Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: This Week In GIFs

From the peanut gallery: Fans grade the Rams 2010 draft

The St. Louis Rams wrapped up the 2010 NFL Draft this afternoon. It was the second draft of the post-Zygmunt era (PZE). While each packs for spring OTAs, we'll have lots more to say about it. 

And of course, it's almost as ridiculous to grade the Rams 2010 draft less than 24 hour after it ended, but we are, alas, human. All things must be understood in a digestible order. So let's open this up to a vote and a hardy discussion. Here are the picks:

R1- Sam Bradford, QB, Oklahoma (link)

R2 Roger Saffold, OT, Indiana (link)

R3 - Jerome Murphy, CB, South Florida (link)

R4 - Mardy Gilyard, WR, Cincinnati (link)

R5 - Michael Hoomanawanui, TE, Illinois (link)

R5 - Hall Davis, DE, Louisiana- Lafayette (link)

R6 - Fendi Onobon, TE, Houston (link)

R6 - Eugene Sims, DE, West Texas A&M (link)

R7 - Marquis Johnson, CB, Alabama (link)

R7 - George Selvie, DE, South Florida (link)

R7 - Josh Hill, LB, Penn State

Poll
What grade would you give the Rams for their draft this year?
A
164 votes
B
571 votes
C
203 votes
D
40 votes
F
15 votes

993 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 93 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I gave it a C

And I have a story coming tomorrow with individual grades, so I’ll withhold shit-talking until then.

You don't seem to want to accept the fact you're dealing with an expert in guerrilla warfare, with a man who's the best, with guns, with knives, with his bare hands. A man who's been trained to ignore pain, ignore weather, to live off the land, to eat things that would make a billy goat puke. In *St. Louis* his job was to dispose of enemy personnel. To kill! Period! Win by attrition. Well, *Steven Jackson* was the best.

by 3k on Apr 24, 2010 9:02 PM CDT reply actions  

I gave it a B

addressed some needs and i’m an optimist.

Steve Nash plays D!!

by phxsuns on Apr 24, 2010 9:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

That's me,
As much fun as it's been looking at the negatives for the last 3 years....

by Toddius on Apr 24, 2010 11:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

C here as well

Close to a D.. I felt things went to hell in a handbasket after round 2.. I justified Safford, I justified Bradford.. the rest blanks for me honestly… I felt we left a lot of talent on the table

"The greatest accomplishment is not in never falling, but in rising again after you fall." - Vince Lombardi

by VTramsFan on Apr 24, 2010 9:48 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

C as well

I have to agree…we passed on way too many good players in rounds 2-4 in my mind. The Seahawks and Niners had way better drafts then us and I love all the players the Seahawks got. I’m not sure what the Rams were thinking with some of these picks. After the Bradford pick it went downhill fast in my mind. How did we pass on Everson Griffen in the 4th round? Absolutely crazy!

by ksmooth on Apr 24, 2010 9:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

aight

my grades are up. Vent as necessary.

You don't seem to want to accept the fact you're dealing with an expert in guerrilla warfare, with a man who's the best, with guns, with knives, with his bare hands. A man who's been trained to ignore pain, ignore weather, to live off the land, to eat things that would make a billy goat puke. In *St. Louis* his job was to dispose of enemy personnel. To kill! Period! Win by attrition. Well, *Steven Jackson* was the best.

by 3k on Apr 24, 2010 11:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

When they didn't even address OLB

or DT, and only added some DEs at the end of the draft, nor did they pick up any real qualtiy TE or back-up RB, it’s hard to see how this draft can even be a C. I gave it a D, and that’s only because of their first two picks. I guess I’m channeling edjpr.

by andyrose on Apr 24, 2010 9:15 PM CDT reply actions  

Channeling??

Is Edjpr dead?

Steve Nash plays D!!

by phxsuns on Apr 24, 2010 9:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

That's EDPJR...

