Recap: Rams fight to the end despite a blowout loss
For some, it was over for the St. Louis Rams before they even took the field against New Orleans. And it looked like that might very well have been an accurate prediction after the Saints scored on their first two drives while eating up an overwhelming amount of time. After settling for a couple of field goals, the Rams had the chance to make it a 13-14 game with less than 2 minutes left to play.
And Bradford threw and interception. He threw the ball low and too far to the inside for an easy pick that Michael Jenkins returned for a touchdown. That pretty much did it for the Rams.
Let's review...
Here are the meta-themes for the Rams from this game.
Turnovers - The Rams didn't technically lose the turnover battle. But they did. First, the Rams turnovers proved to be costly ones. Steven Jackson's fumble ended the Rams' first possession, a drive in which they were moving the football well, a must against a high scoring Saints team. Also, Bradford's INTs both came in the red zone. Killer. New Orleans capitalized on turnovers. The Rams did not, until a fourth quarter INT resulted, after some consternation, in the Rams' first TD.
Pass rush - Or lack thereof. The Rams failed to get a pass rush going, mostly relying on their front four to pester the QB. Spagnuolo's Giants won the Super Bowl because they blitzed the living Hell out of the Patriots. Nine of the Rams 35 sacks this season have come from players other than the front four. There were no safety blitzes this week, as the Rams opted to leave as many as they could in coverage. They still got beat. Badly. For all the talk of taking chances on offense, the same goes for defense against a team like this. A QB like Drew Brees can pick you apart no matter how many guys you have in coverage, sort of like Tom Brady. Without real, consistent, disruptive pressure, he will make plays. I wonder if the Rams coaches forgot that this week. Also, it's clear that if the Rams are going to rely solely on their front four for pressure, they need a speed rusher, a talented guy with burners who can get to quick release passers like Brees.
Coaching - I hate to be too critical of the coaches because they fought to the bitter end, but some of the Rams problems on the field today came from some very questionable judgement calls. Why aren't they blitzing more? Why are they using a cover-2 type defense to leave an open Colston in the end zone with 15 yards between the LOS and a score? And why are they running the ball on third-and-10? I know the Rams are trying to accomplish something without exactly being loaded up on talent, but at times you get the sense that they're just outsmarting themselves. Of course, the offense did find a new affinity for the deep ball, and it worked at times too.
Shaking it off - The Rams have rebounded well, and nobody seems more capable of rebounding from adversity than rookie QB Sam Bradford. Give him credit for not allowing some costly mistakes to take away one ounce of confidence or focus. SJ39 did the same thing after his fumble. Really, the whole team, though limited by talent, rebounds well from tough circumstances. I look forward to seeing what they can do at home next week.
Random thoughts
- I wonder what kind of difference Bartell would have made. You have to think he would have been all over Colston who scored twice. Still, the Rams were just plain overmatched this week, regardless of the Xs and Os.
- I'll say it again. I love the fight in this team. Well out of the mix, they played like it was a one-point game in the fourth quarter. That's what winners do.
- People were beating up on the Rams safeties before and during the game, but give them credit for solid play. Atogwe made a big mistake biting on the play fake on Colston's first TD, but he's been pretty good in coverage lately. And let's face it, good QBs beat good coverage enough to come out ahead in the end. Credit Craig Dahl, whose INT led to the Rams only TD of the game. That's two weeks in a row for Dahl to have an INT.
- I know first and second downs are where you make your money, but you don't win many games converting just once on 11 third down tries.
- Laurent Robinson made a nice catch on that 32-yarder, but he mostly had an awful game. He's a free agent after this season, anyone think he'll be back?
- Danario Alexander was targeted just once.
- Is John Greco really that bad in pass protection?
- The Saints had the ball for 13 minutes in the first quarter.
- Seattle lost big to San Francisco to keep the Rams on top of the NFC West, but watch out for San Fran. That week 16 game will have more to say about the playoffs than the week 17 game, in my opinion.
61 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I think that if the Rams win the next 2 games
The SF game will eliminate them and the last 1 against the gulls won’t matter.
oh, of course.
pretty much two wins will do it. as long as the 49ers don’t run the table. (rooting big for san diego thursday)
Wow, the Cardinals put up 36 today
mostly on the foot of the kicker. And the Chargers killed the Chiefs because Matt Cassel is out…too bad he couldn’t have been out next week.
Anything less then a victory next week
And I’ll be extremely disappointed in this team. They could have made it much closer, and I’m sure that realization will factor into there remaining 3 games.
