Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Explaining Jeremy Lin's Early, Surprising Success

Reviewing the Rams restricted free agents for 2010

Since we're on the subject of restricted free agents this morning, might as well take a look at the St. Louis Rams players who will be RFAs if and when the salary cap goes away for the 2010 season, something that seems all but assured with both sides in the labor negotiations still far apart. Who's a keeper and who gets thrown back into the lake?

DE Victor Adeyanju - Inactive for the first part of the season, injuries put Adeyanju back into the mix. He even started last week with James Hall and Leonard Little out. He has some usefulness as a role player, mostly a run defender, but you have to wonder how Spagnuolo feels about him given his time on the bench this year. It's not like the Rams DL is so talented that they can't let go of marginal players either. Adeyanju could get tendered an offer at the lowest level, but would still have to fight for his job in camp. Look for C.J. Ah You to be the depth guy they bring back for 2010.

OT Alex Barron - I'm not fully convinced that the Rams won't bring back Alex Barron as much as we'd all like to part ways with the oft-penalized former first round pick. OTs aren't exactly a dime a dozen. However, the team needs a right tackle next season, with Jason Smith slated to move to the left side, and while Barron does fine run blocking, I'd have to think they might try to find more of a mauler in the draft or free agency. They could even install Goldberg and find a suitable replacement as a backup OT. Barron might be a suitable replacement, sitting on the bench in 2010 with a RFA tender at one of the lower levels. Remember, RFA tenders don't pay much relative to free agent deals. Right now, it's unlikely Barron will be back, but don't be surprised if he does return. 

RB Samkon Gado - Watching Gado carry the ball on 3rd downs was painful this season, but not as painful as it would be watching the same thing happen in 2010. Given the coaching staff's trial of Kenneth Darby and Chris Ogbonnaya last week, I'd say Gado won't be back. Meh.

DT Gary Gibson - Gibson you'll remember replaced former first round pick Adam Carriker as the starting LDT before Carriker suffered a season-ending injury in August. Gibson is bound to be back, though he may not be starting, especially with the first overall pick. Useful guy to have as part of the rotation.

WR/ST Ruvell Martin - Obviously, they don't need him for his WR skills, or at least we hope that the receiver picture is  improved enough for 2010 that we don't need Martin as a regular. Where the Rams will likely bring Martin back is on special teams, where his coverage skills have helped improved the once maligned unit. 

OL Mark Setterstrom - Given the importance of competent linemen, I'd say this is a no-brainer. However, given Setts' injury history - three season-ending injuries since 2007 - it's risky bringing him back and counting on him to fill in for the starters in the middle. They could very well follow the route they took this year with Setterstrom, not tendering him an RFA offer, rather waiting for that window to close and re-signing him for less as a free agent. 

FS Oshiomogho Atogwe - This is the big one for the Rams. They'd like to get a long-term deal worked out, but his injury situation has complicated that to a degree. If they don't get something done, they may have to use the RFA tag for OJ, which would pay him much less than his franchise tag this season. Of course, that could sour Atogwe on the Rams and result in him demanding a trade, the only route he'd have in negotiations with an RFA tender on the table, since holding out would mean not playing in that case. This is the one to keep your eye on as the offseason progresses. 

Comment 19 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I think...

If Gibson’s not hurt real bad, he’s a lock to beat out Carriker (even if he tries a comeback). Otogwe might not be as good as we/he think. And we don’t know how he’ll comeback from injury either. He does us NO good if he’s not satisfied with his contract and plays grudgingly. Conversely, we’ve been burned multiple times by paying big $$$ to flameouts like Bulger, Carriker, Drew Bennett, etc. While he is capable, Setts injury plagued career bothers me too. Can’t count on him for 16 games, but may be OK as a b/u. Barron would be a morale killer to this team even on the bench. It’s a #1 priority that he go, hopefully to another NFC west team. But given the Rams organizational judgment and wisdom that has dropped us to 32nd place over recent years, Barron will probably be resigned to a lifetime contract. Gado is toast and Darby’s not secure either. SJax needs a real b/u. Little and Hall should’ve quit in 2008.

by edpjr on Jan 2, 2010 10:21 AM CST reply actions  

Let's be honest

Carriker wasn’t a “flame out,” he was a bust.

I believe in 2010

by Eric Nagel on Jan 2, 2010 12:48 PM CST up reply actions  

According to Devaney

he is a big part of next years plans. I don’t see how. He will be used to free up money and a roster space for someone else?

