Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: This Week In GIFs

Sam Bradford, the Rams and the shotgun

Few things have complicated prospect evaluation and draft prognostication like the predominance of the spread offense in college. And of all the players being evaluated for the NFL ranks, quarterbacks face the most questions when it comes to making the transition. Oklahoma QB Sam Bradford has succeeded in putting to rest lots of the questions surrounding his draft status, particularly his health, but plenty of people still wonder about how well he'll fare when he's actually got his hands close to the center's most intimate parts for a snap as opposed to the shotgun, which he's far more accustomed to seeing. It may not matter all much. 

The trend in the NFL right now is firmly fixed on passing. As a result, more and more teams are using the shotgun in their offense. The Rams could be positioned to do the same thing. Of course, how often they use the shotgun and how effectively they use it has to do with personnel. If the Rams do draft Bradford, they'll have a QB very comfortable with the shotgun and some talent around him that could help make it more effective. 

Head coach Steve Spagnuolo and offensive coordinator Pat Shurmur used the shotgun on 38.8 percent of the team's offensive plays. Two NFL teams used it more than 50 percent of the time, New England and Indianapolis. Like the rest of the Rams offense, it wasn't very effective. They averaged 4.9 yards per play out of the gun and had a DVOA of -40.3 percent, second worst in the league. It's worth remembering that the Rams passing offense had a DVOA of -33.5 percent, worst in the league. With the total offense last season being so bad, it's hard to judge just how effective the shotgun was. Keith Null, a spread QB who reportedly still wasn't comfortable taking snaps under center until mid-season, started four games for the Rams...two of which featured an offensive line with just 40 percent of it's regular starters protecting him. 

Star-divide

But, this could be a much different year for the Rams. They'll start the season with their offensive line completely healthy. Ordinarily, that might not be much of an assurance to Rams fans, but the offensive line did improve last year with the additions of Jason Smith, Jason Brown and a healthy, bulked up Jacob Bell. Still in doubt? Check out t his article from Pro Football Focus rating the pass protection of all 32 teams. They put the Rams at #12. The discrepancy between the protection and the sacks? The quarterbacks. Check it out, from PFF:

In fact, they could have been even better. But if Peyton Manning is a master when it comes to stopping pressure from becoming sacks, the Rams quarterbacks were magicians at turning pressure into sacks: They ranked 31st in sack/pressure ratio (and were 32nd in 2008), making their general protection look a lot worse than it was. The bottom line here is they are generally good pass protectors -- especially in the middle -- who don't like to leave in too many people to help out.

That jives with some of the complaints appearing in the game threads at TST last year. It also speaks to some of the issues the Rams had with their receivers. 

My next question was just how much the Rams are likely to run the shotgun. Unfortunately, Football Outsider's shotgun stats cover just last season. The best comparison we can do is to look at how often the Eagles lined up in the shotgun, since that was where Shurmur was before coming to the Rams (as QB coach) and the Eagles offense didn't change too much in the wake of his departure. (Not the best comparison, but a starting point) And just how often did they use the shotgun?

Only the Pats and Colts used the gun more than the Eagles, who used it on 48.7 percent of their total offensive plays. 

So could the Rams be using the shotgun more in 2010? It's very probable. They spent their first round pick last year, second overall, on OT Jason Smith, who really came into his own as a pass blocker last year, especially when he used the two-point stance that he used so often at Baylor. It offer the Rams the justification they need to (not that his contract doesn't) to move him over to the left side this year. 

The Rams also have the one and only Steven Jackson, who you may recall is a pretty good player whether he's running the ball or catching a pass. It seems like every Sunday last year we were beating our heads against the walls, lamenting the lack of options and draw plays coming from the Rams' huddle. With an offense more capable of playing out of the shotgun, Jackson could get a lot more action on those kinds of plays. 

