Jason Brown will be a Ram...or will he?
The Rams needed a center, desperately, and they went out and got the best one they could. Good move. The PD is reporting that a deal with former Ravens C Jason Brown is "imminent."
After morning reports had the Rams as the favorite to sign Jason Brown, there were some whispers that the Raiders might be interested. Guess nothing ever materialized on that front though.
There might be another weird angle emerging in this story. According to this post at the Sporting News, which is acting as the surrogate blog for ProFootballTalk.com (whose servers have been unable to handle the traffic today; SBNation is up and running strong), one league source says that the Rams are willing to pay Brown $7 million per season, BUT Brown doesn't want to play for the Rams. He's supposedly hoping that someone else will step up and make him a similar offer. Nobody is though.
A league source tells ProFootballTalk.com that Brown doesn't want to play for the Rams, and thus wants someone/anyone to step up and match the offer St. Louis has made to him.
I'm dubious. I know players use interested teams as leverage, but it's been pretty clear for some time now that the Ravens weren't going to give Brown the kind of deal he wanted. I realize the Rams aren't exactly atop most players wish lists, but you'd have to think that with the changes made to the very structure of the organization players, especially young players like Brown, can see the writing on the wall that this Rams team has a renewed committment to winning. And should be easily competing for the division title come 2010. PFT's been wrong before, whiffing on news around Steven Jackson's holdout last August. Either way, I suspect he'll find it a little better destination than he thought come September.
0 recs |
11 comments
|
Comments
Hmmm
If there is even a 10% chance that this is true(Brown not wanting to play for the Rams and just using us for leverage) I say kindly escort him to the parking lot and refuse to pay for his ticket home……..I sure hope this isnt true, what does this tell us about his character? Will he give us 100% if signed………..I’m already starting to not like this guy
by JordansDad on Feb 27, 2009 5:02 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
i think it's BS
i can’t imagine with the espoused new attitude at Rams park they’d let that fly.
by VanRam on Feb 27, 2009 6:41 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
So what does that mean?
A deal was thought to be imminent hours ago.
That could say that they said fine, take a hike
by ram_rod on Feb 27, 2009 8:43 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
A little more than the Rams apparently wanted to pay.
but I suppose they wanted their man and they went and got him.
So, I guess we can cross Center of the “To-Do” List.
Getting two tickets to an execution is like getting two tickets to NASCAR, except you KNOW Jeff Gordon's gonna die.
by Tackle Box on Feb 27, 2009 9:33 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
We signed a guy who doesn't want to play for us.
Great.
I have witnessed time and time again.
by srdmad on Feb 27, 2009 10:00 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Faulk didn't wanna play with the Ramd either at first
Look how that ended up
by Option27 on Feb 27, 2009 10:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
In other news the Redskins seem to think money buys championships,
because just like every other offseason they are signing a million guys.
And Lito Sheppard got traded for a 5th and conditional round pick.
I have witnessed time and time again.
by srdmad on Feb 27, 2009 10:01 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
BROWN OUT
Now if my doyers singe manny,it will make my week.
by RAMIFICATION on Feb 27, 2009 10:10 PM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 





















