The Rams and Brandon Marshall
I'm surprised the news of Broncos WR Brandon Marshall's benching hasn't made for more discussion here at TST. The St. Louis Rams, starved for receivers, could use a talented guy like that, but the team's reluctance under GM Billy Devaney to take on players with, ahem, character issues has been notable.
Marshall certainly fits the bill on both counts: he's talented and has plenty of questions about his character. Let's map out the Marshall scenario, just for something to do on a lazy Saturday morning with the season all but over.
It's believed that the Broncos will most likely part ways with Marshall and his prima donna antics. Billy Devaney, in a recent chat with fans, pointed out that the Rams will have more tolerance for players who have some character issues, for lack of a better term, that would have kept them off the team this year. Why? I think much of it has to do with the fact that this is a young team and during the first year leadership of head coach Steve Spagnuolo they wanted to avoid the kind of players that could poison the atmosphere in the locker room. The strategy seems to have worked and Spagnuolo solidified his grip on the team, giving them more freedom in the players they pursue.
Of course, Marshall's not like some draftee that just had a run-in with campus security over a loud party. He's the kind of guy that could really be a headache for a team, a la his benching for refusing to play this week because of a sore hamstring. Not the kind of move that endears one to fans.
All of this is wild speculation...the kind of stuff that makes armchair general management so fun. The next hurdle for the Rams in acquiring Marshall would be the crazy free agency rules this year. If the league does operate with a cap, Marshall will be an unrestricted free agent, and the Rams would have to bid on him along with everyone else...and convince him to play in St. Louis. If the league has no cap, which is the most likely scenario at this point, then Marshall will be a restricted free agent. As Sando points out, the Donkeys would probably tender him and trade him. Remember, trades will play a bigger role in the offseason as tighter free agency rules make rosters much harder to reshape. If that's the case, the Rams would be sacrificing draft picks, something they just can't afford to be giving up as they rebuild. Unless, there's a player, but who could the Rams have that would entice such a trade and not leave them with another huge need to fill?
EIther way, it seems like a long shot for the Rams and Marshall, who has the kind of talent the Rams so desperately need at WR. Then again maybe that's a good thing for the Rams since it would take Marshall somewhere between two and three weeks to piss off the already suffering fan base.
0 recs |
12 comments
|
Comments
So, just asking...
How many top-tier receivers do we actually have a shot at acquiring? IMO, there are only three or four who are free agents at season’s end: Marshall, Jackson, Austin and Edwards. And admittedly, some may not even include Austin and Edwards in the definition of “top-tier.” Given all of the issues surrounding the team and the league (draft, cap, trades, etc.) it seems we will be another year without a #1.
by victorian on Jan 2, 2010 7:48 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Time to post Draft blogs for the 2010 draft
A receiver can be had in the 3rd rd. (maybe 2nd rd. if Rams think an impact DE or OLB still remains for the top of the 3rd rd.
If I had to guess right now at possible draftees or positions to draft, this is it thus far below:
1st rd. = Suh or McCoy
2nd rd. = impact out. linebacker or impact DE
3rd rd. = Freddie Barnes – receiver (plays slot – which we need better play from)
4th rd. = DB or guard/tackle
5th rd. = DE or out. linebacker
6th rd. = OG/OT
7th rd. = Fullback or DB (D-!AA, D-2 schools?)
by jlcdb70 on Jan 2, 2010 8:00 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
If we take McCoy in the first round I'm never rooting for the Rams again
You may run like Hayes, but you hit like shit.
by flipthebird on Jan 2, 2010 12:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i think he means
Gerald mccoy not colt mccoy
by Habte E on Jan 2, 2010 1:28 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, DT McCoy
Not Colt.
Sorry, the draft sucks for qb’s thus far.
by jlcdb70 on Jan 2, 2010 7:00 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
"Poison the atmosphere in the locker room?"
It must have be full of Chlorine gas all year as the guys had to put up with Barron dogging off all the time and outbursts from headcase Incognito. Then there’s Otogwe not happy with his 1-year deal. And there’s surely been resentment toward highly paid players like Bulger and Long not playing up to their expectations. The worst thing that permeates a locker room is the stench of defeat – like losing 24 of your last 25 games… I say give players like Marshall and Vick a chance. How much worse can we do?
by edpjr on Jan 2, 2010 10:29 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I have to be honest
But I believe Marshall over McDaniels. It’s one thing if one player doesn’t like the coach, but when the biggest players don’t , something may be amiss. He’s in the last year of his contract wanted reassurance that he’d be signed. I wouldn’t want to deal with that RFA bs, especially if I disagreed with the coach. So I’d either want a new contract, or a trade, which is exactly what he demanded for.
I believe in 2010
by ram_rod on Jan 2, 2010 12:43 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I'd be happy with Scheffler
If we could get Marshall or both it’d be a dream come true.
Can't think of a good sig
by Carneros on Jan 2, 2010 11:50 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
You know Sheffler
is on the Denver scout team now, don’t you? They don’t think he is good enough to be on the active roster. He is soft and unreliable from everything I’ve seen.
by andyrose on Jan 3, 2010 12:11 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
He's still played in every game this year.
He’s just being benched for the last game so they can trade him if its an uncapped year and don’t want to risk injury. He’s still have over 400 receiving yards this year and has had at least 500 the previous two years. If you hadn’t noticed McDaniels doesn’t like a lot of his players. Scheffler is still far better than McMichael right now. He has been targeted 50 times this year and has 31 receptions. I don’t know how many of those were drops. If used, he could be a weapon. 6’5’’ 250 lbs. 4.5 40-yards and 33" vertical. He’s got the speed to be a receiver and the size to be a tight end. He is definitely worth a shot. I am not a fan of McDaniels. He is making things worse in Denver as far as I’m concerned. 1. Ran his star QB out of town. 2. About to run a star WR out of town. 3. About to run a good TE out of town. How much have you seen?
Can't think of a good sig
by Carneros on Jan 3, 2010 12:53 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
How about this?
As a Broncos fan, I would gladly see Denver part with Marshall and the #1 pick they got from Chicago last year in the Cutler deal in exchange for the Rams #1 pick this year (and the #1 pick overall this year). With that pick Denver could get the nose tackle they need (Suh from Nebraska).
by BroncosfanBinghamton on Jan 4, 2010 10:03 AM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 




















