Inside 3k's brain - June 20th
All that aside, it's been an interesting last week. I completed a life-long desire to come up with a reason to hate Mali. We said goodbye to one of the oddest (and yet nicest) figures in all of sport, Manute Bol. And Texas stayed in the Big XII / Big ?. Still, there's plenty in the old head tank to throw out. I'll try to avoid any fútbol, since last time that turned into a classic "You're stupid", "No, you're stupid.","Whatever, stupid" TST thread. So today, I'll hit:
- The NFL contract (we need a better word for that)
- Things you should not have
Join me for a world of fantasy and jollity where I channel my most whiny inner Andy Rooney (who is a Giants season ticket-holder). Oh, and my single comin' out.
Contractual obligations
What is the point of a contract in the NFL? Really, what is? The Raiders are suing JaMarcus Russell for $9.55 million claiming his contract was changed at "some point." How is there an argument here? When you or I sign a contract, it counts. When NFL players sign a contract, it only counts until it doesn't. Unless it was changed to not count until it needed to be counted at which time we would count who counted it and talk like the Count. Darrelle Revis signed a six-year, $30 million contract in 2007. In 2008, Chris Johnson signed a five-year deal for $12 million. Now, in 2010, they are holding out for new contracts. I would like to apply this to my contract in the Army. "I have been a high-speed NCO and a consummate professional beyond expectations. I am therefore not going to show up for formation tomorrow until I am offered a ton more money. Like that general over there." Or I could always go the Albert Haynesworth route - take on a huge contract, not be very useful in a new system, be a complete ass to my teammates and then demand I be traded. "When I came to this unit, I thought I was going to do what I did in my last unit and earn a lot more money. Instead, you are asking me to do something new that I might not be good at. I do not like this. I demand you send me to a unit like my old one where I can go back to doing what I was good at even though you'll pay me lots of money if I suck at doing what you want me to do."
These kinds of things make me respect a situation like Logan Mankins that much more. Mankins, like most offensive linemen, is unkown to the casual fan (even his photo on Wikipedia maintains his facial secrecy like Tim's neighbor over the fence in Home Improvement). While he would have been an unrestricted free agent this year, the new rules made him a restricted FA and eventually saw his tender lowered by the Patriots' FO. Sure, if someone verbally "promised" him a new contract and then went back on it, that's a punk move. But that's business. Paper's valid, words are salad...or something. And I can understand his holdout - he's been a phenomenal guard, he's getting screwed, and this is his only recourse outside of playing a final year in his less-than-true-value contract. When Mankins signed it, the rules were different. In fact, he went to the FO at the end of the 2008 season to discuss the issue. This seems like a case where an outstanding player showed his desire to remain with a team, but is upset that the team is trying to secure his services as cheaply as possible. I understand both sides.
I'm not a lawyer. I'm not an accountant. I'm not a football player (at least a professional one. I did go roughly 28/30 at QB the last time I played a pick-up game, and talked some A-level ish, so that's practically UFL game). I just don't get how NFL contracts are completely relative. And yes, I know I've skipped over San Diego's pair (!) and Tom Brady's contract talks and even the looming standard-setting Peyton Manning deal. Hell, I've skipped over hundreds of these situations (our own AxJax included). I don't know what the answer is (which is why I'm hoping this thread is more constructive than the last), but I hope the league moves toward sanity once we get the new CBA figured out.
Things you should not have
- The toe-shoes: Your grandfather died in World War II so you could wear running shoes. Don't be a jerk.
- The vibrating toothbrush: What are you, too lazy to make your forearms work for a minute?
- The man thong: Unless for comedic effect. Then, must be purchased, worn, paraded in front of thousands, and immediately burned.
- The man granny panties: See above.
- Manicured nails: Holy hot sauce, if you need a reason, punch yourself where you skin is thinnest.
- A painting of you as a centaur: No ego can justify such a thing. Equally culpable is the fool who painted it. Even Thomas Kinkade deserves more respect than you.
