Recap, Rams 17, Falcons 34: Atlanta too much for the Rams
If you came here looking for answers about the St. Louis Rams 34-17 loss to the Atlanta Falcons there's an easy one for you:
The Falcons are a much better team than the Rams. Really, that's it.
Their offense is patient and doesn't make many mistakes, thanks in large part to the unflappable Matt Ryan, who has more than enough talent around him to make things happen.
For their part, the Rams played at the same level that's allowed them to win four game this season and compete in all but other. Really, considering the lack of talent at some spots on the roster, it's no small accomplishment that Spagnuolo has this team where they are. But at the end of the day, they just don't have the kind of talent to matchup against a team like Atlanta, who I'm standing by as my pick to win the NFC.
A little more breakdown after the jump.
Again, there were lots of little things here and there that could have made a difference for the Rams. To keep this recap appropriate for Sunday night audiences, let's run through the big three, the three factors that made the biggest difference.
The offense - Probably there are a few things happening here to contribute, once again, to the inability of the Rams offense to move the ball. Nobody does much for yards after the catch, a prerequisite for the West Coast offense and the easiest way to make the dink and dump passing game look as futile and annoying as it does. It also makes it hard to convert third downs, especially when they're completing 18-yard plays...with 20-yards to go.
I liked the play calling early on, or at least I thought I did. Why no run? Really, just 11 touches for Steven Jackson, sometimes it seems like the Rams just don't even want to try. Yes, the Falcons have a good run defense, but that hasn't stopped the Rams from using him successfully against other tough run defenses in the past. When the Rams don't run, it's easy for teams to bottle up the passing game. Now, this week they did much better with some longer passes, but they just don't have the ability to do it very often.
Atlanta dominated the time of possession. Give the defense credit they played well despite being overmatched. But the Rams have to score points AND control the ball.
That said, it's pretty impressive just how effective Sam Bradford can be in the two minute offense. Why aren't they doing more of that?
Coverage - We've said it before and we'll say it again, the Rams need better OLBs. Hard to believe it's an upgrade over last year, but it's way off the mark. You can also factor in depth at safety, where they lack for coverage guys too.
Fletcher was a much better corner than Dockery was last week, but still had some wildly inconsistent moments. He is young...as are the other guys that were asked to step into the game after Bartell left and Atogwe left for awhile. Jerome Murphy, a rookie, matched up with Roddy White...
Pass rush - or lack thereof. The league's sack leaders didn't get a single sack today, and Matt Ryan was coldly efficient with that kind of time. They tried, but Atlanta's offensive line played very, very well.
The lack of pass rush left the secondary exposed. And that's just too much against a team like this.
Random notes:
- The Rams offensive line is a great pass blocking group, but they need to be better as run blocking. Again, they left OG John Greco on the inactive list. Why? Greco has been a solid run blocker this year, and the Rams were effective when they were using him in the mix. Plus, Hank Fraley if one of the guards gets injured?
- Really Mike Smith, you needed two points with two minutes left? Boo.
- Can't blame Bradford for that INT too much. The play was pretty poorly executed all around. Three points would have done nothing for the Rams either, but he threw the INT, after setting the rookie record for most attempts without one, on third down and had one more chance to put it in the end zone. Probably shouldn't have thrown it blindly.
- On Turf Show Radio, 3k mentioned how the Rams could use a receiver that gets the jump balls, a guy who can nail those post routes in the end zone. That would have been nice today.
- One for ten on third downs. Yikes.
56 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Congrats on a well played game
I agree about how we should have won, but it’s nice to see other fans be gracious all the same. The 2 pt conversion made sense at the time to me, since it’d put us up by three scores, but looking back, there really was no need. Either way, you look like the 08 Falcons to me…I’m looking forward to a 2012 Rams v Falcons championship, although it’s pretty far away to be calling. ;)
Thanks for being a great group as a whole.
I had no problem with the 2 pt conversion. It was the correct decision to push the game to 3 scores.