Grade F because there’s nothing lower. I’m so pissed about this draft that I can’t see straight. Not only do the A-holes in the FO keep detrimental players like Barron, but they added all useless players except Bradford. Not an impact player anywhere but with the 1st pick. Turned a blind eye to our non-existent D-Line problems (Chrissy Long included). Crapped on best defender James Lauranaitis. He’s still got to do the job of 3 LB’s. Told SJax to suck it up and do it on his own with no backup. What a bunch of idiots we have in Devaney, Spags, Shurmur, et.al !! Coughlin must be the real genius of the NYG’s. Cause they didn’t win a SB due to Spagnuola type convoluted thinking. Hey, maybe the OT with the 2nd pick is to cover for picking soft-head Jason Smith last year when Mark Sanchez was available? Quick Spags, maybe you can still trade and get Adam Carriker back. Or maybe you can re-sign Marc Bulger to help teach Bradford how to be a star loser. Oh wait, you already got Feeley and Null to do that. Better yet, have Alex Barron instill some “team spirit” in the boy. The Rams have been cursed since we dumped Kurt Warner. And damn if it don’t look like we deserve it.

by edpjr on Apr 25, 2010 12:46 AM CDT up reply actions  

Hey were you been they told me you have stop posting here lol

i was being asked questions about you just today by carneros and coachconnors they think i was you ha ha ha

by Ram-on on Apr 26, 2010 4:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

Devaney understands positional value and need

And he’s clearly acting with a plan and sticking to it. This deserves an ‘A’

I'm like a polygon, I'm edgy.

Resident malcontented betamale

by slu on Apr 24, 2010 9:25 PM CDT reply actions  

+1

Just going down a checklist and picking someone who fills a need is not a good draft strategy. Drafting like that is how you end up 1-15. Devanney clearly went with BPA to a shocking degree, and it will pay dividends for us in the future. When everson griffin is out of the league in two years you will understand.

by gomer7 on Apr 24, 2010 10:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

When Steven Jackson is burned out in two years

you’ll understand. We had to have a solid back-up for him and we didn’t get it.

Ed Dickson at TE would have been a far greater upgrade for our passing attack than Gilyard at WR. A solid OLB would have been worth far more than the average-at-best DEs we drafted. Don’t put up straw men like Everson Griffen. I was happy to pass on him. Where is our OLB? Our run defense is going to be just as bad in 2010 as it was in 2009. Our pass rush will be just as bad in 2010 as it was in 2009. We went for quantity, not quality, and that’s the way you lose. The only position where we really upgraded in this draft was QB.

by andyrose on Apr 25, 2010 12:23 AM CDT up reply actions  

I also gave it a C

My off the cuff analysis based on no actual scouting but just who we picked. I am not giving these actual players these grades but more the position and type of player we took where we took him.

My draft analysis:
1) Bradford (A) – Definite need and the more I hear about him I like him. I was leaning towards Suh but there is no arguing that the Rams needed a franchise QB more than a DT. I am officially a die-hard Bradford fan.

2) Saffold (B) – I am not giving this pick a B because I think Saffold is bad at all. I think he makes sense and does help the Rams. He was also a decent value where we grabbed him. However, I feel we had more pressing needs than a OT/OG with this pick. He will contribute and will help a lot especially long term, but I feel a starting OLB, DT, or WR would have been a better use of a pick here. For example I would have much rather picked the WR Benn here (even if it was a bit of a reach) and drafted a OT/OG in round 4 instead of Gilyard.

3) Jerome Murphy © – Again I would argue that a OLB, DT, WR, or backup RB would be better picks here. I think we need help at CB especially with depth, but with Bartell and Fletcher (assuming he recovers form the injury) we already have 2 starters that are viable. The same can’t be said for OLB.

4) Gilyard (A) – I really liked this pick. I would have much rather addressed the need at WR earlier but I like Gilyard a lot for where we got him. Great KR and really productive. He will be great at yards after the catch.

5) Hoomanawanui (D) – I am not a big fan of this pick at all. Yes we need TE help, but we have so many other big needs that this seems like a waste. He isn’t a receiving threat from what I read so at best he is out #2 blocking TE. The only way I would really condone this is if they feel he is a beast at run blocking and will give our running game a huge boost. Even then, I would have rather had a OLB, DE, DT, RB with this pick.

6) Davis (B) – DE is a major need and we picked one! He sounds pretty good and hopefully he can contribute in the rotation. I was just glad we drafted a position of need here.

7) Onobon (F) – A second TE and a guy who is totally raw and has not played much football? A good team that is drafting for depth can afford this kind of pick in Round 6 but that Rams can’t. We have so many positions of need that a TE (and the 2nd one in this draft) just doesn’t make sense. Similar to Null, he probably would have gone undrafted and we could have picked him up post draft. I hope he turns into the next Gates, but right now he is just a raw talent that can’t contribute for a while. Bad pick in my opinion.

