Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Africa Cup Of Nations Semifinal: Black Stars Ripe For Upset?

Rams go offense in MTD's Mock Draft

The gang at Mocking the Draft posted their most recent mock draft yesterday, a two round mock. Their picks for the St. Louis Rams seem to confirm some recent trends developing among draftniks regarding the team's likely direction come April. 

The picks from MTD are...

Round 1

Sam Bradford | Quarterback | Oklahoma: In consecutive years, the Rams have passed on the likes of Mark Sanchez and Matt Ryan, players considered franchise quarterbacks. It may be somewhat unlikely the Rams will be contending for a playoff spot in the coming season. But taking a quarterback this year would allow him to ease into the starting spot. It will also give head coach Steve Spagnuolo another season to work over the team's defense while the team adds more talent.

Conventional wisdom is shifting and many are starting to think that the Rams coaches will use the draft to bring in "their guy" as the team's next quarterback. You'll recall 3k predicted this in late January, saying:

I think this is going to be much like Detroit's pick last year; the country is going to feel the team gravitating toward a QB before the local fan base accepts it. And just like Detroit fans last year were clamoring for offensive line help, I won't be surprised if Suh's contingent here at TST feels the sting early on (similar to the Aaron Curry fans in 2009), but this puts a lot of pressure on HC Spagnuolo and OC Shurmur to turn things up a notch offensively in 2010 especially if they take Bradford over Jimmy Clausen (QB, Notre Dame).

Round 2

Damian Williams | Wide receiver | USC: When Steve Spagnuolo was defensive coordinator of the Giants, he made his name off getting the most out of tackles who were somewhat underachievers. He should be able to do the same with a later-round defensive tackle in this draft. Instead, opting for a good possession receiver with solid athletic abilities would help a player like Bradford develop faster.

I know some of our USC fans around this site have seen plenty of Williams, so I'll ask you (and every other draftnik here) what you think about this pick? Is it redundant for the Rams to have Williams and Laurent Robinson? Based on the available players in MTD's draft, would DE Corey Wooten or DT Lamar Houston be a better pick for the Rams? Or, what about Brandon Spikes; could he make the move to WLB in the Rams' defense?

Weigh in.

Comment 55 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Damian Williams...

…isn’t the fastest guy, but he has MITS and can run a hell of a route. He also isn’t afraid of contact, and has only suffered minor injuries to show for it. He’d be a fantastic pick, but I doubt we go offense with our top 2 picks. My ideal scenario is Suh, then offense.

Btw, the ESPN heads, as well as NFL Network, still think QB at 1 is a reach and it’ll be Suh/McCoy there. They’re usually right.

"I was just letting the shots fly. You know, I don't leave any bullets in the chamber."

"Everything negative- pressure, challenges- is all an opportunity for me to rise."

-Kobe Bryant

A mantra for all athletes.

by TrojanRam on Feb 17, 2010 5:08 PM CST via mobile reply actions  

I think ESPN

has Bradford as the third best player overall. That’s the same ranking Stafford had last year.

by Toddius on Feb 17, 2010 5:22 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree with TrojanRam

that Williams does run very clean, crisp routes (considering his age), but there is no way I think we should grab him there.

by CaliRamMan on Feb 17, 2010 8:57 PM CST up reply actions  

Heres my take

        If we go QB in the first overall, maybe because it changes our draft needs from pick-to-pick, but I think our quality goes down every pick. The DTs left after Suh and McCoy drop off tremendously where as the DEs may stay strong through the 33rd pick. I don’t know why this is what I think but it is. So draft a DE you say with the 33rd pick, after QB? Well I don’t want a QB without more protection up front.. I know we can’t get it all in one draft but there is a way to stage this, without requiring certain other teams to go certain ways.
        I wish we’d have gotten more O-line help last year but we didn’t so, We get some depth on the O-line this year with the 3rd and either 4th or 5th. O-line depth projects down that far in this draft at this point. this still leaves us room to get a CB, a TE an OLB, whom I wouldn’t get earlier than our 4th right now anyway. All this after Suh and a killer DE. If all the killer DEs are gone well start the whole process one round earlier.
       This whole plan is dependent on drafting a franchise QB next year, along with another offensive weapon or 2 and some more O-line help. The only D we’d need though would be another CB and OLB.

by dbcouver on Feb 17, 2010 5:13 PM CST reply actions  

I'd rather take a running back with the 2nd round pick

Best or (if he drops) Spiller.