Can't think of a good sig

by Carneros on Jan 2, 2010 2:35 PM CST up reply actions  

I tend to agree on trying him at DE to replace Little and/or Hall IF he comes back.

The bad thing about Carriker is that he’s already torn up his shoulder twice and has a bum ankle to boot. That’s from just two partial seasons work. That situation doesn’t bode well for durability or longevity in this league. But, IF he does come back healthy and can play DE, with that Long guy everyone, except me, says is constantly improving, and in tandem with Suh, Gibson/Ryan, we might have a real D-Line again. But, I’ll have to see it to believe it…

by edpjr on Jan 2, 2010 10:35 PM CST up reply actions  

remember

carriker was a defensive end in college the rams decided to move him over tackle put him back on the outside and get some strength on the outside. I dont think he is a bust or a flameout yet

by Hakeem J on Jan 2, 2010 2:39 PM CST up reply actions  

Its very possible that he is a bust or flameout.

Its hard to tell when he hasn’t done anything yet due to injury. But thus far in his career he is, since he has done almost nothing to contribute to the team. If he isn’t a bust, and we draft Suh, and we sign Osi, just think of that line. Long, Carriker, Suh, Umenyiora, with Scott, Ryan, and Ah You and maybe Hall or Adeyanju in rotation.

Can't think of a good sig

by Carneros on Jan 2, 2010 2:44 PM CST up reply actions  

he's not as bad against the run as I thought he was

really when you go back and look at it, he’s not a total liability on the field on 3rd and short. Is he playing up to third round pick status? No. But if the Rams can get what potential they can out of him, they might as well.

Turf Show Times

by Ryan Van Bibber on Jan 2, 2010 9:23 PM CST up reply actions  

I'd wait until late

        On any RFA. Let any of them receive offers from other teams before decidiong. My bet is that Atogwe is the only one to whom anyone else will offer.

by dbcouver on Jan 2, 2010 11:32 AM CST reply actions  

If cut, Barron would be with another team within 7 days

So would Carriker. A lot of other teams can cope with ego’s, or whatever the players problems are. ie.. Cogs-
In the right situation, Carriker has talent, so does Barron, as did Hedgecock, Warner, and especially “The Train” in the Steelers camp.

by Knoxfan on Jan 2, 2010 1:17 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree.

Carriker is a bust at DT, but he was a DE in college, and that is where he needs to go. Put him on the other side with Long and maybe he shows the reason why he was drafted in the first round.

by kickasskeever on Jan 2, 2010 1:32 PM CST up reply actions  

Wasn't he a 3-4 DE?

which is basically a tackle since you line up in between guard and tackle a lot. We could try it, but I don’t think moving positions again would make things any easier, although he’s barely played DT for us due to injury.

Can't think of a good sig

by Carneros on Jan 2, 2010 2:37 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm not sure which defense Nebraska uses

haven’t seen any of their games.

I believe in 2010

by Eric Nagel on Jan 2, 2010 4:28 PM CST up reply actions  

I thought they played 4-3 when I was watching Suh

But I might not have been watching that closely and they might have changed. I thought I just remember hearing someone say he played in a 3-4 defense.

Can't think of a good sig

by Carneros on Jan 2, 2010 7:34 PM CST up reply actions  

When Carriker was playing

Nebraska used a 3-4. The new coaching staff took them back to a 4-3.

by andyrose on Jan 3, 2010 12:06 AM CST up reply actions  

i think....

its to early to label Carriker a bust lets give him next year before we decided

by Danteslion on Jan 2, 2010 2:44 PM CST reply actions  

i agree lets pray he doesnt get hurt again and play him in the rotation

by Habte E on Jan 2, 2010 5:37 PM CST up reply actions  

I also wish he could withstand getting injured again and then we may see what he can produce during a season

If practice makes perfect....
Yet nobodies perfect.....
Then why practice ???

by peteyweestro on Jan 3, 2010 4:13 PM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about St. Louis Rams.

FanPosts

Cover the web with Turf


Managers

71523_170793669601439_100000124211145_596632_5713708_n_small Ryan Van Bibber

Baby_drinking_becks_small 3k

Editors

Jackson_medium_small Eric Nagel

Peter_small VTramsFan

Bugs_bunny_pose_small Douglas M

Authors

Wildcat_small Tackle Box

Dsc03827_small CoachConnors

Mardygilyardsig_small Tevin T. Broner

Bradford_draft_small buckeyefan55

Tst_small T.Ram

Images_small Brick Top

Small EddieP

Profile_pic1_small Mike Dietrich