability and that occasion win. 

But now there's hope. Fans have finally seen a few bright spots on the field, productive team drafts and visible signs of progress. It all starts on top where leadership changes have reinvigorated the Rams franchise. Whether fans agree with each individual move or not, it's undeniable that now the Rams finally have a front office steeped in the game and unfolding a cognizant plan for fielding a winning team. 

And that's where the franchise ranking piece from the NFP gets it wrong. The offending statement:

Rosenbloom likely won’t be upset that he is ranked last here since he and his sister Lucia Rodriguez are desperately trying to sell this team they inherited in 2008 along with a $200 million dollar-plus tax bill from their late mother Georgia Frontiere. And this is why the franchise is ranked last. Rosenbloom prefers to be a filmmaker than an NFL team owner and he is not making the investments in the franchise to do much more than suit up a team for games. Until ownership stabilizes this organization and reinvests in it, the Rams will be in caretaker mode despite having a talented coach in Steve Spagnuolo.

Yes, it's true Rosenbloom and his sister put the wheels in motion to sell the team within a relatively short time frame after inheriting it from their mother. But it was Rosenbloom who put the franchise back on track. In January 2008, the month Georgia Frontiere died and Rosenbloom was effectively the active owner for that 60 percent share of the team, the Rams hired Billy Devaney as director of pro personnel, bringing him in to save them from another terrible draft that the franchise could ill afford. 

The Rams continued their downward spiral in 2008, and four games into the season, the ineffective Scott Linehan was fired as head coach. On the field, you'll remember the Rams had a temporary bump, winning two games before coming back to earth as a team bereft of talent. Immediately following that season, Rosenbloom made the most important move of his tenure, eighty-sixing the inept Jay Zygmunt, reconciling family friend John Shaw to a marginal role as an advisor and hiring an experienced and knowledgable GM in Billy Devaney. From there Devaney was entrusted with the current rebuilding project, hiring Spagnuolo, severing the ties with the recent past and rebuilding the team from the inside out.

Last season was another tough one for fans to suffer through. Tough but expected, as the work of the front office would take time to catch up to the product on the field. Still, those moves were by far the most important moves the Rams could have made considering the woeful state of the neglected franchise. A focused and functional front office was the best investment Rosenbloom could have made. Those decisions will get the Rams franchise much further down the road to respectability than any free agent signing.

And what about the charge that the Rosenbloom hasn't been willing to spend money on the team? History says otherwise. Last spring, the Rams signed two players to bolster their paper thin offensive line, two contracts totaling almost $100 million dollars for free agent center Jason Brown and second overall draft pick OT Jason Smith. The team also re-signed CB Ron Bartell to a $25 million contract, rather than lose the only starting quality veteran they had at the position. This year, the Rams didn't make any splashes in free agency. Instead, they drafted QB Sam Bradford with the first overall pick in the NFL Draft. Any player taken at that spot would command an enormous investment, but a QB drafted at that spot will become the highest paid player in the NFL sometime in the next month, signing a deal worth more than $70 million and likely containing guarantees upwards of $50 million. That doesn't exactly sound like a team clutching tightly to its purse strings. 

Let's be honest. These moves were hardly selfless on the part of Rosenbloom. A crippling recession and years of mismanagement put the Rams' value in a tailspin. Rosenbloom had to stem the bleeding in order to maximize the amount he and his sister could receive for their 60 percent share of the team. 

Stan Kroenke is set to take the reigns in the near future, upping his 40 percent share to the whole enchilada. That bodes well for the Rams and their fans as Kroenke is a competitive sports owner who understands the value of a winning team. 

Once in danger of being tarnished by neglect, the long-time era of Rosenbloom ownership ended on a high note. That trumps any arbitrary ranking from the outside. 

0 recs  |  Comment 22 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Thanks for this, Van...

as you say, most of these national people have their heads so far up their ass, they don’t know if it’s night or day…I just wish these guys would do their homework…take the time to learn what is going on and assess it fairly, instead of relying on the same old assumptions…to me, the more interesting story is why is it taking so long for the league to resolve this situation with the ownership…Kroenke seems to be operating in good faith to live up to the league’s cross ownership rules…why isn’t he been given the same window to get into compliance that Wayne Huzinga of the Dolphins was given a number of years back? I think Van answers that partially in his second sentence: small market, losing team= no hurry…I don’t want to be a conspiracy theorist here, but I think we all agree that if this was another market, something would have been done by now.

by tbell61 on Jul 2, 2010 10:21 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Ahhhhh, the national media.

The same folks who also considered us a good team long after our time had passed.

by kswiss on Jul 2, 2010 12:22 PM CDT reply actions  

Georgia's gone. It's time to move on and get an aggressive owner(s) that will fork over the big bucks.

