Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jerry Sandusky's Wife Tries To Run A Reporter Over

History leaves the Rams little leverage in Bradford contract talks

Is it hyperbole to say that Sam Bradford's contract is the most important contract negotiations in the St. Louis Rams recent history? Not really. Obviously any first round pick is a critical signing, but when the entire of future of the franchise is riding on the QB picked first overall, the team needs their man in order to start the slow trudge of history out of sports page headlines. 

Yeah, so nothing riding on this or anything. That's why this maybe-it's-nothing report from PFT struck fear into the hearts of patiently waiting fans. 

Friday's meeting between Sam Bradford's representatives and the Rams wasn't very fruitful.

Mike Florio reports via a league source that the two sides have a "long way to go" and there was no real progress made during the meeting.

Take it with a grain of salt. PFT isn't always the most accurate, and your definition of "long way to go" could be much different than my definition of the same phrase. And how much progress do you expect after one meeting?

There's no doubt that Bradford will get a deal richer than the one last year's first overall pick, Lions QB Matthew Stafford...which I guess makes sense because it's a different year? Inflation is as flat as it's ever going to get so that can't be it....huh. Anyway...how much more than Stafford? $50 million guaranteed is about 17 percent above last year's #1 QB deal. A 10 percent jump in guaranteed money represents almost $46 million. Negotiations have to fall in that ballpark, I would think. 

I can't imagine the Rams getting all John Foster Dulles with Tom Condon and taking up a little brinksmanship. With a pending change in ownership, the need to at least explore a stadium deal (somewhere) and three years of flat ticket sales, Kevin Demoff isn't exactly negotiating from a position of strength. 

Yes, rookie deals are ridiculous, but there's nothing owners can do about it at this point other than live with it. That falls under that timeless wisdom of hating the game, rather than the, ahem, playa. Spare us the digression on rookie salaries until we're talking CBA. 

The Rams, much to the chagrin of some fans, spent just a little money here and there in free agency to add some veteran depth (a move I liked) and avoided the big, expensive signings. We can assume much of that had to do with the knowledge that the team had the first overall pick, leaving them little money for other moves at a time when the team's financial operations are hamstrung by the looming ownership change. Cost of a deal for a first overall pick, even for a QB, could have hardly been a surprise for the front office. 

Think of Bradford's mega deal as one last poke from the previous era, a booby trap left by Jay Zygmunt as security dragged him and his banker's box full of stolen office supplies off the premises. Infighting and mismanagement marked the Zygmunt era, along with rouge's gallery of accomplices, leaving the Rams in the sorry state that put them in the very expensive position of picking first in the draft, after picking second the two years prior. Bradford's contract will be a golden reminder of both the Rams past and the future.

-------

We're not the only ones watching the Bradford talks. Detroit and Tampa Bay, who made the second and third picks in the draft, are both negotiating with players, Ndamukong Suh and Gerald McCoy, who are now waiting to see what kind of deal Bradford gets before signing their own.  

Comment 32 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

hey even if isn't signed

he still has the playbook to learn from, right ?

by Le Ram on Jul 18, 2010 1:29 PM CDT reply actions  

The Rams already made the mistake.

There should have been a deal done before they drafted him.

by ram87 on Jul 18, 2010 5:38 PM CDT reply actions  

Exactly.

If the Rams wind up being unable to sign Bradford, they have only themselves to blame. This should have been done before the draft, when they had some leverage.

Probably another issue that can be blamed on the finances; they would have wanted to push back the big payout as far as possible.

by Spielman on Jul 18, 2010 8:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

guess no one in here is lol

 You’ve unearthed why the Rams won’t sign him if he doesn’t play, he won’t get hurt.

Now THATS Genious.

The House of Spears reigns supreme

by ram_rod on Jul 18, 2010 11:09 AM PDT

by rams210 on Jul 21, 2010 4:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

Great point Ram87

I could not understand why we didn’t sign him before drafting him. The second to the last paragraph is exactly right. It sucks we are drafting a QB #1 right before the CBA puts a rookie scale in place, but those are the breaks. Thanks Jay Zygmunt for screwing the franchise!

by STLRambler on Jul 18, 2010 6:02 PM CDT reply actions  

I know the team is still feeling the effects of Zigmunt but

At some point in time this FO has to be held accountable for the actions taken during the Devaney era we cant just keep blaming Zigmunt and Linehan

by rams210 on Jul 19, 2010 2:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

Rookies should come into the league and get paid according their play. Paying $50 million to someone who has never taken a snap before it’s not very logic.

by Guru506 on Jul 18, 2010 6:35 PM CDT reply actions  

Lmao you calling me Ram-on now ha ha ha i love this room

Hey what are you doing I’m trying to keep on the down low here RamChop lol ,but hey seriously this deal should have been done as they drafted him ,its simple to see why that was the best choice,they actually had some leverage at that time to get it done or Bradford could have lost a lot of money if he did not get taken first over all,now its like you say if this drags on that’s all on them

by rams210 on Jul 19, 2010 2:45 AM CDT reply actions  

Nooo buddy! I was NOT calling you Ram-on

I was merely using the term “Ram-on.” Note the exclamation point in the post. I know you are not Ram-on, who was banned, cause you’ve told me you still chat with him. But I know what you mean. I’ve been accused of being several different people on here, including Ram-on himself. Miss the guy..

by RamChop on Jul 19, 2010 5:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

That could be

part of the plan. Keep Suh and McCoy out of camp and slow their progress. We play both Detroit and Tampa this season. Their guys being behind would be good for us.

THIS year's the year. I hope....

by thisguy on Jul 19, 2010 11:14 AM CDT up reply actions  

lol i love the conspiracy!

doing a patriots to back to the top OOOOOOOOOHHH YEAHHH

Bradford to Onobun!

by Infemous on Jul 19, 2010 5:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about St. Louis Rams.

FanPosts

Cover the web with Turf


Managers

71523_170793669601439_100000124211145_596632_5713708_n_small Ryan Van Bibber

Baby_drinking_becks_small 3k

Editors

Jackson_medium_small Eric Nagel

Peter_small VTramsFan

Bugs_bunny_pose_small Douglas M

Authors

Wildcat_small Tackle Box

Dsc03827_small CoachConnors

Mardygilyardsig_small Tevin T. Broner

Bradford_draft_small buckeyefan55

Tst_small T.Ram

Images_small Brick Top

Small EddieP

Profile_pic1_small Mike Dietrich