Rams recap: Three things in the post-mortem
Had the St. Louis Rams played the second half of their road loss to Tampa Bay like they did the first half, it would have been a blowout, one-sided win. Instead, they started the third quarter with an ominous three-and-out that burned up less than half of the four minutes of possession they had in the third quarter.
The Rams' second half play hasn't alway been like this. In fact, they got a lead back in the third quarter against Washington, holding on to win that game. For three straight games now, the Rams have been terrible in the second half, narrowly escaping last week against San Diego. But at least the offense managed to control the ball a little bit in that game, when they had to at least.
There's plenty to say...or maybe there isn't, depends on your perspective I guess or how much you can stomach talking about a game that slipped away like this one did.
Bullet points after the jump.
Okay, three things I took away from the game.
- Little things add up. And to some extent, in the case of death by a thousand cuts, the coaches get the blame. Start with the clock management as the first half wound down. This area is an obvious issue with Spagnuolo, continues to be. It doesn't end there. Visions of easy, missed interceptions haunt this team...not just against Tampa Bay either. The centerfield bobble with Atogwe and Kehl was simply inexcusable. If the Rams were actually catching these INTs this would be a much different season. Both the clock and lost turnovers are just part of the story. Don't forget the penalties. The Rams are not good enough to make those kind of mistakes and hang on to a lead. When the every unit fails to execute like this, the blame goes to the coaches, and Rams fans certainly are within their right to wonder if the coaching isn't letting this team down too.
- Second half offense. No need to belabor the point as to just how piss poor the offense was in the second half. The problem here is that it's a trend. The biggest difference between the halves was the run game. Steven Jackson didn't get much running room in the third and fourth quarters, and Tampa Bay gets some credit for that. They clamped down on the plays that were killing them through the first half, forcing the Rams to move it through the air. Unfortunately, that put the burden on a Rams passing game that stunk for four quarters. Two touchdowns and no picks aside, Sam Bradford did not have a good game today. Funny thing about it, the Rams did well in the red zone and on third downs...they just had trouble moving the ball and that impotency is reflected in a passing game that was a non-starter. Bradford was 6 for 14 in the first half. Deep passes were a problem, but nothing was working well. The receivers did their part too. Rarely did any of them get the kind of separation needed to catch a pass clean and run with it. My biggest problem with the play calling in the second half wasn't that it was too conservative, it was that the coaches failed to find ways to shake it up...like the reverse to Amendola, the lateral on the last play, etc. Tampa had trouble with misdirection, though they got sharper on outside runs and fakes in the second half, but still would have been susceptible.
- Grit. It wasn't all bad. You have to Ron Bartell lots of credit for playing with a bruised thigh. And playing well. Tampa knew that and picked on him when he was in the game, but Bartell played as well as he has all season. Other players who gritted their way through it were Chris Long and Steven Jackson, most notably. Really and truly, I wouldn't say that any of the players lacked toughness; execution was just sorely missing and all the grit in the world can't make up for that.
14 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
some thoughts
everyone complaining about Spag’s timeouts at the end of the first half:
Was he supposed to expect that his defense would let Josh Freeman run for like 30 yards on 3rd down? He made an aggressive call, and it didn’t work out, but I thought we were calling for aggressiveness? It’s easy to second guess after the fact, but in all likeliness the Bucs would have gotten about 10 yards on 3rd, punted to the Rams who would have had about a minute with 3 time outs to go about 60-65 yards. Easily doable. Good call by Spags, bad execution by the defense.
Everyone complaining about the “conservative” play calling by Shurmur:
Of the first 9 offensive plays in the second half, 6 were passes. Shurmur was not trying to run out the clock. Bradford had an awful game, and he admitted that as well. Obviously he’s a rookie, and I’m not trying to get all over him, but the Bucs stacked the line and went man across the board. In other words, they were forcing Bradford to win the game, not SJax. And guess what, Sammy couldn’t come through. No biggie, its only his 3rd road game of his career.
The blame lies mostly with the passing game (execution, not play calling)
The plays were there to be made. I think we can all assume that Laurent Robinson does not factor into the long-term plans here anymore. He is so inconsistent. With Avery and Clayton coming back, and either DX sticking around or the Rams drafting a WR (or both), with Amendola/Gibson/Gilyard bringing up the rear, I think it’s safe to say this might be Robinson’s last go around with the team.
The blame also lies with the Defense:
They got tired and couldn’t tackle. It’s as simple as that. I know they were on the field a bit and it was hot…but still. Freeman was begging to be picked off and we couldn’t oblige him. If JL picks that off he walks in for a pick-six. If Atogwe/Kiehl makes the play, they don’t get a field goal. We’re talking a 9 point swing on possible picks.
I think it’s clear that moving foward, the Rams two biggest needs in the draft are either a #1 WR or a stud DT.
Agree
The coaching staff has taken a lot of flak for the game, but it was really execution.
