Turf Show Times: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Along The Olentangy for Ohio State Fans!

2010 NFL Draft: Rumor round up

And just like that the interwebs are humming with excitement about potential deals just hours away from the second round of the 2010 NFL Draft. Let's take a look at the most recent talk making the rounds.

First and foremost, will the St. Louis Rams be trading their 33rd pick? It seems likely according to Rams GM Billy Devaney. That earlier report had the Bills and Browns interested in the pick, and now Michael Lombardi is saying they've received several offers.

Despite recent denials, Washington DT Albert Haynesworth is expected to be traded by the end of the day. Jason LaCanfora said that the Titans remain a logical stop, but remember that the Rams were once identified in the Haynesworth trade talk when the Redskins were said to be after Bradford. They could be just as eager for a shot at Clausen or McCoy with the 33rd pick.  

There are some other well-known names said to be available including Patrick Crayton, Marcus Spears and Sam Hurd from the Cowboys; Jags DT John Henderson; Saints OT Jamaal Brown; and Titans RB LenDale White

The Rams are on the clock in less than hour. We'll know soon whether or not they've made a swap. Adam Schefter also says they're receiving offers, but he also says they might keep the pick and draft a wide receiver. 

0 recs  |  Comment 97 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Trade the pick, get Benn and Bowman.

by jesus72 on Apr 23, 2010 4:10 PM CDT reply actions  

I would like to see Henderson being slapped in the face in the Rams locker room before every game

by MathB on Apr 23, 2010 4:18 PM CDT reply actions  

What about Bowman and Price???

I think I would like those two picks. All about the defense this year!!!!!

by ramsrule on Apr 23, 2010 4:33 PM CDT reply actions  

Trade down for great picks!

He’s always open. He catches a lot of balls. He’s un-guardable, no matter how old he is

by WarWolf on Apr 23, 2010 4:44 PM CDT reply actions  

I would think the pick would have been traded by now, right?

If the Bulls don’t make the playoffs I won’t need to watch basketball, its on to basketball.

by QUINTEN DALEY on Apr 2, 2010 12:38 PM PDT

by Option27 on Apr 23, 2010 4:59 PM CDT reply actions  

Jump on the wagon!

If the Bulls don’t make the playoffs I won’t need to watch basketball, its on to basketball.

by QUINTEN DALEY on Apr 2, 2010 12:38 PM PDT

by Option27 on Apr 23, 2010 5:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

protect Sam it is

He’s always open. He catches a lot of balls. He’s un-guardable, no matter how old he is

by WarWolf on Apr 23, 2010 5:11 PM CDT reply actions  

Wow definitly didn’t expect that.

by bobhugehands on Apr 23, 2010 5:12 PM CDT reply actions  

I don’t like the pick at all

by MathB on Apr 23, 2010 5:12 PM CDT reply actions  

first, no trade. second we have way bigger need then OT. But no trade is what hurt the most

by MathB on Apr 23, 2010 5:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

Reach!

We’re going to scrape a D together with late round picks and hope Spags can work some magic out of nothing.

Drafting to our coaching strengths I suppose…

by RamintheUK on Apr 23, 2010 5:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

Devaney said the best offer they got

was to trade down to #48 in 2nd round and get some late round garbage. Carolina wan’ted to get up to get Clausen, but they didn’t offer us much. Everyone kept saying the talent in the 2nd round was pretty even from top to bottom, so why would most teams trade up? We all thought there would be a race to take the QBs, but Clausen fell all the way to 48 and McCoy to the late 3rd round. Obviously we guessed wrong when we felt there would be lots of teams fighting to get to the top of the 2nd round. It didn’t happen, largely because no one wanted the QBs.

by andyrose on Apr 23, 2010 11:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

Drafting Bradford has handcuffed us

        I knew it. We have lost the flexibility by drafting a QB first.

by dbcouver on Apr 23, 2010 5:13 PM CDT reply actions  

Saffold?

Really? Why in God’s name would we pick ANOTHER OFFENSIVE TACKLE????????????????????????????????????

