Grading the Rams: Week 1 @ Seattle
That was not pretty. That is all. Grades after the fold.
QB: C+Bulger doesn't deserve the blame for the offensive woes. He forced very few throws, and the ones he did came after the game was "decided." Still, to throw less than 200 yds., less than a 50% clip and no TDs prevents me from giving him in the B range.
HB: C-
This is as much for the playcalling as it is a condemnation of Jackson's play or the O-line. Any game where Action Jackson doesn't get 20 carries signals a failure, especially when he fails to tally a single reception. We needed more from him today.
WR: D
Robinson and Avery made themselves available in the 2nd half, but by then it was too little too late. Too often did we see Bulger in the pocket waiting for one of his receivers to get open. Robinson proved he was more than a preseason flare and Avery ran some solid routes underneath late in the game, but Donnie didn't register a reception longer than 16 yards. Poor showing.
O-line: D/B/F
The three grades are essentially for run blocking/pass blocking/Incognito. When you have a talent like Steven Jackson, you have to give him opportunities to succeed. He had very few today. On the other hand, Marc Bulger had something he enjoyed very rarely in 2008: time to throw. The Seahawks registered just three sacks despite multiple examples of Bulger waiting in the pocket and accepting the sack as a last resort. The final game is self-explanatory for anyone who watched the game. Incognito registered the first offensive play of the game after an interception in our end zone pushed the momentum in our favor with a false start. It was an omen of the kind of game he would play. Two unnecessary roughness penalties and the occasional absent-minded tomfoolery later, Cogs would at last be pulled to the bench.
I'll say this. I've been a defender of Incognito's ability as a blocker and the fact that he brings more fire than anyone on offense and arguably the team. But if he can't control that fire within the confines of a play and effect his skills on a defensive line instead of the referees, then we'd better off without him.
D-line: B/F
Outside of Julius Jones' 62 yard scamper, he was held to just 55 yards on 18 carries. That's a testament to the tenaciousness of our D-line, especially Gary Gibson who should make Adam Carriker an afterthought. Unfortunately, the pressure we saw on run defense was absent in the pass. Chris Long, Leonard Little and James Hall combined for 10 tackles... and 0 sacks against a line that was without two starters.
LB: B
James Laurinaitis is an NFL MLB. He finished with 14 tackles, 10 of them on his own. You can point to his overpenetration on the first TD, you can look at plays when his lateral movement put him a second behind where he should have been, but the reality is that he played exceptionally well for his first NFL game. Witherspoon looked like a true WLB and Vobora was anything but irrelevant. A solid showing.
DB: C+
Hard to put these guys in the "C" range after coming out so strong, but the Seahawks ran the kind of offense we needed to run. To counter, the DBs should have played a tighter first ten yards until Hasselbeck showed a willingness to go deep. We saw flashes of ability from Bartell, Wade and King - that's a great sign. And the duo of James Butler and O.J. Atogwe is as good as advertised. They came out ready to play.
ST: C
I wanted to give this a C-, but Donnie Jones is the best punter in the NFL hands down. He does as much as you could possibly ask of a punter and more with every opportunity. Josh Brown, on the other hand, had one chance to help the Rams and failed. Against his former team, you would have hoped he could quiet the opposing crowd and give the Rams a 3-0 lead. Keep hoping. Donnie Avery's fumble on the opening kick gave a possession and momentum to Seattle at one of the worst times he could have done so. Luckily, our defense was more than capable of dealing with the turnover.
Coaching: D-
So many penalties, two burnt time outs early, some simple playcalling (both in terms of timing offensively and to sit off the blitz defensively when Seattle had committed to the quick pass) earns this grade. And putting 12 men on the field for the FG attempt at the end of the half turned a 7-7 game into a 14-0 nothing one. A 14 point swing just before the half is difficult to bring to the locker room. Were my expectations higher? Definitely. Will they remain so? Certainly. Am I worried? Without question.
The Rams leave this game knowing they beat themselves early on with penalties and soft offensive play. These are correctable faults, but they were at the end of the first drive, quarter and half, and we saw little change. This is a tough final score to stomach simply because we came out with a desire defensively, and a childish hyperactivity on offense. You can give "credit" to the crowd, but any NFL player who can't play in a hostile environment without containing their emotions and providing their skills to their teammates shouldn't be on the field in the NFL. Get to work, Coach Spagnuolo. You have a lot to do.
