Kroenke part of league's Los Angeles stadium committee
If you've already purchased your Sam Bradford customized St. Louis Rams jersey, don't despair. You'l got until at least 2015, the year the Rams hit an out clause in their lease agreement for the Dome. This news does however take away any solace fans in the St. Louis Metro might have had about whether or not our Rams would be around after that date.
The fact is that it's just too damn early to tell. If the Rams get their franchise on the right track and start winning games sooner rather than later, then staying in St. Louis remains a viable option. Bradford, assuming the Rams draft him, would ideally be hitting the best years of his career around 2014. A sold out Dome increases the likelihood of a stadium solution in the city or surrounding area.
There are bunches of factors to consider here. LA could be a nice leverage tool for Kroenke, assuming he gets approved in his ownership bid, to get a new facility in St. Louis. Then, there's always the possibility of a team moving to LA prior to that 2015 date. Yes, I realize Los Angeles is a big market capable of sustaining two professional sports teams, but that doesn't mean the market can sustain enough interest in two NFL teams. I'm sure the economy will improve by that date too, but to what level? St. Louis is pretty hard hit right now, can it recover to the point of supporting an NFL team and a new stadium?
Yes, a move could very well happen, and Kroenke is not the kind of guy who wouldn't make it so if he thought it was the right move for business. The league might or might not be committed to keeping a team in STL, which could factor into the approval process. Lots could happen.
The bottom line for fans: same as it ever was, we want to see this team get turned around and start winning games again, then we'll worry about where they play.
8 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I am a LIFETIME Rams fans. I always want what is best for the club. I supported, at the time, their move from LA to StL.
However, I am a native Californian. I would like for the team to remain in StL BUT if they did move back in SoCal I would still support them as I always have.
Welcome to being a Rams fan StL….
GO RAMS !!!
Great post
You make a great point – who cares where the team is if they continue to suck. They need to start winning, no doubt about it. As a St. Louisian who moved to Brooklyn, at the end of the day a move wouldn’t kill me. But it would be disappointing and the league would be making a big mistake not to do everything in their power to keep the team where it is
modern media environment
the way media works now, you can be a fan and live anywhere.
Turf Show Times
by Ryan Van Bibber on Apr 16, 2010 9:51 AM CDT reply actions
different spot, but similar analogy
I watched more Cardinal baseball games when I lived in DC than I do now in MO…of course some of that has to do with having child now versus then.
Turf Show Times
by Ryan Van Bibber on Apr 16, 2010 11:31 AM CDT reply actions
my family
is from vegas and my dad grew up an l.a. rams fan. i was 3 or 4 when they moved to st. louis so i never got to see them play in l.a. i wouldn’t mind the rams going back there, maybe then i can drive up and see some game. either way, i’ll still be cheering on the rams. i can’t wait to see what bradford will do in the nfl.
I've been hearing the Sacramento Kings were moving to Las Vegas for 10 years
Meranwhile, I just continue to enjoy the team.
I think every team that has ownership with any ties elsewhere goes through the same old rumors, whether they have merit or not.
The blind stares of a million pairs of eyes, lookin hard but won't realize, that they'll never see the C. And when I'm rollin by, you can't see me!

by 

























