Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Knicks Beat Lakers With Familiar Strategy

McNabb, Campbell, Bradford and the Rams

It's Monday, and the St. Louis Rams do not have an answer at QB for 2010. Of course, that could change in just a little less than three weeks when the Rams are widely expected to make Oklahoma QB Sam Bradford the first overall pick of the draft. However, the Eagles decision to trade Donovan McNabb to the Redskins gives the Rams one other scenario to consider as April 22 approaches. Let's jump in with some Monday morning water cooler fodder. 

Star-divide

Redskins QB Jason Campbell became expendable yesterday, and already several teams are said to be interested. From Rotoworld:

Buffalo, Carolina, Oakland, Jacksonville and an unknown team are interested in Jason Campbell, according to ESPN Radio 980 in Washington D.C.

No word if that's the Rams, and I'd be surprised if it were. If Billy Devaney made a move to get Campbell, the Rams would be charting a different course in the draft, likely pursuing DT Ndamukong Suh or DT Gerald McCoy with the first overall pick. 

Campbell is in that middle tier of quarterbacks; he's quite capable, but hardly the kind of guy that can dominate a game on his own on a weekly basis. In an earlier conversation about Bradford here at TST someone hit the nail on the head when calling him a game-manager, or something like that.

The former Auburn QB would fit nicely into the team's West Coast offense, and at 28, he figures to have some tread left on his tires. Of course, playing behind Washington's offensive line may have done irreversible damage, and the Rams can't afford to go through that again. 

With a fresh, capable face under center, the Rams could make a significant upgrade to their defense drafting one of the afore mentioned DTs. It might even generate some trade interest for the top pick (doubtful, but possible). 

The Rams would lose considerable bargaining leverage if they made this move before April 22, which could defeat one advantage - the price of the contract - of not drafting a QB first overall. 

As far as the cost of trading for Campbell, who was tendered at the first round level, it might be the Rams second round pick, which would give the Rams a better QB than they'd be apt to get in the second round anyway. [Note by VanRam, 04/05/10 11:40 AM EDT ] The price may be right. Peter King speculates that Campbell would be worth a fifth round pick. He's bound to be something below the second round in an offer since what else will Washington do with him?

In that scenario, Cleveland or Buffalo would be the most likely landing spots for Bradford in the draft. 

Besides the big hurdle of whether or not Devaney and Co. could pull off such a trade, the question comes down to the franchise direction. Bradford, who looks like a very promising QB, would be the face of the franchise for a decade at least, the kind of cornerstone franchises are built around. Dynamic, young QBs are to football teams what the Acropolis was to Athens.

If the Rams were to make this hypothetical trade for Campbell, they'd be putting that off and pursuing a win sooner if not now strategy, whereas with a rookie QB they'd be looking at another losing season, but one headed, finally, in the right direction. A more competitive team now would put butts in the seats and help the team's revenue picture, not to mention give the team some leverage when 2014 rolls around and it's time to find an answer to the stadium conundrum. Bradford could do the same thing, hitting the peak of his career at exactly the time the Rams need local fan and financial support. With Campbell, the team would be looking for their next QB right about that time, if not sooner. 

This is a tough scenario to think about because either way it could work out well for the Rams. Thoughts?

Poll
Hypothetical: Would you rather the Rams draft a young Sam Bradford to take them into the future or pursue Jason Campbell for a shorter-term solution?
Draft Bradford
520 votes
Get Campbell
423 votes
No to both
149 votes

1092 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 20 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I'd be happy with Campbell

but trading that 33rd overall pick would be giving away too much.
Given as the price for a multiple time Pro Bowl QB is #37 overall and a 3rd or 4th round pick in 2011 (itself an inflated price due to divisional rivalry) then no way would we get fair value by giving up our 2nd rounder for Campbell IMO.
Campbell may have benefits in trade value (younger and smaller salary), but there is much more than a 3rd or 4th round pick in 2011 between them in value.
If the FO can get creative (Barron and/or Carriker anyone?) or lower Washington’s likely expectations, then great, but otherwise, surely, we watch Bradford tell Keenan Burton to get a new shirt number.

by RamintheUK on Apr 5, 2010 10:08 AM CDT reply actions  

Trust me...

…there’s absolutely nothing that you want from the Redskins. The Skins will most likely unload Campbell but, BUF, CLE and OAK are more inclined to make a larger trade with Washington. It’s not a pressing issue to sign Campbell to the Rams if you have Bradford staring at you in the face at #1. Not to say that it’s not a possibility, but I assume Bruce Allen will want the biggest bang for his buck, and STL is set up right now to send low-ball offers for JC17.

And if I so hear another armchair ’Skins fan toss Carlos “cant-cover-a-double-move” Rogers name in to a possible trade package, Imma throw up. Their best way to get rid of him is to drive straight up i95 for about 45 minutes, ring the doorbell and run away giggling.

by Boofer on Apr 5, 2010 11:23 AM CDT reply actions  

Why not do both?

Trade Campbell for Null and a 5th rounder. QB depth is as follows:
1)Campbell; 2)Bradford, and 3) Feeley. QB depth problems solved. Bradford could learn under Campbell who is not afraid to take hits. Feeley could help Campbell and Bradford adjust to pure WC offense.