Number 8 is great
Rams need to win the next 2 home games and lock the division up
I may be in the minority, but I am uncertain about this team’s ability to go into Qwest in January and win a division-deciding game. If that game truly does decide the division winner, that crowd is going to be fired up, the weather is going to be awful, and Seahawks as bad as they are, are halfway decent at home. They’re getting healthier every week too.
I'm not uncertain about the ability to do it
uncertain about them actually doing it perhaps, but they could win it.
it is crucial to win out
just for momentum and confidence.
I don’t want to leave anything to chance and KC at home is a winnable game, regardless of how improved they are, we are at home and will be fighting for playoffs.
It will be tough no doubt, but a win vs them will propel us into a confident state of mind when San Fran come into town, and we should beat them, memories of that awful call hurt bad and we need to stamp some authority on the division.
winning at QWEST will be very tough but I think Sam is determined to overcome his road woes and we will beat them through sheer desire, giving us great momentum in the playoffs at home to most likely the Saints.
then it’s time to pray for health, good luck and some amazing game planning.
Bradford to Onobun!
I turned on the game just in time
to see sam chase down roman harper. I feel like I caught the best part of the game
Will gladly sell my soul for a championship..........
This is from Brandon Gibson
Shot ourselves in the foot today. We didn’t play like we normally do..,good thing is we might c them again
by Smoooth Criminal on Dec 12, 2010 7:19 PM CST reply actions
Bernie Miklasz
Rodger Saffold said he missed the block and because of it Bradford couldn’t step through and make a strong throw on that pick 6.
by Smoooth Criminal on Dec 12, 2010 7:19 PM CST reply actions
No excuse...that was just a bad throw.
I love KING SAM and he’s great, but he wasn’t looking at the safety on that pass.
by Pekka for Predator Pontiff on Dec 12, 2010 7:40 PM CST up reply actions
No that was just as much on Saffold as well.
I said it after the play too, he got absolutely DOMINATED. If Sam had another second he would have seen Jenkins jump the route and probably would have thown it away or scrambled but bad protection causes bad throws and Sam made a poor decision still.
"I kind of stepped my swagger up. You look at the Madden game and the swagger's so low, maybe they'll bump me up. Before it was a meatball flex, so you've got to liven it up a little bit." - Animal Jr.
by douchiedude on Dec 12, 2010 11:39 PM CST up reply actions
Sam threw a weak ball off of his back foot.
Saffold didn’t make him throw it.
I can take a beating ... I'm a Rams fan.
Yeah...he didn't make Bradford throw it!
Don’t make me trash Bradford cause that’s one of the few mistakes he’s made this year. But that was just a bad throw.
by Pekka for Predator Pontiff on Dec 13, 2010 9:46 AM CST up reply actions
And Chris Long with a denny Green like quote
We beat ourselves. They’re not that much better than us.
I like it.
by Smoooth Criminal on Dec 12, 2010 7:21 PM CST reply actions
good to see that the players realize that they lost something they could have easily won
i’ll really impressed by the mental aspects of this team
I'm not trolling, just being sarcastic.
by hr on Dec 12, 2010 7:25 PM CST up reply actions
I believe that to be the biggest strength of Spags & possibly the rest of the coaching staff.
they have prepared this team very well mentally. both times we’ve lost two in a row we’ve responded with winning two in a row.
So are you saying we're gonna lose to KC
and then beat Seattle and San Francisoco?
by Smoooth Criminal on Dec 12, 2010 7:29 PM CST up reply actions
not at all haha.
I expect us to respond by winning three in a row. I’m just saying that each time we’ve started a losing streak we responded well.
uh. . .
easily have won? the saints are a much better team than us. they made just as many mistakes as we did. literally. we tied the turnover battle.
sure we both had 3 turnovers. But two of ours were in the red zone ( And one returned for a TD). It’s not the same
by Smoooth Criminal on Dec 12, 2010 9:01 PM CST up reply actions
yea i dont think so this game wasn't even close
And as much as i like Chris Long I never once heard his name called for doing anything
World Champions at last
by mississippisaintsfan on Dec 12, 2010 8:37 PM CST up reply actions
The whole defensive line didn't show up
He was talking about the team not himself.
by Smoooth Criminal on Dec 12, 2010 8:40 PM CST up reply actions
They are, who we THOUGHT they were!
And we let ’em off the hook!
Pooch punts should be illegal inside an opponents 38 yard line.
That pass rush was terrible...
…but is there ANY chance that we were saving something if we have to see them in the playoffs? And I’m (again) beginning to tire of dink and dunk…and our pass rush was terrible! Brees had 5 secs on just about every dropback…no way we can stop them in that scenario.
