Rams take Redskins down to the wire; come up short in a 7-9 loss
It wasn't a win, but it was tantalizingly close for the St Louis Rams as they made a strong showing against the Washington Redskins, a 10 point favorite. You can break down the game, slice it up anyway you want. There were a number of factors contributing to the final score, but, for me, it all came down to the last two minutes of the game. And when was the last time you could say that about the Rams?
Of course, fans of sloppy play still had plenty to appreciate.
After a sloppy effort last in their opener against the Seahawks, the Rams offense came out and immediately established a rhythm, which stalled out when Donnie Avery dropped a first down pass. It wasn't the last time Avery, last season's rookie hero, would be a ball-and-chain for the Rams as he dropped another first down pass on the Rams very last possession of a 9-7 game.
The defense kept it competitive, defining bend but don't break in the process. The Redskins had more than 360 yards in offense, two-thirds of that through the air, but managed just three field goals because of timely stops by the Rams. The stats deceive. Washington QB Jason Campbell got most of his passing yards because the Rams lacked an effective pass rush. The defensive line was a problem all day, except when it wasn't. And when it wasn't, it made timely plays, like sacking Campbell in the fourth quarter and very nearly getting a safety.
Steven Jackson finished the game with 104 yards on just 17 carries, 58 of those yards coming on a run that ended with a Donnie Avery illegal block. Pat Shurmur stuck with the run. In the early going, it looked like the run might be in for a long day. DT Albert Haynesworth made things difficult in the middle, to sat the least. However, a nice block by RIchie Incognito, no doubt fearing exile to the bench, to keep Fletcher off Jackson created the near-game changing moment on Jackson's 58-yard run. They kept grinding it out to keep the run in the arsenal. That decision saved the screen pass and generally helped to keep the field open for the offense.
The game was still well within reach at the start of the fourth quarter. Marc Bulger and the Rams grinding it out from their own 25 in a drive spanning the last two quarters of the game. Jackson ran through the left side for a first down to get the ball to the Redskins 15-yard-line. Should have had three at least, right? No, a third down conversion was fumbled by none other than Donnie Avery, to totally keep the Rams off the board. I'm going to go ahead and call that the play that sunk the Rams. You can probably find another play or two and argue the point, but the Rams played a much better football game, signaling that there might be more enjoyable football in St. Louis this year.
Random Thoughts:
- I still like what I saw from James Laurinaitis. His missed tackle on Portis that allowed Washington to convert their first 4th down attempt late in the game reminded me he was a still a rookie.
- The defensive line is weak; however, the run defense is, overall, better because of much better play from the linebackers. They did get some pressure, certainly at times when it mattered, but still let Campbell go about his work with too much ease.
- Campbell's passing numbers conceal the strong play from the secondary (again, not perfect). Campbell had too much time too often to complete some solid passes that might not have happened with more pressure coming up front. They were better against the run.
- Pickups LaJuan Ramsey and Gary Gibson are our two best defensive tackles. That allows teams to concentrate on Chris Long (who was solid today).
- I liked the way the Rams finally stepped up and took Cooley out of the equation, mostly. He had 6 catches in the first half, but just one after that. That's a positive sign.
- On the other side of the ball, Marc Bulger looks much better than he has the past two years. Not the Bulger of 2006, but he doesn't have those kind of receivers either.
- Keenan Burton stepped up in the nick of time. He could have been written off with a poor outing today.
- Nobody expected Donnie Avery to be the league's best WR, but this kind of play in simply inexcusable. He had costly ball control issues to go with a dumb couple of penalties. If he doesn't botch all those things, it's a different ball game.
- At times I caught myself doing the Marge Simpson groan of disapproval at the offensive line, but Washington has a good defensive front. Containing an obviously fired up Albert Haynesworth is no small task. Bulger was pressured too much early in the game and sacked once late, but it could have been much, much worse. They still have some things to work on. They should be better than this.
- Keep an eye on the Jason Smith situation.
- We need someone who can return kicks. Desperately.
All in all, I'd say it was a positive outing for the Rams. At least it was interesting until the end. (If I'm a Redskins fan, I'm worried right now). Then again, as head coach Steve Spagnuolo said after the game:
"There are no moral victories in football."
