Interesting article just wanted to pass it on
Are NFL Officials Being
Bribed?
by William Schmidt, Ph.D.
NFL officiating is so bad now, you can usually tell who'll lose based either
on which side the officials assess the penalties on or who benefits from the
execrable calls that have now become common place. The instant replay
and review was supposed to help, but what happens when the home team
turns off the replay camera so that there can be no replay, even after a
challenge. Nothing. There is no review. The visitors get screwed. And
what happens if the official blows his whistle to call a dead ball for no reason?
Nothing. There is no review.
Today's San Diego - Denver football game shows football is no longer
a game about football. The winner is fixed in advanced. The game's outcome
is pre-determined and the officials are there to make sure the script is
followed, just like in a wrestling match or on Wall Street. The biased and
ridiculously bad officiating is not accidental. It could only be this bad by
design. It must be deliberate and sinister. What proof? I can safely
predict that this game's two ridiculous calls will not be seriously investigated
by the League. Will the media tackle this? No. They know who butters
their bread. They will not make nearly enough about how bad and biased
the officiating is. Their silence has ruined the game for the millions who
expect a modicum of fairness.
So, what happened that got me to write about football?
What was the first clue today that the officials were there to make sure
that the home-town Denver broncos would beat the San Diego Chargers?
Early in the first quarter, San Diego threw a 10-yard completed pass inside its
30 yard line. The SD receiver was brought down. His elbow hit the ground.
He was down on his back and the Denver tackler then stripped the ball away
from him and took the ball back so close to the goal line that Denver had a
touch-down before anyone could catch their breath. San Diego challenged
the call. We saw on TV the replay that showed the SD receiver should have
been called down before the ball was taken away. That was the much-repeated
opinion of the two TV commentators broadcasting the game. But the official
said the play could not be reviewed because the replay machine, which Denver
was expected to maintain, was not working! How convenient for the
home team! Instead of SD having the ball after a completed pass, Denver
got a quick and easy seven point lead. Why didn't the official just get the TV
networks to offer a replay? Why if the home team fails to make their equipment
work, are they not penalized and the appeal approved? Why? Because the "fix"
was on and the script said Denver was to be the winner.
(See - http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2008/09/14/sports/nelson/z5f99e36f532c9938882574c5001c72c3.txt )
This was bad. But listened to what happened with less than a minute left
in the game, Denver had the ball on San Diego's 2 yard-line and was behind
38-31, The Denver quarterback ran to his right and looked downfield for
someone to throw the ball to. In his hurry to get the pass off as a burly SD
linebacker rushed towards him, he whipped the ball back to throw it, but it fell
out of his hands, very clearly before he started moving his passing arm forward.
The SD player grabbed the ball off the ground and was tackled and went out
of bounds. Just as they had earlier, the TV announcers did a review in slow
motion of the play from several angles. They all immediately agreed that
the Denver quarterback had fumbled it and it was San Diego's ball.
"Not so quick", said the official. On review he claimed that the ball had
been whistled dead. Why? Absolutely no explanation. It was not a fumble.
And it was also not considered an incomplete forward pass. The ball was
placed back at the 10 year line where the quarterback had dropped it. If it had
been considered an incomplete forward pass, the ball should have been given
to Denver on the 2-yardline. But the official did not try to claim that the quarter-
back had the ball as he was moving his arm forward. No. This would not
have been tenable stance. The replay showed that he clearly lost it as he
was taking his arm back. So, then it was a fumble? "No", said the official,
it wasn't a fumble, even though that's what it looked liked to everyone else
It was an "official's whistle-blown dead-ball." Why the whistle? No explanation
was given. So Denver got to keep the ball and then scored the winning
touchdown and points-after. The official claimed that once the whistle was
blown the other team could not take possession. But that is patently untrue.
In March 2007, it was ruled that a fumble caused by contact is live on review,
even when the whistle is mistakenly blown. The same rule should have applied
here. The quarterback dropped the ball because he was about to be hit hard.
The official who blew both calls was Ed Hochuli. He is an attorney. He
ehochuli@jshfirm.com TEL: 602-263-1719 FAX: 602-263-1784
specializes in civil litigation in areas where
expert. all right, in bad faith. He was standing less than 20' from the quarterback
when he blew his whistle prematurely. This was no accident. In his career,
he has surely called thousands of plays involving quarerback fumbles. He blew
the earlier call. And then to fix the game's outcome he blew his whistle and blew
this call deliberately. He could have reversed himself. That he refused to
is proof, he blew this call deliberately.
he will get a letter from the Commiss downgrading his performance for
admitting he made a mistake, not for the error itself.
The letter means nothing. He just won't officiate at other games
involving these teams. That's the League's typical response. Hoculi was
previously banned by the League officials after 2001 from officiating a
San Diego-Denver game because of his terrible calls back then. The owner
of the Denver team admits that Hochili has long been one of the most
criticized of the league's umps.
See - http://forums.contracostatimes.com/topic/bad-calls-nfl-referees
Video of the 2 plays.
Now Yahoo reports that Hochuli is publicly contrite. But he has not
resigned. That's the least he should do. But in an age when arrogant
politicians and CEOs grab all they can, I wouldn't expect Hochuli to do
the right thing and resign.
bad faith is involved. He's anThe League should fire him. InsteadWhat Players Are Saying:
Shaun Phillips, a star player on the SD defense wrote this about the
incident: "Damn. I can't say that the ref cheated us because that's a fine. I can't say that
the Broncos didn't win that game because that's being a sore loser. I can't say that it was a
mistake that the replay machine wasn't working in the first qtr cause that would be a lie.
$ $