- Anything ever seen at Wired's Danger Room, an awesome blog if you have any interest in the future of warfare. And definitely no EMPs. It's such a dickhead weapon. What if I haven't saved my work?
- Any Seahawks, Niners or Cardinals memorabilia. In fact, be careful with your St. Louis Cardinals stuff - it would be very easy for some hooligan from Phoenix to vandalize your Cards shirt so as to break this rule.
- A Lawrence Phillips jersey
- A crappy Father's Day (unless you are childless, then all the happiness in your life for today should be sucked out and reallocated to dads).
Holler.
8 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I tried
to mentally connect points from the contracts and from things you should not have; but then figured out that there was no connection between the two. Made for some really confusing, but amusing reading for a few minutes.
I do wish they’d at least re-term the word ‘contracts’. I always see what must be breaches of contract with not much of a penalty on both sides of the deal.
THIS year's the year. I hope....
I think that would solve most of my issue if they just changed the word
Instead of “contracts,” just call them “Footbagreements” or something. Hell, have the #1 overall pick in the 2011 Draft sign the first one and market the whole new structure. But calling them contracts just confuses me (and obviously, many many others) because they don’t bear much resemblance to the contracts any of us sign.
And I apologize for the confusion – the things you should not have are just things you should not have. Under any circumstances. Ever.
You don't seem to want to accept the fact you're dealing with an expert in guerrilla warfare, with a man who's the best, with guns, with knives, with his bare hands. A man who's been trained to ignore pain, ignore weather, to live off the land, to eat things that would make a billy goat puke. In *St. Louis* his job was to dispose of enemy personnel. To kill! Period! Win by attrition. Well, *Steven Jackson* was the best.
by 3k on Jun 20, 2010 7:59 PM CDT up reply actions
Man am I itching to get my new 360
I’ve been stuck without modern warfare 2 for far too long during this summer vacation. That EMP comment reminded me.
The House of Spears reigns supreme
I might be the only guy in the Army under 40
who hasn’t played it. Now Madden and NCAA? I’m all over it this year.
You don't seem to want to accept the fact you're dealing with an expert in guerrilla warfare, with a man who's the best, with guns, with knives, with his bare hands. A man who's been trained to ignore pain, ignore weather, to live off the land, to eat things that would make a billy goat puke. In *St. Louis* his job was to dispose of enemy personnel. To kill! Period! Win by attrition. Well, *Steven Jackson* was the best.
From one NCO to another,
Five Fingers. Don’t knock it till you try it. I absolutely was against them until I “test ran” a pair at a local outfitter. My ankles, calves, and knees have never been stronger.
Contracts? contracts? You wanna talk about contracts? What a mess. There are so many reasons to have a rookie pay scale, coupled with incentive laden, structured contracts down the road. Just glad we have a cap now, and hope we do in the future, otherwise the Dallas "Yankees :will be super bowl champs for the next 20 years.
Read “One Second After” by William R. Forstchen a few months ago. If you haven’t read it, it is a great read on potential carnage resulting from an EMP attack. I agree, total dickhead weapon.
They will notice and they will giggle.
EMP is the next weapon of submission
After the nuclear bomb, there is the neutron bomb.
After the neutron, there is the EMP. Not a weapon of mass destruction, but of mass DOS attack.
EMP is almost as dangerous as the other two bombs in that it can, strategically speaking, allow one army to virtually checkmate another army without firing a shot. In todays world where collateral damage is such a concern, I think it’s very possible an EMP could be used for the same reason the atomic bombs were used in Japan.
Good thing they dont ask you what you think
i dont think we need to be using it for any reason any were
are you talking to me? Since when do I need to have someone ask what I think?
or are you just picking a fight because you got banned as ram_on and james?
by CoachConnors on Jun 22, 2010 7:05 PM CDT up reply actions

by 



