I think Spiller could really fit a Reggie Bush type role where he can be a “jack-of-all-trades” type player on the offense. We could sure use that type of talent.

The House of Spears reigns supreme

by Eric Nagel on Feb 17, 2010 5:24 PM CST reply actions  

Man, we've got so many holes

thanks to the past decade of lousy drafting (especial the Martz years) that it seems no matter who we draft, we will need them to plug one. I would be happy if the Rams just draft the ‘best player available’ in the 1st 3 rounds.

Go Rams!

"We can't run. We can't pass. We can't stop the run. We can't stop the pass. We can't kick. Other than that, we're just not a very good football team right now." --- Bruce Coslett, New York Jets Head Coach circa 1990s

by Nbr1RamFan on Feb 17, 2010 5:31 PM CST reply actions  

When I think of Williams

I think of another former USC wideout Steve Smith, the New York Giants version.

--Conquest Chronicles, SBNation's USC Trojans blog

by Joey Kaufman on Feb 17, 2010 5:37 PM CST reply actions  

I agree...

…though I think Damian has better hands. Both great route runners though.

"I was just letting the shots fly. You know, I don't leave any bullets in the chamber."

"Everything negative- pressure, challenges- is all an opportunity for me to rise."

-Kobe Bryant

A mantra for all athletes.

by TrojanRam on Feb 17, 2010 6:21 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

I like the idea of more offense

but, as many of us believe, we should draft back. I’m hoping Suh or another player blows up at the combine and a few teams fall in love. Somebody will pull the trigger to have their guy.

by RamsFan1979 on Feb 17, 2010 7:21 PM CST reply actions  

...Donnie Avery?

The House of Spears reigns supreme

by Eric Nagel on Feb 17, 2010 8:48 PM CST up reply actions  

Yeah, but he's also pointing out who we missed on

to grab Avery. Nobody had nabbed a WR to that point…DeSean Jackson, Eddie Royal, or Early Doucet could’ve been a Ram.

by RamsFan1979 on Feb 18, 2010 10:56 AM CST up reply actions  

Not only MTD

but now Walter Football is going offensive with the Rams (although, he’s been predicting the Rams go QB 1st round for a long time).

1st Round – Jimmy Claussen – QB – Notre Dame
2nd Round – Golden Tate – WR – Notre Dame
3rd Round – Navorro Bowman – OLB – Penn State
4th Round – Austen Lane – DE – Murray State

Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.

by Tackle Box on Feb 17, 2010 8:36 PM CST reply actions  

Give me Brandon Spikes at 33 all day!

He would be better fit for us at the SLB rather than the WLB. The guy plays the run as good if not better than any LB in this draft. He can blitz the C and D gaps to cause all kinds of havoc. I would really be happy if he was paired up with James Laurinaits for the next decade. That would be two young, intelligent, vocal, and talented LBs that would help solidify our Def for years to come. its been a while since we have had a solid LB core.
I really do not want us to go WR in this draft. I don’t see anyone in this class (Bryant aside) supplanting our top 4 wideouts for a spot. I just don’t see it happening. I am currently OK with Robinson, Avery and Gibson having a year of this offense under their belt.

by CaliRamMan on Feb 17, 2010 9:09 PM CST reply actions  

Surprised if Williams is There

I doubt Williams will fall out of the 1st round because I think he is the 2nd best WR in this draft and there are some teams in the mid-late first round that need some WRs. I also doubt the Rams bring in another rookie at WR, especially in the first 5 rounds. Look for them to address WR in free agency if anything.