8) Sims © – It appears we will try him at OLB and that is why I’m giving it a C. At least we tried to address one of our biggest positions of need. It isn’t uncommon to try to convert a DE to OLB and I hope our coaches can do it. I really like this guy’s size and I hope we can get something out of him sooner rather than later. I would have preferred to take someone who had actually played the position before, but I guess they thought he was better than the other OLBs left.

9) Johnson (F) – A second corner and a guy who was only good enough to play 3rd corner in college? Doesn’t sound that promising. I would have much rather picked up RB or DT help with this pick. I hope he is great, but nothing I am reading about him gets me too excited.

10) Selvie (A) – Really good value, serves a need on our team, and can help replace some of Little’s productivity. I liked the pick and even though it was our second DE, he was a good value where we got him.

11) Hill (B) – A LB!! I know he isn’t really an OLB, but I was just happy they drafted some LB help. I will take any linebacker from Penn State is I can get him. I would have much rather the Rams addressed this position earlier, but at least we got some help here.

Grand Total:
I gave them 3 A’s, 3 B’s, 2 C’s, 1 D, and 2 F’s. Again, I am not really passing judgment on any of these guys at players, but more on our coaches and GM and where they picked what position. I am a die hard Rams fan and I will root for all of these guys as hard as I can as long as they are in our uniform.

It seems to me that Devany and company make the right picks at the right positions in early rounds, but are too quick to use later rounds for pet projects or guys they think are interesting. I think there is a place for this, but guys are dropping into these later rounds and you need to look for value here as well.

by Hetfield72 on Apr 24, 2010 9:33 PM CDT reply actions  

It turned my...

C’s into © ’s above I just noticed. Sorry for the confusion.

by Hetfield72 on Apr 24, 2010 9:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

Onobon

will contribute on special teams right away.

I don’t know how you can grade players you don’t know and you haven’t watched film on. Maybe you do know them. I don’t. The draft is always a good place to reserve judgment in my experience. You don’t know whether you were successful until much later.

by Toddius on Apr 25, 2010 12:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

Onobon played one year in college

and caught a grand total of two passes. What can you possibly see when watching film that would tell you he is going to help us at all? If we had a development team in Europe where he could learn to play football, this might work, but having him learn on the NFL roster when we have so many positions that are really hurting just doesn’t make sense.

by andyrose on Apr 25, 2010 12:29 AM CDT up reply actions  

Not sure how any 7th round pick can be an F (unless they drafted me of course)

Sure the guy was the 3rd CB but he was the 3rd behind a first and second round pick this year. Can’t really use that to say he’s incapable, especially for a 7th rounder.

I'm like a polygon, I'm edgy.

Resident malcontented betamale

by slu on Apr 24, 2010 9:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

I gave an F...

to the fact that they drafted a CB there, not really to the player. I wasn’t really trying to grade the actual players too much because I haven’t seen almost any of them play. I just was giving my opinion on what the picked was used for…if that makes any sense. I guess I am saying that I would have rather had a 7th round RB, OLB or DT than another CB. Just my opinion.

by Hetfield72 on Apr 24, 2010 9:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

It seems smarter

to me then trying to project how these guys will play in the NFL when they have never taken a snap. I hate when people give draft grades based on how good these guys are because no one really knows if they are good.

I totally get that you shouldn’t just say “okay we need a RB so no matter who is there with our next pick we take a RB”. That would be stupid. But I do think there should be a thought like “We have 3 big team needs at OLB, DT, and RB here. I will look for talent and value at these 3 positions and compare it to the other guys. If it is close I will try to fill our needs”. Maybe it was never close according to our guys, but it seems unlikely that there wasn’t someone.

You obviously can’t always draft best player available or you could end up with 5 WRs in a draft or something. At some point you have to factor in whether or not these guys will even make your roster. Hopefully they did that, but for example with Fells appearing to be a guy that the coaches like, how can both these new TEs get on the field? I

by Hetfield72 on Apr 24, 2010 10:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

I just did..

A=4.0, B=3.0, C=2.0, D=1.0, and F=0. Added them all up and divided by 11. Was like 2.3ish so I gave it a C. I didn’t weight early picks more because it wasn’t like I was comparing the talent of the players or anything.

by Hetfield72 on Apr 24, 2010 9:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

you cant argue

that OLB is a better pick there. Who. which OLB. Maybe there wasn’t one near as good as murphy is a corner. Our secondary didnt perform that great either.

by gomer7 on Apr 24, 2010 10:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

back up rb

would have loved to see them get joe mcknight would have been great compliment to Steven

by phx suns on Apr 24, 2010 9:46 PM CDT reply actions  

I'm still too pissed to make a logical assessment!

