Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Rams favorites to sign Vick?

As if whispers about the bidders in the pending sale of the St. Louis Rams weren't enough to fire your imagination, then another Michael Vick rumor ought to get your synapses firing on all cylinders. A report from Jason LaCanfora on the NFL Network yesterday said that the Rams were the favorites to land Michael Vick

This won't be the last Vick rumor to surface. Just yesterday there was a report from the NFL Network's Michael Lombardi that the Eagles would like to hang on to Vick. That seems more like posturing as the team tries to gin up some trade interest before they have to pay him $5 million on March 5. What LaCanfora's report does not say is how the Rams would be most  likely to acquire Vick, via trade or as a free agent. I would hope that GM Billy Devaney goes the later route, using some of the freed up "dead money" from last year's roster purge to sign Vick rather than trade any of the Rams precious few assets, players or picks, for a guy who hasn't thrown more than two regular season passes since 2006...when he had a 52.6 percent completion rate, lower than Bulger's in 2009. 

There's more QB news that might have implications for the Rams. Pending free agent Chad Pennington has stated a preference to return to the Dolphins, even as a backup. Pennington would be one of the few free agent QBs if the league goes without a cap in 2010. He's another guy that if the Rams made a move for would require them to have a real solid backup option given Pennington's injury history. Frankly, I'll pass.

Comment 66 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Vick or "Poofer" Pennington?

My choice is neither. I’d rather have Null start and groom a first-day rookie.

by 81 Witness on Feb 4, 2010 10:26 AM CST reply actions  

I actually

have no problem going forward with Null either

by gomer7 on Feb 4, 2010 11:34 AM CST up reply actions  

Isn't a "first day" rookie...

a “first round” rookie?

Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.

by Tackle Box on Feb 4, 2010 11:51 AM CST up reply actions  

No

first day includes the 2nd round too

by Habte E on Feb 4, 2010 12:23 PM CST up reply actions  

Really?

I heard they moved the first day to thursday but how is it done from there?

by Habte E on Feb 4, 2010 12:35 PM CST up reply actions  

I may be wrong

But i thought the first round was the first day
Then 2nd and 3rd is the second
then 4-7th is the third day.

At least from now on.

The House of Spears reigns supreme

by Eric Nagel on Feb 4, 2010 1:51 PM CST up reply actions  

Yup

Thursday is round 1
Friday rounds 2-3
Saturday rounds 4-7

by Caruso on Feb 4, 2010 2:23 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm still on the fence concerning Vick

He has never impressed me with his passing… and his legs aren’t what they used to be.

"The greatest accomplishment is not in never falling, but in rising again after you fall." - Vince Lombardi

by VTramsFan on Feb 4, 2010 10:37 AM CST reply actions  

i agree 100%

there’s no doubt he’s a talented athlete, BUT…

Turf Show Times

by Ryan Van Bibber on Feb 4, 2010 10:46 AM CST up reply actions  

AGREED

But that puts us in the SUH camp answering the question of “Then who??”

Frankly, this ship is not getting turned around this year by VICK or ora rookie QB.. .then our D-Line needs addressing.

It’s a win one, lose another situation no matter how we cut it.

Take SUH and call it a day, start Null for a year… who knows!

"The greatest accomplishment is not in never falling, but in rising again after you fall." - Vince Lombardi

by VTramsFan on Feb 4, 2010 11:47 AM CST up reply actions  

To be honest,

I really don’t see any reason why Keith Null can’t become Kyle Orton.

Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.

by Tackle Box on Feb 4, 2010 11:52 AM CST up reply actions  

i'd feel alot better if he had played for a significant amount of time last year

but he didn’t.

Furthermore, his playing style is so unique that it seems if he doesn’t work out, we’re stuck with having to shift the offense (again) in mid-stream, a tough task for a young team that’s just learning the playbook installed last year.