With more time this year between the 1st and 2nd round there is a good shot at trading down with this pick, rather than the 1st. Staying in the first half of the 2nd round should allow the Rams to pick up a quality player still while picking up more draft ammunition.

If not traded, wth the defensive depth of this draft pool I am expecting to see a defensive pick at 33rd unless perhaps a CJ Spiller or Jermaine Gresham were to somehow fall into our laps. It seems that the better value at this point will more than likely be at DE, DT, CB, or OLB.

by maybra48 on Feb 17, 2010 9:10 PM CST reply actions  

and there's so much talent

it’s hard to say who could go where in the late first round and early second. some of these guys could go anywhere in that range

Turf Show Times

by Ryan Van Bibber on Feb 17, 2010 9:29 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm thinking the same w/our 2nd rnd pick

The value of that pick is incredible and like you said, should be easier to deal. IMO, with the talent coming out, it’s the same as having another 1st rnd pick: 3 picks for our 2nd.

by RamsFan1979 on Feb 18, 2010 11:04 AM CST up reply actions  

We're doing another little 4-round live draft over at MTD

        Check it out. So far We have Suh in the first and Pierre-Paul in the second round. The whole first 2 rounds is posted on a fanpost if you want to see who went where. The 3rd and 4th rounds are Saturday at 2pm Pacific I think. The best player available is a DE/OLB, Ricky Sapp. I’m thinking Offensive line, though. Anyone want to chime in?

by dbcouver on Feb 17, 2010 9:36 PM CST reply actions  

out side looking in from alions fan i see you going

1st QB Jimmy Claussen
2nd WR Golden Tate

i just think it will be a mistake taking DT yall have been going the “safe pick” last few years and that hasn’t gotten you very far.. you pick OL last year and DL 2 years in a row before that…. you avg 10 points a game.. i think it just time to get some more skilled positions.. you can make the point it all starts in the trenches all you want but when you got nothing behind them other then a ageing RB it don’t boge well…

Jimmy Claussen had 28 tds 4ints and a 68% comp in a west coast offence. i don’t see how people cant say he is not worth the number one pick.. if you are waiting for a QB to be the best player in the draft you are going to be waiting along time they are never the BPA let alone best in draft…

the rams just need to take a risk could he be the next leaf?? yea… but he could also be the next manning.. what would you rather have on your team a young Manning or a young sapp?? your kidding your self if you say a young sapp..

if Claussen isn’t good enough for you no QB ever will be

don’t take this as a bate btw i not trying for it to sound like that i just fell as if it is time

and on a some what related note most lions fan wanted curry last year not smith.. we couldn’t go OT( and still cant) do to current contacts and drafting a OT with the 17th over all pick in 2008

and a off-topic note (lol) i am thinking it is the viking moving to LA still just b/c of there leese and such regardless of who you think it will be.. if the viking are the team that gets moved out there do you think yall would move to the north div and vikings to the west??

by det32 on Feb 17, 2010 10:34 PM CST reply actions  

I hope we don't move to the NFC north

        I still harbor plans to see the Rams once a year in Sheattle.

by dbcouver on Feb 17, 2010 10:58 PM CST up reply actions  

you might not it just makes more sense

from a geography stand point if it is indeed the vikings that move..

by det32 on Feb 17, 2010 11:07 PM CST up reply actions  

Did you see the latest National Football Post ranking of players?

Clausen isn’t even in their top 30. Others are saying Colt McCoy is catching Clausen and could pass him at the Combine. Most of them just don’t believe Clausen has any real upside – he’s already about as good as he’s ever going to be.