That says it all.
0 recs |
66 comments
|
Comments
I don't need a moral victory,
I just want them to compete and have a shot to win the game at the end, which is exactly what they did…if you’re throwing to Bruce or Holt or Proehl, they make that catch and the Rams win the game…those guys are gone now and you have to develop their replacements, which they are in the process of doing now…hopefully, Avery becomes a decent WR…if now, we go get someone else.
Those jerkoffs at Hogs Haven expected a 30 point blowout…W-R-O-N-G…they’re at home and they just barely beat the Rams? – that don’t look too good…personally, I will enjoy seeing them get reamed out the rest of the year by the Giants, Eagles and Cowboys…they’ll finish in last this year, we probably will so we’ll pick this up again in ’10.
I want to win, but sometimes you have to learn to do the little things that help you win…that’s where the Rams are now…this was an important game.
by tbell61 on Sep 20, 2009 4:04 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I second your opinion. Even though the game was 9-7 it was a lot more entertaining knowing that rams at least have a chance of winning.
by mlkgandhiv2k on Sep 20, 2009 4:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The offense blows. Two weeks in a row, Avery coughs up ball, especially after coaches left him a signal about spinning equals fumbles. Ya, so a 9-7 loss. I would have rather see the Rams lose by 30 than to give away the game like they did.
This team is suffering the AL Davis effect for screwing Mike Martz over, screwing Kurt Warner over and the front office being completely insane! Spags has his work cut out because it does not matter what he does, it matters only what the players do and don’t do. Anemic is futility!
by jlcdb70 on Sep 20, 2009 4:32 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
how much thinking did you have to do to post that comment?
find me under the fan voices section for the st. louis rams
by stlcardinalsfang on Sep 20, 2009 4:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
maybe some radical ideas, but I'm still waiting to read something of value by you.
by edpjr on Sep 20, 2009 6:20 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
and the same to you, sir
reading “bulger sucks blah blah blah fuck life rams suck blah blah blah” gets really fucking old after the 80th time. you consistently present no evidence to your claims and consistently put my FACTS to bed as soon as you read them to post another poorly written, low thought “bulger sucks blah blah blah” comment.
find me under the fan voices section for the st. louis rams
by stlcardinalsfang on Sep 20, 2009 7:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
your foul language on a forum that's open to "young" fans...
…simply proves that you’re a twerp with nothing of value to say. For what it’s worth, some of the guys that run this forum occasionally refer to my posts because of their facts, logic and insight based on my 40+ years of Ram fanhood. I doubt that’s going to happen in your case. And say hello to your cousin “Marc” for me, and tell him better luck next week.
by edpjr on Sep 20, 2009 8:05 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
really? i haven't seen anyone do that.
and your “40+ years of ram fanhood” seems more like 40 seconds with some of the comments you make.
and who says this forum is open to younger fans? i haven’t seen a SB nation site yet that discourages cursing because of “young” fans. either way, the youngest person i could imagine on this blog is a 13 year old. and if a 13 year old hasn’t heard the word “fucking,” that’s a problem. and i very rarely use the word anyway, only when needed. in your case, it’s needed.
as for the snide “cousin” remark, it just shows you have no desire to hear me out in the first place and just would love to hit on bulger some more because you have nothing better to say.
find me under the fan voices section for the st. louis rams
by stlcardinalsfang on Sep 20, 2009 8:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
you're still a foul-mouthed little twerp with nothing to say...
…except to make excuses for cousin “Marc.” And who are you to determine what age a minor should be exposed to your obscenities? Most parents, like me, would gladly massage your chin whiskers with a fist if you spoke out loud like that in front of of children.
by edpjr on Sep 20, 2009 8:29 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
you're meeting my cursing with "little twerp"
that’s so much better, especially considering you’re not only personally attacking me, but threatening me as well. i have done neither.
and if you want to believe your middle schooler goes to school and doesn’t hear the word “fuck” on a daily basis, you be my guest my friend.
find me under the fan voices section for the st. louis rams
by stlcardinalsfang on Sep 20, 2009 8:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Chillin' like it is below freezing point
This is what happens when the organization one has followed since 1979 has self-destructed!
by jlcdb70 on Sep 20, 2009 11:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i been a Rams fan since 1967 but the down fall started in 2003
by james535 on Sep 21, 2009 5:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Here's your trophy.