Turf Show Times

by Ryan Van Bibber on Feb 4, 2010 3:14 PM CST up reply actions  

if we can get him for a minimum salary without trading any of our assets.....

you wouldnt want to at least give him a chance to see what he can do before writing him off?

by Danteslion on Feb 4, 2010 11:24 AM CST up reply actions  

You cannot get Vick for the minimum

He already showed he can appear to be a QB for long enough periods that he will get a lot fo money

by CoachConnors on Feb 4, 2010 11:43 AM CST up reply actions  

With the first pick in each round, I actually think we could get him for Round 5 Pick 1, don’t you? That’s not giving up too much for an upgrade at QB and to have something for people to talk about your team for besides whether or not Rush Limbaugh will be an owner of if we’re headed to LA or Toronto.

by bigwood25 on Feb 4, 2010 4:05 PM CST up reply actions  

Screw Vick

Inhumane Friggin’ abuser – he knew his evil while he did. He deserves no fruitful life. If the Rams get him, I will be so spent!

by jlcdb70 on Feb 7, 2010 12:51 AM CST up reply actions  

If he's not the longterm answer

then I don’t care, he is just a place holder. It is getting way too much attention. Oh yea, and then there is the fact that he is a HORRIBLE QB.

by gomer7 on Feb 4, 2010 11:34 AM CST reply actions  

You never know what to believe with these things.

If you were the Eagles, and you wanted something for Vick, you’d get stories out there about how you actually wanted to keep him.

He’ll be 30 next year, and a QB like Vick will be facing a drop off in productivity sooner than a guy like Manning who is 33 but doesn’t run and doesn’t get hit much.

there is going to be a loss of quickness, deterioration of top end speed and injuries will start to take longer to heal. This has nothing to do with milage, this has to do with the body aging.

He’ll probably show up already being a little less than the Mike Vick of years past. He’s probably got another 3 years of the Vick-type of physicality that makes him valuable.

Assuming he doesn’t prove his decision making is unacceptably bad for a starter, the Rams might get a young Null developed by the time Vick exits for good. Yeah Null, or a guy they draft this year of course. : )

by CoachConnors on Feb 4, 2010 11:39 AM CST reply actions  

Funny You Should Say That About The Eagles

SI.com Truth/Rumors section has an article about the Eagles keeping Vick

Jake Locker in 2011

by JordansDad on Feb 5, 2010 2:38 AM CST up reply actions  

I hope most of this is just rumors started

by the Eagles or by writers needing something to fill space. I still think it would be a huge mistake for the Rams to add Vick – even if they got him for free.

by andyrose on Feb 4, 2010 11:49 AM CST reply actions  

I realize he's paid his debt to society

but the first question is, does he meet the four pillars?

"The greatest accomplishment is not in never falling, but in rising again after you fall." - Vince Lombardi

by VTramsFan on Feb 4, 2010 12:04 PM CST reply actions  

@ of them are all I need

        a good team mate and good character

by dbcouver on Feb 4, 2010 4:24 PM CST up reply actions  

Let me rephrase... personally I could give 2 squats myself if he does

Will SPAGS even consider him because the first question HE asks is does he meet the four pillars.

"The greatest accomplishment is not in never falling, but in rising again after you fall." - Vince Lombardi

by VTramsFan on Feb 5, 2010 9:38 AM CST up reply actions  

They've already stated publically

that they are now in the position to take players who don’t necessarily fall 100% into the four pillars.

They wanted to build a core of individuals who would lead the team in the right way. Now that they have that core (at least they feel as though they do), they can now take more chances and trust that the core will hold the team up.

Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.

by Tackle Box on Feb 5, 2010 11:34 AM CST up reply actions  

I know you don't

        I hope I didn’t come across as contemptuios, contemptuous, contemptoui, ah fuck it. I hope that Steven jacksons little problem results in a lowering of the standards for the pillars. It may result in a perceived need to lift the bar though. I’m thinkin he was one of the teams leaders.

by dbcouver on Feb 5, 2010 7:03 PM CST up reply actions  

Interesting thought-

I wonder if Spags had a little notion of SJax’s problem to come? Is that why he eased up on the “Four Pillars” bit?-Gosh-soap opera stuff-

by Knoxfan on Feb 6, 2010 1:11 PM CST up reply actions  

The biggest concern I have with Vick is

how he affects the team…
The first group of players that I am concerned about is the WRs. Vick has never shown to utilize his Receivers to their max potential…hell not even half their potential. With our group of 4 young and developing WRs, we cannot afford to lose any time in getting this wide outs where we need them. I am not a supporter of this move. Vick can not move like he used to, and quite frankly his depth of understanding for offense is limited. Is Testeverde still available?

by CaliRamMan on Feb 4, 2010 12:39 PM CST reply actions  

They say a great QB "makes" his receiving corp

I agree that the St Lou WR’s are not yet playing at even half of what their potential is. They’ll get there, it takes 2 or 3 years for good Wides to shw up. And I’m with you that I really would rather not put Vick in the mix right now, too.

Starting off with a QB who isn’t very accurate and doesn’t have a grasp of their offense…I just wish they wouldn’t bring Vick into a situation that’s the very definition of “developing.”

Maybe Vick is easily signable, but he’s not going to bring as much as a lot of other veteran QB’s would, that might be had via trade.

by CoachConnors on Feb 4, 2010 1:10 PM CST up reply actions  

Never was going to be great as a pass stat-wise, but found a way to move the ball down the field and win. At 30, he’s probably lost a little, but look at how many awful QBs started this year, and start in St. Louis when you do. Believe me, I’d be MUCH more excited to see Vick roll out with Steven Jackson (ala VY + Chris Johnson) than watch Bulger throw off his back foot to our inexperienced WRs.

by bigwood25 on Feb 4, 2010 4:04 PM CST up reply actions  

Get the long term solution at QB asap

we’re rebuilding and obviously need a QB. So I think the team either needs to take one in the draft, a first round guy, or trade for a guy young guy who still has his future ahead of him. The most likely scenario seems to be the draft, but I’m open to the possibilities.

With a rookie, they’d still need a veteran for next season, maybe not guaranteed to start, but a viable option just in case. Maybe, I’m too bound to tradition on this matter, but I think a rebuilding team needs to get their QB in place as soon as possible so that he’s ready to lead as soon as possible.

Turf Show Times

by Ryan Van Bibber on Feb 4, 2010 3:17 PM CST reply actions  

I'm with you on all that

I’m with you on all that And with you on your comment up there about the Rams maybe needing to shift the whole offense to fit his unique skillset.

I’m going to say this in all honesty — I really hope he goes to the Raiders.
You know I have the seats in Oaktown, and you know I can’t stand Vick, but right now I could really get behind a sinister, Darth Vader talent there in Oakland, someone evil, someone me and my seat-neighbors could cheer on while he eats the hearts off Chiefs and Broncos fans.

The Raiders are uniqe that way, one reason why I’ve stayed in love with them through the malaise they’ve fallen in, and I would love to get some dark, evil talent there to get with.

by CoachConnors on Feb 4, 2010 4:17 PM CST up reply actions  

Instant starters/playmakers

Taking Suh #1 and trading for Vick = two instant playmakers on a team that severely lacks playmaking ability (outside of Steven Jackson and James Laurinaitis), not to mention a little grab of the spotlight for a franchise that needs to fill some seats in order to stay in town. I’ve been calling for this for weeks now (along with many others). Let’s make it happen! GO RAMS!

by bigwood25 on Feb 4, 2010 4:03 PM CST reply actions  

Why do you think he would fill the seats?

I think he would empty just as many as he might fill just because of who he is, and he would only fill seats if the Rams started winning. It won’t happen with Vick at QB. He is well past his prime, he never was a decent passer, and he would just set the Rams back.

by andyrose on Feb 4, 2010 11:40 PM CST up reply actions  

Yeah I don't think you can realistically expect to fill seats

       any other way than by winning. Not in the NFL.

by dbcouver on Feb 5, 2010 6:41 PM CST up reply actions  

Vick, nooooooooooooo

Inhumane fricken person.

