Are the Rams moving Sam Bradford up their draft board?
Here's a little more insight for the discussion of whether or not the St. Louis Rams will be looking to draft a quarterback when Christmas in April arrives.
The issue of the Rams drafting a QB is inextricably linked to the discussion of no-so-consensus first overall pick Ndamukong Suh and the Detroit Lions, who pick behind the Rams at our usual number two spot. This latest information comes from a post centered on the emerging meme of whether or not Oklahoma DT Gerald McCoy is a better DT than Suh. Blah, blah, blah...expect lots more of that as the weeks go by. Now, let's get the grist of this post. From a post today at MLive.com, the online outlet for a consortium of Michigan newspapers:
In talking to a couple of well-informed folks from St. Louis last week at the Super Bowl, two interesting points came up.
The first is one that I've been talking about for awhile -- that Oklahoma quarterback Sam Bradford, once he proves his injured right shoulder is OK -- could move into that No. 1 spot. The Rams are desperate to replace Marc Bulger, who is not in the team's long-term plans.
That shouldn't be much of a surprise. Last year, Bradford, coming off his Heisman-winning campaign, would have been considered by many the top player available in the draft, certainly the top QB. He's throwing again and is said to be ahead of schedule on rehabbing from his shoulder injury. Bradford will not participate in drills at the Combine, but he is predicted to be ready to go for Pro Day at OU, which should happen sometime in March. Ok, now, back to the Rams and why the idea of drafting a QB isn't such a far out possibility.
The other interesting piece of information was that the Rams had considered drafting USC quarterback Mark Sanchez with the second overall pick last year. The Jets trading up to No. 5 and taking Sanchez was considered a reach so the Rams would've taken plenty of heat for taking Sanchez at No. 2 -- which is why they didn't. But after the rookie performance by Sanchez, it appears the Rams -- who took tackle Jason Smith -- made a mistake.
Remember, the Rams had some offers to trade down; the terms just weren't acceptable enough for GM Billy Devaney to pull the trigger. Supposedly, Devaney made a 2010 first round pick a precondition of any trade at last year's draft. Regardless, we kind of already knew that the Rams were interested in and considered drafting Mark Sanchez last year, but the notion that taking some heat for using the second pick was a reason never entered into the conversation. How much of a concern was it? I'm not surprised that the issue played into their decision, but I still tend to think that ultimately the team realized just how badly they needed to address the offensive line before they invested in another QB.
Either way, I think it's safe to assume that Devaney and his draft cadre will most certainly be seriously considering their options at QB and weighing that against the other options available to them in the draft.
0 recs |
28 comments
|
Comments
Not taking Sanchez was a mistake? Really?
How? He was pretty terrible this year. I like the guy. I think he could be good. But putting him on last year’s Rams team would have been a disaster too. Smith was and will prove to be the correct decision.
As for the first pick, I’ve been pro-Suh the entire time, but in reality I think I realize that I’ve just been anti-Clausen. I think I would be fine with Bradford, but not #1 overall. The money would be just insane. I still think that you have to build a team from the trenches, so a Suh or McCoy would still be my first choice.
And I know that the Rams wide receiver troubles are well known amongst everyone here. What does everyone think about Jordan Shipley? I just caught a little of the skills competition that was on ESPN before the Super Bowl and his hands were absolutely amazing, not to mention that he was outperforming Dez Bryant in every drill. Apparently the knock on him is that he has quite an injury history and the guy isn’t 6’ tall, but he did look very natural and was beating out the “more athletic” wide receivers. Guess we’ll see what happens closer to the draft.
He took. It out.
by flipthebird15 on Feb 9, 2010 2:12 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Actually not everyone agress that the Wides are all that weak
by CoachConnors on Feb 9, 2010 3:38 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The only thing we need
is a legit #1. Other than that, we have very good receivers.
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
by Tackle Box on Feb 10, 2010 7:08 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Ya.. wth?
Sanchez was a terrible QB who was backed up by an excellent defense, an excellent OL and an excellent running game. I’m pretty sure Kyle Boller could have had similar numbers in the same position as Sanchez. Where’s that quote from anyway?
And Jimmy Clausen… I dont like that his older brother didn’t make it… aren’t older brothers supposed to be better at football than their yougner ones? Maybe its just coincidence or Im not old enough remember enough brothers
Redzonophobia - characterized by w/e the Rams do in the red zone
by heinzketchup on Feb 9, 2010 3:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
totally unfounded
i didn;t realize there were that many brothers in teh nfl… i was just putting that out there for fun
Redzonophobia - characterized by w/e the Rams do in the red zone
by heinzketchup on Feb 9, 2010 3:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
older brothers supposed to be better at football than their yougner ones
Thought you meant like Varsity and JV, ha ha
by CoachConnors on Feb 9, 2010 4:58 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
FYI
Peyton and Eli have an older brother named Cooper….