"F@*& Lidge and the horse he rode in on!"
-Cards Fan in Chitown, via text message shortly after the VEB Get Together Day.
by Tackle Box on Sep 21, 2009 10:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Point is...
We’re in for a long year. This was a game (along with seattle) where I thought we could pull out wins.
Take a look at the schedule… it will get even more painful.
Green Bay, Minnesota, Indy, Jacksonville
Might want to plan your vacation around those weeks… some are consecutive.
Unless we can get above average talent at WR, get 2 solid pass rushing DE’s, (O-Line hasn’t looked all that impressive either) you can put a fork in it.
Prove me wrong Donnie, Leonard, Chris (Long).
"The greatest accomplishment is not in never falling, but in rising again after you fall." - Vince Lombardi
by VTramsFan on Sep 20, 2009 5:05 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree with you, VT...
I do think we can sneak up on some people…it almost happened today…you get one or two upset wins, and it begins to set the foundation for winning that this franchise needs so desperately…we know we’re not going to the playoffs…but a lot of teams are going to take us lightly…I hope we can take advantage of that.
by tbell61 on Sep 20, 2009 5:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Naah, VT is right...
Todays game could’ve easily been 28-7 if the Redskins hadn’t continually bellyflopped in the redzone. I’ll give our secondary and LBs some credit, but our D-Line is consistently weak and porous. They’re the reason our “D” can’t ever get off the field when we get the other team in a 3rd and long situation. We can’t even record a sack on an allout blitz. Avery had had two weeks of being putrid. Maybe he’s more like a number 2 or 3 receiver. And again, I won’t let Bulger off the hook. Our first possession ended when he threw a pass well behind Avery on 3rd down. There was virtually no pass pressure on Bulger on that play either. And, 17 carries for SJax is NOT enough. Lastly, the 49ers showed today that the Chicken Hawks, who laid 28 points and 446 yards on us last week, ain’t no juggernaut. We’re a bad team guys – three years running.
by edpjr on Sep 20, 2009 6:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
WELL BEHIND AVERY!?!?
are you blind? i blamed that more on avery not catching the ball than the throw. bulger played well today, period.
find me under the fan voices section for the st. louis rams
by stlcardinalsfang on Sep 20, 2009 7:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bulger did play well
It is sad that Rams did not select Deshaun Jackson from CAL!
by jlcdb70 on Sep 20, 2009 8:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
huh?
find me under the fan voices section for the st. louis rams
by stlcardinalsfang on Sep 20, 2009 8:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Deshaun Jackson is a receiver, btw
He is turning out to be the better pro over Avery!
by jlcdb70 on Sep 20, 2009 11:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
wait ten more years before making that judgment
find me under the fan voices section for the st. louis rams
by stlcardinalsfang on Sep 20, 2009 11:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
15 of 28 for net of 119 yards...
how low some people’s expectations have sunk for our QB.
by edpjr on Sep 20, 2009 8:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
look deeper
first of all, it’s 125 yards.
completion percentage: 54%
decent for an entire game, especially considering the receivers and the fact bulger was under pressure a decent portion of the game.
INTs: 0
always important. you know why he had 0 INTs? because he’s one of the most accurate QBs in the league.
yards/completion: 8.33
not great, but certainly not terrible considering the a lot of those throws were on crucial third downs, which brings me to my next point
3rd down conversions: 6/12
i can’t think of the last time (save the dallas game last year) the rams went 50% or better on third down. and you can chalk most of that up to bulger.
bulger made good throws when he had to. throw in the fact that he was under pressure most of the game and still has only one legit target right now, he played a pretty damn good ball game. also, you have to remember steven jackson was a huge factor in this game as well. of course your QB isn’t going to have gaudy numbers when your RB has a huge game.
find me under the fan voices section for the st. louis rams
by stlcardinalsfang on Sep 20, 2009 8:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I watched the game.