I can take a beating ... I'm a Rams fan.
by Midasknight on Nov 22, 2010 11:50 AM CST up reply actions
I hate that we're still losing
But I love that we’re playing competive football. The good news of the day is that our entire division lost and we still control our own destiny.
The only thing comparable to a Rams win is a 49er loss!
by DevsLaRams on Nov 21, 2010 6:54 PM CST via mobile reply actions
competitive once again...and BTW
Randy Moss had 1 catch for 26 yards today and the titans lost. There were 4 rams who outperformed him.
If you love something, set it free. If it doesn't come back, find it and kill it.
Sweet!
maybe that means that moss will pitch another fit and demand to come to st. louis?
……..
Pile R.Moss does not have Sam at QB throwing him the ball Titans dont have a QB
And here Moss was not gona save the day, just help spread the defense open things up but you can see in todays game we have no one to really do that for us
only winning and losing matters right?
Titans are 0-2 with moss? Spread that defense out as much as you want…
Like I said in the other post...
While it sort of stings, the 2 pt conversion was smart football, not running up the score.
3 scores vs 2 (with the extra point). That completely eliminated the possibility that the Rams return a TD, then get an onside kick. Which happens. It’s very slim. But it’s possible. So good coaching (I know, something we haven’t seen in St. Louis for over 10 years).
Anyway, beyond that, I think the Rams pass rush has always been sort of iffy, a lot of the sacks they’ve gotten are really coverage sacks.
The Falcons are a really good team. Not flashy or exciting, but just really good.
If we win then pass rush is great
If we lose a close one to a good team our pass rush is iffy… We were tied for first in sacks last week and I’m sure we are still up there compared to the rest of the league after today. How many sacks did the “great” falcons rack up against us?
I was responding to another person's post
I understand that stats don’t mean too much.
This game went about how i was expecting it to.
I just wish we could run S.Jax in a 3rd and 1 situation, with out our G and C getting blown back 2 yards into the backfield.
Is that our biggest weakness?
You can’t run an offense without effective runs, and we just can’t run the ball effectively.
You don't seem to want to accept the fact you're dealing with an expert in guerrilla warfare, with a man who's the best, with guns, with knives, with his bare hands. A man who's been trained to ignore pain, ignore weather, to live off the land, to eat things that would make a billy goat puke. In *St. Louis* his job was to dispose of enemy personnel. To kill! Period! Win by attrition. Well, *Steven Jackson* was the best.
by 3k on Nov 21, 2010 8:00 PM CST up reply actions
I don't know 3k
As much improvement as we’ve had on defense this year, I also never felt confident that we could get a stop, when the Falcons had the ball. Ryan has some nice targets to throw to, and we don’t….
+ infinity
the run blocking is garbage
I don't love to hate you T.O. I just hate you.
by Brandon Birkhead on Nov 21, 2010 9:58 PM CST up reply actions
i agree about our run blocking
now with the tackles they are young but with the middle of our line they are not. Is it possible to coach them up in run blocking or do we really need new gaurds?
Why would 3 points not have meant anything with us trailing 26-17???
It seems then that an onsides kick recovery might have set up a win. No?
we had all of our timeouts left with over 3 minutes on the clock
didn’t even need an onside kick, just a defensive stop.
I think we didn't have many run plays because
the Falcons are great at run defense, and our pass blocking is significantly better than our run blocking. You answered your own question VanRam.
Next year this team will be DANGEROUS!
Count on it!
"SJAX" - The extra strength cleaner that fights off that Stubborn, Stingy Defense
I hate the over-reactive opening sentence
The falcons are Perceived as a much better team than the Rams. This was a close game between two good teams. Wait until next year and we may be a Great team.
perceived?
That’s funny. The Falcons are aguably the best team in the NFC. The Rams are a nearly rebuilt team who are a year away from honest, consistent competition with anyone and everyone in the league. That doesn’t make us great.