Tough loss to the SB champs…we’re gonna win out from here though!
by Pekka for Predator Pontiff on Dec 12, 2010 7:42 PM CST reply actions
tired of dink and dunk really?
Did you see that saints “dink and dunk” all over our defense, totally negating our pressure.
We were moving the ball well down the field, we just had a bunch of really bad turnovers.
I feel like no matter what occurs in a game the conclusion will always be to throw more deep passes, even when a deep pass is responsible for a 97 yd pick 6.
Totally negating our pressure?
We had no pressure! He had 5 secs or more on every dropback. Its impossible to stop that…not cause he’s Brees and they’re the Saints, but because we had NO PRESSURE!
And when we were down by 20, did we go down the field? No, it was dink and dunk. So its not that I mind dink and dunk when we win or are in the game. But even when the game was well out of reach did we stretch the field? No, we dink and dunked. That’s what I’m hating. Of course the TOs hurt us but they’re not the reason why we had no chance to make a comeback.
No idea what your point is in the last comment…
by Pekka for Predator Pontiff on Dec 12, 2010 8:03 PM CST up reply actions
AND...
…I’m not saying that you can’t dink and dunk effectively! But when you never go down the field, then it doesn’t work! Brees was constantly stretching the field with deep passes…something we don’t do enough of.
by Pekka for Predator Pontiff on Dec 12, 2010 8:22 PM CST up reply actions
bradford had 7.2 yard per attempt.
only two teams average better for the season (san diego, 7.83; green bay, 7.23. new england and the giants are the other two over 7). the rams average 5.39 on the season which is only better than arizona and carolina. so yeah, there wasn’t as much dink and dunking today.
Really?
You’re gonna use a one game average compared to the league average to verify that we weren’t dinking and dunking? Really? Well then, you’re definitely no genius :) Or you didn’t watch the game…
In the 4th quarter, when the game was over, he was 7-10 with 103 yds. So through the first three QTRs when the game was still “somewhat” competitive, he was 11-22 for 128 yards, which would put him way the hell down at the bottom of the list. There were only a handful of times KING SAM went deep today.
by Pekka for Predator Pontiff on Dec 12, 2010 8:19 PM CST reply actions
Im not liking the fact that DX was only targeted once
was he being covered well or just not out there?
"Why not just throw an empty glove down at the shortstop position, it would be cheaper and have better range." - justin007000
Great writeup VanRam
I hope the Rams pick that up from the Saints. If the other team gets a turnover from you, go right back and do it to them.
Conversely, if you get a turnover or a big play….BE WARY of the other team coming back and doing it to you.
All I want for Christmas is a Pete Carroll scowl on week 17!
5 of Bradford's INTs have come in the redzone
1 against Arizona (Not sure if it was we were at the 20 but we were really close to it)
1 vs Seattle ( Earl Thomas)
1 vs ATL (The shovel pass)
2 vs NO
That’s something that Bradford needs to clean up. Maybe Shurmur can help with the playcalling this season.
by Smoooth Criminal on Dec 12, 2010 8:29 PM CST reply actions
wow grammar fail
Anyway the AZ int. The Rams were on AZ’s 21
by Smoooth Criminal on Dec 12, 2010 8:30 PM CST up reply actions
pretty much red zone
typically rookies struggle in the redzone, it will be ironed out next season
but i’d like to see how many tds hes gotten in the redzone too.
i know that one play we rely on too much is the PA rollout of a goalline or 1 wr formation. and while it works, we need to open the playbook up a bit more there or just hand it off more if we can activate greco once in a damn while lol
Bradford to Onobun!
Come to think of it...
…I don’t recall a single rollout play yesterday. Did I miss that? We did and didn’t do a lot of the things we don’t and do-do, respectively, on a regular basis.
by Pekka for Predator Pontiff on Dec 13, 2010 2:52 PM CST up reply actions
I think 8 or 9 of his tds came with goal to go
not sure about the redzone
by Smoooth Criminal on Dec 13, 2010 3:02 PM CST up reply actions
Good game
And your young QB was really impressive today
He made a few rookie mistakes but we do have the best DB’s in the nfl and we are ranked 3rd in pass defense so i wouldnt be to hard on him
Good luck the rest of the year we will probably see you in the first round of the playoffs because if we tie with Atlanta at 13-3 they have the tie breakers
World Champions at last
by mississippisaintsfan on Dec 12, 2010 8:35 PM CST reply actions
Thanks for hopping in... you guys are REALLY GOOD
Pooch punts should be illegal inside an opponents 38 yard line.
Thanks for the kind words
I also commend you on a really outstanding football team. Would have liked to have seen a healthier secondary so we could dial up some exotic blitzes. Didn’t happen.
