Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Animated GIFs Of January

It's a winner: Can the Rams surprise the league this year?

The excitement of downloading my copy of Football Outsiders 2009 Almanac was like Christmas in July, but cracking open the Rams section and reading that they have a legitimate shot at a winning season, even a playoff run, was like Christmas and the first time - the first time I saw the Rams win the Super Bowl that is - all rolled into one. A prediction like this, from a recognized legitimate source (i.e. this ain't no Peter King prediction) merits its own discussion.

However, because the FO Almanac is a great tool at an affordable price, I'm not going to delve far into detail (there's lots of detail) out of respect to their business and the service they provide. With that out of the way let's jump right and look at why they think the Rams will turn things around in 2009.

Star-divide

To begin, you have to understand something about the way FO analyses and project offense. In their work, offense is easier to project because it is more consistent from year to year than defense. At the heart of this idea is the closer correlation that offense has with winning than defense. This isn't the time or place to get into the whys and hows of that theory, but I'd invite to head over to Football Outsiders to llearn more about it.

Naturally, then, it's improvements and  turnarounds on the offensive side of the ball that could make Sundays fun again, which is sort of ironic on the sruface in a year where the Rams have hired a head coach who made his reputation as a defensive mind. Contributing to the Rams upward swing:

Drafting Jason Smith, improving the offensive line

This is about the improvements on the offensive line, something we've been pointing to for a while, and now the rest of the world is starting to understand too. Teams that use a significant amount of "draft value," i.e. the points assigned to the slots where players are picked, improve on offense the following season. From 2001-2008, twelve teams used 1200 or more draft value points on the OL, all saw their offensive DVOA improve the next season. Four out of five teams that used more than 2000 points (the Rams used 2500 this year) improved by more than 20 percent in terms of their offensive DVOA. I'm going to throw out the Miami example, because I think there are some correlations in the type of offensive systems. From 2007 to 2008, the Dolphins saw their offensive DVOA go from -5.3% to 16.6%.

Games lost to injury

Only two teams lost more games to injury from their players than the Rams did last season. Teams with a high number of injuries one season tend to bounce back in that department the next year. Of course, the Rams of 2007 and the Rams of 2008 were both burdened pretty heavily by injuries, and after being bitten by that once, I'll be gunshy until proven otherwise. However, this is a much younger team than the old (no pun intended) Rams squad. We'll all miss Orlando Pace, but his effectiveness has been slowed considerably as age and its twin injury caught up to the future HOFer. Releasing Pace, like it or not, was a good move for a rebuilding team. The big one here is Steven Jackson, who missed time with injury in the past two seasons. I think his holdout last year certianly contributed to that, but that argument doesn't hold up for 2007. One factor dogging Jackson in those two years was the state of the offensive line, which I don't need to remind you wasn't very good, and offensive line has A LOT to do with running back performance.

Red zone running

The Rams, for the second year in a row, were unsuccessful in the red zone when running the ball. Teams tend to regress to the mean in those categories; teams with two bad years improve at an average of 7.8% DVOA. Here again you have to throw offensive line improvements into the mix.

Red zone passing

The Rams were even worse when they passed in the red zone. As with rushing, those numbers tend to regress to the mean. As bad as Marc Bulger looked in 2008, he actually performed better than he did in 2007, save for those fantasy categories. His accuracy was improved between those two seasons, and if the new offensive line can better protect him (remember, it was the middle were the real problems came from) and the coaches help him get his head back on right, he should to well in Pat Shurmur's offense, a system that utliizes his strengths, i.e. accuracy.

Fumble recovery

Fumble recovery is a mostly random event, due largely to a player being in the right place at the right time, the bounce of the fumbled ball, etc. The Rams offense recovered just 5 of 17 fumbles in 2008. Surely the Rams luck will improve too?

Defensive front

On the other side of the ball, the improvements on defense cannot be discounted in the potential turnaround of the Rams. As with the offensive line, teams that spend a high number of draft value points on players for the front seven of their defense over two years, typically leads to measured improvement. The Rams, with DE Chris Long drafted second overall last year and LB James Laurinaitis and even fourth round DT Darell Scott this season, have spent 3,138 draft value points on their front seven.

There you have the basic ingredients for a real turnaround, but don't take it for granted. There are still plenty of factors that could sink the Rams again, particularly more injuries among the skilled players and new playbooks.

I don't think you have to be a blue and gold kool aid drinker to see that this is a team heading in the right direction. Still, even the most optimistic among us would have a hard time putting our life savings (if only you could wager student loan debt) on an 8-win season, but it is nice to know that such a thing is at least not out of the realm of possibility.

Comment 9 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I think alot of my friends will be surprised.

There is a lot of non-believers in Ontario! Can’t wait to prove them wrong!

by PCarn on Jul 13, 2009 3:11 PM CDT reply actions  

SC Rams Fan

Finally a positive out look, this is what I like to read. We have been bad for a while so our high draft choices have got to start paying off. It’s playoff time we will win our division with 9 wins that’s right Miami, Atlanta,New Orleans they turned it around in one year with good coaching GO SPAGS.

by 39jackson on Jul 13, 2009 5:03 PM CDT reply actions  

I'm just wondering

if some people legitimately predicted the Cards and Dolphins success last year.