Hochuli is the President of the NFL Referees' Association. This should give readers
some idea about how unfairly professional football is officiated. I have long considered
NFL officials to be partial, biased and determined to give one team, usually the home
team, the game. See my earlier Blog - http://www.tigersoft.com/Tiger-Blogs/1-16-2008/index.html
It comes as no surprise that NFL officials supported Hochuli's ruling, even though no
one else on the plant has.
Players have to be careful what they say. They may get the same official in the next game.
But the SD Chargers were quick to speak out after today's badly distorted game. It was all too
much to take.
SD Coach Norv Turner: “It was a fumble, clear to everyone on our sideline, and
I'm sure all the fans...Ed came over to me and said he blew it and that's not, to me,
acceptable. This is a high-level performance game and it is not acceptable to have a
game decided on that play.” (So, why didn't he reverse himself then. Moral cowardice?
Denver fan pressure? No, I think he got money in advance and was afraid of being
found shot. Officials are not full time employees of the NFL. A little extra money
on the side is hard for some officals to refuse. Two blown calls is not accidental.
Denver Quarterback: "I think it was a fumble,”
LaDainian Tomlinson: "The NFL is always holding us accountable for stuff we do, and
so at some point, the referees have to be held accountable too," he said. "Otherwise,
what is the point is having referees out there?"

Clinton Hart: "The machine is not working in the first quarter when a call
should have went our way ... we thought," Chargers safety Clinton Hart said. "Then,
all of a sudden, it is working every other quarter."
(Source: http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2008/09/14/sports/nelson/z5f99e36f532c9938882574c5001c72c3.txt )
Having just written this, I decide to see if anyone else on the Internet agrees:
"NO RESPECT: I have long respected Ed Hochuli as an NFL referee. That ended Sunday."
"REAL SCORE II: Final Score: Chargers 38, Denver 24, Referees 15".
"Not since the 1919 Chicago White Sox has there been a more blatant fix of a professional
sports game. The Chargers won this game twice. Why should I be a season ticket holder |
when the games are fixed? Never before have I seen such a sham!"
"PAGING THE FBI: In the NBA they call officiating like that “point shaving.” Perhaps the
FBI should launch an investigation."
"Are you kidding me?"
"Why even bother playing the game when the referee could have told us who was going to
win before it started? Two major blown calls that turned a hard-fought comeback win into
another loss. Can anyone remember an instance where an obvious missed call was not
overturned due to an equipment malfunction? If the NFL had any integrity, it would nullify
the results of this game and replay it. No more Super Bowls for Ed Hochuli."
"I still have not gotten over the ridiculousness of the officiating in this game. It ranks right
up there or actually EXCEEDS the holy roller and any other incompetent officiating we have
had to endure as Bolt fans. This is probably the WORST officiated Bolt game in history.
Simple fact. ALL announcers, commentator, and even players such as Cutler agree that
call was blown at the end. This is NOT supposed to happen with a fair official replay system
and with halfway competent officials What the hell was Hochuli doing? He wasn't in position
to clearly see the motion of Cutler's arm, obviously. Otherwise he would have not blown the
call. So if he is not sure, DO NOT BLOW THE PLAY DEAD.....that is the WORST thing
that an official can do...particularly on a play at this point in the game and with consequences
of such magnitude!....If the NFL does not seriously discipline this guy and/or demote him
or just plain kick his *** out of the league...then something is wrong.
A sample of opinions from this site:
: http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stories/2008/sep/14/chargers-1s15chfans19185/?chargers
Many believe the mob can fix a game by
getting to the officials.
Have Ed Hochuli and his crew been bribed by the mob or are they under direct orders
from the NFL to make sure that Denver beats SD? That's the only explanation many
observers offer for the abysmally poor officiating in this game....
As corrupt as the White House.. NFL ... Other Fans' Comments:
. "In a world where corruption routinely invades our most hallowed institutions,
it's silly to think the NFL is immune." Newsweek.com
How about an investigative report uncovering bribes to an NFL officiating crew that were secretly
paid by a highly successful NFL team The NFL wouldn't stand for it
NFL Fixing Games for the Patriots?
Was Last Night’s Patriots-Ravens Game Fixed? « “Holy Toledo!”
Corrupt NFL referee Pete Morelli NFL admits ref’s mistake but ...
Instant Replay Needs Another Look / Safety net required to offset ...
http://blogs.king5.com/seahawks/archives/2006/02/nfl_stands_by_i.html
http://cowboys.beloblog.com/archives/2007/09/thats_the_ware_weve_been_waiting_for.html
NFL steroid dealer names names, ends up dead - The Something Awful ...The NFL, the Mafia, Ronald Reagan and Fixing Elections ...Interesting Things For you Late @ Night: NFL steps up monitoring ...
Bad Officiating - the Walt Coleman Story
0 recs |
0 comments

by 



