I think if the Rams are going to take a QB, it will be either Bradford in the 1st or Colt McCoy in the second.

by andyrose on Feb 17, 2010 11:54 PM CST up reply actions  

bradford would be a good pick if they like him more

i think Clausen better. but its not what i think or even what you think.. it your FO

by det32 on Feb 18, 2010 8:48 AM CST up reply actions  

on that point
Most of them just don’t believe Clausen has any real upside – he’s already about as good as he’s ever going to be.

Was this from Todd McShay? I read a reference to a claim McShay made that Clausen had “already peaked”, whatever he meant by that. Maybe it was a different analyst.

It was in a great letter written to walterfootball:

…He then states he is worried Clausen has already “peaked” and may not have much room to grow at the next level because he has already played in a pro-style offense. What the hell does that mean?!? So getting experience in a pro-style offense in college is now a bad thing for a player’s draft stock?? And how does McShay arrive at such a conclusion?? Isn’t Clausen like 20 years old? I find it hard to believe that a QB will peak at this age. Favre is peaking at age 40. Peyton is peaking in his 30s.

When was the last time a team didn’t draft a player because they were worried they already peaked??? I can’t see a GM ever saying, "We love the kid. He has great arm strength, precision accuracy, real tough…but I have this feeling in my gut that he has already peaked so we can’t take him. Don’t ask me to defend this decision any further. It’s just a feeling I have.

I guess I just don’t get what part of throwing 28 td’s and 4 int’s, for 68% completion and 8.8 ypa, in a pro-style offense, for a major college program, in the single best junior season in recent history, despite not having the best blocking, and battling through a toe injury that is now fixed, makes Clausen not worthy of being a highly-selected.

by n4ry4 on Feb 18, 2010 2:22 PM CST up reply actions  

I'd take Colt in the 2nd

If Rams trade down and pick up extra picks. If so, McCoy in second I would approve of.

McCoy regardless, if there in 3rd….is tempting. He kinda reminds me a little of Troy Aikman!

by jlcdb70 on Feb 18, 2010 7:18 PM CST up reply actions  

i just cant see him lasting to the 2nd..

there is way to meany teams looking at QB this year for him to last that long

by det32 on Feb 18, 2010 8:41 PM CST up reply actions  

I'd love a move the the NFC North.

Living in Chicago would make every divisional road game accessable to me.

Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.

by Tackle Box on Feb 18, 2010 7:40 AM CST up reply actions  

yep as well as me

i am in Kalamazoo.. so not to far from any of them

i would love it for the lions but in a different way right now GB and viking are light years ahead of us.. i think we will catch the bears this yea and rams and lions are fairly even matched.. so it would just help out are season a little bit

by det32 on Feb 18, 2010 8:52 AM CST up reply actions  

Cutler was better than Clausen

coming outa college – just sayin’…..

by jlcdb70 on Feb 18, 2010 7:19 PM CST up reply actions  

i doubt Tate will be there in the second

i am against taking a WR in the second, but i am even more against taking a RB.

that being said, if Benn is there in the 2nd, it wouldn’t be the worst thing in the world if the Rams took him. I like him the most out of all the WR’s in this draft class (except Dez Bryant of course)

by jb22 on Feb 17, 2010 10:49 PM CST reply actions  

not going to be offense unless they trade down to #3

If they trade down to #3 and get a 2nd rounder this year then you might see Bradford get selected. This is what I really see happening though.

They aquire Mike Vick as a stop gap. (Bulger can’t run and with Baron at LT the QB will need to run for his life.)

Draft goes like this.
IF they get Vick or another veteran:
1. Suh
2. Cody or Weatherspoon. whichever is still there
3. Lafevor or however you spell it. (Dukes it out with Null for backup or starter)
4. Best DB on board

No Vick or veteran:
Trade down to #3 and take Bradford
Try to get Cody in 2nd round and linebacker or db with aquired pick
Gerhart in 3rd round

by stlmobuck on Feb 17, 2010 10:56 PM CST reply actions  

i dont think cody or Weatherspoon will be there at your 2nd…

3rd is to soon for lafe.. and i dont think he will be able to start ever.. i have seen most of his games i just don’t see it in him but who knows

there is almost no way you are trading out of that spot i cant see any trades till 5th pick..