"Twin-headed infinite swirling vortex of grotesque suckitude known as Tony Clark and Eric Byrnes"

by sergey606 on Jul 14, 2009 12:30 AM CDT reply actions  

The Cards, maybe. The Dolphins??

The Cardinals have been building a pretty decent offense for years, despite their penchant for slow running backs, and had Warner emerge in the second half of ‘07. Plus, they play in a pretty soft division. But predicting the Dolphins to do anything, when at this time last year they had John Beck as their first-string QB, and a healthy Tom Brady in the division, is a little hard to believe. Even with Parcells in the front office and a good draft, you couldn’t peg them as a playoff team without fudging a bit.

RamsHerd.com - Graphic Rams Discussion

by taiko on Jul 14, 2009 9:57 AM CDT up reply actions  

yeah

That’s why i was wondering. The analists are always trying to pick a team that’s going to surprise everyone, and I just don’t want to get my hopes up. I keep hearing some people talk about actual stud teams, that might have a winning record, and when they mention their schedule it’s always “yeah, they play st. louis….” It’s frustrating as hell, but like I said, I don’t wanna get my hopes up; however, it would be SWEET.

"Twin-headed infinite swirling vortex of grotesque suckitude known as Tony Clark and Eric Byrnes"

by sergey606 on Jul 14, 2009 10:57 AM CDT up reply actions  

Cards

with the Cards, lots of people were discounting Warner last season…and the defense.

I don’t think they expected DRC to be as good a CB as he was in his rookie year, and, well, don’t discount Kurt Warner.

Turf Show Times

by Ryan Van Bibber on Jul 14, 2009 2:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

As far as the Dolphins go,

I can tell you that I never heard anything that anyone had predicted we would do much this past year. The consensus among the analysts and even a majority of the fans was that we were still a few years out from being any kind of playoff contender. We were in the beginning of a rebuilding phase, which we had been in for a while, but pretty much started over from scratch when Parcells was hired and shuffled everything around.

The general thought was that there would be some improvement, but still a few more years before we would make a serious bid at the playoffs. But as you saw, everything meshed well for us and one of the biggest factors in that (in my opinion) is that for the most part, everyone stayed healthy and didn’t get hurt. We only lost a few guys to injuries, and most of those were later in the season. But I don’t know of anyone who thought that we would do as well as we did before the season started.

"Why don't you put that in a memo and entitle it 'Shit I Already Know'!" - Sarge from Red vs. Blue

9 "Phinsider Feud" Points

by Chupathingy on Jul 14, 2009 11:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

I gotta be a realist...

I’m still thinking 7-9 tops, which would be a marvelous improvement and cause me to renew my Direct TV NFL Gameday package another season. The rebuilt O-Line and Jax are strengths. I still think the D-Line is our weakest link with too old Little and so-far disappointment Carriker. We can’t win if teams continue to blow holes in our D-Line big enough to push the Titanic through. We’re thin at WR – what if Avery goes down? Can we really depend on Tye Hill at CB and David Vobora at OLB to be effective? Still the biggest question mark, to me, is Marc Bulger. Will he or won’t he? The jury’s still out. Of course “hope springs eternal in the human breast” and I hope we go 10-6 and sweep both the Chicken Hawks and 49ers.

by edpjr on Jul 14, 2009 10:44 AM CDT reply actions  

I believe, statistically-speaking, there is a good chance that all of these will be true, except one—why because over the long run, statistics represent chance—-and chance always changes when the human will is involved. The Rams have the right people, and mentality, and I will take Bulger over Chad P from the Dolphins any day..

There is a lot of work and coordination and creativity missing in the red zone approach at Rams park the last three years….I don’t believe there will be increased red zone passing the first 8 games…..Can’t say…But Fells & McMichael should help a lot.//

by sbrown1021 on Jul 14, 2009 1:59 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about St. Louis Rams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Sp-studio1_small
St. Louis Rams Free Agent Options: John Carlson
Small
In response to Douglas M
Jackson_medium_small
TST Community Mock 2012: Trades
Stewie_small
Why We Must Draft Blakmon
Images-1_small
2012 NFL Draft: Stickum

Recent FanPosts

Marshall-faulk-1999_small
St. Louis Rams Free Agent Option: Cliff Avril
Small
The Free Agent Wide Receivers
Images_small
The landscape is a changin'!
Torryholt_small
Plan A and Plan B + A Note On Blackmon
Small
well, you didnt ask for it
Small
You're the GM. Who do you draft?
Rams_small
Ranking the Top 3 Needs and Ranking the Prospects
Small
Rams in Real Life Cont'd

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Cover the web with Turf


Managers

71523_170793669601439_100000124211145_596632_5713708_n_small Ryan Van Bibber

Baby_drinking_becks_small 3k

Editors

Jackson_medium_small Eric Nagel

Peter_small VTramsFan

Bugs_bunny_pose_small Douglas M

Authors

Wildcat_small Tackle Box

Dsc03827_small CoachConnors

Mardygilyardsig_small Tevin T. Broner

Bradford_draft_small buckeyefan55

Tst_small T.Ram

Images_small Brick Top

Small EddieP

Profile_pic1_small Mike Dietrich