Turf Show Times: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: World Soccer Digest for Soccer Fans!

Random Ramsdom 4/3: A look back at day one of minicamp...and more

Ramsdom2_medium

Welcome to the kinda, sorta new Random Ramsdom. A big thanks to Landon for the logo. And another thanks to Will for the other logo. They both look great. I could have never made the choice on my own, so thanks to everyone who voted and be sure to thank the guys who took time out to put these together. I'm working on getting some TST-shirts, and I'll get one to both artists once we have them. Now, let's talk minicamp...

  • Spagnuolo seems to be getting good reviews from the players, clearly laying out his expectations (and I doubt giving much room for excuse) and teaching players as they move through practice. Obviously, we're a long way from being able to see the results, but it's hard not to like what we're hearing after the first day. You've got to be kind of excited about this.
  • Right now, the O-line they're working with features Barron at LT, Bell at LG, Brown at C, Incognito at RG, and Goldberg at RT. That's an interesting combination, basically, it's an upgraded version of some of the line combos we saw in '06 and '07, beefed up in the middle. Baed on past performance and capability, that wouldn't be an elite o-line, but it would get some results, esp with the additions of Karney at FB and Bajema as the blocking TE. However, it wouldn't be much of a wall against elite pass rushers, opponents like Minnesota and Tennesse who the Rams will face next year.
  • Is it just me or is Barron being really, really low key about his trial run as the starting LT?
  • The Frerotte thing is far from a done deal after all, with the two sides agreeing to resume talks after the draft.
  • The offense, though new, could be much simpler than the Al Saunders "War and Peace"-like playbook, according to Donnie Avery:

As you know, last year we had a heck of an offense that was really hard. This year, we kind of toned it down a little bit without all of the motions and stuff so we are just lining up and playing.

  • To make the Cutler deal complete, the Bears also signed former Ram Orlando Pace...to a 3-year, $15 million deal. The contract will pay him $11 million for the first two years, a big risk for the Bears based on Pace's injury history.
  • Sure they have Kyle Orton, but Denver's going to need a QB. Oh, and look, they now have two first round picks, one, or both, of which could be used to trade up for Matt Stafford or Mark Sanchez. The Donkeys have traded up to get a QB before, Cutler, so this is something to keep on the radar for the Rams potential draft scenarios. How about it, Rams fans, would you pass on Curry or Jason Smith to trade the #2 pick for the Donkeys' 12 and 18 picks...or some other combo involving one of those picks?

0 recs  |  Comment 13 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

my aaron curry mancrush

…prevents me from rationally considering any “trade-down” scenarios.

However, I could consider it for the two 1s and a third and 5th.

Future Redbirds!
www.futureredbirds.net
Rams Gab!
www.ramsgab.com

by jroman on Apr 3, 2009 9:29 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

however...

the broncos know that neither us nor the chiefs at 3 are going to pick a QB, so they will get a better reception and an easier deal with Seattle at 4.

Future Redbirds!
www.futureredbirds.net
Rams Gab!
www.ramsgab.com

by jroman on Apr 3, 2009 9:31 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Unless....

Maybe Seattle would be unwilling to make a deal because they are interested in a QB with their pick. It would just depend on if the Broncos wanted Stafford or would be cool with Sanchez. They can afford to wait on Sanchez, but if they really want Stafford they may need to make a deal with us to get up above some other teams (assuming the Lions take a pass on him).

by Hetfield72 on Apr 3, 2009 11:00 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

As much as I would be dissapointed on missing out on Curry...

I think it would be better for the team in the long run, addressing on more pressing needs throughout the team as a whole, rather than addressing one need at a time. Perhaps with with 12th pick we could still get Andre Smith (maybe a bad idea? but 2 months ago he was being considered the 1st overall pick) or even Jeremy Maclin! (I mean, they are comparing him to Holt, and we need a new Holt).

This would open a wide range of possibilities for the Rams.

by PCarn on Apr 3, 2009 9:35 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

It would be a great idea, if....