On this team, we are all united in a common goal: to keep my job.
-- Lou Holtz

by RamsMan83 on Apr 23, 2010 5:13 PM CDT reply actions  

i love how kiper

is convinced he will be playing Left Tackle

Don't leave the duck there thats totally irresponsible. Put it on the swing it'll have much more fun. - Sleep Talkin' Man

by gingerredboy on Apr 23, 2010 5:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

well we payed smith

a good amount of money to play Left Tackle so I would hope he would be playing there.

Don't leave the duck there thats totally irresponsible. Put it on the swing it'll have much more fun. - Sleep Talkin' Man

by gingerredboy on Apr 23, 2010 5:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

Here's a good idea...

Why don’t we get someone to throw the ball to? He can stand back there for an hour if he wants….but if he has NO ONE TO THROW THE BALL TO, THEN WHY DOES HE NEED ALL THAT TIME??

On this team, we are all united in a common goal: to keep my job.
-- Lou Holtz

by RamsMan83 on Apr 23, 2010 5:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

Barron is gonna be gone after this year

groom the next tackle opposite of J. Smith. I like our O-Line a lot

Sam Bradford

by Jombari on Apr 23, 2010 5:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yea whats wrong with having 2 good tackles for years to come?

by bobhugehands on Apr 23, 2010 5:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

Because we don't have anybody else good on our team!!!!

On this team, we are all united in a common goal: to keep my job.
-- Lou Holtz

by RamsMan83 on Apr 23, 2010 5:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

Correction

We have a 50 Million Dollar quarterback. If I could install bulletproof glass and kevlar around him I would.

by GrnGyant on Apr 23, 2010 5:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

So if we don’t have any thats good then it doesn’t matter who we pick cause they should be better than what we already have correct?

by bobhugehands on Apr 23, 2010 6:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

Lots of people were saying we should draft a tackle

and get rid of Barron. I heard “book-end tackles” a lot on here leading up to the draft. Well, we got what quite a few were hoping for.

by andyrose on Apr 23, 2010 11:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

Good pick!

This is a need for our O-line. We have Goldberg who is better suited at G. This pick will allow Smith to go to the left and Barron at the right. Saffold will be third and groomed to take over the right.

by 81 Witness on Apr 23, 2010 5:15 PM CDT reply actions  

Saffold as third?

I’m all for developing a QB, but our 2 top picks appear projects.

Is a starter coming anytime soon?

by RamintheUK on Apr 23, 2010 5:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah...As I said before, we draft all our starters in the 6th and 7th round.

On this team, we are all united in a common goal: to keep my job.
-- Lou Holtz

by RamsMan83 on Apr 23, 2010 5:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

we need to trade Barron by the end of the day. we need picks

by MathB on Apr 23, 2010 5:15 PM CDT reply actions  

Don't mind the pick at all

Bradford got hurt with a porous O-line last year. With a $50 investment behind center, you got to protect him, right?

--Conquest Chronicles , SBNation's USC Trojans blog

Follow me on Twitter @Joey_Kaufman

by Joey Kaufman on Apr 23, 2010 5:15 PM CDT reply actions  

You need a QB at some point going forward

--Conquest Chronicles , SBNation's USC Trojans blog

Follow me on Twitter @Joey_Kaufman

by Joey Kaufman on Apr 23, 2010 9:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

Here we go with the 'if not Bradford, who' arguments again.

        It’s like half the worlds population is under the impression that Bradford was the only QB who could play for us. I understand hindsight is 20/20 but part of my reasoning for wanting Suh was flexibilty on who we drafted the other rounds.

by dbcouver on Apr 24, 2010 2:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

This draft is bordering on failing

       considering our draft position. I’m not commenting on the performance of any of our picks it’s justr not the way I’d go.

by dbcouver on Apr 23, 2010 5:17 PM CDT reply actions  

Thanks

We’ll take your analysis under more consideration when you get a GM job.

by blindmouse on Apr 23, 2010 5:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

no

we suck every year because we had horrific leadership for a few years. that’s not the case anymore

by riotmute on Apr 23, 2010 5:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

Don't bother

       What you take under consideration means nothing to me

by dbcouver on Apr 23, 2010 5:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't mind the pick