That factor is key in acquiring high-quality players. Despite his ultra-conservative political leanings, Rush Limbaugh had the mega-$$$ to buy us a SB or two within a couple years.

by RamChop on Jul 2, 2010 2:11 PM CDT reply actions  

?

In the era of the salary cap having mega dollars hardly sets a team ahead. Although there is no salary cap now, it’s likely there will be one. Look at the Patriots, we might hate them, but they knew how to build a franchise, and didn’t go out spending big bucks on free agents.

by RamsFan7 on Jul 2, 2010 4:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree...

Rush Limbaugh? Didn’t we handle this 5 months ago? He wouldn’t really bring much to the table financially or leadership-wise being a minority owner (no pun intended) . Kroenke owned 40% of the team and didn’t have that much push in team operations. Things will work out just fine for this team with the two candidates that are fighting for ownership rights. One owner can get a lot more done that a group of co-owners. And this team has had a lot of bad things happen to it; the last thing you need is an added distraction that polarizes the players and the fans. Only a small handful of people think that Limbaugh would have made a positive impact on the team and they’re all ditto-heads. Lets worry about the positive stuff thats going and leave that stuff in the past.

by Da Rams! on Jul 6, 2010 5:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree with what the report said for the most part. Let’s face it, we are the worst team in football and have been in the bottom 2 for 4 years now. The blame has to fall to somebody and not just guys that we kicked to the curb. If we win three this year, I don’t care what anyone says, that is a failure. We are being handcuffed by our ownership situation and not being aggressive in the trade and free agent markets. A team has not been built strictly through the draft since the salary cap was instituted during the Cowboys reign of terror. The Pats are the only team comparable to the 90’s Cowboys and they have brought in free agents left and right to plug holes. There are and were plenty of young players out there that should be wearing the horns this year. While the Jets, Lions, Browns, Dolphins and Raiders have been active, you will see a major improvement in their records not the 1-2 win improvement that we will have to struggle through this year as Rams fans. Again, I shouldn’t have to say this but; I want the Rams to win more than most I just don’t see a real effort to get there. Our drafts to this point under Spags and Devaney have yet to yield any superstars just a few capable starters. We did pick up a couple of solid free agents last year but this years pick ups were flat out weak. I know most of you will say we were adding depth….and I say….how do you add depth to starters when they should be the back ups? To me it’s like buying 2 broken down cars because your daily driver is broken down. Go Rams!

Ignorance is bliss and way too many people are happy.

by Everett 11 on Jul 3, 2010 11:29 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Agree that you don't need to add depth when the bulk of the team is backups and 6-7th rounders.

I was excruciatingly upset about this year’s FA acquistions, and have said so on here many times. I was much more happy about the rotten eggs, worn-out, and untalented players released; Bulger, Boller, McMicheals, Barron, Little, Lenon, etc. Now that we have Bradford with Jackson, I’ve been crying like a voice in the wilderness for adding a minimum of FOUR (4) good players at DE/DT, OLB, OL and b/u RB. Those additions would make a world of difference in the team. And, we have the perceived high value 2011 and 2012 draft picks to bargain with in an uncapped year. I say trade some 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th picks or any combination thereof to get us some good players in their prime. But, nobody’s listening. Most people don’t realize Spags has to win 10 of his next 20 games JUST to match the awful Linehan record. If we flail around at 3-13 or 4-12 this year with our much easier schedule, there’s a better than 50% chance the new owners will dump Devaney and Spags on the way back to LA and the TV money market. I want us to at least have a fighting chance.

by RamChop on Jul 4, 2010 5:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

They can't go back to LA until 2015

at the earliest. If they dump Spags and Devaney after this year, it won’t be on the way back to LA.

I wish we had more good players too, but I’m going to stay calm while I wait to see what happens. Getting upset isn’t going to change anything on the Rams. I’m still hoping as training camp develops some teams will decide they can afford to trade away a solid player or two for draft choices (Marshawn Lynch, anyone?) and we can pick them up. There really are only two times that happens – leading up to the draft and nearing the end of training camp. Even filling one or two of your positions that way would really help.

by andyrose on Jul 4, 2010 10:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

Granted, these team moves take time. Unless there's some contract wiggle room we don't know about.

I keep hearing of 2011 being another freakin’ strike year, So that would give the new ownership 3 seasons to grease the skids right back to LA and that giant TV market.

by RamChop on Jul 4, 2010 10:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm guessing Kroenke

will start pressuring St. Louis to agree to a new stadium sometime around 2012. If everyone can come to some agreement by 2014, the Rams will stay. If the St. Louis area just won’t go for a new stadium unless Kroenke pays for it all with his own money (which he could afford to do), the chances of a move out of St. Louis grow much larger. To some extent this is all going to be driven by the state of the economy at that time. If it has recovered and the area is feeling much better about its financial state, the chances of agreeing on a new stadium are a lot greater than if the economy is still struggling.

