Rams 2009 draft started up front
Not that I'm suddenly turning to Peter King for football gospel, but he has an interesting point about the Rams decision to draft an OT in his column today.
King echoes the argument made by some, and thoughtfully-countered by others, on these pages that the sorry state of the Rams offensive line demanded they get the best tackle they could during the offseason. Here's a quote from Devaney explaining the rationale:
I was tired of seeing our quarterback get killed. I don't care if we give up 50 points a game, I'm not going to sit around and watch our quarterback get abused the way he did last year and the way he would have if we didn't address the offense line.
I understand and I appreciate our fans who say, 'Go get the quarterback. He could be a franchise quarterback. How many times are you in position to get an elite quarterback' They're right. But how many times are you in position to get an elite left tackle? You can't get one down the line in the draft. You can't get one in free-agency; they're never available.
The top free agent OT, Jordan Gross, was promptly re-signed by the Panthers. After Gross, upper echelon starters with less than a decade of experience were impossible to find. Team make it a priority to keep those guys because a good offensive line is a precious, precious thing. Hence the idea of building a football team from the inside out:
Plus, I really believe, like our coach, that the personality of your team revolves around a big, tough, physical offensive line.
Draft, free agency, whatever, the point is that the Rams had to rebuild their o-line, and they did that, toughening up the middle by signing C Jason Brown and now, making a "safe" choice in the draft to add Jason Smith. The cost doing business behind recent incarnations of the Rams offensive line is just too high, and King relays the moral of his story with the take of David Carr, a first round pick ravaged by play behind a porous offensive line, sacked 208 times in four years with the expansion Texans. Bulger has been sacked 150 times over the last four years, 124 times in the last three, more than any other passer in the league during that span.
Whether Bulger can regain competency remains to be seen, but there's no hope for him or any other QB without help up front. The real arguement isn't whether we needed help, ready-to-play help, at OT, it's more of where we could have drafted one. And with the Rams having so many needs as the rebuilding process gets underway, there's plenty of room to argue that other positions should have been a priority. Anyway, that's a debate I suspect we'll be having until the season gets underway and we start to get a feel for what the Rams did get in the draft.
Ugh, I'm agreeing with Peter King (at least it wasn't an article about Brett Favre)...gotta find a shower.
0 recs |
19 comments
|
Comments
Trautwein, Feinga, and Sanders
will also contribute to the point I think that we may be good on the Oline unless someone falls into our lap next year. I think Scheuning will have to improve greatly to keep his job this season.
I would have liked to have drafted 2 OLs, but we made up for it in FAs. I agree that your O line is the spine of toughness your team is measured on.
by dbcouver on Apr 28, 2009 5:00 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I know most people on this website didn't want a lineman...
…but I have to say I was proud of Devaney for the pick. I just really felt it would have been a colossal mistake to draft a QB when we can’t even protect the guy. I think that’s been the saddest part of of the last 3 years for me as a Rams fan. Knowing we had a Pro-Bowl QB and one of the best Tackles in the league, but Bulger couldn’t stay healthy because we would always lose Orlando in the preseason…I think Orlando’s injuries were the main factor in our failures, that and our defense. So to me, this was a great draft. I know they were tempted to take Mark Sanchez at #2, but I just can’t see how that pick could be justified. Jason Smith has some rawness, but his upside is incredible given his athleticism and he just looks ready to play both mentally and (10 pounds later) physically. Even though I love Maualuga and was SHOCKED when we passed on him, I saw Laurinaitis live and I know he’s going to be solid. Therefore, I’m proud of my team’s draft, especially if our 3rd and 4th picks can be good. Time will tell, but I’m pleased with the new regime thus far. Let’s see it on the field.
by LARamsFan29 on Apr 28, 2009 5:44 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Then again, maybe Bulger has lost it...
