Brandon Marshall to Seahawks?
by revrue914 on Mar 5, 2010 1:53 PM CST
Email
Print
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
This could potentially cost the Rams draft picks
Marshall doesn’t make sense (to me) without a good QB. If Seattle doesn’t sign a veteran QB, they’ll be commited to drafting one.
If the Rams have decided on drafting a QB, it makes it dangerous to trade down. It’d be devastating to have Seattle leapfrog them with their own trade.
Would the division rivals do something like that? Sure, iI they think the Rams are going to take the QB Pete Carroll wants, I think it’s very possible. This is a high stakes game. Sticking it to a division rival while getting your QB of the future…or allowing them to take the QB you have planned your draft around…either would be huge.
That whole scenario may make the Rams play it safe and sign their choice of QB before draft day and not risk trading down, effectively costing them a couple of picks they may have otherwise garnered by safely trading down to 3.
by CoachConnors on Mar 5, 2010 10:02 PM CST up reply actions
Haha
stevie wonders could be QB for the seacocks with those weapons playing against our OJ-less secondary
New Seachicken QB... meet Mr. Suh
Oh, Colt McCoy, you’ve already met.
What's the point
Why get Marshall when you have washed up Hasselback, at least for 4-5 games a season, and Seneca Wallce throwing him the ball. Take a look at TJ and ask him how leaving Cinci wasn’t such a good idea. So now the Seahawks could have 2 former probowl WR on their team with no one to get them the ball. Although you’re right Habte E Marshall and TJ will problem go for 150 and 2 td’s each against the Rams. Unfortunately for the Seahawks they only get to play us twice and the rest of the NFL and most of the NCAA have a better pass d than us
There's a good chance that one of the top QBs could be available at #14 when the hawks are on the board
by revrue914 on Mar 5, 2010 11:14 PM CST via mobile reply actions
It would be very surprising
if either Bradford or Clausen are still there at #14. There are too many teams needing a new QB for them to last.
pretty unlikely
If you’re including guys not name Bradford or Clausen in your definition of top QB, then yeah
by CoachConnors on Mar 5, 2010 11:42 PM CST up reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2012 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