You don't seem to want to accept the fact you're dealing with an expert in guerrilla warfare, with a man who's the best, with guns, with knives, with his bare hands. A man who's been trained to ignore pain, ignore weather, to live off the land, to eat things that would make a billy goat puke. In *St. Louis* his job was to dispose of enemy personnel. To kill! Period! Win by attrition. Well, *Steven Jackson* was the best.
by 3k on Nov 21, 2010 7:59 PM CST up reply actions
this
For the first time this season, I felt completely out-classed today. The Falcons are a very good team.
hey donkey
It was so apparent what we lack because this was a team that plays the EXACT same game we play, dink and dunk, but they have skill set you stretch it and get the YAC. That is why it was so obvious what we lacked.
The only thing comparable to a Rams win is a 49er loss!
by DevsLaRams on Nov 21, 2010 9:26 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
their offensive line was more of a difference
they were able to have a more balanced offense because of their run blocking. With 28 sacks coming into the game we weren’t able to even get close to Matt Ryan.
A much better team
Lets a rookie QB on a rebuilding team drive the length of the field in the 4th quarter to make it a one score game? Yes we lost by 17- Did you watch the game? It was very close until the end. I would agree that they are a better team, not a much better team.
Also does the phrase
Much better team take into account the injury situation that is the St. Louis Rams? You think that not having clayton, avery, or DX makes no difference? “they have more talent”-yes “they beat us”-yup “they are a better team”-sure. They won a close one and that’s what matters. I still think these Rams match up to any team in the league with a solid chance of winning.
The Rams don't have the depth to match up with any team in the league as you say
As the season goes on week by week the Rams are left with fewer capable players to start
Any given Sunday?
We don’t have the depth, talent, gameplan, coaches,- why do we even play? It’s just hopeless.
falcons are not a good team
they are a great team… i’d argue the rams aren’t a good team, they are an average team at best given their record and who they have faced….
by stlcardsfan4 on Nov 21, 2010 9:05 PM CST up reply actions
Try not to second guess the coach anytime we lose
Does anyone remember the last 4 years? If you think Spags has nothing to do with the turnaround then who does?
who said he hadn't nothing to do with the turnaround?
if you can find where someone said that, by all means, keep bitching….
by stlcardsfan4 on Nov 21, 2010 9:07 PM CST up reply actions
Bitching?
How’s about realizing that we played a good team hard until the end and lost. the falcons are great according to you because they beat us- the same drivel would have been said about the redskins, chargers, or probably even seahawks at their respective times in the season-if we had lost. “they are just a better team than us” ok.
i don't think talent is an excuse, it's the NFL. The game was still close
and most games will be close. We didn’t play an awful game, but I couldn’t believe that shovel pass INT. We weren’t totally outclassed, if you just change a dropped INT into an INT or that shovel pass into a TD, we would have had a good chance to win.
Even though we were less talented and let their offense dominate, we were still close,
Sam the MAN! GIANTS WIN THE WORLD SERIES!!!!!!!
That 2 pt conversion
put the Falcons 3 scores up, you can’t blame Smith for that. Sam Bradford is really, really impressive, you guys have a great future qb in him, and he’s proven he can run a 2 minute offense. With time left, 2 scores isn’t that much if you get a big play and an onside kick. Makes sense for me, I didn’t think it was running up the score.
Check out this week's Falcons best case/worst case article here.
by Turner_The_Burner on Nov 21, 2010 10:03 PM CST reply actions
The bottom line is that the Rams are fun to watch again. I understand all the armchair coaching, but Spaggs is the man. What I know is that he has turned around the most pathetic team in the league into a team that has been competitive in every game this year. When is the last time we were this far in the season and still in the hunt for the division lead?
by florida ram fan on Nov 21, 2010 10:33 PM CST reply actions
With the exception of the Detriot game.
by florida ram fan on Nov 21, 2010 10:34 PM CST reply actions
speaking of Detroit
They have sucking for a long time. The Rams are turning thing around far faster than them.