Why don’t you go TIVO the play over and over till it becomes a Bulger completion???
by edpjr on Sep 20, 2009 8:18 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
so maybe it was a bit off target
but avery still should have caught it. and it was one a few not great throws bulger threw all day.
find me under the fan voices section for the st. louis rams
by stlcardinalsfang on Sep 20, 2009 8:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
oh, and
28-7? the only scored three FGs. and i seem to remember avery fumbling what would’ve been at the very least a field goal. both teams made mistakes today, but the score is fair considering how both teams played. they were very close today.
find me under the fan voices section for the st. louis rams
by stlcardinalsfang on Sep 20, 2009 7:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Take a look at the game numbers sometimes....
1st downs: Redskins 21 Rams 14
Total yards: Redskins 362 Rams 245
Time of Poss: Redskins 34:53 Rams 25:07
the only thing close in this game was the score. Again, say “hey” to your cousin Marc.
by edpjr on Sep 20, 2009 8:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
take away that last redskin drive and you get this
first downs: redskins 16 rams 14
total yards: redskins 286 rams 245
time of poss: redskins 27:33 rams 25:07
sure looks closer, doesn’t it?
find me under the fan voices section for the st. louis rams
by stlcardinalsfang on Sep 20, 2009 8:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rams should have taken Aaron Curry
Smith injured – MCL. MRI will show to what extent.
by jlcdb70 on Sep 20, 2009 8:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Spags
not quite ready to put the dagger in Spags heart yet, but the coach we should have taken is 2-0 and just held the Pats to 0 touchdowns……….and their offensive personell is not much better than ours,,neither is their D…………i know Spags needs some time to turn it around so i’ll be patient
I have proof TackleBox IS Jim Haslett
by JordansDad on Sep 20, 2009 9:16 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I completely disagree.
The roster in New York was head and shoulders better than the Rams last year and that makes it all the easier.
"F@*& Lidge and the horse he rode in on!"
-Cards Fan in Chitown, via text message shortly after the VEB Get Together Day.
by Tackle Box on Sep 20, 2009 9:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
We don't have half the capable players the Jets do...
that’s why they whacked us 47-3 last year. However, we could’ve had Mark Sanchez instead of Jason Smith. That was the Rams and Spag’s choice.
by edpjr on Sep 20, 2009 10:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
This thread is funny.
There is no reason anybody should be cursing. I also disagree that we should have taken Mark Sanchez because pretty boy Mark wont look too pretty after getting hit while playing behind an ineffective line. I thought we should have drafted Aaron Curry and we could have gotten a right tackle in the second round. Just hope Bradford will be a stud QB in the League.
Football players, like prostitutes, are in the business of ruining their bodies for the pleasure of strangers. ~Merle Kessler
by mlkgandhiv2k on Sep 20, 2009 10:32 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
key play
nfl.com’s analysis points to the below as the key play:
Redskins safety Chris Horton knocked away a long Marc Bulger pass intended for Donnie Avery on fourth-and-10 with 1:40 to play
However, I disagree. The play Avery fumbled on was the turning point for me. When you have 3rd and 4 on your opponents 9 in the 4th quarter and you’re trailing by 2 points, I feel the play to call is an inside run. If you get the 1st then great, hell you might even punch it in for 6. If not you chip the FG on 4th down and go up by a point. Any coach will tell you (and I am a coach) that you have to score on every RZ trip, even if it’s through being conservative and settling for a FG.
I accept many will say that just delays the inevitable as the Redskins would most likely score on their next posession but the hypothetical of what would have followed on the next posession is a moot point because the possibilities are endless.
