More perspective on Bradford's game and the Rams' week 12 win
St. Louis Rams QB Sam Bradford had an impressive game last week by any standard. Most notable was that he became the first rookie QB to throw for 300 yards, 3 TD and no interceptions against the Broncos this weekend.
That performance was enough to earn him a top spot on Football Outsiders' weekly Quick Reads list. Bradford was the 8th best QB in week 12 with a mark of 111 DYAR (defense-adjusted yards above replacement).
The comments that accompanied the analysis of Bradford's performance might be more enlightening for what they say about the Rams play calling decisions and the Broncos comeback efforts in the second half.
Comments and commentary after the jump.
Bradford came out on fire, as 13 of his first 20 dropbacks resulted in either a first down or a touchdown for the Rams. He finished the first half with three incompletions and a sack inside the red zone, though, and the Rams chose to run Steven Jackson into the line for no gain over and over in the second half. Bradford had just five first downs on 15 dropbacks in the second half, although each of those first downs went for at least 13 yards.
The point is that the Rams continued to gain yardage when they threw the ball; however, they continued to run it and fail to get needed first downs despite the Broncos comeback efforts.
I understand what it looks like the Rams are trying to do, control the ball with a lead and let the defense do the heavy lifting. Except, that wasn't working last week. Note where Steven Jackson ranks on the list of running backs. Need I say more?
Ok, I will say more, more Bradford at least.
Matt Williamson of Scouts, Inc. puts the Rams QB on top of his rookie watch list, just above the second overall pick in the draft, Lions DT Ndamukong Suh.
Bradford told reporters today that he prefers wins rather than records. Can you imagine if he'd said otherwise?
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Bradford
is the 1st rookie QB to throw for 300 yards and 3 TDs on the road in a win in NFL history.
by Smoooth Criminal on Dec 1, 2010 4:45 PM CST reply actions
I think this kid is gonna beat a few more records before the season ends.
He gets better every week. In 2001 Warner scored a TD on just about every possession. With a couple red hot receivers, Bradford would do the same.
The only thing comparable to a Rams win is a 49er loss!
Bradford is already showing
he can make chicken salad out of chicken shit. He’s 11 games into his career and though they’ve played a somewhat easy schedule, he’s helped the team to five wins with no legitimate No. 1 or No. 2 receiver. I agree he’d be a lot more lethal with a big target and Mark Clayton, but to be at this point with THIS group of receivers? Unbelievable.
As long as he stays healthy, we’re seeing the start of something very special.
by blindmouse on Dec 1, 2010 10:34 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
He made Clayton look amazing
I remember how people said how Clayton dropped too many passes and wasnt fulfulling the role he needed. With bradford. Clayton looked like an amazing pro-bowl caliber receiver
Will gladly sell my soul for a championship..........
And that's what's so freaking awsome.
The room for growth. If Bradford, right now, when he still has a lot of growing to do as a quarterback, is capable of making a guy like Clayton look better than he ever had before, what’s going to happen when the Rams get him a top-flight target or two?
Buckethead
Look how badly buckethead has been struggling in Indianapolis with his receivers. To just think that the Rams have close to the same caliber of receivers and Bradford has been putting up better numbers recently.
Mark Clayton
Does anyone think there is any doubt in Clayton’s head right now that he WILL WANT TO stay with St. Louis next year being that he is a free agent after this season? Being that Clayton is a fellow Oklahoma Sooner and worked out with Bradford on campus last year, you just know that there is a chemistry between them.
I'm suffering from an extreme case of laurinaitis!
2nd Half offense
You write, “I understand what it looks like the Rams are trying to do, control the ball with a lead and let the defense do the heavy lifting. Except, that wasn’t working last week.”
Yet, it hasn’t worked all season. Go back to Oakland, Tampa and SF for the obvious ones – but remember San Diego? Arizona? This strategy has failed over and over and we’re still a mediocre team because of it.
It’s obvious that the team is going to run so our opponents play the run. Why not pass on first or second down? What do you have to lose? Bradford isn’t Bulger and will rarely give the ball up – and even if he does, why not go for the win especially on the road?
This team is a playoff caliber team – in the first half. Everybody says they don’t have the talent – guess what. They do. They don’t have the coaching experience and confidence to make adjustments and actually play to win. It’s as if they’re afraid to take chances because they’ll fail, but THEY CAN’T BE AFRAID TO WIN.
Go with what works. Even if you’re up by 20. We’ve seen what happens otherwise and it’s the same ’ol sorry Rams.
I agree with that...
The St Louis Rams are waiting on their Coaching staff to learn to manage the game properly.
I forgot where I read it or saw it but..
..someone stated that the way Sam Bradford has been performing the last few weeks, he is playing like a top 10 quarterback.
I am very curious to see where he will be ranked among the top quarterbacks at the beginning of next year. How close will his name be to Tom Brady, Drew Brees, Peyton Manning, Phillip Rivers, Michael Vick, Matt Ryan and Aaron Rodgers? At this point in the season, his 82.0 passer rating number already has Mark Sanchez, Matt Hasselbeck, Carson Palmer, Donovan McNabb, Brett Favre, Alex Smith and Jason Campbell in the rear view mirror.
I'm suffering from an extreme case of laurinaitis!

by 
