If Rams get him, karma will snap him in two. When he wakes out of it and looks up, he is going to see some d-lineman barking like a dog . Vick should get no rewards for being a torturing abuser.

Apparantly winning a football game is more important that punishing a friggin animal torturer and killer. Sell outs to America guys, sell outs to America!

by jlcdb70 on Feb 7, 2010 1:01 AM CST up reply actions  

Another Vick rumor?

        Did LaCanfora offer any reasoning for this, or is he just joining the chorus of previous rumor mills? I didn’t see anything in the linked article but there may be more information elsewhere.

by dbcouver on Feb 4, 2010 4:34 PM CST reply actions  

noooooo

Like dbcouver just pointed out, I don’t see any reason to think this is serious … anyone can go on TV and make blanket statements.

But it still gets me worked up enough that I need to throw in my two cents. I just don’t understand how this makes sense. For just a second, let’s forget that this guy was a millionare and he still decided he wanted to spend his free time watching dogs kill other dogs and then had no problem with the losing ones being finished off if they were still alive. Even if you forget that, I still don’t understand.

He was a QB last year as much as Ronnie Brown was a QB … wow, he tossed a few passes, big deal. I’m not sold. I don’t see how anyone else IS sold. We haven’t seen enough.

Sign Jason Campbell, draft someone and start Null one more year … do whatever you have to do, but this is not the answer. At all.

And I don’t think the fact that he’ll “get people talking” is a good reason at all. Wow, now people will be picketing Rams games, how exciting. I’m so glad people are talking!

This made a little sense for the Eagles. It makes none for the Rams.

by mikeistight on Feb 4, 2010 4:49 PM CST reply actions  

GIVE THE MAN A SHOT

Vick has proved he can win in this league. U can’t tell me that he won’t bring some excitement to this dull franchise. A rookie will struggle in this offense if he’s thrown in there too quick. The way it looks Spags is a run first coach so get us a tight end and let Vick and SJax go to work. We can leave J Smith on the right side to protect Vicks blind side. And who said he doesn’t know this offense ? Philly supposedly run something very simular. With Vicks scrambling ability , he can buy time for our receivers to get separation which looked impossible last year. I honestly think it would be a great move to get this guy. He has made it to a NFC championship game. Who else that’s a possibility has done more. For every person that say they will cancel their season tix if we get Vick , I garuntee there are two who will purchase them. Don’t let this guy get away !!! GO RAMS !!!!!!!

by RamMan1 on Feb 4, 2010 8:48 PM CST via mobile reply actions  

If we get Vick,

I’ve got two PSLs I’ll be glad to sell you.

by andyrose on Feb 4, 2010 11:43 PM CST up reply actions  

A vet

probably knows a good drug or two to needle him with before beating him upside like a dog?

by jlcdb70 on Feb 7, 2010 1:04 AM CST up reply actions  

I would be okay with Null and LeFevour duking it out this year.

Hopefully one can stick. Maybe throw Ainge into the mix. So for the QBs on the roster we can have three of Null, Veteran (Bulger/Pennington), LeFevour, and Ainge. I like all three of those guys and hopefully one of them can develop into a quality QB.

by Carneros on Feb 4, 2010 9:06 PM CST reply actions  

Null couldn't duke it out shadow boxing.

Apparently someone in the STL Rams organization has sprouted a brain and is pursuing Vick.

by edpjr on Feb 4, 2010 9:57 PM CST up reply actions  

Its better than anything we have now. U tell me if we keep what we have ur going to keep ur PSL’s. We have to bring some buzz back to the dome. Vick can win us more than 1 game for sure.

by RamMan1 on Feb 5, 2010 9:09 AM CST via mobile up reply actions  

I will absolutely keep my PSLs if the Rams

continue on the right course as they did in 2009. If they start with band-aids like Vick, I’m gone.

by andyrose on Feb 5, 2010 3:32 PM CST up reply actions  

I'd say...