Again, good win.
Van, I gotta give it up
I wouldn’t have the poise to put this one in the proper context. So hats off to you. But as it pertains to the team, this one hurts much, much more than the Falcons loss.
The players got it, whether it was Brandon Gibson or Chris Long as noted above: the Rams took themselves out of this one. And whereas in seasons past, recognizing that was the issue, the question is how to overcome that. It certainly isn’t something I feel confident that this coaching staff can combat, whether by ability or experience. And it’s not something we have the depth to be able to deal with by rotating starters out for backups whose motivation and dedication may allow them to make plays where more talented, yes lesser focused, superiors cannot.
In the end, this one hurts because it reminded me how much more we need to grow, and specifically how well we need to draft, to make the 2011 Rams SB contenders. I know it’s possible, but I’m less optimistic that it’s likely after today.
You don't seem to want to accept the fact you're dealing with an expert in guerrilla warfare, with a man who's the best, with guns, with knives, with his bare hands. A man who's been trained to ignore pain, ignore weather, to live off the land, to eat things that would make a billy goat puke. In *St. Louis* his job was to dispose of enemy personnel. To kill! Period! Win by attrition. Well, *Steven Jackson* was the best.
I think this whole season has been one big over achievement
I just hope the coaches and FO don’t forget this:
3k-
In the end, this one hurts because it reminded me how much more we need to grow, and specifically how well we need to draft, to make the 2011 Rams SB contenders. I know it’s possible, but I’m less optimistic that it’s likely after today
Sure we need to draft well
But don’t forget about FA signings.
by Smoooth Criminal on Dec 12, 2010 8:51 PM CST up reply actions
I hate to say it
But I really think the long wait after the saints returner’s injury hurt the rams momentum. They just recovered the fumble and were ready to make it 13-14. A td would have changed the shape of the game, but having to wait so long took the wind from their sails IMO
by Salti Cracker on Dec 12, 2010 9:03 PM CST via mobile reply actions
it did look bad!!!... he didn't look like he had much movement at all
but he was moving his hands while he was carted off which was relieving
Look gang...
We can talk about momentum, or a few plays etc etc, but bottom line, we got beat today by the defending super bowl champions, and a team that is most likely destined to represent the NFC once again this year in the super bowl against the Pats (most likely).
We got beat by an outstanding football team (not just good, but outstanding) on their home turf, in our THIRD road game in a ROW (a rare occurrence I might ad) with a rookie quarterback who has no real targets to speak of due to injury and lack of talent. Period. End of story.
I know it sucks, we lost, but there is no shame in this loss, only satisfaction in knowing we’ve improved, and also knowing where we stand.
Barring the lock out, one more draft and our team is going to get a WHOLE lot better, not just a little.
Let’s just suck it up, win our next two HOME games, and wrap this puppy up so we can at least host a playoff game and get our young players some valuable playoff experience.
That’s reality, and it’s not really a bad reality either.
Pooch punts should be illegal inside an opponents 38 yard line.
Get ready for some payback!!
New Orleans @St. Louis wld card round
by Smoooth Criminal on Dec 12, 2010 9:31 PM CST up reply actions
+1 millions
The reality was that this game was an obvious mismatch and we still could have won it if we wouldn’t have had some very costly mistakes at very costly times. However, that was going to be the only way we won, if we executed pretty close to perfectly for a full 60 minutes. That is a tall order for a young team especially away for the third week in a row…. Tell me another team that won three games in a row away this year that has equal talent and I will begin to complain about this game. Until then, I am going to go ahead and give the boys a pass this week and a pat on the back that the heart they showed by never lying down even in the end when it was obvious the game was too far gone.
Chis Long is pissed
We r better than that, next wk will come fast, let’s focus on Kc
by Smoooth Criminal on Dec 12, 2010 9:52 PM CST reply actions
We have complained all year about the coaching staff being too conservative..
I was actually hoping we could finish off the first half conservatively by handing the ball to Jackson a couple of more times when we got in the red zone down 14-6. I figured if we could have ate up the clock and settled for the field goal we could have gone into the locker only down 14-9 and feeling good about ourselves after being down 14-0. Especially knowing that we were getting the ball to start the second half. Bradford throwing that ball in the flat for the pick six was the huge momentum changer that basically put the nail in our coffin.
I didn’t think the Saints defense was Super Bowl caliber, our fumbles and interceptions were just ill timed. We should have protected the ball a little better especially since we forced two turnovers ourselves in the first half.
I'm suffering from an extreme case of laurinaitis!

by 
