The Lions take Curry. If he’s gone, it would be smart to trade down 10 spots and pick up an extra 1st rounder next year. But if Curry is there, we HAVE to take him. The OT’s in this draft, personally, are less than appealing. I would rather take my chances next year….

by RamsMan83 on Apr 3, 2009 9:54 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I would be disappointed

if we miss out on Curry. I really would. That being said, I think the Rams have so many needs that you have to take the extra picks. Picking twice in the 1st round could give us two starters – maybe an OT and a LB, and allow us to draft a WR or CB with our second round pick.

by Toddius on Apr 3, 2009 11:00 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Same Page

Looks like we were on the same page with our posts, just 1 minute apart :)

by Hetfield72 on Apr 3, 2009 11:02 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Trading Down

I don’t know how I feel about trading down. We do need a lot and that could be a great way to get more pieces. We could use the two ones this year to get one of the middle linebacker prospects (one of the USC guys or Laurinaitis) and one of the tackles. Then we would get a starting middle linebacker and a starting RT and be able to use our early second rounder on a WR.

That would fulfill a lot of the draft scenarios around here. But you would have to be willing to give up on Curry or Smith (which is hard to do if you have a Curry man crush going like we all seem to have…myself included).

by Hetfield72 on Apr 3, 2009 11:01 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Trading the picks if possible would be best move

It sounds like we all would love to have Curry on the team, but if we could get the extra pick and the lower Cap cost, nobody wants the first or second picks any more, they are too expensive, more picks less cap cost could be a good thing

by Ramfanforever on Apr 3, 2009 12:57 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

regards to Barron....

i just read the post about Barron not being enthusiastic enough and people are up in flames about it!!!!

I thin they are overreacting. He said what he felt….which was the truth. I dont think hes happy about having to switch positions again but he certainly didnt seem down about it. He was clear and to the point-

“The techniques are just totally opposite; it’s technique and mind-set.”
“I’ll go over there and see if I can work some kinks out. I haven’t been over there in a while, and I’m a little rusty.”

Thats it. All those who are upset about this need to just relax. Give him some time to work back into his natural position and he will be fine. Once he is at that point he’ll be more comfortable and be much more positive about it.

by rams since day1 on Apr 3, 2009 1:52 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I would go for the trade down.

While Curry would be great, the Rams still have to makeover a good portion of the roster, and being able to plug in 2 first rounders would be huge. Moving into the 2nd spot would be a risky move for the Broncos, though, so I doubt it happens.

by ViperLjs on Apr 3, 2009 2:03 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Oher and Maualuaga/Cushing

…wouldn’t be so bad! I think Curry is awesome, but two holes filled with very high quality players is better than one filled with a superstar.

by Oski Bear on Apr 3, 2009 8:43 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

pick your poison...

the Rams badly need a star at WR, MLB or D-Line. In this draft, that’s either Crabtree, Curry or Raji, respectively. I’d take Crab because I think Spags will have an easier time motivating the “D” versus the “O”. Although I must admit, I think we’re extremely weak at DE having to depend on 35 year old Leonard Little (who was surely great in his day). Also, Witherspoon is our only quality LB.

by edpjr on Apr 6, 2009 7:59 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about St. Louis Rams.
Start posting about the Rams »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Dickcheneycftblmask2_small
Saints versus Rams - Trap Game?

Recent FanPosts

Andrew602_avatar_small
Ask Revenge of the Birds
Dickcheneycftblmask2_small
Cards versus Rams - close game or blowout?
Ncaab_uclabruins_small
The greatness that is Steven Jackson
Bruce_holt_small
Ndamukong Suh vs. Gerald McCoy
Small
O-line grades
Ricky_prohel_small
Please thank Mike Karney and the offensive line for their job this season
Peter_small
Sent SJAX An "Honorable Tweet" + Shower Loofa
Dsc03827_small
A Link to the Jim Rome Radio Show
Images
The Draft

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Cover the web with Turf

Add a little Turf to your internet!

Become a fan of TST on Facebook.

Follow TST and talk more Rams on Twitter.


Managers

Turfshowtimes_small VanRam

Editors

Spags_victory_small 3k

Authors

340x_small kevinramsfan

Wildcat_small Tackle Box

Uncleface_small taiko

Small ram_rod

Dsc03827_small CoachConnors