the rumors are vick is not on the block so donno if you could get him… i do think it would be wrong thing to do.. it is better to have your QB learn why there is little chance of you going any where

by det32 on Feb 17, 2010 11:04 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm a Bradford fan...

but if the Rams take a QB with the first pick in the draft they will again be drafting for need instead of BPA. I still curse the fact that they passed on Curry and then right tackle Phil Loadholt in the 2nd round last year. Both of these guys are going to be pro bowl players at their positions for years to come. Just goes to show you that you get what you pay for when you play it too safe in the draft… mediocrity.

by Da Rams! on Feb 17, 2010 11:13 PM CST reply actions  

One more thing...

I’m not knocking the Rams selection of James Laurinaitis in the second round. Imagine if the defense the Rams would have if they would have taken Curry in the first, Laurinaitis in the second and followed that draft up with getting Suh this year. They’d be on their way to putting together a top 10 ‘D’. This underscores the need to draft defense this year. The draft is front loaded with defense, why not take advantage of it?

by Da Rams! on Feb 17, 2010 11:26 PM CST reply actions  

i can go either way on this one we need help on both sides of the ball, so please!!!! trade our 1st pick we need alot more help and that extra playa or two can be huge

by ManRam95 on Feb 18, 2010 2:52 AM CST reply actions  

Drafting it

So, I guess we’re going with a DT or Qb with teh pick. So, if we go with a DT, does our strategy change? I mean I really don’t know where to start to be honest. I know we need DBs, more DL, probably more OL, a QB, a spell back, AHHH.. don’t know where to start. But, if we do go with QB, our offense is not good enough to support him. So, I suspect more offense would follow whether through the draft or FA.

by heinzketchup on Feb 18, 2010 4:49 AM CST reply actions  

I was encouraged by the report from Spags

that Fletcher is coming along better than expected with his rehab. If he is able to come back and be as good as he was when he was injured last year, that would help a lot with the defensive back situation and drop it down the list of things we badly need.

by andyrose on Feb 18, 2010 2:23 PM CST up reply actions  

Puzzling, isn't it?

No qb is a “franchise tag” in this year’s draft. Like the poster below says something about, “if Rams don’t stop the run, Rams will NEVER win”."

I agree with that poster who implied this thought of no run stop – no win. It is true that we could win more games with the qb’s we have right now if we could stop the run and pass – most games, Rams have lost because of runs, often times in BIG CHUNKS! Flat-footed and tired d.b.‘s can last only so long when first down after first down racks up against a lightweight, non-dominating defensive line that can’t stop the run, so Rams lose.

If Rams trade down, and pick up extra picks (especially 2nd and 3rd round picks), then, and only then, will I approve of a qb being taken in rounds 1-3!

by jlcdb70 on Feb 18, 2010 7:13 PM CST up reply actions  

Draft

We need to face the fact that if we can’t stop the run we will never win. Drafting Suh makes so much sense. Clifton Ryan-Suh-Chris long is a good start and next year we can draft Adrian Clayborn DE from Iowa(St Louis native) and give us a strong D-Line for many years

Chris

by chrisrmsfn on Feb 18, 2010 12:58 PM CST reply actions  

Ram fan since 1965

I cannot recall the Rams ever drafting a franchise QB. Time to change.Draft Bradford or Clausen #1.

by Thomas W on Feb 18, 2010 3:30 PM CST reply actions  

Jay Cutler was better out of college than any qb in this years draft!!!

Look what the Rams did with that opportunity.

THERE IS NO GOOD QB IN THE DRAFT FOR A “FRANCHISE TAG OR LABEL”!!!

Rams, go defense the first 3 rounds (unless Okung for 1st overall/trade down or Dez Bryant – offense); otherwise SUH, BERRY, McCOY, or DE Morgan———-or trade down for defense or Okung or Morgan———Berry, Suh, and McCoy probably don’t falll below picks 5 thru 7.

