Rams Going All in by Releasing Bulger
by Eric Nagel on Apr 6, 2010 5:48 PM CDT
in 2010 St. Louis Rams offseason
Email
PrintThere were a couple of things I thought about after the Rams released Bulger...Like just about everyone, I wasn't shocked by the move. He was due a lot of money this year, and was worth not even half of the 9 million dollars. But I had a deeper brainstorm, and this is what I came up with:
- Bulger probably hasn't decided if he'd like to retire or not. We heard some rumors awhile back about him probably retiring, but unless the front office is ice cold, I think they would have let him save face by retiring with the Rams. Unfortunately, it comes down to business. He probably hadn't decided yet, and the Rams felt the need to let him go without dealing with any hassle he might have brought them (I doubt it though; he isn't Brett Favre).
- This move may signal that there isn't much interest in the first overall pick. We at TST were hopeful that something with the Redskins could have been done, but I don't think very many teams (those not in the top 10) are willing to trade their whole draft away. It could also mean the Rams are trying to stir up interest. But either way, things don't look that good on the trade side of things.
- The Rams are going all in with the first pick. I'm sorry to everyone who was still holding out hope that they'd draft someone besides Sam Bradford (or Jimmy Clausen) but their simply isn't anyway they aren't leaving the first round with a QB. The only other option there is (that is if the Rams are in love with Suh or hate Clausen and Bradford) is taking Colt McCoy, possibly in the second. Either way, the Rams QB's currently on the roster are completely "meh," so get ready to start pre-ordering your new QB Jersey's.
- Bulger will probably be in demand. Derek Anderson and Jake Delhomme both found new homes. Marc is just as good, if not better then both of them, so don't be surprised if he decides to find a new team, and does so fairly quickly. My guess? The 49er's. Alex Smith is still on thin ice, and they could use someone who has starting experience and who can step in. At the very least, he can teach him how to play better.
Agree? Disagree? Sound off in the comments. If you need more draft, stay updated with our Community Mock Draft and as always, have a great day!
27 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
If Andy Rose's observation that Bulger had asked to be released....
And I don’t know if it is or isn’t, but if it is true then:
- Bulger has decided to play, else there would be no need to request to leave
- Maybe doesn’t say as much about the market for the #1 pick as it does the market for Bulger
- The Rams know that you know they will be looking for a QB in the draft, unless and until they sign someone more promsing than Feeley. Which still might happen.
The blind stares of a million pairs of eyes, lookin hard but won't realize, that they'll never see the C. And when I'm rollin by, you can't see me!
The report that Bulger asked to be released
was on the front page of the St. Louis paper today. That leads me to believe it is true.
And oh yeah, Alex Smith has been on thin ice for a while
I thought late last season that Singletary is probably looking for either a big step forward or a replacement. The way he tried both guys, the way he puts up with no BS, I really can’t see him suffering through weak QB play for very long.
The blind stares of a million pairs of eyes, lookin hard but won't realize, that they'll never see the C. And when I'm rollin by, you can't see me!
We'll probably trade for Campbell
Maybe Campbell for Carriker straight up.
Yes, I actually wore a watermelon on my head during the Rams SuperBowl victory in 2000.
We'll probably not do that
Shanahan is more worried about unloading Ms. Buttersworth. I watched today’s interview with Shanahan , he said, “if Jason is still around after the draft, he more than welcomed to fight for the starting job in DC.” But they’re letting JC shop around and he’s not working out in Ashburn with the rest of the team.
So, I’m assuming that Shanahan wants a drat pick for Jason, and nothing else. Based on how he worded “if Jason is still around after the draft”.
Do you think there are teams that want Carriker? lol hes a bust from day one
dont be naive,Carriker has no worthiness to get traded to any one they wont even take him for free lmao he just get hurt and they be paying money all year for nothing ,hes a real bum a Linehan pick what you expect
If he doesn't stay healthy this year
the Rams need to cut their losses and move on.
