Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: News And Other Updates Leading Up To Pats-Giants

Bears TE Olsen not the right fit for the Rams?

As the St. Louis Rams continue to search for answers at tight end, one name that keeps coming up is Bears TE Greg Olsen. His name got included on the market after Mike Martz was hired to be the new offensive coordinator in Chicago, where he is expected to implement his famous system that doesn't rely heavily on a receiving tight end with limited blocking ability. 

Olsen's name came up Tuesday in Jim Thomas' weekly QnA with fans and armchair general managers at the Post-Dispatch. One reader asked about the possibility of an Olsen-for-Alex Barron swap, which Thomas called "intriguing." That hardly qualifies as a trade rumor, but it hit the internets nonetheless. I want to reiterate that was Thomas' own judgement and it was clearly noted as a hypothetical situation. 

The Olsen possibility was further discussed on ESPN's Rumor Central, where Adam Schefter mentioned that the likely price tag was a second round pick (notice how coveted those second round picks are this year?). From there, KC Joyner, the Football Scientist weighed in with some intriguing information of his own:

The general consensus is that the Bears might be thinking of moving Olsen because Mike Martz doesn't use his tight ends, but there is another reason they might be inclined to make the move. Olsen was one of only eight tight ends to be targeted more than 100 times last season, but his 5.9 YPA total was the fourth-worst among tight ends. That total was only one-tenth of a yard higher than Randy McMichael's mark last season, so unless the Rams were to get more productivity out of Olsen than Chicago did, the move would be a lateral one and would not make much sense.

Yikes. Randy McMichael territory? My first thought was that this perhaps had something to do with the fact that the Bears offense didn't have many weapons last year (Olsen led the team in receiving). I've sent a message to KC for more insight.

I wouldn't make the move, regardless of this info, for a second rounder. 

Comment 9 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

i watched a lot of bears games because I like Cutler

basically when the bears get down in the red zone, it is throw to Olsen on 1st, 2nd, and 3rd. Every one knows it, including the defense. Chicago had literally no other options. All their receivers were pretty raw, and Matt Forte disappeared. There were numerous occasions in which Cutler fired a rocket to Olsen who was in TRIPLE COVERAGE. (surprisingly worked sometimes….Cutler has an ARM)

5.9 YPA would be averaging his receiving yards by the times he was targeted, correct?

I think this was more of a result of the lack of an offensive scheme/players in Chicago last year.

that being said, I don’t think the Rams should go for Olsen, because the 33rd pick is too high. BUT, they better not take Gresham with that second pick then, because I would rather have Olsen than Gresham.

by jb22 on Mar 18, 2010 12:51 PM CDT reply actions  

That is exactly my thinking

2nd rounder waaaay too much for Olsen.. especially this year!

"The greatest accomplishment is not in never falling, but in rising again after you fall." - Vince Lombardi

by VTramsFan on Mar 18, 2010 1:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

I would do it in a heartbeat for 3rd. Maybe as much as a 3rd and a 6th or 7th. No way would i do it for a second however. not this year. way too many options.

by Bralidore on Mar 18, 2010 1:28 PM CDT reply actions  

The thing is though

That McMichael is old. I’m also not too sure about how many times Olsen dropped the ball as well…

The House of Spears reigns supreme

by Eric Nagel on Mar 18, 2010 2:02 PM CDT reply actions  

NO WAY!!!

I say draft talent at the other positions and take either Dennis Pitta or Colin Peek in the 5th round. There are a lot of good tight ends coming out this year for us to even consider trading away our 2nd round pick.

by NachoD on Mar 18, 2010 3:13 PM CDT reply actions  

that 2nd round pick is gold

they can keep it and get a stud or trade it for more picks.

Turf Show Times

by Ryan Van Bibber on Mar 18, 2010 3:58 PM CDT reply actions  

I agree. The 2nd round is way too much.

However, no way Pitta is going to fall to the 5th. He had a great combine and will probably go in the 3rd round, if not sooner.

by andyrose on Mar 18, 2010 4:33 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about St. Louis Rams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Images-1_small
Eye told ewe sew
Small
MY FIRST MOCK DRAFT! :D
26934064_l_small
Can the Rams' draft be successful without a trade?
Images-1_small
How about before the draft, we...
Small
Revolving Door at QB may be hurting the Rams Trade Down Options

Recent FanPosts

Small
Why We Must Draft Kalil
Small
mock draft 2.0
Rams_small
Rams Starting Roster with Free Agents and Draft Picks per Bleacher Report
Small
2012 Rams 53-Man Roster
Small
'Skins or Fins Might Work Out as Well
Small
Why is the EJD so bad?
Small
Mockdraft
Small
How's this trade

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Cover the web with Turf


Managers

71523_170793669601439_100000124211145_596632_5713708_n_small Ryan Van Bibber

Baby_drinking_becks_small 3k

Editors

Jackson_medium_small Eric Nagel

Peter_small VTramsFan

Bugs_bunny_pose_small Douglas M

Authors

Wildcat_small Tackle Box

Dsc03827_small CoachConnors

Mardygilyardsig_small Tevin T. Broner

Bradford_draft_small buckeyefan55

Tst_small T.Ram

Images_small Brick Top

Small EddieP

Profile_pic1_small Mike Dietrich