0 recs |
32 comments
|
Comments
With grades like that they must have looked a lot better
than the score would indicate. I guess that is encouraging.
A 1.75 GPA for a team that scored no points and were the only NFL team so far to lose by more than 18? I had the impression from the score and stats that I saw, that they played more like one of the patsies that the top college teams like to schedule to pad their records, eg Florida/Charleston Southern or USC/San Jose State.
by WestCoastBuc on Sep 13, 2009 7:13 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
They played a lot worse than those scores. Bulger a C+? Please. Same for Jackson. When the game mattered, he did nothing. That’s why they stopped using him. Only in garbage time did he have a nice run.
That’s the thing with Bulger and Jackson. They pad their stats at the end of the game, when the other team doesn’t care anymore.
by DiscoJer on Sep 13, 2009 7:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
excellent observation
When you’re up by 28 points with minutes left the “D” will give you a lot of freebies.
by edpjr on Sep 13, 2009 7:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
bulger had absolutely no one to throw to
and jackson had very, very few chances to make something happen. did you even watch the game? do your research before you make comments like this one.
find me under the fan voices section for the st. louis rams
by stlcardinalsfang on Sep 13, 2009 7:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Look at the numbers...
The Sea Hags and their bald QB stomped our butts plain and simple. They plowed us for over 440 yards of offense after wasting the entire 1st qtr floundering around. When we didn’t have points on the board after the 1st 15 mins, I knew it was trouble. We couldn’t get a point off of all those miscues. I don’t see a bright spot anywhere except for maybe Lauranitis and Donnie Jones. Our OL allowed 3 sacks and that idiot Incognito cost us 35 yards in penalties. Nobody opened any holes for SJax. Nobody was there for Bulger to throw too – no WRs, no TE’s, no RBs. But I still don’t think Marc could hit a bull in the butt with a bass fiddle anymore. Our highly paid new Center made a critical bad snap. Ol’ reliable Josh Brown, ain’t. On the “D” side Little, Hall and Long were invisible whenever there was a pass attempt. I don’t believe Hasselbeck was so much as brushed against on a passing down. And while we did a little better against the run, that one 67 yd running play kinda negates any improvement. Our corners allowed the Seattle receivers about 10 yards leeway to catch balls. What’s up with that? The new coaching staff reeked of Scott Linehan play calling. I can’t believe this franchise could dump the front office, the coaching staff and half the team and still be this putrid. Yes 28-0. Zero points scored and 28 allowed in three quarters. We suck. There is no bright side. Here’s my grade: F-
by edpjr on Sep 13, 2009 7:29 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
That Sums It Up Right There
We better sign a couple solid pass rushing DE’s, a solid #1 WR, dump Incognito, and improve our focus and play calling… or these Sundays will continue to be long no question.
What has 22 legs and can't move? The Rams offense.
by VTramsFan on Sep 13, 2009 7:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
way to stay optimistic there!
find me under the fan voices section for the st. louis rams
by stlcardinalsfang on Sep 13, 2009 7:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
optimistic???
u gotta be f-in kidding me. What did u see to be optimistic about? I think you could find some positive aspect to facing a firing squad.
by edpjr on Sep 13, 2009 7:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
positives
the offensive line: bulger had time to throw today, something he hasn’t had for three years. you can bitch and whine about jackson not having any holes, but he had enough to work with. this unit is finally playing like a unit and will be solid.
bulger: made smart decisions with the ball. again, bitch and whine all you want about his (lack of) stats, but he made the right decisions to not throw to covered receivers
james laurinaitis: the dude is a stud, not even you can deny that
the safeties: atogwe and butler are one of the better tandems in the league
this team is only going to get better under spags. it’s one game, there’s 15 more to be played.
find me under the fan voices section for the st. louis rams
by stlcardinalsfang on Sep 13, 2009 7:53 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Really?
I say fool yourself all you want too. And I’m not whining about anything, I’m flat out bitchin and cussin cause I’m mad as hell.
+ the O-Line: you really saw a lot of good stuff from Jacob Bell and Richie Incognito today? And how about that wild snap by Jason Brown?
+ Bulger: QB of a team that scored zero points. Case closed.
+ Lauranaitis: he and Donnie Jones were bright spots absorbed by the vacuum of the rest of the inept squad.