I thought I was the ultimate optimists, however I keep seeing people saying: How can you be pissed about guys that haven’t played a down yet?
You have to make your judgement based on the passed 4 years (more realistically 2 years) of a players production. I am a firm believer if we give our coaching staff the most talent possible, that they will be able to have a better chance of success. I don’t think we did that this draft.

by CaliRamMan on Apr 24, 2010 10:16 PM CDT reply actions  

I wasn't because I knew what kind of player Fletcher was.

The only good thing to come from all this is that we’ll be picking at top of every round again next year. Even with the passive approach our FO takes, sooner or later we’ll have to add a few good players. Of course, SJ is going to be burned out by then because they won’t get him any help, electing to take a CB who couldn’t start in college instead of one of the two solid running backs who were never drafted – Blount and Stefan Johnson.

by andyrose on Apr 25, 2010 12:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

Nope!

I didn’t even think we should consider Barden until the 5th round. I will admit, that I didn’t know much about Fletcher, so I was more interested in finding out about him. I was Pissed about drafting Brooks Foster over Duke Robinson who was an All-American OG. That reaction has only been validated by the drafting of Gilyard, basically admitting that Foster was a wasted pick and that he may have a hard time making the roster.
I was pissed about the TE acquisition in the 5th, hell both rounds 5 and 6 were f-ing pointless, leaving talent on the table. I was pissed about waiting to address DE and OLB so late in the draft.

by CaliRamMan on Apr 25, 2010 4:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

yeah.....

i’m gonna give them a B. but think about it, Billy is getting paid soooooooooo much more than me to do his job, so just cause we’re fans it don’t mean we know what’s exactly going on

"Twin-headed infinite swirling vortex of grotesque suckitude known as Tony Clark and Eric Byrnes"

by sergey606 on Apr 24, 2010 10:19 PM CDT reply actions  

Zygmut was also getting paid much more than you to do the same job

and he basically ruined our team within half a decade. I am still in-limbo on where I stand on Billy D.

by CaliRamMan on Apr 25, 2010 4:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

Being a HUGE Suh supporter...

Just kidding. I did want Suh, but I’ve come to terms with our pick and truly hope he succeeds. There was lots of value to be had after round 2 that we left out there. I get the feeling that we drafted players for their motor and desire to succeed which is always a good thing to do, but I still feel like we should have taken Griffen in the 4th. That would have made the draft that much deeper for us and allowed us to not take 2 DE’s later.

Spags likes his character guys though, and I really like the Selvie pick in the 7th. Reminds me of a few years ago when the Broncos took Elvis Dumervil in the 4th(?) round I think. Big producer in college but his pro status was discounted because he didn’t fit the typical DE mold. It looks like Dumervil has now switched to OLB, but still. I think the undervalued comparison holds.

I don’t understand the TEs or the CBs really. Seems like one TE would have been enough. I go the the University of Illinois and got to see Uh-oh-manawanui play. Seemed to me he was a viable pass catcher and wasn’t relied on near enough especially with the poor quarterback play we received. He could also block pretty well so there’s that. A high-floor low ceiling pick if there ever was one.

I gave us a C for this draft. Bradford will be fine and I liked the Saffold pick. Our O-line should be above average to great for the forseeable future. Questions in the later rounds definitely drag down the score.

Jeff Jordan's dad can beat up your dad.

by flipthebird15 on Apr 24, 2010 10:21 PM CDT reply actions  

I think the Rams draft picks just got a little weird after the Gilyard pick. I was hopeful up until that point. I also think the FO made an huge error not moving up for Hernandez. But hey, they get paid to see things we don’t and ultimately their jobs will rest on the choices they made. Draft Grade: C-

My life's unique distinction is being one of the very few who bought (and suffered through) Rams season tickets in Anaheim from '86 to '94. Boy, I miss those days.

by cuseguy on Apr 24, 2010 10:39 PM CDT reply actions  

A disappointed rams fan

I’m really disappointed the way the rams did in the draft over all. I’ve been a rams fan since the 70’s and always will be. But I really am sick at the way this draft went. A very deep draft but the rams left a lot of talent on the board. I will always be a rams fan , but I’m so sick of the way the seasons goes and this draft finally has pushed me to the point where I’ve got to find another team to root for. I still will root for the rams and always will , but I need 2 teams just to make it through the stinking season. This draft really disappoints me big time! Sick is all I can say. I hope I’m wrong but I wonder if the FO knows what they are doing.

by rambro4ever on Apr 24, 2010 10:39 PM CDT reply actions  

thebirds...we don't make trades or give up super valuable 4th or 5th round draft picks so we can get guys that other teams didn't even have on thier boards.

