T.O.
by VanRam on Mar 5, 2009 8:20 AM CST
10 comments
It's completely preposterous, but I feel like I have to ask. T.O. a Ram?
There's not a snowball's chance this would happen. Even if T.O. weren't T.O., the salary demands would be too high for the Rams, and wipe out whatever budget they have to add depth. More importantly, Owens is exactly the kind of player the Rams don't need right now in their locker room. A 'me first' guy for a team just starting out in a new direction would be disastrous.
On the other hand, Owens is usually relatively contained in his first season or two with a new team. It's only once things get rolling that he lobs a hand grenade into the locker room, metaphorically speaking of course.
Over at his blog, Mike Sando runs down the possibilities of T.O. landing in the NFC West. It doesn't seem likely. Not that it would matter, the Rams held him to just two catches for 31 yards and no TDs in their week seven win over the Cowboys last season.
Rams Gab is right on the money: "Don't do it."
0 recs |
10 comments
|
Email
Print
Comments
haha
as you can see, I’m adamant about this!
Rams Gab!
www.ramsgab.com
by jroman on Mar 5, 2009 8:26 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with
the consensus. Don’t touch him. Not only is he a distraction, his production is down and he’s not getting any younger.
by Toddius on Mar 5, 2009 10:50 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
nope
hellz no
"I always think one step ahead, like a carpenter....the builds stairs"
by sergey606 on Mar 5, 2009 12:04 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
NO!
(Please.)
"Attaway to stomp 'em. Stomp the piss out of 'em. Stomp 'em when they're down. Kick 'em and stomp 'em. Attaway to go boys. Pound that old Budweiser into you and go get them tomorrow." -- Joe Schultz
by taiko on Mar 5, 2009 2:48 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Not that it would matter, the Rams held him to just two catches for 31 yards and no TDs in their week seven win over the Cowboys last season.
I think that had more to with Brad Johnson than Owens.
With Holt wanting out, what do the Rams do at receiver? Does this mean they pretty much have to take Crabtree? I’d rather see them take an OT and keep Holt, myself.
by adiueordie on Mar 5, 2009 3:33 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
no
but he is an aggresive receiver who makes plays something the rams dont have .I would say 1 year minimum contract something like marbury got with the celtics,but then again no ,lets just get a receiver in round two or three
the west is ours
by jaram on Mar 6, 2009 1:01 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
YES
but only sign him to a 2 year contract…….Owens is always a good student for the first couple of years with a team………..then the clock winds down and something inside him thinks “Im too good for everyone” which IMO is where he goes wrong
by JordansDad on Mar 6, 2009 3:45 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Not happening
PFT has “inside sources” that confirm we will have no part in TO’s wackiness. Feel free to throw away any popcorn you might have made.
Jay Zygmunt, now that you have fired yourself, please have yourself hired by Seattle. Thanks.
by 3k on Mar 6, 2009 7:49 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
Related FanPosts on Turf Show Times
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2010 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