I can stay philosphical about this issue because by the 2015 season my wife and I will be old enough we may not want to attend the games anymore anyway. It should be an interesting four or five years.

by andyrose on Jul 5, 2010 4:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

25 MIL

we had to keep him
had know 0ther CB
too jump and run with
Fitz an others,lots of money
but lets see it B..SHOW US!!

by Magyar on Jul 4, 2010 12:45 AM CDT reply actions  

This Write Up Is The Reason

why the Rams will be back in LA soon. it makes sense, you dont have to re align the whole conference, they can stay in the NFC West. 2015 means nothing, yeah I know thats when the lease is up, but any lease can be bought out if the owners wanted to………

I Guess It Won't Be Locker In 2011

by JordansDad on Jul 5, 2010 9:19 PM CDT reply actions  

Oops

I dont mean the actual write up wil be the reason why they move, the points made in the write up will be the reason……….just wanted to be clear, now you St Loo homers can attack……….

I Guess It Won't Be Locker In 2011

by JordansDad on Jul 5, 2010 9:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

It would take a lot to buy out this lease

since the powers that be here probably wouldn’t want it to happen. Why would Kroenke spend all that extra money to buy out the lease when he knows he can walk away for free after the 2014 season? I think he’s too hard headed a businessman to spend money he doesn’t have to spend.

by andyrose on Jul 5, 2010 10:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

He May

be thinking he can make that money up with 3 extra years in LA, ticket sales etc

I Guess It Won't Be Locker In 2011

by JordansDad on Jul 6, 2010 12:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

Those would be three years

of big ticket sales like they had right before they left LA? I think you’re dreaming, but it’s okay if it makes you happy.

by andyrose on Jul 6, 2010 10:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

The Rams and the Rosenblooms

Carroll must be rolling in his grave. His hairdresser wife and now these “rich kids,” have taken a once proud and great franchise and ran it into the ground all for the sake of money. You StLouis fans are now learning what the LA fans had to endure. Why go to a game or support a team where the outcome is already a foregone conclusion? Hello dummy’s, it will be easier to sell the team if they are winners!!!

by Tomcat01 on Jul 6, 2010 6:32 AM CDT reply actions  

Perfect!

+1

Ignorance is bliss and way too many people are happy.

by Everett 11 on Jul 6, 2010 10:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about St. Louis Rams.
Start posting about the Rams »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Twitter-kevin-payne-right_small
We're Feelin' Real Good About Beating The Patriots
Dsc03827_small
Upon Further Review - Notes on St. Louis Rams Preseason Game 3

Recent FanPosts

Rocky_mtn_sheep-2_small
Unsure about this season
Small
We're not getting any respect?!
Small
Why The rams will beat the Cardinals: Agree, contructive criticism?
Videoslideshow4_011_small
Hopefully our offense won't be as offensive as last year.
South_park_caracter_small
Sheriff Sam Bradford & the Young Guns!!!!!!
South_park_caracter_small
Sweet! Finally a veteran WR!!!!!!!!!!
Small
Sam Bradford has previous experience with Mark Clayton
Bb_aaho068_8x10_small
Grading the TST Draft
Ricky_prohel_small
The Rams Starters This Season, Compared to last season (Week 1)
Ram_chop_small
All the hype about new additions to the team

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Acme Packing Company
Charles Woodson Receives Two-Year Extension
Big Blue View
Tom Coughlin, 10.09.10
Field Gulls
Coach Fran Didn't Do Red No Favors

Cover the web with Turf

Add a little Turf to your internet!

Become a fan of TST on Facebook.

Follow TST and talk more Rams on Twitter.

SBNation.com Recent Stories

EAST RUTHERFORD NJ - AUGUST 27:  Antonio Cromartie #31 of the New York Jets is introduced before the game against the Washington Redskins  during their preseason game on August 27 2010 at the New Meadowlands Stadium  in East Rutherford New Jersey.  (Photo by Al Bello/Getty Images)

NFL Season Preview: Football, Why Do We Love You So?

Photo +2 updates

Vikings Vs. Saints: Week 1 Opens With NFC Championship Rematch On Thursday Night

Photo

2010 NFL Preview, New Orleans Saints: Defending Their Title

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

Turfshowtimes_small VanRam

Editors

Spags_victory_small 3k

Authors

340x_small kevinramsfan

Wildcat_small Tackle Box

Ramshelmet_small taiko

79de1760b8532ce8_small ram_rod

Dsc03827_small CoachConnors

Peter_small VTramsFan

Mardygilyardsig_small Tevin T. Broner

Photo_small Hark Dulai

27001_1297293834928_1307820105_30913780_1670936_n_small Brett Gall