You want to see how to run a team? All you have to do is look at the Sea Chickens, Patriots, Lions ect…. Good draft picks and picked up a decent RB (Lendale White) for a hamburger or something. The Rams front office didn’t know anything about Leon Washington, L.White or S. Holmes. Nah we will pick up a 40yr old RB with massive injury issues. Awesome! The draft sucked and reaffirmed what I have been saying all along. If you play the lottery you get nothing more times than not. Hope you guys like changing coaches every 3 years.

by Everett 11 on Apr 24, 2010 10:39 PM CDT reply actions  

Yeah you are right, we wouldn’t want 12-15 carries a game and 500 punishing yards this coming season. We will just pick up 50yr old Westbrook and his ten concussions. You are right and much smarter than me. We probably wouldn’t have wanted Leon Washington or Santonio either.

by Everett 11 on Apr 24, 2010 11:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

And I hear he's a douchebag

Jeff Jordan's dad can beat up your dad.

by flipthebird15 on Apr 25, 2010 1:34 AM CDT up reply actions  

im in shock

i never thought anybody would look to the lions as a model example of how to run a team…

"'Doublethink' means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them" -George Orwell

by SmoothlikeRaz on Apr 24, 2010 10:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah I didn’t either but, they drafted well and picked up a lot of help via free agency. We will be alone or maybe with the Raiders at the bottom in 2010.

by Everett 11 on Apr 24, 2010 11:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

The Raiders have a far better defense than we do.

Now that they have an average QB, they will do far better than the Rams.

by andyrose on Apr 25, 2010 12:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

i wonder if we did it again

would devaney pick suh and go with clausen or mcoy?

Keith Null won't accept my friend requests.

by loyal2therams on Apr 24, 2010 10:45 PM CDT reply actions  

no, he could have done it the first time

If anything it reaffirms that the no one in the rest of the league considers Clausen a top talent

by gomer7 on Apr 24, 2010 10:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

Here's the thing....

I keep hearing from people here “we left a lot of talent on the board”, think about that statement for a second, were we the only team that passed on that “talent” through the 2nd and 3rd rounds? NO!!! There were 30 other NFL franchises that past on that so called “talent”. Do you as fans really honestly believe that you are a better talent evaluater than the FO from 30 NFL teams I would like to think there were good reasons why that “talent” continued to fall and get passed by teams round by round.

by bdemartin on Apr 24, 2010 10:59 PM CDT reply actions  

I thought about it

and the only thing I can add is that it’s hard to determine how much talent was left on the board when the draft only ended seven hours ago.

by blindmouse on Apr 24, 2010 11:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

Tight end Ed Dickson

went shortly after we picked Gilyard. He would have been a much greater upgrade for us at TE than Gilyard will be at WR. We passed on all the OLBs that were there. And for what, two TEs that probably won’t play much for us this year and two DEs that may not even make the team? That’s what we mean when we say they left lots of talent on the board.

by andyrose on Apr 25, 2010 12:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

I give the Rams a B

Lot of negative arm-chair fans here….. lol. It takes 3 years for a draft to pan out.Take a breath and relax.

by Thomas W on Apr 24, 2010 11:04 PM CDT reply actions  

+1

Same mark here.

And Devaney, Spagnuolo and Co actually have much more info than all of us here when they pick players. They have watched films, met players and talked to their coaches.

Fans judge players based on reputation mostly.

by Le Ram on Apr 24, 2010 11:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

That's what they used to tell us

about Linehan and company also. Oh, they know lots more about it than we do. Look how that turned out. And Mike Martz before that. Yes, they have more information about specific players than we do, but that doesn’t mean their judgement is any better or that they are using all that information to make the best picks for the team.

by andyrose on Apr 25, 2010 12:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

Now I have been extremely critical

of the Rams and the entire front office. I don’t agree with a lot of the decisions made through the off season so far, but I will say that we did pretty good in this years draft. It’s not going to be able to be seen for 5 months but on paper it’s not a bad job. Now it has to all get put together and somehow scrape up some wins in 2010. I think if we keep the team as it is now, providing OJ is with us, we are still looking at a 2-3 win season at best. There are still a lot of positions that we need to fill before we can start calling these guys a professional football team again. So now lets go round up some veteran players to fill those holes at WR,LB,and CB. Maybe get a little agressive for a change and we’ll be in a lot better shape than we are now

by Dub3g on Apr 24, 2010 11:17 PM CDT reply actions  

Mark me down down as a "C".