Bottom line…when points are on offer, you make sure you score at least 3
by IrishRamsFan on Sep 21, 2009 7:16 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I'll bet a lot of coaches would disagree with what you just wrote
A TD in that spot would have given the Rams a far better chance of winning the game than a FG. I think a team needs to be willing to take reasonable risks in such situations to try to come away with 7.
by WestCoastBuc on Sep 21, 2009 10:00 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1
for intents and purposes, the rams converted on that third down. they ran a conservative pass play that got them exactly what they needed, avery just screwed it up at the end and fumbled.
running an inside run play signifies to the opposition that you’re too afraid of a mistake to put the ball in the air and try and get the TD as opposed to the FG. you just can’t play like that.
find me under the fan voices section for the st. louis rams
by stlcardinalsfang on Sep 21, 2009 10:43 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
how is throwing a conservative pass any different than calling an inside run in that situation? A lead/dive play is designed to pick up 4 yards (I know many don’t). The call to throw to Avery didn’t demonstrate any desire to “put the ball in the air”. If he held onto the ball he was going to be tackled down at the 5 anyway. My point is that an inside run is a higher percentage call and would have been a safer option to try to pick up the 1st. Then you get 3 more shots at a TD before making a decision on 4th down
by IrishRamsFan on Sep 22, 2009 6:56 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am not
trying to be negative but…we need to start looking at the 2010 draft. If Looker the QB out of Univ. of Washington comes out. We might be able to get him in the second of third round. I am not basing this by the Univ. of Washington win but by the one and most important throw that had to be made and he made it…a 20 yard(?) stike on the side line.
by JL67 on Sep 21, 2009 8:28 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
One 20 yard pass
"F@*& Lidge and the horse he rode in on!"
-Cards Fan in Chitown, via text message shortly after the VEB Get Together Day.
by Tackle Box on Sep 21, 2009 9:02 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
we're two games into the season....
why don’t we at least just pay attention to the current until at least thanksgiving. that’s wayyyyy more fun.
find me under the fan voices section for the st. louis rams
by stlcardinalsfang on Sep 21, 2009 10:42 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I understand and agree
but I am going to keep one eye on our season and the other eye on the future.
- yes, it was only one pass and he (Looker) had more to prove but it was when and how it was throwen.
by JL67 on Sep 21, 2009 11:11 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
For starters - its LOCKER
2nd – I understand (and I’m with you there) the need to keep an eye on the future, but you can’t jump on player bandwagons 3 weeks into the college season. Last week it was Barkley, this week it is Locker, it started as Bradford. You just can’t look at a couple of games and say – Jacory Harris is a stud – we should strategize to draft him!
Need to track players for the future and go off their body of work over the season (and how that translates to the NFL game for you Tebow lovers).
Free Brandon Wood!
by gorams77 on Sep 21, 2009 12:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
At times I caught myself doing the Marge Simpson groan of disapproval at the offensive line
Now that was funny.
I believe they are moving in the right direction. Let’s hope the club felt there where 6 preseason games this year and begin their march forward next week.
by Heydewd on Sep 21, 2009 11:09 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
How about now?
How about Incognito? He is the only O-linemen that is blocking. All the big runs have come from his side and behind him. Does any fair wether football Rams fan still want to get grid of him. The two big runs of the year are last week where Donnie Avery held the DB and the play was called back and this week when Donnie Avery blocked the DB in the back. If there is anyone we need to get rid of, it is DONNIE AVERY! He can’t block, catch and doesn’t know how to run a pattern. But he is one fast fool.
by JL67 on Sep 21, 2009 11:37 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
One day, I'd like to percieve the world through your eyes.
Because, in your world, we’ve all been bitching about the way Incognito blocks.
Really?
It had nothing to do with the way he gets Unsportsmanlikes over and over and over and over year after year after year?
No one on here has ever questioned his ability to block or his desire to win. It’s the mess between his ears we have a problem with. And when one shows over time they are either unwilling or unable to change such behavrior, then there is a legit reason to complain.
Avery, on the other hand, has problems that are new and (hopefully) fixable. But until Avery costs this team game after game over the course of two or three seasons, then he gets somewhat of a pass. It’s not overlooked, but he gets the benefit of the doubt.
It’s thinking like this that paints the picture of a fairweather fan. You make grand statements based on one game. Avery has a bad game (which followed a not very good game) and you deem him cut material. Yet, Incognito blocks well (which he usually does) and doesn’t cost his team with a dumb ass personal foul, and he’s the greatest thing since Anthony Munoz.
Save it. It’s boring.
"F@*& Lidge and the horse he rode in on!"
