The Rams and the deep ball, again
Football Outsiders has their weekly "Quick Reads" posted, a look at the week's best and worst in individual offensive performances. The St. Louis Rams don't have anyone at the top or at the bottom of the list following their week 11 loss to Atlanta, which I've just been informed I'm now legally required to call Hotlanta.
Anyway, the comment from FO accompanying Sam Bradford's stats offers some insight into the Rams passing game, particularly the dink and dunk versus the long balls.
Bradford completed three of his first four "deep" throws -- passes thrown 15 or more yards downfield -- for 18, 24, and 25 yards. Two of them went to Michael Hoomanawanui...Bradford threw just four "deep" passes on his final 33 dropbacks, including just two during the entire second half. Were the Falcons defending against the deep pass? Perhaps -- all four of those passes fell incmplete. But it sure seems like Bradford might have wanted to press the issue with deep throws a little more frequently.
More thoughts on the deep ball below...
Without going back and watching the game tape (yet), it's hard to speculate as to what the thought process was. On the Rams third quarter scoring drive, they started with excellent field position thanks to a 33-yard punt return and only needed three plays to score a TD. The first play was a 16-yard run from Steven Jackson, the second an 8-yard pass to Danny Amendola, and the TD play was a 13-yard pass to Brandon Gibson, almost a "deep" throw.
The 18-yard completion to Amendola on 3rd-and-21 at the end of the third quarter was a short throw the Amendola extended with some YAC. It just wasn't enough. Though it's predictable, you wonder why that play of all plays didn't feature a deep strike?
The Rams offense is a strange case study. On one hand, they don't run like they used to, particularly on those power, up-the-gut type runs with a fullback leading the way. On the other hand, they pass lots, but just not downfield very often. Some of that has to do with the players on hand. But the success of those plays sprinkled into the mix with the current group of receivers do work, proving that they're capable of making more like it.
The league is transforming into a pass-first business. But offenses still have to mix it up.
Read the rest of the FO article. Their comments about Matt Ryan's performance this week will be of particular interest.
10 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I am not an DC or OC, but...
… if I am playing against the Rams, I know that most of their pass plays are going to happen well short of the first down marker. I would just tell my defense, if you cant breakup the pass, thats fine just make sure they dont run after the catch!
If you can do that, it almost makes the Ram offense work against itself…if their pass play goes 3 yards or less, you win that play because
A. It’s likely that one of the plays is going to be a Jackson run
B. That Jackson run you know is coming on second down because the Rams always pass on 1st down
So if you hold the Rams pass play to 3 yards or less on first down, then you stuff Jackson up the gut on second down which puts the Rams at 3rd and 7 or more. Now the Rams cant run jackson and there is still a very high percentage chance that the rams will throw the underneath ball and try to get the yac for the first down. So on 3rd down, you just set your defense up to let them do that…put your DBs and LBs near the sticks and when the Rams reciever catches the ball several yards in front of them, you close with several guys from different angles and prevent him from getting the first down.
In contrast for instance the GSOT Rams or even take the Colts…the short pass is 7 yards with a chance to get yac for the first if they dont get it, hey its 2nd and 3 which even if the opposing defense guesses your play correctly…say…a run…you still have a good chance of getting 3 yards out of it, if not you still get one more chance at 3rd and short.
Most of the time though,
the GSOT Rams or the Colts throw pass plays that are at least just beyond the sticks.
Are there any CFL or UFL WR available for the Rams to pick up?Seems to me we need to stretch the field.
I'd like to see
Kevin Curtis get a workout. He just had a root canal. Other than that, he’s supposedly good to go.
VJ, Avery, Clayton, DX, Amendola
And Gibson\Gilyard. We should be flying high in 2011.
The only thing comparable to a Rams win is a 49er loss!
by DevsLaRams on Nov 24, 2010 1:55 AM CST via mobile reply actions

by 
































