Splitting the difference behind Steven Jackson
The St. Louis Rams need a backup running back. As if the issue weren't pressing enough, Steven Jackson's offseason back surgery elevated the issue to Lost finale proportions, well maybe not, but it's a big enough topic to overshadow a rookie QB and a team that just can't get sold. The PD caught up with the Rams incumbent backups for today's paper, but, for me, the article just brought up more questions, not the least of which is: what's the difference between Kenneth Darby and Chris Ogbonnaya?
Alright, go ahead and rattle off the most significant differences.
Ok, maybe that's not fair. We really haven't seen enough of Ogbonnaya to form a complete assessment. Instead, let's take a look at the similarities and then ask ourselves how that impacts the Rams depth chart behind Steven Jackson.
Both Darby and Ogbonnaya excel at catching passes. Ogbonnaya was even recruited to the Longhorns as a wide receiver. Both backs possess some aptitude for blocking, and Darby has made some third down appearances for the Rams since coming on board in October 2008. Their physical stats look very similar as well. Darby is 5'10" 219 lbs; Ogbonnaya is 6'0" 220 lbs. Both posted a 40 time of 4.6 seconds. Neither back is speedy enough to make a difference with their wheels, as we've seen on the field.
The differences? Age gives Ogbonnaya an advantage; he's three years younger. The Texas product also comes out of spread offense where he was asked to run routes and catch passes more than he hit holes and ran between the tackles. Upside seems to be Ogbonnaya's advantage in the coming camp battle, and you wonder if the Rams will keep both backs on the roster if they find a suitable third option.
It's telling that the Rams are interested in Brian Westbrook, a back who has excelled as a route runner and pass catcher, though he certainly is, or has been, a top all-around running back. Now, SJ39 is no slouch when it comes to catching passes himself, and it seems like the Rams want a backup who doesn't necessarily require a different section of the playbook when on the field...though none of these guys can do everything that Jackson can do.
It seems to me that having a runner(s) like Darby/Ogbonnaya or Westbrook behind Jackson has its distinct advantages. Expecting one of those guys to do everything that Jackson does is pure folly. Jackson's a talent all his own. Westbrook's injury history has taken away that ability...and provided a reminder of just how important it is to find a backup for Jackson. Without Jackson the Rams would severely miss a guy who can make those runs between the tackles. Adding a guy who fits that more traditional running back role seems like the most logical addition for the Rams. That would give them a useful tandem of backups who could become Steven Jackson by committee...though still not the sum of the man.
30 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Sando seems to think Ogbie could be why we haven't addressed the bu RB situation this offseason
http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcwest/post/_/id/18582/do-rams-have-their-backup-to-steven-jackson
I can take a beating ... I'm a Rams fan.
thanks for posting the interesting article....do you guys get his chart?
It says “The chart shows every play in the Rams-Cardinals game when Ogbonnaya carried the ball or was targeted in the passing game.”
How is the last one the fourth in a row, if the others were all 1st and 10’s?
1 10 Tiger: 1RB-2TE Run 4 Breaks Gerald Hayes’ tackle
1 10 Reglr: 2RB-1TE Run 2 Falls forward
1 10 Tiger: 1RB-2TE Run 7 Room behind Adam Goldberg
1 10 Tiger: 1RB-2TE Run 3 Fourth play in row Ogbonnaya carried
and more..
by CoachConnors on May 24, 2010 11:15 AM CDT up reply actions
I have always disliked how Sando sorts things
he usually puts things in an order where you can’t detect any flow or continuity at all. The straight numbers never tell the story.
by CoachConnors on May 24, 2010 12:07 PM CDT up reply actions
there is something to this ..
He looks good when he has been given oppurtunity. Give him more.
If you love something, set it free. If it doesn't come back, find it and kill it.
if ogie works out
it officially makes last year’s draft a success. Only Brooks Foster has yet to give us any value.
Smith
Laurenitius
Fletcher/ Bradley
Scott
Null
Ogabayanna
That is a good load of new players
If you love something, set it free. If it doesn't come back, find it and kill it.
JUst thinking ahead a bit...
If the Rams stick with what they have then what are the chances that they draft a RB in the 1st round next year (and maybe a WR in the 2nd).
By the way, who are the star RBs that will be in the college ranks next season? That might make a difference.
Go Rams!
"We can't run. We can't pass. We can't stop the run. We can't stop the pass. We can't kick. Other than that, we're just not a very good football team right now." --- Bruce Coslett, New York Jets Head Coach circa 1990s
I hope not
We need to address RB in rounds 2-3 at the highest, RB should never be a round 1 pick anymore. So that means we probably will do it in 2011 or 2012.
Agreed
A first round RB is a waste.