There are 7-8 WR’s projected for the 2nd-3rd rounds – none as good as Tate or Benn but we can get someone in the 3rd that can contribute immediately. Not too excited though

by riotmute on Apr 23, 2010 5:17 PM CDT reply actions  

what about it?

we drafted a franchise quarterback in the 1st round – he has to be protected. you can’t have it all – i don’t disagree with you but look, we need everything. until we have everything, we won’t agree on anything

i don’t think that made any sense

by riotmute on Apr 23, 2010 5:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

WE WILL PROTECT HIM WITH OUR $40 Million dollar LT FROM LAST YEAR!!!

On this team, we are all united in a common goal: to keep my job.
-- Lou Holtz

by RamsMan83 on Apr 23, 2010 5:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

wow, what about Billy D

Stating we need game changers???? Im not sure about this pick at all, but last year I was pissed with the 2nd round pick, so in all honestly what do I know.

by ramsrule on Apr 23, 2010 5:20 PM CDT reply actions  

Conservative...

We are just being conservative… we are not taking any risks. I am OK with the move but we need to get a TE and a WR… It is a good start to solidify our OL for Bradford but a TE is going to be key in our WCO.

by abiRam on Apr 23, 2010 5:22 PM CDT reply actions  

They took a QB

and plan on giving him $50 million. How is that not a risk?

by blindmouse on Apr 23, 2010 5:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don’t think we’ll see a WR today or tomorrow. A TE is more likely.

by MathB on Apr 23, 2010 5:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't mind the pick

Need O-Line depth to protect the QB. Very deep defensive draft – there are still going to be some good players there when we pick in the 3rd.

It’s still possible that we trade Barron, too.

by Toddius on Apr 23, 2010 5:25 PM CDT reply actions  

I’ll like the pick if we trade Barron

by MathB on Apr 23, 2010 5:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

It might be a deep draft

But the best players will still be gone early.

Are we going to get great starters in the 3rd, 4th and 5th rounds to address DE, OLB and TE? Not unless they unearth some gems, and we still have other needs.

by RamintheUK on Apr 23, 2010 5:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree.

we haven’t even thought about another RB or WR….

On this team, we are all united in a common goal: to keep my job.
-- Lou Holtz

by RamsMan83 on Apr 23, 2010 5:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

What about trading up our 3rd

We could make sure of Asamoah and make sure that Bradford is totally safe when handing off to SJax

by RamintheUK on Apr 23, 2010 5:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

Deveany loves that idea! He's fielding phone calls now!

On this team, we are all united in a common goal: to keep my job.
-- Lou Holtz

by RamsMan83 on Apr 23, 2010 5:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

They better trade Barron

I won’t be happy with this pick unless they do

by Option27 on Apr 23, 2010 5:25 PM CDT reply actions  

Don't worry, they wont....

On this team, we are all united in a common goal: to keep my job.
-- Lou Holtz

by RamsMan83 on Apr 23, 2010 5:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

Oh my god Mccluster that early??

by MathB on Apr 23, 2010 5:29 PM CDT reply actions  

very weird

must be some SERIOUS doubt, despite Kiper’s cheerleading

by riotmute on Apr 23, 2010 5:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

I’m starting to think McCoy might go before him

by MathB on Apr 23, 2010 5:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

I hope he does...

McCoy is the winningest college QB of all time. What more needs to be said?

On this team, we are all united in a common goal: to keep my job.
-- Lou Holtz

by RamsMan83 on Apr 23, 2010 5:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

that he played with a lot more talent than anybody else

against lesser talented college football teams.

Sam Bradford

by Jombari on Apr 23, 2010 5:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

Not true...

While he was there, he never won a National Championship. So obviously there were better teams out there….

On this team, we are all united in a common goal: to keep my job.
-- Lou Holtz

by RamsMan83 on Apr 23, 2010 5:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

A lot of mock had him with Indy in the first

by MathB on Apr 23, 2010 5:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

Oh so then he wasn’t a bad pick. Why is everyone frowning on this crap? Saffold will challenge Barron for playing time and probably win the starting position at the end of training camp.