And what about the QB? If the Rams do go with Bradford, there's no question about his ability to take snaps out of the shotgun. He figures to have decent pass protection around him, so what about the issue that pluaged Rams QBs last year, the ability to keep pressure from becomming sacks? Bradford has a quick release and throws well on the move,  and though he is hardly a scrambler, he does have the mobility to keep himself out of pressure. In college, he showed good decision making and an ability to read defenses. How well that translates to the pro level remains to be seen, and is arguably the biggest question mark he brings to the draft. As the TCU game reminds us, he's not perfect at picking up blitzers. 

If the Rams eschew Bradford with their top pick, they still might get a QB like Colt McCoy who also spent lots of time working out of the shotgun in college. 

Barring a giant shock, the Rams will draft Sam Bradford with their top pick, and you can expect to see more of the shotgun in their offense. 

Comment 17 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Bradford

let’s sign him now lol, seriously speaking, this guy is the best prospect in the draft IMO (yes over Suh and McCoy), let’s take a chance

by Jae-So on Apr 16, 2010 12:43 PM CDT reply actions  

Over Berry?

I don’t think so…

The House of Spears reigns supreme

by Eric Nagel on Apr 16, 2010 2:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

true about berry

but i think bradford has just as much upside at his position than any other player in the draft.

by douchiedude on Apr 16, 2010 2:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

forgot about berry, but still, if Bradford develops like we hope (I kno, big if) he’ll help this team, so much more

by Jae-So on Apr 16, 2010 8:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

Great post

  Something I tried to touch on a couple days ago, but didn’t do it this well. To me, setting up in the shotgun isn’t a concern as much as that quote from PFF and what it infers.
  I was consistently down on our receivers, and that stat only reignites my concerns. Bradford will need plenty of practice avoiding intentional grounding calls.

You don't seem to want to accept the fact you're dealing with an expert in guerrilla warfare, with a man who's the best, with guns, with knives, with his bare hands. A man who's been trained to ignore pain, ignore weather, to live off the land, to eat things that would make a billy goat puke. In *St. Louis* his job was to dispose of enemy personnel. To kill! Period! Win by attrition. Well, *Steven Jackson* was the best.

by 3k on Apr 16, 2010 1:01 PM CDT reply actions  

That's part of it

At least it’s shaping up that Burton won’t make me crazy with his inability to cut a route

You don't seem to want to accept the fact you're dealing with an expert in guerrilla warfare, with a man who's the best, with guns, with knives, with his bare hands. A man who's been trained to ignore pain, ignore weather, to live off the land, to eat things that would make a billy goat puke. In *St. Louis* his job was to dispose of enemy personnel. To kill! Period! Win by attrition. Well, *Steven Jackson* was the best.

by 3k on Apr 16, 2010 8:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

What do you mean?

“Burton won’t make me crazy with his inability to cut a route”

And how does the quote tie in to that?

“The bottom line here is they are generally good pass protectors — especially in the middle — who don’t like to leave in too many people to help out.”
………I thought that meant not using RB’s and TE’s to pass block. No?

The blind stares of a million pairs of eyes, lookin hard but won't realize, that they'll never see the C. And when I'm rollin by, you can't see me!

by CoachConnors on Apr 18, 2010 1:57 AM CDT up reply actions  

We may start moving to a version of the spread

        over the course of Bradfords career. With all the spread offenses in college, the number of spread players coming out, and their talent is bound to affect the spread of the spread? in the NFL. I’ve always thought it would be interesting to start the transformation now anyway with so little to lose. It’s not like we’d have to take a huge step back at this point. Steven Jackson would love it, with the way it utilizes the lone RB.. His ability to pass block would be a great deterent to stacking the box, allowing for the delayed running plays to develop. I think our receiving corps is iseal for these patterns as well. You don’t need a true #1 with the spread, but you do need at least one true pass-catching TE.