You're probably right, unless they draft a high DT and they resign him as depth
but cutting their losses from a starting DT perspective should be a forgone conclusion, I would think. He obviously isn’t on track to make anyone think he will play like a first rounder some day and the way this GM/Coach set has run things, smart money is on them letting him walk away.
The blind stares of a million pairs of eyes, lookin hard but won't realize, that they'll never see the C. And when I'm rollin by, you can't see me!
by CoachConnors on Apr 7, 2010 11:34 AM CDT up reply actions
if our FO wants campbell
they should just wait for the skins to cut him lose. i don’t believe we should trade anything for this guy. well maybe a 6th or 7th. but that’s it. and trading away carriker, good luck w/ that one. he hasn’t played enough games for anyone to know if he can actually play, which quite honestly shows us he can’t.
wow, these statements that i just made, brought me to the conclusion that your right Midasknight. straight up trade would be even steven.
"SJAX" - The extra strength cleaner that fights off that Stubborn, Stingy Defense
by moy on Apr 7, 2010 2:32 PM CDT up reply actions
You don't think someone will offer a pick for a young starter with his stats?
Someone mentioned draft day trade. I think that’s very possible. The Rams will probably have Bradford signed by that time anyway.
The blind stares of a million pairs of eyes, lookin hard but won't realize, that they'll never see the C. And when I'm rollin by, you can't see me!
I don't think anyone would offer very much for Campbell
stats are one thing but he’s got a pretty good case of shell shock. the skins games I watched last yr reminded me of exactly what Bulger was going through. given some time to forget about the pounding he’ll start to look better but now’s just to soon for him. And I agree w/ you on Bradford. I like Suh but I think I’ll be owning a Bradford jersey here, pretty soon.
"SJAX" - The extra strength cleaner that fights off that Stubborn, Stingy Defense
by moy on Apr 9, 2010 2:13 PM CDT up reply actions
I can't imagine a team like Buffalo
wouldn’t provide them with a pick more valuable then a 6th or 7th.
Baseball season is back - Go Halos!
Alas poor Bulger, I knew him well.
Leader of a team that’s won 6 of 48 games the last 3 seasons. Farewell.
I bet...
he signs with the Steelers, there’s a good chance Big Ben won’t be playing at the start of the season.
I don't think Pitts is a good fit...
Big Ben takes a beating too – but has a much bigger frame to hold up to the pounding vs Bulger. I know he holds the ball a long time to account for a portion of the sacks, but still…
Free Brandon Wood!
49ers
I suppose they could bring in Bulger on a one-year deal, but given that they gave David Carr a two-year deal, I just don’t see it happening.
That's what I was thinking
But honestly I don’t think David Carr is even worth mentioning as a backup.
The House of Spears reigns supreme
Bulger
to me would be a great fit in arizona. I know they got leinhart but Bulger would be a great back up. I mean I thought warner was done in New York but he goes to the Cardinals and makes a superbowl run. Bulger is no Warner but he does show symptoms of him (accurate, quick release, and needs time in the pocket). also TB or Carolina.
Think B's for Bulger
Browns or Bills?
Anyhow, these two teams are STILL IN PLAY to trade up for Bradford. Often, players whose college team colors are similar to their pro team colors do well – something about the visual comfort level/assymilation … Also, don’t count out Carolina or Seattle.
Also, draft pundits lately have like 5-6 OT going in the top 12 selections – what does this tell ya?
#1 pick
Agree with jlcb70, #1 pick still in play with team picking after 5.
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Recommended FanPosts
Recent FanPosts
Cover the web with Turf
In Association With
Shutdown Corner - NFL - Yahoo! Sports
- Former high-school star Brian Banks does serious time on trumped-up charge, now hopes for an NFL shot
- Former ‘idiot kicker’ Mike Vanderjagt in trouble after accosting junior-high heckler
- Adrian Peterson blows teammates away in footraces; appears to be on the mend
- UPDATE: Charlie Sheen didn’t buy Lawrence Taylor’s Super Bowl ring
- Alex Smith gets blown up by Jon Beason over Cam Newton comments