+ still allowed way too many catches (nearly 300 passing yards)
by edpjr on Sep 13, 2009 8:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
yes, really
-i’m talking about the o-line as a unit. sure, some of the individuals played poorly today, but the unit as a whole looked decent.
-i don’t know how many ways i can say that bulger had no one to throw to. you just don’t seem to get it.
-you’re right, 300 yards is a lot to give up, but a lot of it was on short passes that went for long YAC, and that falls on bartell and wade, not the safeties.
find me under the fan voices section for the st. louis rams
by stlcardinalsfang on Sep 13, 2009 8:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hate to Agree and Disagree
But the O Line did play well and with any hope Icognito will not be starting. As far as Bulger, no I watched that game, TIVOd it and watched it again, more than a few times guys were open, but they were progressive reads he did not feel comfortable waiting for. To be fair in a West Coast Offense your receivers are designed to be free, but how many times have you seen Montanta, McNabb (no I am not putting him Montana’s category), Young, and other West Coast QBs work through the reads and find a Brent Jones, a Westbrook, or any able bodied guy who was open?
by No1Betta on Sep 13, 2009 8:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bulger simply holds the ball too long. No rhythm at all. The WCO asks qb’s to make some plays based upon their athletic ability and here is where Marc comes up short.
He sees the rush…he cannot “not see” it and he’s (understandably?) terrified of it.
It seems that the more Bulger has been asked to read defenses (post-Martz, in opther words) the more he has struggled. There’s a reason why he wasn’t drafted until the 6th round & then cut twice.
He’s like the one-night-stand that lasted waaaayyy too long.
by younghutch on Sep 13, 2009 9:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for not drawing any comparison between Montana and Bulger...
While I have despised SF since the days of John Brodie, QB’s don’t come any better than Joe Montana IMHO.
by edpjr on Sep 13, 2009 10:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm with you, there were positives ... you just have to look beyond the score
The Rams came out much more competitive in the first quarter than we’ve seen in a long time. They overcame early mistakes with exceptional defensive play. The offense cut down on its penalties in the second half, even with Incognito back in the game. Except for Josh Brown and the 12th man, the Rams’ special teams played very well.
Bulger gets his own category of analysis. He did play with some moxie, and he did avoid turnovers. Most of his passes were crisp — no lawn darts, no weak back-foot floaters. On the other hand, it seems clear clear that he isn’t fully comfortable with the playbook in terms of looking for second and third reads. (For Steven Jackson to get only one target — dropped — in the passing game, to me, says that he isn’t working his way through his receivers.) He had a very difficult time communicating under the noise. And he’s still probably the slowest quarterback in football. For such a skinny dude, he runs like Stan Humphries.
The criticism of any Rams player padding their stats when Seattle’s defense stopped caring? Pure bullshit. Seattle never backed off, never went into a “prevent.” They were gunning for the shutout all the way, and they got it. The Rams earned all of their yards. They also earned all of their penalty yards, though, and there’s no getting around that.
Without two penalties — the false start on McMichael, and the 12th man on Seattle’s punt — this is a very different football game. The Rams will be able to compete. Today, however, they were their own worst enemy.
RamsHerd.com - Graphic Rams Discussion
by taiko on Sep 13, 2009 10:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
without the two penalties....?
Seattle still put up over 200 more yards of offense than we did. And what’s the odds the kick would’ve actually been blocked without the 12th man out there? That do make things easier. And what about Incognito’s 35 yards worth of penalties? Or the failure to capitalize on any of the SeaHawks 1st qtr mistakes? There’s just no way to sugarcoat a 28-0 loss when the opponent lays 446 yards on you. Lauranitis played well, but even he couldn’t get our “D” off the field on third down. And, on Seattle’s second TD, he got faked out of his jock strap (a rookie mistake). From now on I’m referring to Chris Long as the “invisible man.” Maybe someday he’ll fall down in the right place and a QB will trip over him. Cause that’s the closest thing to a sack or pressure we’ll see from Chrissy. The Dolphins robbed us when they picked Jake Long in 2008 and left us with Chris. Leonard Little was constantly blown-off the line, but managed to rack up a 15 yard late hit OOB penalty for us. Today was a total team loss. Almost nobody, save Donnie Jones did any good. The main culprits are Bulger, Jax, Jason Brown, Josh Brown, Incognito, Jason Smith, Avery, Burton, Chrissy, Little, Hall, Witherspoon, McMichael, Gibson, Spagnuolo AND virtually anyone else wearing a Rams uniform. We’re not going to win any games till someone in power realizes a team must have competent players at QB, WR and on the D-Line to compete in this league. I’m so disgusted I can’t stand it.
by edpjr on Sep 13, 2009 11:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Playcalling
I could have sworn that the gameplan was Jackson. All day. This is frighteningly reminiscient of the censored Linehan era.
