When next April rolls around, the FO is going to look at our corps of WR and think to themselves "this group looks pretty good". Mark Clayton (he will be resigned), Donnie Avery (will look much better with Bradford throwing to him), Danario Alexander, Danny Amendola, Mardy GIlyard and Gibson fight for position 5. There is no way this team reaches for a WR in the first. We have plenty of other places that need help. The usual hoots and hollers for a WR will be vocal all year long, but I think it is a strategically a better decision to once again go BPA in this years draft excluding QB,LT,RT, TE (I like what we got going on here) and MLB. Every other position is can be augmented realistically through the draft. Robbins and HAll wont be good forever. Our OLBs do not scare anyone and OJ's contract is not exactly binding (and dahl isn't exactly amazing). Do we really have 2 years to wait for a rookie WR to develope? If a WR is the best player available, then Im sure we take him. But after winning four games, I think the chances of a WR being the BPA when we draft is remote.


There are 50 Comments. Load Now.
Shortcuts to mastering the comment thread. Use wisely.
C - Next Comment
X - Mark as Read
R - Reply
Z - Mark Read & Next
Shift + C - Previous
Shift + A - Mark All Read
Comment Settings
Live comment alert: Hide it!
Comments for this post are closed.