Rams offensive play was mainly due to poor line play and injuries. I would take Bulger back no question and groom Null and Reilly!!! Bulger needs time to throw, not time to wonder where to get sacked. Alex Barron has not really been the billing he was labeled. Hopefully, Jason Smith is better and Jacob Bell and the rest of the line can gel – I still like Greco and Setterstrom (damn Setterstrom has been injured 2 seasons in a row…reak incidents) Before the injuries, Sets was becoming a dominating guard, especially opening holes for the rb’s. Let’s hope Sets comes back and never has an injury again!

by jlcdb70 on Feb 18, 2010 7:06 PM CST reply actions  

THERE IS NO GOOD QB IN THE DRAFT FOR A "FRANCHISE TAG OR LABEL

i dont see how you can say say 28tds 4 int 68 comp isnt any good..

by det32 on Feb 18, 2010 8:43 PM CST up reply actions  

The problem with Clausen

is that no one sees any upside to him. He is about as good as he’s going to get, and that just isn’t good enough for the long run. He probably would be the most successful his first year if thrown into the fire, but after that the others would catch and pass him due to his lack of upside.

by andyrose on Feb 19, 2010 12:40 AM CST up reply actions  

You Been Listening

to ESPN too much………“no upside” LoL………….thats what they said about C Long too……..Clausen will be a decent QB for years to come, just not for the Rams

Jake Locker in 2011

by JordansDad on Feb 19, 2010 12:50 AM CST up reply actions  

LoL

Admit it……….the only reason why you want us to go QB is so that the Lions can draft Suh………just come out and say it, don’t act like you care about who we draft because you want us to be a good team…………..

Jake Locker in 2011

by JordansDad on Feb 19, 2010 12:48 AM CST up reply actions  

The Rams should take Ndamakung Suh

DT is a need for the Rams. A QB is also a need for the Rams. But Suh is more explosive player than Bradford or Clausen.
Suh has the potential to be a 2 to 3 time Pro Bowler while Bradford could be a huge bust with the amount of injuries on his shoulder and Clausen is okay but I just don’t see him taken first to the Rams.
Lets go Rams!!!

by brians rams on Feb 18, 2010 9:23 PM CST reply actions  

Give Bulger

1 more year, behind a line that played a season together(somewhat) then draft Locker next year, he’s a “franchise” QB…………..draft Suh this year at #1 get a stud LB, DE, or OL in the 2nd. Then our D will have potential……..we also need to get a WR, draft or FA, the WR’s we have now dont scare anyone, we need a WR that will make opposing D’s think twice about stacking up against SJAX

Jake Locker in 2011

by JordansDad on Feb 19, 2010 12:54 AM CST reply actions  

i am going to puke

if the rams waste their two top picks on those two i will be visiting my toilet, as well as finding a new team with a front office that is not filled with morons.

by johnny scuba on Feb 20, 2010 5:22 PM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about St. Louis Rams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Jackson_medium_small
TST Community Mock 2012: Trades
Stewie_small
Why We Must Draft Blakmon
Images-1_small
2012 NFL Draft: Stickum
Small
Why Super Bowl 46 is bittersweet for Rams fans
Small
If I Were GM

Recent FanPosts

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Cover the web with Turf


Managers

71523_170793669601439_100000124211145_596632_5713708_n_small Ryan Van Bibber

Baby_drinking_becks_small 3k

Editors

Jackson_medium_small Eric Nagel

Peter_small VTramsFan

Bugs_bunny_pose_small Douglas M

Authors

Wildcat_small Tackle Box

Dsc03827_small CoachConnors

Mardygilyardsig_small Tevin T. Broner

Bradford_draft_small buckeyefan55

Tst_small T.Ram

Images_small Brick Top

Small EddieP

Profile_pic1_small Mike Dietrich