R1- Sam Bradford, QB, Oklahoma (link)-B- I would only give an “A” to a sure thing. Bradford is talented and has the tools to succeed but I didn’t have him in my top 10 players available and he is going to cost a fortune.

R2 Roger Saffold, OT, Indiana (link)-A- I love everything about this pick excluding that they did not trade it….

R3 – Jerome Murphy, CB, South Florida (link)-C- Didn’t we draft this guy last year when he went by “Fletcher”?

R4 – Mardy Gilyard, WR, Cincinnati (link)-B- I expect him to be a serviceable WR and, perhaps, a dynamic ST player. The problem is that we need a No.1 and Gilyard is destined for the slot. Nearly every receiver we already have is more of a slot-type.

R5 – Michael Hoomanawanui, TE, Illinois (link)-F- Couldn’t we have found a blocking TE somewhere other than the fifth round?

R5 – Hall Davis, DE, Louisiana- Lafayette (link)-C- Maybe Spags knows what he is doing with the d-line: I don’t.

R6 – Fendi Onobon, TE, Houston (link)-C- This would be an “A” a round later. There was too much talent available here. That being said, I am really excited about Fendi. He has HUGE upside despite his limited experience. A perfect seventh round choice…that we took in the 6th.

R6 – Eugene Sims, DE, West Texas A&M (link)-D- Would he have been drafted at all? What position will he play? I want to trust Spags so I won’t give an “F” here.

R7 – Marquis Johnson, CB, Alabama (link)-A- A winner from a winning program. I heard an interview with him on the radio today and came away impressed. A seventh round pick that could make the team.

R7 – George Selvie, DE, South Florida (link)-A-It is the seventh round. We drafted a player that could be difference maker.

R7 – Josh Hill, LB, Penn State-A- I could see him making the team.

Clearly, I grade easier as the intrinsic value of the picks decrease. The 7th rounders all got "A"s because I think they are potential starters in the NFL. They might even be good enough to make teams that aren’t as woeful as the Rams. They may get cut, too.

I am not terribly disappointed that we did not draft a top RB(to be a backup) or OLB as I think that they are two of the easiest positions to fill.

by Sofanumber1 on Apr 25, 2010 12:16 AM CDT reply actions  

Then when are we going to fill them?

And what are we going to get, someone else’s castoffs?

by andyrose on Apr 25, 2010 12:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yes, Castoffs.

I am completely fine with that. OLB is one of the lowest priority positions and one of the easiest to fill. Rosters are not locked for the season. There will be undrafted free agents and castoffs to pick from. Would a good OLB in the fourth round have significantly improved this team? Perhaps.

Backup RB is hugely overvalued when you have a workhorse. Do you want the backup RB to get 10 carries a game? 5? Blount wasn’t drafted. Westbrook isn’t signed.

Everyone complains that SJAX will take a pounding because we don’t have a backup. A credible passing game will take way more pressure of SJAX than a backup RB.

Consider this: If the NFL decided to a redraft from scratch, where would you have the premier OLB ranked? the premier Backup RB?

The Rams have a number of needs and backup RB and OLB are among them;they are simply lower priority.

by Sofanumber1 on Apr 25, 2010 1:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

I would take a stud OLB or DE anyday over a stud RB. Most teams in the NFL have stud RB’s some teams have two. Any coach or scout will tell you that RB and WR are the two easiest positons to find in the draft. Although there is a massive market for premier back up running backs (Chester Taylor, Michael Turner, LT). The market is much smaller for great LB/DE/DT’s due to the fact that there are much less of them in the league. So if you have or can get a premier OLB/DE/DT, that is more valuable than a RB of any stature. Just draft a RB or trade one of the runningback rich teams for one. RB’s are a dime a dozen, great defenders are not.

