Random Ramsdom 4/24: Do not discount the Sanchez talk

by Ryan Van Bibber on Apr 24, 2009 12:30 PM CDT in 2009 NFL draft

Ramsdom2_medium

This Sanchez to the Rams at #2 is gaining traction, to the point it can't be completely dismissed as a ploy.

Sanchez has fans amidst the Rams draft braintrust. Whether or not Billy Devaney, who has the ultimate say on the team's picks, is one of those guys is unknown, but remember, Devaney was one of the people that met with Sanchez during the league meetings in California earlier this spring. The gang at the Post-Dispatch usually has pretty reliable insights into the Rams thinking on the draft - witness the Dorsey v. C. Long debate this time last year - and here's what columnist Bernie Miklasz said in his online forum yesterday:

They have a man crush on Sanchez.
I think they're trying to talk themselves into taking him.
I don't think they will, however. I think they'll be pragmatic.
Can't be sure, obviously.

Sports Illustrated's Peter King, in St. Louis the last two days, drops a similar hint:

I think the Rams won't take Sanchez, but they'll be very, very tempted. I do not make this claim lightly...

Sanchez is flying up draft boards, and people are talking about an interview with draft expert, legit draft expert, Rob Rang yesterday (can't find a link, sorry) in which he talks up Sanchez being a better #1 QB pick, over Stafford, in this year's draft and even in next year's draft. King, in the same article linked above, mentions teams in the top 10 who have the USC passer ahead of Stafford. You'll also note there's not been any news of progress in the reported Detroit/Stafford contract talks. Shades of Brady Quinn?

With the Seahawks interested in Sanchez with their #4 pick, that could make the Rams spot more lucrative for others wanting the QB should Seattle not be inclined to deal.

Can't get enough Rams QB talk? How 'bout NFL's Steve Wyche, who has strong ties to Devaney from his days covering the Falcons, tossed out some speculation on the radio yesterday that the Rams would also consider drafting Kansas State QB Josh Freeman if he slipped to the second round. Take it all with a grain of salt.

Keep an eye out for what happens with Matt Stafford. If he agrees to terms with Detroit, that should set the price range for first round picks and liekly have some influence on how high teams are willing to trade up for Sanchez.

Do you like this story?

Comments

ManCrush?

Why dont we just draft a tight end.

by RAMIFICATION on Apr 24, 2009 1:35 PM CDT reply actions

Because we have 4 on the roster already

And between McMichael and Bajema, we have both types: receiving TE and blocking TE.

Jay Zygmunt, now that you have fired yourself, please have yourself hired by Seattle. Thanks.

by 3k on Apr 24, 2009 2:00 PM CDT up reply actions

Been on Curry Bandwagon

and still am. If he is truly the BPA in the draft as a lot speculate then I hope they go for him. Graded high at combine skill activities, great personality/character, and fills a need. I know an OT is needed – no denying it – but there are sooo many with differing reports on the talent separation from the top to the 10th rated that one can be picked at top of 2nd rd (or the 2nd rd pick can get packaged in a trade up to bottom of 1st if needed).

We have a D specialized coach now on a D that needs help at MLB. A good D keeps pts off the board and the team in the game.

All that being said – I have already mentally prepared myself for them calling an OT’s name tomorrow. Just hope that they are still able to find startes in the 1st three rds adressing MLB, T, and WR.

Outfielders For Sale! This weeks special...GMJ - see Tony for details!

by gorams77 on Apr 24, 2009 2:07 PM CDT reply actions

This is assuming there is no trade down and the pick is kept

Outfielders For Sale! This weeks special...GMJ - see Tony for details!

by gorams77 on Apr 24, 2009 2:13 PM CDT up reply actions

Sanchez might just be the next Ryan Leaf.

In a year of such turmoil, whining still abounds.

by Downing Rules on Apr 24, 2009 5:19 PM CDT reply actions

I think it would be a major mistake

to take Sanchez. The risk that he won’t be a star is pretty high, and we need lots of other thngs much more than another QB when we already have two on the roster who have started in the NFL. I’m hoping this is just one last attempt by the Rams to get Snyder of the Redskins to panic and trade up to our pick to take him. We need an OT, a WR and a MLB badly, and the QB class next year will be much better. Forget Sanchez, Rams! Get serious.

by andyrose on Apr 24, 2009 11:01 PM CDT reply actions

Pull the TRIGGER!!!

Rams hurry up and draft Sanchez! I use to be a Bulger fan, I thought he was a solid qb. One season I blamed his poor play on lack of blocking from the O-line. Blamed another horrible season on concussion problems. But after last season I finally came to the conclusion he just doesnt have it any more. Last season they had chances to win alot of close games, but lost due to interceptions being thrown on final drive situations. His personality will never motivate his teemates to get the best out of them. He cant throw the long ball. He’s to slow to scramble out of the pocket, and he holds the ball so long he’s a sitting duck back there waiting to get sacked. Its time for a change at the qb spot. If they stay with Bulger another season expect the Rams to be last in the division for years to come while Sancez beats them in a seachicken jersey year after year. trade bulger for a future mr. irrelavent pick and call it even. (-)

by ivobox on Apr 24, 2009 11:57 PM CDT reply actions