-Cards Fan in Chitown, via text message shortly after the VEB Get Together Day.
by Tackle Box on Sep 21, 2009 12:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Next?
I can understand how grandiose my standment seems. But I am tried of my fellow Ram fan riding him into the dirt. Most of these knuckleheads are only complaining about his miscues and not his ability. I will take his passion and miscues over people/players who do not have the right type of ability i.e. Donnie Avery. Avery could be traded to another team and become ALL WORLD, however, under this system and his in-ability, I do not see him passing the muster. I am willing to bet that Avery costs us at least 2 more game for a total of 4 for the season i.e. the first 2 and 2 more. We will see. (I should have added a ? after the “Does any fair wether football Rams fan still want to get grid of him?” ) That would have helpe clarify the statement. Your personel shot at me being fair weather is not good, for I am not. And I never said he is the next Munoz or even implied it, I was just indicating that he is better than what else we currently have on staff.
by JL67 on Sep 21, 2009 12:47 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I would hardly put the blame for week 1 on Avery
As you suggest that he is already responsible for two losses. There was a whole lot of blame to go around last week on the offensive side of the ball.
I would nominate Donnie for the “blame of the game” this week though because I agree with Irish – game changes if Avery holds on to that ball. Yes, yes, I know edpjr – we have no pass rush and I agree – but fact is if Avery holds that ball, the Rams could very well be 1-1.
Free Brandon Wood!
by gorams77 on Sep 21, 2009 1:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes. We fluked Washington last year and it could have happened again.
But, Avery, Bulger and the D-Line are the goats. And the O-Line has got nothing to brag about. Neither do the play callers. SJax got 17 carries – it shoulda been 25 or more.
by edpjr on Sep 21, 2009 1:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Then that goes on the OC
Tell me exactly what Bulger did to get labeled a “goat” for this game. Please. Hell, he even scrambled for about 7 yards when protection broke down which is something you said he couldn’t do.
"F@*& Lidge and the horse he rode in on!"
-Cards Fan in Chitown, via text message shortly after the VEB Get Together Day.
by Tackle Box on Sep 21, 2009 3:56 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sure. The first problem I saw was...
…the behind your back pass to Avery (who couldn’t catch one on the numbers) on the 3rd down play that ended our first possession. There was little pass pressure on this play. A few other things; QB rating 69.5, 15-28 for 119 yards, leader of the 31st ranked offense in the NFL averaging 3.5 ppg, and finally, four and out when we actually had a chance to win the game with a FG. I’ll spot him the scramble, which was quite a pleasant surprise, and not tossing any INT’s. Still, the aforementioned points reveal generally poor QB play against anyone’s criteria. And, we’ve only faced two mediocre teams so far.
by edpjr on Sep 21, 2009 5:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Still nothing new I see.
And the pass was more than catchable to Avery.
No interceptions. No fumbles. No major screw-ups. These are things that make a goat. The things you list above are products of the team (i.e., dropped passes, fumbles, penalties, having one viable receiver, etc., etc.).
"F@*& Lidge and the horse he rode in on!"
-Cards Fan in Chitown, via text message shortly after the VEB Get Together Day.
by Tackle Box on Sep 21, 2009 10:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
he is failing to perform is that not good enough for you
what are you trying to say that Bulger is playing good football ,maybe your Bulgers mother incognito ,you always seem to be wiping his ass all the time after he take a dump
by james535 on Sep 21, 2009 5:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
At what?
Making guys catch catchable balls?
At making guys not make dumb ass penalties?
At keeping guys from fumbling on the 3 yard line?
At making the defense give up a shit load of yards?
"F@*& Lidge and the horse he rode in on!"
-Cards Fan in Chitown, via text message shortly after the VEB Get Together Day.
by Tackle Box on Sep 21, 2009 10:53 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mock draft time!
S-St. Louis, R-Rams, D-Dallas, M-Mavericks, A-Arizona, D-Diamondbacks.
by srdmad on Sep 21, 2009 3:34 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
and Avery can go to another team if he still needs to learn how to hold the ball
this is not a children’s academy
by james535 on Sep 21, 2009 5:37 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 



