by Everett 11 on Apr 25, 2010 1:33 AM CDT reply actions  

If you want info on how a “great” running back has helped us over the years, just look at our record since 1990 and then look at the 1,000 yards rushers. We have had some of the worst years in Rams history with a 1,000 yard back running for us. Passing is what wins you games. We needed a great TE and a #1 WR, plain and simple.

by Everett 11 on Apr 25, 2010 1:39 AM CDT reply actions  

Well passing and a decent defense.

by Everett 11 on Apr 25, 2010 1:40 AM CDT reply actions  

F

        Some of these choices made me physically sick to my stomach.

by dbcouver on Apr 25, 2010 4:02 AM CDT reply actions  

Devaney was sleep walking in the war room and his puppet Spags never speaks lol

Spagnolo has no real authority on this team like a real head coach he is just Davaneys puppet he will say and do as he is told ,this is all Devaney so its time he gets the full blame as well,Billy i hope you read our blog let me just say your draft really sucked other then bradford your picks were piss poor

by Ram-on on Apr 25, 2010 5:36 AM CDT reply actions  

I inherently disagree with the grading of drafts

so I’ll give this Rams draft an “incomplete”.

Because the Rams drank too much this semester, and forgot to turn in a few key assignments.

OLB whauhhaha?

block! building kick! exploooooooosion!

by mooseknuckles41 on Apr 25, 2010 5:38 AM CDT reply actions  

I'm still hoping for a few moves to happen before the season starts

We need to get Osi from the giants, he has obviously been deemed umworthy by the giants via their 1st round pick. i think under spags hes a quality starter. 2nd lets get a backup RB if its westbrook ill take him. He isnt what he once was, but we arent going to use him like the Eagles were, He will only be our backup and he will be one of the best backups in the league. Finally get another olb. Diggs and vobra are okay but we need depth at olb.

by Force 314 on Apr 25, 2010 8:18 AM CDT reply actions  

C at best, like others have said after the Bradford pick the rest of the draft went downhill fast, typical of the Rams to blow the only positive from last year and that was to have the first pick of every round, they WASTED IT…I can not believe that the freaking Lions have to me done an A + draft for their needs and we still can’t pull our heads out of our asses,.

PS- Glad to see EDJPR back!!!

If practice makes perfect....
Yet nobodies perfect.....
Then why practice ???

by peteyweestro on Apr 25, 2010 3:45 PM CDT reply actions  

Very nice draft

Bradford Gilyard and Saffold rock

I would say B+

He’s always open. He catches a lot of balls. He’s un-guardable, no matter how old he is

by WarWolf on Apr 25, 2010 11:34 PM CDT reply actions  

I like Selvie too

I don’t know the other names, but most are late rounders and may turn out to be good

Sam and Marty with Saffold and Selvie is enough

He’s always open. He catches a lot of balls. He’s un-guardable, no matter how old he is

by WarWolf on Apr 26, 2010 8:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about St. Louis Rams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Cletus-the-slack-jawed-yokel-7_small
Attention All Dome Lemmings: Shut Up!
Img_20120429_144716_small
Quick Thoughts: CVC Proposal vs Rams Proposal
Small
New York Giant And Medal Of Honor Winner: 1st Lt Andrew Jackson Lummus
Small
St. Louis Rams:Tough Call - Who Stays And Who Goes In 2013?
Marshall-faulk-1999_small
St. Louis Rams Coaching- The Offensive Line

Recent FanPosts

L50i99-l50i4n0704ohiostaterams_small
Does Mike Karney Deserve A Second Shot?
Small
How many games will the Rams win this coming year??
Small
My Early 53 Man Roster Predictions
Stewie_small
Time To Step Up Bradford
Images_small
Mocking the 53
Small
Rams Land a Litter in Ground-Breaking Trade
Small
40 Years of Ram Football

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Cover the web with Turf


Managers

71523_170793669601439_100000124211145_596632_5713708_n_small Ryan Van Bibber

Baby_drinking_becks_small 3k

Editors

Jackson_medium_small Eric Nagel

Peter_small VTramsFan

Bugs_bunny_pose_small Douglas M

Authors

Marshall-faulk-1999_small papapegasus

Lggn0229jules-and-vincent-cartoon-pulp-fiction-poster_small Rick Siegel

Images-3_small DCRamFan

Bradford_draft_small Josh Wehrle

Tst_small Tevin Broner

Images_small Brick Top

Plaid_small EddieP

Profile_pic1_small Mike Dietrich

Sp-studio1_small Joe Mazzi

Moderators

Dsc03827_small CoachConnors