We brought in Jacob Bell last year for the O-Line and we already had 300 pounders like Pace, Barron and Incognito. What happened…? We lost 14 games. Admittedly, we were very weak at Center. Still, Bulger was virtually immobile and couldn’t hit the broad side of a barn. I think he would’ve been sacked even more but threw many INT’s off his rear foot just trying to get rid of the ball before contact. Marc Bulger was never Kurt Warner, but he could play pretty good a few years ago. Now, I’d say there’s at least a 50% probability that he’s done, but we still have to pay him millions of $$$. How many Ram fans would’ve rather seen Marc playing for the Jets in 2009 with us taking Sanchez? Next year, a 33 year old Bulger probably won’t bring a 4th rounder in trade. Meanwhile, our atrocious defense has so far got one upgrade by acquiring Butler and another by drafting Lauranitis. We’re still saddled with a lackluster D-Line, Pisa is a weak spot at LB, and Tye Hill is weak anywhere. And, Leonard Little has not improved with age. Since our D-Line can’t ever stuff the run or put pressure on opposing QB’s, our Bulger led offense better find a way to score 30 points per game, instead of 14.5 like in 2008, since our “almost the same” D gave up 29 ppg last season. It’s tough love being a Rams fan these days. It’s worse than the early 1990’s.
by edpjr on Apr 28, 2009 7:11 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Thereally sad thing is.....
I’d take a 4th rounder for him.
by dbcouver on Apr 28, 2009 7:53 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm ok with Bulger for 2009
But this is it. Failure, or even mediocrity on his part, this season pushes us into the “we need a franchise QB” camp for 2010. If Jevan Snead comes out, it will be a great draft for QBs.
Jay Zygmunt, now that you have fired yourself, please have yourself hired by Seattle. Thanks.
by 3k on Apr 28, 2009 8:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No Doubt
Mediocrity – even a decent season IMO – a franchise QB needed to be drafter this year or next. It was smart not to go QB in 09 due to the many needs so next year I would think it is a non-negotiable…
Outfielders For Sale! This weeks special...GMJ - see Tony for details!
by gorams77 on Apr 28, 2009 10:05 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think it matters what kind of season Bulger has this year.
We still have to approach the draft knowing we have to find his replacement. They can both still be on the roster in 2010, but by 2011 it should be the new guy….and if his name just happened to be Dan Lefevour, I might wet myself.
Did I ever tell you about the time Brasky and I went horseback riding, but there weren't any horses around? Anyway, Brasky throws a saddle on my back and rides me around Wyoming for three days. Well, wouldn't ya know it, my stamina increased with each day, and I develop tremendous leg muscles. So anyway, Brasky decides to enter me into the Breeders Cup under the name Turkish Delight. And Im running in second place, and I'm running, and I break my ankle. So anyway, they're about to shoot me. Then someone from the crowd yells out, God bless him, Dont shoot him, he's a human.
by Tackle Box on Apr 28, 2009 10:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
fair enough
I just meant to imply that mediocrity makes the search more critical. If Bulger actually plays well, then I’m sure there will be other vital needs to address that may come first, as in a premier DE, or a true #1-type WR.
Jay Zygmunt, now that you have fired yourself, please have yourself hired by Seattle. Thanks.
by 3k on Apr 29, 2009 7:27 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good point.
If he’s not up to the task this season, it does accelerate finding his replacement while if he plays well, we still have to find his replacement but we might have a little more time to develop him.
Did I ever tell you about the time Brasky and I went horseback riding, but there weren't any horses around? Anyway, Brasky throws a saddle on my back and rides me around Wyoming for three days. Well, wouldn't ya know it, my stamina increased with each day, and I develop tremendous leg muscles. So anyway, Brasky decides to enter me into the Breeders Cup under the name Turkish Delight. And Im running in second place, and I'm running, and I break my ankle. So anyway, they're about to shoot me. Then someone from the crowd yells out, God bless him, Dont shoot him, he's a human.
by Tackle Box on Apr 29, 2009 11:23 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dan LeWho?
"Attaway to stomp 'em. Stomp the piss out of 'em. Stomp 'em when they're down. Kick 'em and stomp 'em. Attaway to go boys. Pound that old Budweiser into you and go get them tomorrow." -- Joe Schultz
by taiko on Apr 29, 2009 3:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Big Dan!
I’ve yakked up Dan LeFevour (QB, Central Michigan) for a while now. In fact, after the pre-draft Turf Show Radio, I exchanged a couple e-mails with Dan from Mocking the Draft on next year’s QB class. He had this to say:
LeFevour is a product of a system. His release has a big hitch in it, he doesn’t have great arm strength and takes off too early. We’ll see though. A lot will change between now and this time next year.