I have a tough time blaming the defense. They played well the whole game. They limited the Bucs to under 20 points while the offense barely managed more than a few first downs in the second half.
Remember the great 2004 and 2005 Rams teams...
by Marmie is the best on Oct 25, 2010 9:15 AM CDT up reply actions
Guh.
I’m enjoying how you seem to think that the Rams would have magically have had three timeouts to work with in the scenario you describe, after having lost one on the challenge earlier and using two to stop the clock. In fact, the most likely outcome of Spagnuolo’s tactic was to give the Rams possession somewhere around their own 10 yard line, with just under a minute to work with and no timeouts. That’s the most likely scenario, and it’s one that a rational coach working with a 17-3 lead would react to by sitting on the ball. That’s not worthwhile.
Also, the criticism of the play-calling is not necessarily that it wasn’t aggressive, but that it failed to adjust to the changes in approach the Buccaneers made. We had a terrific game plan at the start. The Bucs adjusted, and we utterly failed to return the favor. Plays were NOT there to be made for the most part, because they would not or could not come up with ways to exploit the extreme approach the Buccaneers took.
You can trumpet the execution argument all you want. Any call, any decision by any coach anywhere at any time can be defended by saying “well, it would have worked if the players had executed.” Sure, but that doesn’t mean it was a smart decision, and as analysis it’s not worth the bandwidth that it takes to distribute.
ok
i completely f***ed up on the timeouts part. I’ve just heard blowhard announcers say “get the ball back with 3 timeouts and just 50 yards blah blah” that it’s become almost mechanical for me to say. My bad.
I’m not saying the playcalling was perfect, but I don’t agree with people saying we were trying to run out the clock in the third quarter. I mean you had to figure the Bucs would adjust and really gear up against the Run. And the Rams adjusted accordingly…sort of. They called 6 pass plays right out the gate, but they just couldn’t execute. They weren’t the best play calls probably, and I think it’s clear the Rams need to work on the fade. (Why wasn’t DX on for the fades?) But a lot of Sam’s passes were uncharacteristic. I mean the one time Robinson got free, Sam misses him. I just think we need some continuity at the WR position. It seems like everyone’s always getting shuffled around, except for Danny and guess who our best WR is.
Also, how many times did the D get their hands on blount in the backfield, only to get dragged for positive yardage
These are the ups and downs of a young team.
If I told you at the beginning of the season that the Rams would be an average team, 99% of us fans would have been ecstatic.
Guess what? The Rams are an average team.
Do yourselves a favor and stop thinking playoffs every time we win and stop thinking about firing the coaches every time we lose.
The hyperbole around here is starting to get annoying.
Yeah, this loss was pretty hard to swallow, but swallow it we must. We are getting better. Our team makes mistakes and misses opportunities but our team is also tough and talented. We need less mistakes and more talent, but we’re getting there.
This week, Carolina. Forget about Tampa.
I can take a beating ... I'm a Rams fan.
Pfft.
They’re not average. They’re not very close to average. The record is an illusion of schedule.
Are they better than they’ve been the last two years? Yeah, because they’re not embarrassingly awful, and that’s progress. But we’re still looking up at average and dreaming.
I agree, to a point.
As fans, we can appreciate the improvement the team has made, shrug it off & go on to the next game. However, I like that the Rams have standards, expectations of themselves—they were very upset about this loss, and I like that. Every team has to go into every game expecting to win, or else why are they there? Why not forfeit & go home? At one point, this team’s culture was so bad, former players would call to congratulate those who were cut or traded. But now, they know they are better, and expect to win. They’ve been upset about every loss this year….and that’s good.
I am talking about the fans.
Like you said, the players and coaches need to believe they can win each game and each loss should be taken personally.
However, the players are also not changing their expectations upward with each win and downward with each loss.
I can take a beating ... I'm a Rams fan.
by Midasknight on Oct 25, 2010 12:04 PM CDT up reply actions
As disappointing as this loss was...
we haven’t come so far, that I have forgotten where we came from…a year ago, hell, two weeks ago, we were upset about another blowout loss…now, seven games in, the only game we were out of was Detroit…not saying we should be 6-1, but this team has come a long way from what we had to put up with the last two years…this team shook off the embarrassment of the Lions game and played a decent contest with the Chargers, and won…I’m betting they will do the same this week against Carolina.
Yes, players need to exectue, but if the D is set for the pass it’s difficult to complete passes, especially given our current crop of WR’s. There are many ways to change it up: a screen to SJ, TE’s in passing game, more passes out of the backfield, etc..
I’m very dissapointed in the team’s overall effort though. I’d be less dissapointed if they learn from the mistakes made and come back better.
Not this week
I can take a beating ... I'm a Rams fan.
by Midasknight on Oct 25, 2010 10:36 AM CDT up reply actions
Doubt it
Bradford was missing open guys too. The second half was just a mess.
by CoachConnors on Oct 25, 2010 7:03 PM CDT up reply actions

by 


