I was surprised by about the 4th drive that we were throwing the ball on 1st down, which made us have to throw the ball on second down, which, in turn, forced us to throw the ball on 3rd down. The real action I saw for Jackson was on 3rd and 2, when we called his number, and he made the yardage. All the rest was pass, pass, pass.
Just sad, really. Even when we were behind by 2 scores, I would have kept the defense honest by running.
Well, here’s to next week.
THIS year's the year. I hope....
by thisguy on Sep 13, 2009 8:39 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Agree Agree Agree
How many coaches have stuck to the ground game and lived and died by it, but when you have a Pro Bowl RB and revamped line, give it a chance. Where was the smashmouth. Knowing my defense was turning the ball over all preseason and saw the first Seahawks drive end in an interception, know my jittery QB was missing all preseason, I would have stayed with my rested, stud of a TB and smashed it down their throat three times in a row.
by No1Betta on Sep 13, 2009 8:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
At this point...
I’m hoping that Bulger gets hurt and Null or Boller creates a Warner or Brady success story. Bulger has to be the worst starting QB not named Jake Delhomme.
by heinzketchup on Sep 13, 2009 11:07 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't want Bulger hurt - just fired. Carolina might take him.
by edpjr on Sep 14, 2009 12:02 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe it's too early to ask this question...
But would it have made more sense to draft Sanchez and trade Bulger?
by victorian on Sep 14, 2009 12:33 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes
I’ve watched Mark play since I was 6 years old and he was 7. Dude could dunk on the grade school basketball hoops 2 years before everyone else. He had a 6-pack when he was 11, and he made me punch him in the stomach as hard as I could and he didn’t flinch. That guy has been a stud since he was born.
But seriously, he brings and excitement and a passion for the game that Bulger completely lacks. Bringing in Sanchez and Laurinitis would establish solid leadership for years to come. Of course, he’d still be attempting to pass to receivers who can’t get open and experiencing a constant pass rush. But he’s a lot faster than Bulger (so is molasses) and he is willing to try to make something out of nothing. Mark has never been a loser while Bulger has been nothing but a product of mediocrity since his days at WVU. Plus, think of all the good, exciting press of bringing in the rookie QB.
by BruinHalo on Sep 14, 2009 12:52 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And...
He is from Los Angeles, where the Rams still have a ton of fans, played in the Coliseum, where the Rams used to play – the marketing would have been too easy.
And maybe we could have used the picks from the Bulger deal to get some receivers.
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again – people on this site have a better grasp of personnel than the “executives” on the team and the executives have scouts and thousands of hours of film at their disposal. I don’t get it.
by victorian on Sep 14, 2009 1:00 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
OK, I was at the game and here's my thoughts...
Passion: 12th man is absolutely nuts. There are times during the game where my ears were ringing. I can really see why Seattle is so proud of their noise levels. They even keep track on the billboard of how many false starts they’ve created since 2005 (They’re #1 by a lot , Rams are #4 or 5, I don’t remember). Anywho, it felt to me that the Seahawks came out of the tunnel with much more passion and intensity than the Rams, jumping and pumping up the crowd for a while before the game, and this was only exacerbated by the rabid crowd. In fact, the Rams never looked excited to play, and aside from the dancing by Atogwe whenever music played, they were incredibly stoic. Bulger, specifically, never looked excited, but when has he ever? Perhaps that’s one reason I’ve never been a huge fan of his. Anyway, it looked to me and even the Seahawks fans around me that the Rams never looked like they wanted to be there.
Gameplay: So it felt for a while like the Rams would make this game interesting. 3 first quarter turnovers and strong run defense kept them in the game for a while. On offense, however, it really just felt like a matter of time before a penalty brought back any gains and killed any momentum. Given these penalties and the lack of ability to score on opportunities, I really feel like this game was thrown by the offense. Those out there who complain that the defense let up 400+ yards and don’t deserve credit must not have been watching the game. That defense was worn out by the end of the second quarter, and the offense showed no life. When Bulger made his scramble and was hit, I was hoping he just wouldn’t want to come back and Boller/Null would come in and fire up the team. All in all, it was far from the defense’s fault that the game was lost. Penalties and complete lack of offense ruined any chance the Rams had to win.