Maybe we should draft him?
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
by Tackle Box on Feb 10, 2010 7:15 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i know
he had an injury to his spine if i remember correctly,and he was a WR. Can’t really compare. And i was being facetious anyway.
by heinzketchup on Feb 18, 2010 4:40 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Shipley's speed isn't that great either
But I like his agility and footwork.
You don't seem to want to accept the fact you're dealing with an expert in guerrilla warfare, with a man who's the best, with guns, with knives, with his bare hands. A man who's been trained to ignore pain, ignore weather, to live off the land, to eat things that would make a billy goat puke. In *St. Louis* his job was to dispose of enemy personnel. To kill! Period! Win by attrition. Well, *Steven Jackson* was the best.
by 3k on Feb 9, 2010 6:54 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Bradford
this guy has been pretty awesome throughout his career I truly do hope we draft him over Suh, I do think Suh will be dominant but if Bradord lives up to his potential he will help us a hell of a lot more, if we can trade down to like 4th I would be ecstatic to have this guy on our team
by Jae-So on Feb 9, 2010 2:16 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Suh's still the BPA...
but I had Bradford #1 before his shoulder injuries. A lot people dinged a former teamate of his for being an injury risk too. They also said he was a benefactor of being on a superior team and some questioned if he could be successful at the next level. A lot of teams shied away from him in the draft because they thought he was too brittle and couldn’t be relied on to carry the load at his position. I’m sure a lot of them are kicking themselves for over-looking Adrian Peterson now. Not a Sooner fan, just recalling history. I like Suh a lot with the first pick, I won’t cry in my beer if they drafted Bradford #1.
by Da Rams! on Feb 9, 2010 5:49 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Bradford not going to throw at combine, will need a personal workout
Read this in a newspaper.
by CoachConnors on Feb 9, 2010 2:17 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
BPA draft
This should be a BPA draft down the line. The Rams need upgrades or back-ups at basically all positions.
by 81 Witness on Feb 9, 2010 2:17 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
we need bang for are buck
Le fevour 2nd round
by 2011 the kid will be are franchise
he threw for 12,905
rushed for 2,948
only person ever in ncaa history
thats what the rams need
by Magyar on Feb 9, 2010 2:49 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
forget bang for the buck
i’d rather have an overpaid decent QB (like a Cutler or a Flacco) than an underpaid (deservingly so) Jamarcus Russel
by jb22 on Feb 9, 2010 7:29 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
not saying Jamarcus is underpaid, he obviously isn't
but Flacco at 12 mil a year, or Jamarcus at 1 mil a year. take your pick
by jb22 on Feb 9, 2010 7:30 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
sorry for the repeat posts
not saying flacco is overpaid or makes 12 mil either. this is all hypothetical
by jb22 on Feb 9, 2010 7:30 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm completely lost.
but nevertheless, I wouldn’t take JaMarcus Russell ever.
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
by Tackle Box on Feb 10, 2010 7:17 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
2nd RB
Everyone knows that we need a compliment back for SJ39; what are the chances the Saints downgrade their three-headed monster to a two back system? Could Mike Bell be a possible good pick up by the Rams?
by ECURam87 on Feb 9, 2010 4:17 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I think trading down to #2 or #3
and then taking Bradford, assuming he proves to be fully recovered, would make a lot of sense. The extra picks you received could then be used to fill other holes. Of course, the risk is that Tampa or Detroit then trades down with Washington or Buffalo and they grab Bradford. We could be sitting at #3, with Suh and Bradford already gone. We could take G. McCoy and still have picked up an extra early round pick, but I really think we have to take either Suh or Bradford in the first round. G. McCoy and Clausen could well prove to be excellent players, but I just think we have to come out of this draft with either Suh or Bradford.
by andyrose on Feb 9, 2010 5:38 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I think if they're convinced Bradford is a Franchise QB, they have to take him 1.
Franchise QB’s are too rare to screw around with and maybe lose. If they aren’t convinced, then yeah.
If it’s just “As long as we get one of these 2 or 3 guys” then yeah.
by CoachConnors on Feb 9, 2010 6:56 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Drafting BPAs didn’t make the Lions any better. Suh isn’t even the consensus best DT in the draft. Bradford should be close enough on the board that it makes sense to draft him and start rebuilding around him.
by rams_fan on Feb 9, 2010 6:17 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
History
In the Rams history have they ever drafted a franchise QB ? I cant remember, and i go back to the days of Roman Gabriel and the Fearsome -Foursome.
by Thomas W on Feb 9, 2010 7:02 PM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 



