It was the end of our back and forth, but I would have thrown this back at him: LeFevour plays for Central Michigan. His hitch is thick, but that’s a techical issue that could be worked on. although I doubt it could be corrected. As for his arm strength, I haven’t seen him play much, so I’m to see him air it out. And as for taking off, his O-line and WR corps are woefully inadequate, so he’s got a case of the Bulgers.
I only saw part of the game against Ball State and the bowl game against Florida Atlantic, so I’ll definitely be watching him this year with a keen, Rams-based interest.
Crazily enough, I found this little tidbit on ESPN recently (Insider subscription only):
QB to watch (Kiper): Dan LeFevour, QB, Central Michigan. “I think he goes top-15 in Round 1,” Kiper said. McShay thinks he’ll be a Day 2 pick.
Jay Zygmunt, now that you have fired yourself, please have yourself hired by Seattle. Thanks.
by 3k on Apr 29, 2009 4:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
what....me worry?
Why would we need a new QB with the likes of Bulger, Berlin and now Null already on the squad? I’m hoping that by some miracle Kyle Boller will regain his early talent and productivity to become Kurt Warner Jr.
by edpjr on Apr 30, 2009 8:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
watching the Rams in the ‘90s was damn near impossible. They weren’t anything near a team. This team last year showed momentary glances at decentness. So, I wouldn’t go as bad as the ’90s, then, they were just an arrest from forfeiting the games.
Sadly, I don’t think there was a chance in hell that the Jets wanted Bulger and wanted to give us a second or third round pick, which would have given us something to get the tackle or WR we needed to make Sanchez a worthwhile pick.
The one highlight is that if we suck again this year we will probably have a great chance at getting the Mizzou killer Sam Bradford who I would rate better than Sanchez in pure skills anyways, and we will have a great LT to save his ass.
by kickasskeever on Apr 28, 2009 9:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
upgrades on D
the additions of Butler and Laurinaitis are/could be pretty significant upgrades…certainly both were among the best option the Rams had at those positions and should both strength the middle of the defense. The Clemson DT, Darell Scott, should be effective as an NT – he fits the profile and filled the role well in college. Even as part of a DT rotation he should help. There are still lots of needs though, as you say
Bell’s play was hurt by two factors, his struggles with weight and injury and playing next to weak centers. He started the season fine, but tapered off. And having to compensate for a weak spot next to you always brings down the value of an offensive lineman, anywhere on the front five.
Trading Bulger was never really an option. According to the Post-Dispatch, there was never any serious interest in trading Bulger…and not much in the way of serious offers for the #2 pick. Thomas mentions that several times in his chat yesterday, http://www.stltoday.com/discussions/sports/jim-thomas-live/LD042409733/all.
by VanRam on Apr 29, 2009 9:38 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
They would have taken a massive cap hit
if they traded or cut Bulger this year. I think I read it was $8 million. They simply couldn’t afford to do it. Next year the cap hit is almost nothing if they trade or cut him, so I think this is his “make or break” year. Unless something bad happens this year, it would seem next year would be the year to take a top QB and WR. Sometimes reality hurts, but the cap problem meant they just couldn’t trade him this year.
by andyrose on Apr 28, 2009 10:58 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
or next year
So we might as well consign ourselves to the idea that Bulger is going to play out his contract.
Jay Zygmunt, now that you have fired yourself, please have yourself hired by Seattle. Thanks.
by 3k on Apr 29, 2009 7:28 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
more like $10 million
for Bulger’s cap hit this year if they dumped him. Next year, however, they can save $4.5 million if they need to cut or trade him.
People need to understand one thing: there was never any interest from other teams in trading for Bulger. Those were rumors that turned out to be wrong. And remember, for a trade, there has to be TWO interested parties.
by VanRam on Apr 29, 2009 9:40 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Or, one interested party and some very compromising photographs...
"Attaway to stomp 'em. Stomp the piss out of 'em. Stomp 'em when they're down. Kick 'em and stomp 'em. Attaway to go boys. Pound that old Budweiser into you and go get them tomorrow." -- Joe Schultz
by taiko on Apr 29, 2009 3:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 


