1) that’s a big mistake

and….

2)…..you’re bluffing

Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.

by Tackle Box on Feb 5, 2010 3:42 PM CST up reply actions  

I really wonder why. It can’t be cause what he has done on the field. Which is win more than 1 game a year. If u can deal wit last year u can deal with anything. It can’t get any worse.

by RamMan1 on Feb 5, 2010 5:00 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

It wouldn't make a difference to me if I had PSLs.

But if my decision to keep them or not was based solely on Vick, I’d have to get rid of them. Vick will not help. I’d rather have Null start 16 games than waste any draft picks on Vick just to realize he sucks and can’t complete a pass.

by Carneros on Feb 7, 2010 11:58 PM CST up reply actions  

I think the real problem is not "Vick"

I think the point people are trying to make is, we’re sick of attempted band-aids. We don’t even know if we’re drafting a QB or not at this point.

If we’re not, then we have NO CHOICE but look for a viable FA… Vick as much as I hate to say it MAY BE the best of the lot.

Campbell, Pennington (who most likely will stay in Miami btw) or Vick seems to be the only three. Sounds like Philly will hang onto McNab and Kolb..

So with that said… who then?

"The greatest accomplishment is not in never falling, but in rising again after you fall." - Vince Lombardi

by VTramsFan on Feb 5, 2010 9:42 AM CST reply actions   1 recs

There are no "viable" free agents.

Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.

by Tackle Box on Feb 5, 2010 11:35 AM CST up reply actions  

Well put

We’re all just frustrated from years of suckitude. But when you take a step back and look at all the actual options available, ie you don’t just say “we need a true #1 QB” without any ideas, it becomes clear that Vick might be the least of all evils.

We’re tired of band-aids, but it takes time for a wound to coagulate and it looks like it’s just gonna take patience and faith in the skills of the doctors.

by BruinHalo on Feb 5, 2010 2:01 PM CST up reply actions  

Integrity

Rams either have it, or not. With a potential sale, prospective buyers will be aware.

SCREW VICK! FRIGGIN’ KILLER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by jlcdb70 on Feb 7, 2010 1:07 AM CST reply actions  

NO TO VICK!!!

YES TO LITTLE!!!!!!

wait………

Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.

by Tackle Box on Feb 7, 2010 12:20 PM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about St. Louis Rams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Cletus-the-slack-jawed-yokel-7_small
Attention All Dome Lemmings: Shut Up!
Img_20120429_144716_small
Quick Thoughts: CVC Proposal vs Rams Proposal
Small
New York Giant And Medal Of Honor Winner: 1st Lt Andrew Jackson Lummus
Small
St. Louis Rams:Tough Call - Who Stays And Who Goes In 2013?
Marshall-faulk-1999_small
St. Louis Rams Coaching- The Offensive Line

Recent FanPosts

L50i99-l50i4n0704ohiostaterams_small
Does Mike Karney Deserve A Second Shot?
Small
How many games will the Rams win this coming year??
Small
My Early 53 Man Roster Predictions
Stewie_small
Time To Step Up Bradford
Images_small
Mocking the 53
Small
Rams Land a Litter in Ground-Breaking Trade
Small
40 Years of Ram Football

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Cover the web with Turf


Managers

71523_170793669601439_100000124211145_596632_5713708_n_small Ryan Van Bibber

Baby_drinking_becks_small 3k

Editors

Jackson_medium_small Eric Nagel

Peter_small VTramsFan

Bugs_bunny_pose_small Douglas M

Authors

Marshall-faulk-1999_small papapegasus

Lggn0229jules-and-vincent-cartoon-pulp-fiction-poster_small Rick Siegel

Images-3_small DCRamFan

Bradford_draft_small Josh Wehrle

Tst_small Tevin Broner

Images_small Brick Top

Plaid_small EddieP

Profile_pic1_small Mike Dietrich

Sp-studio1_small Joe Mazzi

Moderators

Dsc03827_small CoachConnors