Random Ramsdom: 10/11/2010
I get tasked with delivering overreaction Monday Random Ramsdom. But there isn't much to get over-reacted (is that a word...or phrase?) about. The Rams got spanked by Scott Linehan's offense. Time to regroup and play like they have shown they can.
Here are the links for today:
Confirmed: Mark Clayton himself told reporters he's done for the season. See you next year. Who still thinks the Rams don't have some bad luck/curse with injuries?
Mike Sando has his wrap up of the game. The Rams better find a way to win on the road or the next 7 weeks are going to be long.
Jim Thomas has his take on the game. I'm not saying Bradford wasn't the right choice, but Suh looks like he's the real deal too- I bet Spagnuolo wished there was a young talent like that on the defensive line besides Chris Long.
Jeff at Ramsgab calls the loss in Detroit "gutless".
The Rams official website has the answers to their "keys of the game". The Rams didn't have too many figured out, if you can guess.
That's all for this morning. Hopefully next Monday we can resume festivities and the jubilation of winning!
Go Rams.
15 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
So my man Suh wins first head-to-head
BRADS – another ugly pick and deflection pick too!
Let’s hope ala Alex Smith don’t happen with Brads in a few seasons IF an injury don’t occur.
I wuved SUH for the #1 overall, but nooooooo, Brads was the best enamored(silently) qb in years to come out. Really though, Rams FO needed a face for the organization. SUH is a Reggie White type!
you remind
me of jay zygmunt…hmm, I wonder…
Lion troll,,,,, to bad Calvin Johnson went down with major shoulder injury.....Call that bad Linehan karma
he's not a lions fan
just a bradford hater
I'm not trolling, just being sarcastic.
by hr on Oct 11, 2010 2:50 PM CDT up reply actions
I was for SUH
But Bradford is definately not the problem.
The only thing comparable to a Rams win is a 49er loss!
by DevsLaRams on Oct 11, 2010 2:02 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
ram_rod
I’m disappointed in you, and that was a shitty post.
How in the he!! is Bradford gonna be able to get anything done when the Rams don’t have a #1 and their #2 and #3 WRs are out? So now you and the rest of the geniuses are gonna say “I told ya so” about not drafting Suh over Bradford. Fact is that Bradford is the blue chipper here, not Suh. But then don’t take my word for it, listen to all the Monday-morning-QBs a day after the Rams got spanked instead of making up your own mind by what you saw during the game. You sound like Dana from ESPNs First take, yeah, that’s right a chick who reads her info off a teleprompter.
You’re a gutless traitor…and you’re the kind of guy that would sell out his team when the going gets rough. There’s no call for Suh-lovin’ anymore, and if you do then you may as well jump ship and become a Lions fan.
Yeah, I said it…
by Pekka for Predator Pontiff on Oct 11, 2010 10:12 AM CDT reply actions
i'm not in the mood to argue with you
but next time try to understand what i’m saying before you shovel out the shit you call comments. Seriously.
Sam Bradford drops back, sees Laurent Robinson in the open, and he completes the pass for a gain of 28! Oh- Wait, looks like a holding penalty is going to call this one back...(Oh wait; Barron's gone, ignore that last sentence).
by Eric Nagel on Oct 11, 2010 11:36 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
They are both blue-chip players!
Suh and Bradford are both going to have great careers.
You're not the only one, and maybe that's not what you meant, but people are starting to go from thinking Bradford walks on water to thinking he's a bad pick based on one game.
It’s just starting to piss me (and I’m hypersensitive) off and I’m calling people out on it. We had ONE bad game out of five. No reason to start jumping ship already, and especially no reason to wish we had Suh. The way I see it, if you wish we had Suh, then you wish we didn’t draft Bradford. AND, its gonna get a lot tougher for SAM before it gets easier cause he has ZERO receivers to throw the ball to. ZERO!!! And then the bandwagon is gonna get even faster out of now fault of his own.
I should’ve been more tactful, but between yesterday and this morning, I’m having a tough time with people blaming Bradford for the loss (which you didn’t do).
by Pekka for Predator Pontiff on Oct 11, 2010 1:58 PM CDT up reply actions
i'm sorry for snapping
school is bending me over backwards right now…i certainly think bradford was an excellent pick, but i was saying that since Spags has a history with the dline, after seeing Suh’s talents in first person, i’m sure he wished he could have that kind of young playmaker as well.
Sam Bradford drops back, sees Laurent Robinson in the open, and he completes the pass for a gain of 28! Oh- Wait, looks like a holding penalty is going to call this one back...(Oh wait; Barron's gone, ignore that last sentence).
by Eric Nagel on Oct 11, 2010 3:18 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Not fair, I want tp be the one people hare not Ram-Rod :(
He never said Bradford was going to bad, he basically said that both of them are good, and why wouldn’t we want Suh on our D lline? Unless you think allowing a QB 10 secs to complete the pass is good.
by Tevin T. Broner on Oct 11, 2010 12:45 PM CDT reply actions
hey who cares we are not the worst team this year and if bradford can complete passes and hand the ball of i love it. Rams will be in the playoffs next year. If we can win 5 games this year i will go crazy. i am a fan for life till the teams moves. if sam can win 2 games with a hurt jackson and a practice squad for WR think what he will do when he gets used to the playbook and what he can do. 1 more win and he will have a manning rookie season going. hey once again for the first time NEVER SAY BRADFORD’S NAME WITH ALEX SMITH. thank you and have a good night

by 




