Washington gets a project as their 2nd/3rd stringer. It’s win-win for all.

by 81 Witness on Apr 5, 2010 11:34 AM CDT reply actions  

I'd assume Washington is now in the unloading of extra QBs game.

Colt Brennan or Richard Bartel over Null? Of course, Null has more playing minutes in a regular season games than Brennan does (0:00), but Colt has more IR experience. I don’t thing Null is a trade-able option.

by Boofer on Apr 5, 2010 11:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

I still like Null

He played poorly statistically, but played like a man nonetheless.

The blind stares of a million pairs of eyes, lookin hard but won't realize, that they'll never see the C. And when I'm rollin by, you can't see me!

by CoachConnors on Apr 5, 2010 12:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

Did

we trade/release Bulger when I wasn’t looking?

THIS year's the year. I hope....

by thisguy on Apr 5, 2010 1:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

No

Just a lame duck. I assume that they are hanging onto him just in case something weird and unforseen happens. I don’t think his roster bonus is due till week 1 (but I could be wrong)….

Free Brandon Wood!

by gorams77 on Apr 5, 2010 1:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

Haha!

Just saw the Fanpost and story!

THIS year's the year. I hope....

by thisguy on Apr 5, 2010 4:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

If Campbell couldn't win with the Redskins

why does anyone think he could win with the Rams? He would be almost no improvement over last year.

by andyrose on Apr 5, 2010 12:21 PM CDT reply actions  

He certainly had plenty of playing time in DC

I know they had coaching turnover which makes it hard on a young QB, but I still am left with the feeling he’s had ample opportunity and has been the definition of pedestrian. Maybe a change of scenery and scheme would help him but I can’t get excited about him.

The blind stares of a million pairs of eyes, lookin hard but won't realize, that they'll never see the C. And when I'm rollin by, you can't see me!

by CoachConnors on Apr 5, 2010 12:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think this lessens the chance of the Rams trading the #1 significantly because

 If Bradford is the guy someone would trade up for: not only does it take Washington out of consideration but if they trade Campbell, whoever he goes to will probably not be able or interested in moving up to 1.

If Suh is the guy someone would trade up for: better chance of seeing that team trade up to #2 or #3 because most think the Rams are going QB anyway.

The blind stares of a million pairs of eyes, lookin hard but won't realize, that they'll never see the C. And when I'm rollin by, you can't see me!

by CoachConnors on Apr 5, 2010 12:34 PM CDT reply actions  

Yep, this move by skins forced Rams hand!

So, teams that may still make a play for qb’s in the 1st rd. include,

SKINSees after D.M.
BROWNs
BILLS
SEAHAWKS
JAGS
PANTHERS
DOLPHINS
VIKINGS
RAMSEES

anyone else?

by jlcdb70 on Apr 5, 2010 1:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

no way on Campbell

I’ve seen way to many redskins’ games to think campbell would even be an option. i have never seen campbell look comfortable in the pocket. at this point Null would be a better option, at least he’s not afaid to take a hit.

Bradford, Sue or trade the No.1 w/ the right kind of deal. all positive options but no on JC.

"SJAX" - The extra strength cleaner that fights off that Stubborn, Stingy Defense

by moy on Apr 5, 2010 2:27 PM CDT reply actions  

I am blown away....

….with the fact that there are so many Rams fans that are actually cool with the thought of bringing in Jason Campbell to take over under center! I fully believe that Marc Bulger is an upgrade over Jason Campbell. We would definetely be taking a step back if we were to bring him in.

I just hope that Marc Bulger and Jason Campbell both land on teams that are looking for QB help to see if the market for Jimmy Clausen changes. One draft magazine that I have purchased predicts that Clausen is going to go through a free fall much like Aaron Rodgers and Drew Brees did when they came out and fall into our laps at the top of the second round. That would be an all time coupe if we could get Suh number one and Clausen #33.

by NachoD on Apr 5, 2010 4:55 PM CDT reply actions  

That isn't going to happen.

Even when the others dropped, they didn’t fall all the way to the second round. If we want to take Suh, recognize that means we are playing with Feeley and Null as our QBs this year. If you are cool with that, then fine, but don’t kid yourself that Clausen will fall all the way to the second round. He’s too good a QB for that, even though I don’t think he’s as good as Bradford.

by andyrose on Apr 5, 2010 11:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

No way we would have seen Clausen fall that far....

but it did happen! I just wonder if a trade would have occurred by another team knowing that we were banking on Clausen being there for us.

by NachoD on May 4, 2010 6:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

Campbell will be draft day trade

I see skins trading Campbell during draft unless someone gives up at least a 3 before.
I still think Rams will go Suh at 1 and heavy on D side in draft unless a TE like Grisham falls to 2nd.

by rlf707 on Apr 6, 2010 10:25 AM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about St. Louis Rams.

FanPosts

Cover the web with Turf


Managers

71523_170793669601439_100000124211145_596632_5713708_n_small Ryan Van Bibber

Baby_drinking_becks_small 3k

Editors

Jackson_medium_small Eric Nagel

Peter_small VTramsFan

Bugs_bunny_pose_small Douglas M

Authors

Wildcat_small Tackle Box

Dsc03827_small CoachConnors

Mardygilyardsig_small Tevin T. Broner

Bradford_draft_small buckeyefan55

Tst_small T.Ram

Images_small Brick Top

Small EddieP

Profile_pic1_small Mike Dietrich