I’m sure the coaches were tired of Alex “Jump Back” Barron constantly costing us 5 yards in penalties and killing drives.

by 81 Witness on Apr 23, 2010 5:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

at first I was mad because we didn’t trade but clearly nobody would have trade with us considering that all the pick after 33 were reaches.
But now i’m thinking about Bradford having time. I like it. But I still think we need somebody on the D-line

by MathB on Apr 23, 2010 5:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

I like it

Bradford’s greatest strength is surgically ripping a team apart given 4 -5 seconds and Voila! He has a good chance of having that everytime he passes. WR’s were all reaches to become #1’s, DE’s pretty much all had personality concerns, TE’s were all reaches (given Gronkowski’s injury history), and the OLB’s were good but maybe not the best fit (and a reach if Bowman was their favorite). Bradford going to the pro bowl in year 1?

by kinzav29 on Apr 23, 2010 5:34 PM CDT reply actions  

Doubt it....

No matter how good a QB is, you need receivers to catch. Look at McNabb, this guy is a great QB. He only made it when he had T.O.

On this team, we are all united in a common goal: to keep my job.
-- Lou Holtz

by RamsMan83 on Apr 23, 2010 5:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

does steve young

think this is a QB referendum?

by DarkHelmut on Apr 23, 2010 5:39 PM CDT reply actions  

or is he just having an aneurysm?

by DarkHelmut on Apr 23, 2010 5:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

Really, an aneurysm?

Is D’Marco Farr and Carter in the room?

My mistake, he’d be in a fetal position if that was the case and there would be a janitor mopping up piss.

by 81 Witness on Apr 23, 2010 5:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think the WR is coming early next year

when all the #! talent will be there. After Bay-Bay and Bryant there wasn’t much at WR this year. No use adding another #2 WR to the collection we already have.

by andyrose on Apr 24, 2010 12:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about St. Louis Rams.
Start posting about the Rams »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Twitter-kevin-payne-right_small
We're Feelin' Real Good About Beating The Patriots
Dsc03827_small
Upon Further Review - Notes on St. Louis Rams Preseason Game 3

Recent FanPosts

Faulk_small
More Fantasy Value: Amendola or Gilyard?
Ricky_prohel_small
What the Mark Clayton Trade Means
Steven-jackson_small
Who will win the tst fantasy football league?
Fen_small
Rams Acquire Mark Clayton
Sam-bradford-st_-louis-rams_small
TJ or Vjax?? Which is better?
Fen_small
9-5-10 Transactions Thread
Pirates_small
Rams Preview, Some Questions
South_park_caracter_small
Veteran RBs available right now!
Dpscamera_0183_small
TJ Whosyourmomma cut by Seahawks!!!!!
Sj39_small
Are the Rams gonna get Vincent Jackson?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Gang Green Nation
Darrelle Revis Speaks
Big Blue View
Darius Reynaud, 09.06.10
Big Blue View
Sage Rosenfels, 09.06.10

Cover the web with Turf

Add a little Turf to your internet!

Become a fan of TST on Facebook.

Follow TST and talk more Rams on Twitter.

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Photo

2010 NFL Preview, Baltimore Ravens: It's Joe Flacco's Turn

New York Jets wide receiver Darrelle Revis signals to the fans during football practice at the new Meadowlands Stadium, Wednesday, June 16, 2010 in East Rutherford, N.J. (AP Photo/Bill Kostroun) +22 updates

When You're A Jet: Darrelle Revis Agrees To Terms With New York On Extension

Photo +9 updates

Matt Leinart Reportedly Signs One-Year Deal With The Houston Texans

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

Turfshowtimes_small VanRam

Editors

Spags_victory_small 3k

Authors

340x_small kevinramsfan

Wildcat_small Tackle Box

Ramshelmet_small taiko

79de1760b8532ce8_small ram_rod

Dsc03827_small CoachConnors

Peter_small VTramsFan

Mardygilyardsig_small Tevin T. Broner

Photo_small Hark Dulai

27001_1297293834928_1307820105_30913780_1670936_n_small Brett Gall