You don't seem to want to accept the fact you're dealing with an expert in guerrilla warfare, with a man who's the best, with guns, with knives, with his bare hands. A man who's been trained to ignore pain, ignore weather, to live off the land, to eat things that would make a billy goat puke. In *St. Louis* his job was to dispose of enemy personnel. To kill! Period! Win by attrition. Well, *Steven Jackson* was the best.
by 3k on May 24, 2010 5:46 PM CDT up reply actions
SJ backup
To be honest, I really hope we dont have to hear too much about Sj’s backup all year. If we do, its because SJ is out or his backup is really bad! Lets just hope SJ is good for anothe 2000 All Purpose Yards.
No, if we see another 2000 all purpose yards in one season from SJ then we won't see anymore good seasons after that
He might be able to remain elite but only if his workload decreases.
He needs someone to take 10 touches a game away from him or he’ll have one year left instead of 3-4.
That someone will need to be good enough to allow the Rams to give Jackson a rest.
Starting to look like Ogbie. :)
I can take a beating ... I'm a Rams fan.
The value in a #1 RB isn't nearly as valuable
as a potent passing offense.
Only one of the top four rushing yard leaders played on a winning team in 2009: Thomas Jones…who was just cut by the Jets. The rush-first offense is not productive enough in today’s NFL – that could change (as everything does in football tactics), but right now, it’s a passing man’s world.
You don't seem to want to accept the fact you're dealing with an expert in guerrilla warfare, with a man who's the best, with guns, with knives, with his bare hands. A man who's been trained to ignore pain, ignore weather, to live off the land, to eat things that would make a billy goat puke. In *St. Louis* his job was to dispose of enemy personnel. To kill! Period! Win by attrition. Well, *Steven Jackson* was the best.
by 3k on May 24, 2010 4:06 PM CDT up reply actions
Whilst the game has moved on
in my time as a Rams fan, our two best teams had Dickerson and Faulk in the backfield, so I always want us to have a great RB.
While this is probably the backward type thinking that got us into our current mess, I always imagine us having a Pro bowl RB. It wouldn’t seem like the Rams without one.
In any event, no need to panic on the back up front. Westbrook is going to sign for us this week (we will provide a better chance to win than the Broncos, and who would want to play for the Redskins when they had a choice?) and he’ll prove to a good alternative for SJax for at least 9 or 10 games this year. Tosten will then give the extra depth IMO.
Yes but...
If you have a running game other teams respect, it makes the passing game that much better.
Marshall Faulk….(who, by the way was a damn good receiver).
…..yea, I guess you’re right.
True
A running threat does open up the passing game to a degree, but that exposes it’s secondary status to the pass. The run in and of itself doesn’t have as much value as it does in helping the pass.
You don't seem to want to accept the fact you're dealing with an expert in guerrilla warfare, with a man who's the best, with guns, with knives, with his bare hands. A man who's been trained to ignore pain, ignore weather, to live off the land, to eat things that would make a billy goat puke. In *St. Louis* his job was to dispose of enemy personnel. To kill! Period! Win by attrition. Well, *Steven Jackson* was the best.
by 3k on May 24, 2010 5:45 PM CDT up reply actions
Looks like we found Ram-on.
I hope he behaves this time
I can take a beating ... I'm a Rams fan.
by Midasknight on May 25, 2010 10:21 AM CDT up reply actions
you're pretty sharp
Astute observation, Midas.
by CoachConnors on May 25, 2010 11:15 AM CDT up reply actions
it was the trademark lol ... and the day old sign on
I can take a beating ... I'm a Rams fan.
by Midasknight on May 25, 2010 11:18 AM CDT up reply actions
Not so fast bucko
Mike Sando said Oggo might be better than we realize, so, um, nevermind…..:(
Nobody believes Spiller is going to be a full time RB.
He will be a guy who is in for 15 plays or so, and it won’t include running between the tackles. I would much rather see Marshawn Lynch get in more trouble with the Buffalo coaches and get traded to us for a 3rd round pick in 2011. That would give us a serious RB to share the load with SJ.
which is exactly why I would be against nearly any RB being drafter in the first
The running back by committee approach to rushing is becoming the norm (if it is not already). Buffalo now has invested in Lynch and Spiller despite Fred Jax doing a hell of a job on a pretty weak offense. What is the value? Is Spiller really going to improve this offense?
As it relates to us, I’m behind getting Jackson some time off the field so that his body remembers what it’s like to regenerate, but signing a big name backup RB or expending a high draft pick one is a complete waste.
You don't seem to want to accept the fact you're dealing with an expert in guerrilla warfare, with a man who's the best, with guns, with knives, with his bare hands. A man who's been trained to ignore pain, ignore weather, to live off the land, to eat things that would make a billy goat puke. In *St. Louis* his job was to dispose of enemy personnel. To kill! Period! Win by attrition. Well, *Steven Jackson* was the best.
by 3k on May 25, 2010 1:14 PM CDT up reply actions
why a third rd?
aren’t good players going for 5th rounders this offseason?
Good point.
Actually, I chose a 3rd because apparently Seattle offered a 3rd for him before the draft and were turned down. I figure if he gets in trouble again, they may decide a 3rd isn’t so bad.

by 