Random: I found it hilarious that Budweiser was the official beer of the Seahawks and took pleasure telling any fan giving me smack that he was enjoyed a beverage from St. Louis. Also, parking was either ridiculously expensive or dirt cheap. Parking in official lots near the stadium ran upwards of $50-$100. I happened to find parking 2 blocks away in the public parking that is free on Sundays. Can’t get a better deal than that. Finally, I have never attended a Rams game in St. Louis so I don’t know how it is there, but the whole city runs on Seahawks football on Sundays. Every single person in the city (from the Pike Place Market to Safeco Field) is wearing Seahawks apparel- men, women, and children. This is far from the “eh, who cares?” mentality that existed in Anaheim and would have been really fun if I didn’t hate the Seahawks. Overall, I rate the fan experience a 6 or 7 for opposing fans (12th man really makes it suck) and a 9 or 10 for Seahawks fans.
PS- I have pictures of my experience at the game. If you guys say so, I’ll post a link so you can get a flavor for Seattle for yourself.
by BruinHalo on Sep 14, 2009 12:33 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I for one would love to see the photos
Maybe a photo-laden FanPost?
Your uncle molests collies.
by 3k on Sep 14, 2009 7:18 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Where were you sitting?
I was around the 40 yard line. Visitors side. Row H i believe.
by Iwuvrams on Sep 14, 2009 10:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well you probably had better seats than I did
I sat in Section 340 Row D. But I wandered the stadium for a while beforehand taking pictures. Ushers had no problem with me standing on the rail in the lower levels taking pictures. Quite nice of them.
by BruinHalo on Sep 15, 2009 2:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I've gotta give credit where credit is due
For the first half or so, the Rams had me sweating bullets. I didn’t expect all of the turnovers forced or the way the first few Seahawks’ drives were shutdown. I was at the game, so I wasn’t able to hear all the analysis, but Laurinitis’ name came over the loud speaker over and over. That guy is someone you want to build a defense around. Watching the game live, it felt a heck of a lot closer than the final score showed.
Football is a lot like church. Sometimes you get up and yell, sometimes you have to sit and be quiet, and most of the time you praise a guy named JC.
by ninjasocks on Sep 14, 2009 12:46 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Ok I was at the game as well... I was wearing my Atogwe jersey proudly ...
There are quite a few things I noticed. I cant help to feel sorry for the offensive line the crowd noise was reallly really loud. One thing that I noticed Pass Blocking was very good…. bulger might of had to move out but thats because his receivers weren’t getting open and he had to throw it away.
2nd. When your offence goes 3 and out often on a really hot day like it was the defence gets tired. The defensive line played with alot of enthusiasm and besides the long run by Jones they were fine. Chris Long wasnt very good and didn’t show me anything.
3rd. Seconday… I’d like to see more press coverage up against the recievers at the line. The Seahawks were getting 5-10 yards on first down quick passes because our corners were playing off. OJ Atogwe and Butler were good though.
4th. Steven Jackson needs more carries… he only had 16…. not enough….
5th. WR’s…. not great… besides some nice short routes by Robinson and Avery those 2 werent getting open. Burton didnt do anything either.
6th… TE’s I was very happy with our TE unit McMichael and Fells made some nice catches and gained us some yards. Good Show!
7th…. Incognito missed at least one assignment which led to a Bulger sack. his penalties were all drive killers. I would like to see him sit down for the first quarter next game and put Greco in to see what he has to show.
8th… Josh Brown… your the highest paid kicker and you missed a short field goal.. comon… Stanley was fine returning punts and Gado was OK returning kicks, take avery outta there.
9th Coaching… I didnt see Spagnuolo being really active.. ( icouldve missed something but,,,) he needs to coach more.. maybe call some of the plays on defence or something.
10th… To my surprise i saw quite a few rams fans there. THere were a couple right behind me which was nice :).
Cheers
by Iwuvrams on Sep 14, 2009 9:56 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 





