The only thing comparable to a Rams win is a 49er loss!
by DevsLaRams on Nov 21, 2010 11:24 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
did anyone see the "interference" call?
at the game so it can be hard to really tell, but was it as bad on tv as it was in person?
We can actually look at ATL and see some similarities
we both have a great young QB
our RB are beasts
our D’s are pretty stout
you know what we dont have that they did? Roddy White or someone like him
our 1st pick next year needs to be a beast WR…………plain and simple
I can make similarities in almost every position between ATL and Rams
Except WR, they are oddly similar with ATL being a few years older
Please read Turner_The_Burner and my Best case/Worst case analysis of the upcoming week
im not even mad im actually amused
that shuffle pass was the dumbest fucking play i have ever witnessed. everyone failed on that lol
If the rams scored the td with that play...
hindsight it looks stupid, but so does calling the play stupid in hindsight
no really, it was a dumb fucking play
forget hindsight and focus on the truth. the truth is we never had success with a shuffle pass, hell, we never ran a shuffle pass. Our go to play, would have been a pass play and with Bradford completely 64% of his passes that gives us a 64% success rate.
The only thing comparable to a Rams win is a 49er loss!
yeah
even if the play worked, i still wouldnt praise the call. id probably call it ballsy. a shuffle pass on the two yard line is just a terrible call. as pointed out by devs, we never do shuffle passes so why try it during the most important time of the game? not to mention that is the worst possible place to run a shuffle pass. its on the two yard line where its going to be very congested and you have to assume the defense would be keying in on stopping the run up the middle so we shuffle it up the middle?? we should have been as conservative as possible at that moment because we needed a TD and FG. the only thing we didnt need was a turnover so make life easy on your rookie QB and play it safe. run up the middle with sjax, spread out WRs then draw to sjax, sweep to sjax or bradford rolls out to the right and looks for the open guy, if not, toss it away and kick the FG.
by Buck Nasty87 on Nov 22, 2010 12:10 PM CST up reply actions
yeah... it was bizarre
Our coaches confuse me sometimes because I spend alot of time yelling at my tv because they are being soooo conservative then at other times they make these calls that are extremely ballsy like the shuffle pass or the onside kick to start the lions game and I think… stop making such overzelous plays… I get confused on how to yell at them… haha… in all truth though I love spaggs
Well, I might do best to avoid TST after a loss
Anything and everything is criticized and second-guessed. The ONLY reason that call is getting so much heat is because we lost. If it worked like a charm and we came back to win, this site would be in full scale celebration mode. It confounds me why it’s like that. We are not the cowboys,vikings,or 49ers. We were supposed to be awful again. BE HAPPY.
i meant what I said about loving spaggs
he is the reason we even have close games to watch let alone ones we win. You can’t deny the wierd playcalling shuffle though. There is really no grey area…. it goes conservative conservative…. over and over… then all of sudden… crazy play out of nowhere. You are right, if they are successful everyone would scream how brilliant they were but the problem is I’ve seen maybe four plays called like this so far this year (surprise come out of nowhere ballsy plays) yet none of them have been successful…none… and usually when you pull out a play like that you are in a make or break scenario so they come across as being the loosing factor. I would much prefer a more balanced level of play… somewhere between Shurmur and Martz….. not the whole qb cowboy thing but more agressive that Shurmur’s style. He may become moreso as we stack the talent at wr and tight end but for now…. you can’t deny he is easy to yell at (via tv)… as for “being happy” look around at my comments… no one is more happy for what this team has improved to than me… but that doesn’t mean even the most optimistic fan can’t see certain glaring needs or mistakes made.
LOOK ON THE BRITE SIDE
ALL NFC WEST TEAMS LOST – RAMS STILL ONLY 1 GAME BACK OF DIVISION LEAD. wE JUST NEED TO BEAT SEATTLE AGAIN AND A FEW MORE WINS.
BEST OF LUCK THE FINAL LEG.

by 