by dbcouver on Apr 16, 2010 1:24 PM CDT reply actions  

bradford

took 50% of his snaps from under center so he’s more along in that are than most think. his play action passing is flawless so that will be GREAT to see with steven jackson. man i hope we can get sam and hopefully golden tate will fall our of the first. if not then damian williams would be a great 33rd pick. the guy has tremendous talent and could be a steal in the second round. just those 2 picks would make our offense a legitimate threat to worry about. anthony mccoy in the 4th or 5th will give us the receiving threat at tight end too, the man was a freaking BEAST when he was on the field. that and add some more depth on our line and our offense will be good. i think the defense will be better just by having one more year of practicing with spags and we do have good prospects on the defensive side.

by douchiedude on Apr 16, 2010 2:26 PM CDT reply actions  

Way too early for Williams IMO, maybe later in the round

but there will be better talent at 33 that will fill bigger needs IMO. Don’t get me wrong, Williams has potential, but we aren’t in position to reach for a player. This is my thought, so take it w/a grain of salt.

Speaking of upside, I’d like to see us take Graham for TE. I think having Bajema on the team will help Graham learn to block from one of the best blocking TE’s. Graham could be the next Gates. I’d settle on Dickson. The only knock on A. McCoy would be his lack of initial quickness & speed. I think A. McCoy would be a good pick at 4 or 5; he may not have elite speed, but sure hands will help erase that IMO. Again, he could learn from Bajema.

by RamsFan1979 on Apr 16, 2010 6:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't believe we should draft a WR at all this year ...

… unless it is Dez Bryant … and I really think we have higher priorities where we’d need to draft him (at 7).

We have enough #2 WR’s and besides Bryant there are only #2’s in the draft. They are probably fine WR’s but they are not #1’s.

So we pass on WR’s this year and draft one of the studs coming out next year.

Rounds 2,3 and 4 will probably bring us 2 linebackers and a TE if we pick bradford or a QB if we pick Suh (Colt).

If we trade down we’ll still see 2 LB’s in the top 4 rounds. Too big of a need to not address in this rich draft.

Yes, I actually wore a watermelon on my head during the Rams SuperBowl victory in 2000.

by Midasknight on Apr 17, 2010 12:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

Correction: ...the only COACH on this team im not...

I agree, I was not happy w/him last year at all. The WR, TE, & QB had no continuity at all. I want to give Shurm another chance w/help on the O side I’d expect better results. We can only hope.

by RamsFan1979 on Apr 16, 2010 6:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about St. Louis Rams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Cletus-the-slack-jawed-yokel-7_small
Attention All Dome Lemmings: Shut Up!
Img_20120429_144716_small
Quick Thoughts: CVC Proposal vs Rams Proposal
Small
New York Giant And Medal Of Honor Winner: 1st Lt Andrew Jackson Lummus
Small
St. Louis Rams:Tough Call - Who Stays And Who Goes In 2013?
Marshall-faulk-1999_small
St. Louis Rams Coaching- The Offensive Line

Recent FanPosts

L50i99-l50i4n0704ohiostaterams_small
Does Mike Karney Deserve A Second Shot?
Small
How many games will the Rams win this coming year??
Small
My Early 53 Man Roster Predictions
Stewie_small
Time To Step Up Bradford
Images_small
Mocking the 53
Small
Rams Land a Litter in Ground-Breaking Trade
Small
40 Years of Ram Football

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Cover the web with Turf


Managers

71523_170793669601439_100000124211145_596632_5713708_n_small Ryan Van Bibber

Baby_drinking_becks_small 3k

Editors

Jackson_medium_small Eric Nagel

Peter_small VTramsFan

Bugs_bunny_pose_small Douglas M

Authors

Marshall-faulk-1999_small papapegasus

Lggn0229jules-and-vincent-cartoon-pulp-fiction-poster_small Rick Siegel

Images-3_small DCRamFan

Bradford_draft_small Josh Wehrle

Tst_small Tevin Broner

Images_small Brick Top

Plaid_small EddieP

Profile_pic1_small Mike Dietrich

Sp-studio1_small Joe Mazzi

Moderators

Dsc03827_small CoachConnors