Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Letting the Clock Strike Zero

I had a thought just pop into my mind... I haven't heard too many people (if any) talk about the Rams possibly just not picking and letting Detroit (and even Tampa Bay) go ahead of them, and then making their selection. The benefits of such a move would be obvious; you wouldn't have to pay as much to whoever you drafted. Should that be Sam Bradford (I'm guessing Matt Stafford and Josh Freeman have fairly good job security), the Rams would not only be able to snag their "QB of the future" but save some serious coin as well. 

The contract situation would obviously get murky, as even though the Rams technically hold the top selection, he wouldn't be picked at the top of the draft. I'm sure his agent(s) would love that. The uncertainty of someone trading up above them always should be considered, but if they aren't willing to trade with the Rams, what makes anyone so sure they'd trade with another team? After all, moving up to the "top" of the draft would require the same financial burden (and extensive loss of draft picks, present and future) regardless of who the team traded with. Of course, I do hear the Lions love Albert Haynesworth...


Just another strategy to think about as the draft gets closer!

~Also, in addition to this, the Rams would still hold the rights to Sam Bradford, making it possible to have a bait and switch like the Manning/Rivers deal a few years ago.

Poll
Should the Rams wait out the first pick?
No, someone could leap-frog the Rams
117 votes
Yes. Sorry Sam, you're not worth 50 million.
82 votes

199 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 12 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Never?

Just to move down one selection?

I don’t think it’s too far out there…

The House of Spears reigns supreme

by Eric Nagel on Apr 22, 2010 4:11 PM CDT reply actions  

absolutely assinine! we would lose what little credibility we have left. not to mention no agent would ever want to deal with us again.

by ramsfan77 on Apr 22, 2010 4:23 PM CDT reply actions  

What would stop the Lions from

taking Bradford and then auctioning him off to the highest bidder?

by Toddius on Apr 22, 2010 4:25 PM CDT reply actions  

That is the dumbest strategy ever.

The franchise that would do this would instantly be known for being A/ FOOLISH and B/ CHEAP. Although try and tell Bradford and his agent that they are not going to get # 1 money.

Way to start off a good relationship! Can you spell H – O – L – D O – U – T?

by NorthLeft12 on Apr 22, 2010 4:38 PM CDT reply actions  

If that happend and they Lions were picking #1...

the Lions would have to pay Suh more money…
So there would be no incentive for the Lions… Unless Rams gave them an extra pick…
1st overall pick and 7th round pick… for 2nd overall pick??

by PCarn on Apr 22, 2010 4:39 PM CDT reply actions  

yup

Life is a waste of time and time is a waste of life... so lets get wasted all the time and have the time of our lives!

by JazzyBBP on Apr 22, 2010 5:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

Let's not get too freakin cute

I have a feeling Bradford’s agent would say he was basing his demand from last’s year’s top QB chosen anyway. At some point, getting cute turns into getting stupid. This woud be that point.

The blind stares of a million pairs of eyes, lookin hard but won't realize, that they'll never see the C. And when I'm rollin by, you can't see me!

by CoachConnors on Apr 22, 2010 5:03 PM CDT reply actions  

The Vikings did it 4 or 5 years ago

I was thinking the same thing save considerable money and still get your “guy”. Only problem I see if the Bucs or Detroit trade down and cleveland jumps up and and rushes to the podium then you could just say well that’s just the rams being the rams.

Why is patience a virtue and procrastination a sin...I mean whats wrong with patiently procrastionating?

by Go_Blues on Apr 22, 2010 5:05 PM CDT reply actions  

Just make the pick

It seems Rams stance is; Take Bradford ask for allot in return, if you don’t get it then you have QB of future. Hopefully.

by rlf707 on Apr 22, 2010 5:14 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about St. Louis Rams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Cletus-the-slack-jawed-yokel-7_small
Attention All Dome Lemmings: Shut Up!
Img_20120429_144716_small
Quick Thoughts: CVC Proposal vs Rams Proposal
Small
New York Giant And Medal Of Honor Winner: 1st Lt Andrew Jackson Lummus
Small
St. Louis Rams:Tough Call - Who Stays And Who Goes In 2013?
Marshall-faulk-1999_small
St. Louis Rams Coaching- The Offensive Line

Recent FanPosts

L50i99-l50i4n0704ohiostaterams_small
Does Mike Karney Deserve A Second Shot?
Small
How many games will the Rams win this coming year??
Small
My Early 53 Man Roster Predictions
Stewie_small
Time To Step Up Bradford
Images_small
Mocking the 53
Small
Rams Land a Litter in Ground-Breaking Trade
Small
40 Years of Ram Football

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Cover the web with Turf


Managers

71523_170793669601439_100000124211145_596632_5713708_n_small Ryan Van Bibber

Baby_drinking_becks_small 3k

Editors

Jackson_medium_small Eric Nagel

Peter_small VTramsFan

Bugs_bunny_pose_small Douglas M

Authors

Marshall-faulk-1999_small papapegasus

Lggn0229jules-and-vincent-cartoon-pulp-fiction-poster_small Rick Siegel

Images-3_small DCRamFan

Bradford_draft_small Josh Wehrle

Tst_small Tevin Broner

Images_small Brick Top

Plaid_small EddieP

Profile_pic1_small Mike Dietrich

Sp-studio1_small Joe Mazzi

Moderators

Dsc03827_small CoachConnors