Rams starting contract talks for Sam Bradford next week; Projecting Bradford's rookie stats
St. Louis Rams COO Kevin Demoff, aka the contract guru, will take up negotiations with Sam Bradford's agent Tom Condon early next week, according to report from Bernie Miklasz at the PD.
Bradford expects and wants to be in camp on time, ready to compete for the starting QB job. Demoff has an outstanding track record of getting draft picks signed in time for camp, so here's hoping.
We've got an interview with Bradford coming Monday on TST, so stay tuned.
In other contract news, sixth round TE Fendi Onobun is expected to sign next week.
Speaking of Bradford, the 2010 edition of the Football Outsiders annual is out, and available for the low, low price of $12. I highly recommend it for fans and fantasy players alike. It's packed with rich, meaty goodness. Anyway, I thought we'd take a quick look at their projection for the Sam Bradford.
First a note about the projection. They use a 16 game forecast for all the players to make the stats a little more meaningful. That obviously impacts Bradford, since there's the possibility, albeit remote, that he doesn't start for the Rams right away.
Here's Bradford's 16 game projection:
281 completions on 482 attempts for a 58.4 percent completion rate and a total of 3,430 yards with 14 TD and 17 INT.
First of all, though the number of touchdowns is low for a starting QB, though not surprising for a rookie, it would easily top the total number of TD passes thrown by all three Rams quarterbacks last year which was 11. Add in JOsh Brown's fake FG pass to Daniel Fells and you've got 12 TD passes for the Rams in total last season. It sort of reminds me of my approach to dating: set your standards low and you won't regularly be disappointed. Of course, that's not acceptable for a team that desperately needs to win games.
The completion percentage seems low for an arm as accurate as Bradford's, but that has more to do with the rookie learning curve and the team around him. His accuracy is still part of the forecast as seen in the 17 INT; Keith Null is project to throw 26 INT over 16 games.
Let's compare those numbers to some recent rookie QB performances.
In 10 games with the Lions, Matthew Stafford threw 13 TD, 20 INT, passed for 2,267 yards and had a 53.3 completion percentage.
In 2008, Matt Ryan played 16 games and threw 16 TD, 11 INT, passed for 3,440 yards and had a 61.1 completion percentage.
The Stafford comparison is probably more accurate. The Lions were a bad team with a poor offensive line. Hopefully the Rams will provide better protection this year than the Lions did last year. The Rams allowed one more sack last season than the Lions did (44 to 43), but you wonder what that might have looked like without the innumerable injuries to the Rams front five. Detroit also didn't have a running back like Steven Jackson; the Falcons had Michael Turner in 2008. That could make Bradford's rookie numbers a little stronger than Stafford's.
What about playmakers? The Lions had Calvin Johnson, a bona fide #1 WR for their rookie, and little else. Roddy White, in his fourth season during Ryan's rookie year, had established himself the year before as the Falcons top receiver. It goes without saying that the receivers are the big question mark for the Rams and Sam Bradford.
16 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I think that projection could be right.
I don’t think I’d be upset with that if that was what happens. Hopefully he plays all 16 games and hopefully his numbers come in around there, although I could easily see them better in the completion percentage and perhaps a few less INTs. TDs is probably pretty close with our lack of a #1 WR and our running game will score a lot of the TDs probably (as long as the passing game can get us close enough).
Onubon > Gates
Bradford will do better then that
Well I didn’t see Calvin Johnson burning up the NFL for the Lions ,but I do see Bradford making our receivers better with his accuracy and I believe he will have some were in the 60 to 63% completion rating when the year is over and closer to 20 TDs. I think Bradford is much better then Ryan or Stafford,a much more accurate passer,and only Ryan had a better team to work with the Lions sucked
If Rams offensive line "plus" (Steven Jackson) remains healthy & stable
I predict Bradford’s numbers —/ 20 TDS/ 12 INT/ QB Rating 73.5/ 3650 total passing yards.
Jackson and
the right back up could up the TD totals, since they’ll want to do more screens, etc.
Turf Show Times
by Ryan Van Bibber on Jul 10, 2010 3:53 PM CDT up reply actions
another unknown
is the TE situation. If Onobun comes along faster than planned it could help
Turf Show Times
by Ryan Van Bibber on Jul 10, 2010 3:54 PM CDT reply actions
Neat article about prjecting QB performance from SI
This is nice to see.
"I learned a long time ago if you keep checking your stats all year, you're going to end up in the toilet." - Chris Carpenter, 2009.
Yes, saw this earlier in the week
It’s an interesting rule that Bradford meets, but as the article stated, there are also exceptions. But I think it’s a reasonable “loose” yardstick.
I agree
Decent rule of thumb, and I look forward to looking like a genius when it pans out the majority of the time.
But I also am wary of declaring him the second coming of Peyton Manning just yet.
No Rookie TE will make a significant contribution
Reading the posts about the a TE helping the Rams this year. Looking back at history, it is the one position that really doesnt make a dent until year 3 at least. Even Vernon Davis who is a beast took til last year, Dont put any hope of the offense on Fendi this year……..
Sam won't start at seasons beginning
but, with Rams and injuries and an unproven OL unit, continuity will be a key factor in whether Sam plays.
Get the toilet out for “King”.
e
He is a Ram now. Come up with a better “tag”!
That's why he should play week 1 when everyone is healthy.
If he’s ready by week 6, it would be more likely that their are injuries that would keep him from being in the best possible situation.
Onubon > Gates
Will he last?
Does anybody else here worry about Bradford being overrated and frail? He played in a conference that does not play defense and could not stay on the field whenever he played a decent defense. Playing on the Rams, he will take a pounding and might get injured or become scared like Jim Everett did years ago.

by 


























